Oxythyrea cinctella’nın (Schaum, 1841) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae) erkek ve dişi pronotumu arasındaki geometrik morfometriye dayalı morfolojik varyasyonlar

Öz

Bu çalışmada, pronatal morfolojinin Oxythyrea cinctella (Schaum, 1841)'nın eşeysel dimorfizm tayini üzerindeki faydasını değerlendirmek için pronotum büyüklüğü ve şekli örnek bir özellik olarak kullanılmıştır. Geometrik morfometri ile Ankara ilinden toplanan 85 örnekten (45 dişi, 40 erkek) pronotumun eşeysel boyut ve şekil dimorfizmini analiz ettik. Geometrik morfometrinin sonuçları, pronotumda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı eşeysel boyut ve şekil dimorfizmi olduğunu ortaya koydu. Ayrıca, dişilerin ortalama centroid boyutu erkeklerden önemli ölçüde daha büyüktü. Son olarak, çok değişkenli regresyon sonuçları, boyutun eşeyler arasındaki pronotum şeklindeki farklılaşma üzerinde ihmal edilebilir bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Burada sunulan sonuçların Oxythyrea böceklerinde eşeysel dimorfizmin daha iyi anlaşılması için yararlı olacağını umuyoruz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Oxythyrea cinctella
• Scarab kınkanatlısı
• Pronotum
• Landmark temelli morfometri
• Eşeysel dimorfizm

Morphological variations based on geometric morphometrics between male and female pronota of Oxythyrea cinctella (Schaum, 1841) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae)

Öz

In this study, pronotum size and shape were used as an exemplar characteristic to evaluate the utility of pronotal morphology on the sexual dimorphism determination of the scarab beetle Oxythyrea cinctella (Schaum, 1841). Using geometric morphometrics, the sexual size and shape dimorphism of pronotum of 85 specimens (45 females, 40 males) collected from Ankara Province (Turkey) were analyzed. Results of geometric morphometrics revealed that there is statistically significant sexual size and shape dimorphism in pronotum. Further, the mean centroid sizes of the females was significantly larger than that of the males. Finally, multivariate regression results indicated that size has negligible influence on the differentiation in pronotum shape between sexes. We hope the results here presented would be helpful for the further understanding of the sexual dimorphism in the beetle genus Oxythyrea.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Oxythyrea cinctella
• Scarab beetle
• Pronotum
• Landmark-based morphometry
• Sexual dimorphism

Kaynakça

1. Ali HA (1978) Faunistic study of the Cicindelidae (Coleoptera) of Iraq and southwest Asia. Coleopt Bull 32(1): 1-20.
2. Apak FK (2021) Pests species determined in apricot orchards in Malatya province, Turkey. Fresenius Environ Bull 30(2): 1476-1480.
3. Assing V (2006) New species and records of Staphylinidae from Turkey IV, with six new synonymies. Koleopterol Rundsch 76: 223-276.
4. Augul RS (2016) Insect pollinators in different regions of Iraq. J Entomol Zool Stud 4(2): 391-402.
5. Barros RP, Astua D, Grossi PC, Iannuzzi L, Maia ACD (2020) Landmark-based geometric morphometrics as a tool for the characterization of biogeographically isolated populations of the pollinator scarab beetle Erioscelis emarginata (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae). Zool Anz 288: 97-102.
6. Bookstein FL (1986) Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Stat Sci 1(2): 181-222.
7. Bunalski M, Samin N, Ghahari H (2016) A contribution to the faunistic study of Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) from Mazandaran province, northern Iran. Wiad Entomol 35(1): 31-40.
8. Carillo DM, Dela Cruz IN (2018) Disparity in the pronotal shapes between sexes in the two populations of Brontispa longissima (Gestro, 1885) from Caraga region, Philippines using landmark-based geometric morphometrics. Comput Ecol Softw 8(3): 62-74.

