İadenin Geçmişinden Geleceğine: Tersine Teslim Yükümlülüğünün Doğuşu

Yıl 2022, , 494 - 539, 31.12.2022

Burak Boz

https://doi.org/10.47136/asbuhfd.1095274

Cited By: 1

Öz

İade, uluslararası ilişkiler tarihi boyunca gelişen hukuki bir kavramdır. Ancak bu, uluslararası aktörlerin günlük meselelerinin basit bir sonucundan ibaret değildir. İade, özellikle de adi suçluların iadesi, Grotius ve Beccaria gibi önde gelen düşünürler tarafından geliştirilmiş önemli bir entelektüel arka plana sahiptir.
İster tek taraflı ister iki taraflı olsun mevcut iade anlaşmalarının kapsamı, hüküm giymiş veya suç isnadı altında bulunan bir kişinin teslim edilmesi yükümlülüğünü içermektedir. Bu durum iadenin tarihiyle olduğu kadar entelektüel arka planıyla da ilgilidir. Uluslararası hukukta terör faaliyetlerine karışmış çifte vatandaşların vatandaşlıktan çıkarılması gibi güncel gelişmeler, bir devletin artık kendi vatandaşı olmayan birine onu yargılamak üzere sınırlarını açma yükümlülüğünün bulunup bulunmadığı konusunda yeni hukuki ihtilaf başlatmıştır. Bu bağlamda, devletlerin uluslararası hukuk açısından teröristleri alma ve kovuşturma yükümlülüğü altında olup olmadığı incelenmelidir.
Neticede, böyle bir yükümlülük, uluslararası güvenliğin tesisi için elzemdir. Bu yükümlülüğün geçerli bir yasal kurum olarak kabul görmesi, ancak iyi yapılandırılmış bir uluslararası anlaşma ile sağlanabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Extradition, Denaturalization, Terrorism, Transnational Crime, International Security, İade, Vatandaşlıktan Çıkartma, Terörizm, Sınıraşan Suç, Uluslararası Güvenlik

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Teşekkür

Çalışma Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi (ASBÜ) Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı Kamu Hukuku Doktora Programı’nda yazılan “Türk Ceza Hukukunda İade” başlıklı tezden mezuniyet koşulu olarak türetilmiştir. Doktora tezi TÜBİTAK 2214/A Yurt Dışı Doktora Sırası Araştırma Burs Programı tarafından desteklenmiştir. TÜBİTAK'a destekleri dolayısıyla teşekkürü borç bilirim.

FROM THE PAST TO THE FUTURE OF EXTRADITION: THE RISE OF A NEW OBLIGATION AS REVERSE EXTRADITION

Öz

Extradition is a legal concept that has been grown throughout the history of international relations. However, it is not just a simple result of the everyday headaches of international actors. Extradition, specifically, extradition of common criminals, has also a substantial intellectual background that had been developed by prominent scholars such as Grotius and Beccaria.

The current scope of extradition agreements, whether they are unilateral or bilateral, includes an obligation to surrender a person who has been convicted or suspected. This situation is related to its intellectual background as its history as well.
Recent developments in international law, such as the denaturalization of dual citizens who have been involved in terrorist activities, initiated new legal disputes over whether a state has not any duty to open its borders to someone, who is not its citizen anymore, however, it should be examined that whether states are under an obligation to take and prosecute terrorists in terms of international law.
Consequently, such an obligation is essential for the establishment of international security. Recognition of this obligation as a valid legal institution can only be achieved via a well-structured international treaty.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Extradition, Denaturalization, Terrorism, Transnational Crime, International Security

