Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3 30 Ekim 2022
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations

Öz

Introduction: The combined use of ketamine and propofol has been frequently preferred in general anesthesia applications in recent years. The aim of this study was to determine the reliable combination to prevent infection development by comparing different combinations of ketamine and propofol and safe usage period of the combination. Methods: In the present study S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, E. coli, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans microorganisms were used. The turbidity data obtained at different hours and the zero-hour turbidity data were compared to determine the effect of microorganisms when they were kept at room temperature following the contamination of ketamine, propofol, and different ketamine + propofol mixtures by these microorganisms. Results: For each microorganism studied, the growth rate within the first 36 hours was observed to be higher in the propofol group compared to the ketamine group and other ketamine + propofol groups. For each microorganism studied, the growth rate was observed to be lower at all time periods in the ketamine group compared to the propofol group and other ketamine + propofol groups. The growth rate was observed to be less when the ketamine ratio increased in the ketamine + propofol mixture for all microorganisms. Conclusion: The growth rate was observed to be less in ketamine + propofol combinations due to the antibacterial effect of ketamine, compared to the group in which only propofol was used.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Jalili M, Bahreini M, Doosti-Irani A, et al. Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) vs propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:558-69.
  2. 2. Aberra B, Aregawi A, Teklay G, Tasew H. Effect of ketofol versus propofol as an induction agent on ease of laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions and hemodynamic stability in pediatrics: an observational prospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;20:19:41.
  3. 3. Abdelmalak BB, Bashour CA, Yared JP. Skin infection and necrosis after subcutaneous infiltration of propofol in the intensive care unit. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55:471-73.
  4. 4. Muller AE, Huisman I, Roos PJ, et al. Outbreak of severe sepsis due to contaminated propofol: lessons to learn. J Hosp Infect. 2010;76:225-30.
  5. 5. Kruszewska H, Zareba T, Tyski S. Search of antimicrobial activity of selected non-antibiotic drugs. Acta Pol Pharm. 2002;59:36-9.
  6. 6. Gocmen S, Buyukkocak U, Caglayan O. In vitro investigation of the antibacterial effect of ketamine. Upsala J Med Sci. 2008;113:39-46.
  7. 7. Rapeport DA, Martyr JW, Wang LP. The use of ‘’ketofol’’ (ketamine-propofol admixture) infusion in conjunction with regional anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37:121-23.
  8. 8. Weatherall A, Venclovas R. Experience with a propofol ketamine mixture for sedation during pediatric orthopedic surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20:1009-16.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Klinik Tıp Bilimleri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Ekim 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

26 Eylül 2022

Kabul Tarihi

3 Ekim 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Genç Moralar, D., Demirci, M., Kesici, S., Altan, H. A., & Kesıcı, U. (2022). Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi, 8(3), 265-280. https://izlik.org/JA92YK25RE
AMA
1.Genç Moralar D, Demirci M, Kesici S, Altan HA, Kesıcı U. Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations. Aydın Sağlık. 2022;8(3):265-280. https://izlik.org/JA92YK25RE
Chicago
Genç Moralar, Döndü, Mehmet Demirci, Sevgi Kesici, H Aysel Altan, ve Ugur Kesıcı. 2022. “Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations”. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi 8 (3): 265-80. https://izlik.org/JA92YK25RE.
EndNote
Genç Moralar D, Demirci M, Kesici S, Altan HA, Kesıcı U (01 Ekim 2022) Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi 8 3 265–280.
IEEE
[1]D. Genç Moralar, M. Demirci, S. Kesici, H. A. Altan, ve U. Kesıcı, “Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations”, Aydın Sağlık, c. 8, sy 3, ss. 265–280, Eki. 2022, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA92YK25RE
ISNAD
Genç Moralar, Döndü - Demirci, Mehmet - Kesici, Sevgi - Altan, H Aysel - Kesıcı, Ugur. “Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations”. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi 8/3 (01 Ekim 2022): 265-280. https://izlik.org/JA92YK25RE.
JAMA
1.Genç Moralar D, Demirci M, Kesici S, Altan HA, Kesıcı U. Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations. Aydın Sağlık. 2022;8:265–280.
MLA
Genç Moralar, Döndü, vd. “Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations”. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi, c. 8, sy 3, Ekim 2022, ss. 265-80, https://izlik.org/JA92YK25RE.
Vancouver
1.Döndü Genç Moralar, Mehmet Demirci, Sevgi Kesici, H Aysel Altan, Ugur Kesıcı. Comparison of antimicrobial effects of different propofol ketamine combinations. Aydın Sağlık [Internet]. 01 Ekim 2022;8(3):265-80. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA92YK25RE

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution Licence. (CC-BY-NC 4.0)

by-nc.png