9. Da Silva ACS, Nunes LA, De Lima Batista W, Lhano MG (2018) Morphometric variation among males of Orphulella punctata (De Geer, 1773) (Acrididae: Gomphocerinae) from different biomes in Brazil. J Orthoptera Res 27(2): 163-171.
10. Demirözer O, Karaca İ (2011) Phytophagous arthropod species associated with oil bearing rose, Rosa damascena Miller, in Isparta province with distributional remarks. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Science 6(1): 9-25.
11. Demirözer O, Karaca İ, Karsavuran Y (2011) Population fluctuations of some important pests and natural enemies found in oil-bearing rose (Rosa damascena Miller) production areas in Isparta province (Turkey). Turk Entomol Derg 35(4): 539-558.
12. Eldred T, Meloro C, Scholtz C, Murphy D, Fincken K, Hayward M (2016) Does size matter for horny beetles? A geometric morphometric analysis of interspecific and intersexual size and shape variation in Colophon haughtoni Barnard, 1929, and C. kawaii Mizukami, 1997 (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Org Divers Evol 16(4): 821-833.
13. Garnier S, Magniez‐Jannin F, Rasplus JY, Alibert P (2005) When morphometry meets genetics: inferring the phylogeography of Carabus solieri using Fourier analyses of pronotum and male genitalia. J Evol Biol 18(2): 269-280.
14. Jackson TA, Klein MG (2006) Scarabs as pests: a continuing problem. Coleopt Bull 60(mo5): 102-119.
15. Juache A, Ordenes R, Benítez HA (2018) Quantifying the shape variation of the elytra in Patagonian populations of the ground beetle Ceroglossus chilensis (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Zool Anz 274: 123-126.
16. Kaygin AT, Sönmezyildiz H, Ülgentürk S, Özdemir I (2008) Insect species damage on ornamental plants and saplings of Bartin province and its vicinity in the Western Black Sea region of Turkey. Int J Mol Sci 9(4): 526-541.
17. Kerman K, Roggero A, Rolando A, Palestrini C (2018) Evidence for male horn dimorphism and related pronotal shape variation in Copris lunaris (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Coprini). Insects 9(108): 1-13.
18. Klingenberg CP (2011) MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Resour 11(2): 353-357.
19. Li H, Wu C, Ohl M, Liu X (2020) A new sexually dimorphic mantidfly species of Allomantispa Liu et al., 2015 from China (Neuroptera: Mantispidae). J Asia Pac Entomol 23(4): 988-1002.
20. Li S, Ricchiardi E, Bai M, Yang X (2016) A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Valgini). ZooKeys 552: 67-89.
21. Modarres Awal M (2006) Preliminary studies on Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) fauna of Razavi Khorasan province of Iran. Turk Entomol Derg 30(3): 163-172.
22. Ober KA, Connolly CT (2015) Geometric morphometric and phylogenetic analyses of Arizona Sky Island populations of Scaphinotus petersi Roeschke (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Zool J Linnean Soc 175(1): 107-118.
23. Özbek H (2008) Türkiye’de ılıman iklim meyve türlerini ziyaret eden böcek türleri. Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi 8(3): 94-105.
24. Öztürk N, Ulusoy MR, Erkılıç L, Bayhan ÖS (2004) Malatya ili kayısı bahçelerinde saptanan zararlılar ile avcı türler. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 44(1-4): 1-13.
25. Petrov AV, Mandelshtam MY, Beaver RA (2007) Urocorthylus gen. n.: a remarkable monotypical scolytine genus from northern Vietnam. Koleopterol Rundsch 77: 249-254.
26. Pizzo A, Mercurio D, Palestrini C, Roggero A, Rolando A (2006) Male differentiation patterns in two polyphenic sister species of the genus Onthophagus Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): a geometric morphometric approach. J Zool Syst Evol Res 44(1): 54-62.
27. Polihronakis M (2006) Morphometric analysis of intraspecific shape variation in male and female genitalia of Phyllophaga hirticula (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 99(1): 144-150.
28. Pomfret JC, Knell RJ (2006) Sexual selection and horn allometry in the dung beetle Euoniticellus intermedius. Anim Behav 71(3): 567-576.
29. Pretorius R, Philips K, Scholtz C (2000) Geometric morphometrics, the metendosternite and its use in phylogenetics of the Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera). Elytron 14: 125-148.
30. Reaney LT, Knell RJ (2015) Building a beetle: how larval environment leads to adult performance in a horned beetle. Plos One 10(8): e0134399, 1-14.
31. Regueira JC, Damasceno EM, Iannuzzi L (2020) Shape variation of Cydianerus latruncularius (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) across biomes and sexes. Zool Anz 289: 96-107.
32. Rodrigues D, Sanfelice D, Monteiro LR, Moreira GR (2005) Ontogenetic trajectories and hind tibia geometric morphometrics of Holymenia clavigera (Herbst) and Anisoscelis foliacea marginella (Dallas) (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Neotrop Entomol 34(5): 769-776.
33. Rohlf FJ (1999) Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J Classif 16: 197-223.
34. Rohlf FJ (2017) tpsDig, 2.17. (Web page: https://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph) (Date accessed:15 May 2021).
35. Romiti F, Redolfi De Zan L, Piras P, Carpaneto GM (2017) Shape variation of mandible and head in Lucanus cervus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae): a comparison of morphometric approaches. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 120(4): 836-851.
36. Tatsuta H, Takahashi KH, Sakamaki Y (2018) Geometric morphometrics in entomology: basics and applications. Entomol Sci 21(2): 164-184.
37. Tezcan S, Pehlivan E (2001) Evaluation of the Lucanoidea and Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) fauna of ecological cherry orchards in İzmir and Manisa provinces of Turkey. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 38(2-3): 31-37.
38. Vergara O, Benitez HA, Pincheira M, Jerez V (2014) Sexual dimorphism in body shape of Chiasognathus grantii (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Rev Colomb Entomol 40(1): 104-110.
39. Vesović N, Ivanović A, Ćurčić S (2019) Sexual size and shape dimorphism in two ground beetle taxa, Carabus (Procrustes) coriaceus cerisyi and C. (Morphocarabus) kollari praecellens (Coleoptera: Carabidae) - A geometric morphometric approach. Arthropod Struct Dev 49: 1-9.
40. Wood SL (1963) A revision of the bark beetle genus Dendroctonus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Great Basin Nat 23(1-2): 1-117.
41. Yusifov EF, Ahmadov BA, Narimanova VS (2016) Diversity study of scarab beetles belonging to the subfamily Cetoniinae spread in the natural region of the greater Caucasus of Azerbaijan. J Entomol Zool Stud 4(5): 1118-1122.
42. Zhang M, Ruan Y, Wan X, Tong Y, Yang X, Bai M (2019) Geometric morphometric analysis of the pronotum and elytron in stag beetles: insight into its diversity and evolution. ZooKeys 833: 21-40