Kaynakça

• “Isis 'terrorist' bride Suhayra Aden and her children to return to NZ.” NZ Herald, 26 07 2021, available at: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/isis-terrorist-bride-suhayra-aden-and-her-children-to-return-to-nz/MCHFHKTT4KKGLN64RTO3O3VCBU/#/ (Access Date: 14 April 2021).
• “Judges.” Old Testament, 19-20. .........................................................................................
• “Member States.” United Nations, available at: https://www.un.org/en/member-states/index.html (Access Date: 21.06.2021). Alotaibi, Ayedh Hadi. Current International Legal Problems in the Pursuit of Extradition Requests: The Practice of Saudi Arabia. Unpublished PhD Thesis, 2004.
• Ambos, Kai and Christian Steiner, “On the Rationale of Punishment at the Domestic and International Level.” Le Droit Pénal a L'épreuve De L'internationalisation, ed. Marc Henzelin and Robert Roth, Geneve: LGDJ, 2002, 312-317.
• Artuk, M. Emin, Ahmet Gökçen, M. Emin Alşahin and Kerim Çakır. Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler. Ankara: Adalet Yayınevi, 2019. Avcı, Mustafa. Osmanlı Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler. Ankara: Adalet Yayınevi, 2018.
• Baran, Salih. “ABD'ye gönderilecek yabancı teröristin ara bölgede bekleyişi sürüyor.” Anadolu Ajansı, 15 11 2019, available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/abdye-gonderilecek-yabanci-teroristin-ara-bolgede-bekleyisi-suruyor/1646129 (Access Date: 21 January 2020).
• Bassiouni, Mahmoud Cherif. International Extradition: United States Law and Practise. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
• Bassiouni, Mahmoud Cherif. Introduction to International Criminal Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2014).
• Beccaria, Cesare. On Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings. ed. Richard Bellamy, tr. Richard Davies, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
• Blakesley, Christopher L. “Autumn of the Patriarch: The Pinochet Extradition Debacle and Beyond-Human Rights Clauses Compared to Traditional Derivative Protections Such As Double Criminilaty.” The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 91, no. 1 (2001): 1-98.
• Blakesley, Christopher L. “The Practice of Extradition from Antiquity to Modern France and the United States: A Brief History.” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 4, no. 1 (1981): 39-60.
• Chakraborty, Ananya. Extradition Laws in The International and Indian Regime: Focusing on Global Terrorism. Cuttack: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
• Connelly, Eileen AJ. “Turkey sends alleged American ISIS fighter back to US”. New York Post, 16 11 2019, available at: https://nypost.com/2019/11/16/turkey-sends-alleged-american-isis-fighter-back-to-us/ (Access Date: 21 January 2020).
• Council of Europe, Explanatory Report to the European Convention on Nationality, Strasbourg, 1997, available at: https://rm.coe.int/16800ccde7, (Access Date: 06 November 2021).
• de Vattel, Emer. The Law of Nations. ed. Knud Haakonssen, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2008.
• Doğan, Vahit. Türk Vatandaşlık Hukuku. Ankara: Savaş Yayınevi, 2016.
• Donald Trump’s Official Twitter Account (Banned), was available at: https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1096980408401625088 (Access Date: 17 February 2019).
• Eliaçık, Zeliha. “AB'nin yeni kör düğümü: Avrupalı DEAŞ'lılar.” Anadolu Ajansı, 15 11 2019, available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/analiz/abnin-yeni-kor-dugumu-avrupali-deaslilar/1646360 (Access Date: 23 January 2020).
• el-Vâkıdî, Ebû Abdullah Muhammed b. Ömer. Kitâbü'l-Meğâzî. tr. Musa K. Yılmaz, ed. Marsden Jones, İstanbul: İlkharf Yayıncılık, 2016.
• Esbrook, Leslie. “Citizenship Unmoored: Expatriation as a Counter-Terrorism Tool.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 37, no. 4 (2016): 1273-1329.
• European Union, "Council Framework Decision 2"02/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and The Surrender Procedures Between Member States". 45 OJEC, L 190, 18 July 2002.
• Forcese, Craig. “A Tale of "wo Citizenships: Citizenship Revocation for Traitors and Terrorists.” Queen's Law Journal 39, no. 2 (2014): 551-586.
• Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace. ed. Knud Haakonssen, Vol II, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005.
• Güler, Ülkü. Türk Ceza Hukukunda Geri Verme. Unpublished Master Thesis, 2010.
• Harper, Douglas. “Extradition.” Online Etymology Dictionary, available at: https://www.etymonline.com/word/extradition#etymonline_v_14125 (Access Date: 05 January 2021).
• İçel, Kayıhan & Süheyl Donay. Karşılaştırmalı ve Uygulamalı Ceza Hukuku Genel Kısım. 1st Book, İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş., 1999.
• Köprülü, Timuçin. Suçluların Geri Verilmesi. Unpublished Master Thesis, 2001.
• Lewis, Charlton T. and Charles Short. “Traditio”. A Latin Dictionary, available at: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aentry%3Dtraditio (Access Date: 05 January 2021).
• Magnuson, William. “The Domestic Politics of International Extradition.” Virginia Journal of International Law, no. 52 (2012): 839-901.
• Malekian, Farhad. Principles of Islamic International Law: A Comparative Search. Leiden: Brill, 2011.
• Menon, Praveen and Colin Packham. “New Zealand PM urges Australia to 'do the right thing' over terror suspect's citizenship.” Reuters, 16 02 2021, available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-newzealand-australia-turkey-idUSKBN2AG035 (Access Date: 14 April 2021).
• Montañez, Julio Ramírez. “The Extradition of Colombians from the Perspective of the Foundation for the Defense of Colombians with Orders of Extradition (DECOPEX).” Asian Journal of Latin American Studies 29, no. 4 (2016): 55-78.
• Nathalie Colin-Oesterlé’s question (3 March 2020 - O-000022/2020) for oral answer to the Commission on behalf of the PPE Group, available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/O-9-2020-000022_EN.html (Access Date: 18 December 2021).
• Nottebohm Case (Liechte'stein v. Guatemala), Second Phase Judgment of April 6th 1955, available at: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/18/018-19550406-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (Access Date: 21 December 2021).
• Özgen, Eralp Suçluların Geri Verilmesi. Ankara: Ajans-Türk Matbaası, 1962.
• Özgenç İzzet. Türkiye'nin Taraf Olduğu Anlaşmalar Açısından Türk İade Hukukunun Değerlendirilmesi. Unpublished Master Thesis, 1984.
• Özgenç, İzzet. Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2021).
• Pannett, Rachel. "New Zealand to resettle suspected Islamic State militant and her children after Australia revoked citizenship." The Washington Post, 26 07 2021, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/07/26/zealand-islamic-state-australia/ (Access Date: 14 April 2021).
• Petersen, Antje C. “Extradition and the Political Offense Exception in the Suppression of Terrorism.” Indiana Law Journal 67, no. 3 (1992): 767-796.
• Radu, Mariana. “Controversies on the Legal Nature of Extradition.” Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series 13, no. 2 (2013): 144-148.
• Şakiroğlu, Mahmut H. “Toskana.” İç. TDV İslam Ansiklopedisi, Vol. 41, Ankara: TDV İslâm Araştırmaları Merkezi, 2012.
• Schmid, Alex P. and Albert J. Jongman. Political Terrorism: A New Guide to Actors, Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories, and Literature. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 1988.
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Al-Jedda, [2013] UKSC 62, available at, https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2012-0129-judgment.pdf (Access Date: 06 November 2021).
• Shearer, Anthony Ivan. Extradition in International Law. Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1971.
• Toth, Judit. “The Genuine Link Principle in Nationality Law.” Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law 45, no. 1 (2014): 45-56.
• Turhan, Faruk. “Cezai Konularda Uluslararası Adlî İş Birliği Kanununa Göre İadenin Kabul Edilebilirlik Koşulları: Doktrin ve Uluslararası Gelişmeler Işığında Bir Değerlendirme.” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 8, no.2 (2018): 1-87.
• United Nations Security Council (UNSC). Resolution no. 2178, S/RES/2178, 24 September 2014.
• Volpp, Leti. “Citizenship Undone.” Fordham Law Review 75, no. 5 (2007): 2579-2586.
• Wautelet, Patrick R. “Deprivation of Citizenship for 'Jihadists' Analysis of Belgian and French Practice and Policy in Light of the Principle of Equal Treatment.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 11 02 2016, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2713742, (Access Date: 25 January 2020).
• Wise, Edward M. “Some Problems of Extradition.” Wayne Law Review 15, no. 2 (1969): 709-732.
• Zanotti, Isidoro. Extradition in Multilateral Treaties and Conventions. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006.
• Zedner, Lucia. “Citizenship Deprivation, Security and Human Rights.” European Journal of Migration and Law 18, no. 2 (2016): 222-242.