TRADE UNION COMMITMENT AND A FIELD STUDY

Öz

In this study, ıt has been examined concept of trade union commitment and the  antedecedents’.In this terms it has been studied the relation between participation trade union and trade union commitment.. It has been try to find which extend of employee’s trade union commitment by through valid and credible  scale of antedecedents of trade union commitment in terms of international scale.  The random sampling method  was   used for analyses.  Survey was applied 22 factory in Kocaeli,Sakarya,İstanbul and 1104 membership of trade union employees but only 644 survey were suitable to examine. Factories  were not  seperated in terms of  capacity and number of workers. The SPSS analysis method was applied in this study. The antecedents of trade union commitment are percieved trade union support ,trade union attitudes,millitanist tendency,organizational justice ,trade union satisfaction, ınstrumentality. It is deduce from this study there are positive correlation between trade union commitment and antecedents of trade union commitment. Two study was used in this study as a reference. Gordon and at  concluded that trade union commitment  has  four dimension as trade union loyalty,belief of trade union, willigness of trade union, responsibiltiy of trade union. But in this study it was not deduced from four different dimension of trade union commitment. We could approach dimension of trade union commitment as three. And our conclusion is similar with Kellovay and at all. In The study of  Kelloway and our study could not see beliefs of trade union as a  powerful dimension of trade union commitment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Trade Union Commitment,Antecedents Of Trade Union Commitment,Participation Of Trade Union Commitmen

SENDİKAL BAĞLILIK VE BİR ALAN ARAŞTIRMASI

Öz

Bu çalışmada sendikal bağlılık kavramı ve öncülleri incelenmiştir. Bu bağlamda sendikal bağlılığın sendikal katılım ile olan ilişkisi de ele alınmıştır. İşçilerin sendikalarına olan bağlılık düzeyleri ve sendikaya bağlılığın öncülleri olan faktörler  uluslararası literatür baz alınarak güvenilir ve geçerli ölçekler yardımıyla incelenmiştir.  Araştırma için ele alınan örneklem için kolayda örneklem yöntemi tercih edilmiştir. Araştırma Kocaeli, Sakarya ve İstanbul’da yer alan sendikalı 22 işletmede, 1104 kişi üzerine uygulanmıştır ancak 644 anket incelemeye uygun görülmüştür.  İşletmelerin büyüklükleri ve işçi sayıları açısından araştırmada herhangi bir ayrıma gidilmemiştir. Çalışmada SPSS yöntemi ile analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sendikal bağlılığın öncülü olarak algılanan  sendikal destek, sendikal tutum,örgütsel adalet  militanist eğilimler, sendikal tatmin, araçsallık eğilimi ele alınmıştır.  Çalışmada sendikal bağlılığın boyutları ile öncülleri arasında olumlu bir ilişki olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Bu çalışmada   Gordon ve Kelloway’in çalışmaları referans olarak kullanılmıştır. Gordon ve arkadaşları sendikal bağlılığın sendikal sadakat, sendikal inanç, sendikal sorumluluk ve sendikal istek olarak 4 farklı boyutu olduğu sonucuna varmışlardır. Gordon’un çalışmasında olduğu gibi sendikal bağlılığın alt boyutu olarak 4 boyut ortaya çıkmamıştır. Bu çalışmada sendikal bağlılığın boyutu olarak 3 boyuta ulaşılmıştır. Kelloway’in çalışmasında ve bu çalışmada sendikal inanç sendikal bağlılığın güçlü bir boyutu olarak görülmemiştir.

Abstract

In this study, ıt has been examined concept of trade union commitment and the  antedecedents’.In this terms it has been studied the relation between participation trade union and trade union commitment.. It has been try to find which extend of employee’s trade union commitment by through valid and credible  scale of antedecedents of trade union commitment in terms of international scale.  The random sampling method  was   used for analyses.  Survey was applied 22 factory in Kocaeli,Sakarya,İstanbul and 1104 membership of trade union employees but only 644 survey were suitable to examine. Factories  were not  seperated in terms of  capacity and number of workers. The SPSS analysis method was applied in this study. The antecedents of trade union commitment are percieved trade union support ,trade union attitudes,millitanist tendency,organizational justice ,trade union satisfaction, ınstrumentality. It is deduce from this study there are positive correlation between trade union commitment and antecedents of trade union commitment. Two study was used in this study as a reference. Gordon and at  concluded that trade union commitment  has  four dimension as trade union loyalty,belief of trade union, willigness of trade union, responsibiltiy of trade union. But in this study it was not deduced from four different dimension of trade union commitment. We could approach dimension of trade union commitment as three. And our conclusion is similar with Kellovay and at all. In The study of  Kelloway and our study could not see beliefs of trade union as a  powerful dimension of trade union commitment.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sendikal bağlılık,sendikal bağlılığın öncülleri,sendikal sadakat,sendikal inanç,örgütsel adalet,sendikal destek

Kaynakça

1. KAYNAKÇA Altunışık Remzi,Çoşkun Recai,Bayraktaroğlu Serkan,Yıldırım Engin ( 2012), Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri,7. Baskı. Aryee, Samuel. A.Debrah,Yaw.(1997), “Member’s Participation in The Union :An İnvestigation Of Some Determinants in Singapore”,Human Relations ,Volume:50,No:2,ss:129-148.
2. Barling Julian,KellowayE.Kevin,.Bremermann Eric H. (1991), “Preemployment Predictors Of Union Attitudes: The Role Of Family Socialization And Work Beliefs”,Journal of Applied Psychology,Volume:76,No:5,(1991),ss:725-731. Bilgin,Leman (2003), “ Sendikaya Bağlılık Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması”,Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,Cilt:5,Sayı:3,s:12-31.
3. Fullagar,C Barling, J. (1989), “A Longitudinal Test of A Model of The Antecedents And Consequences of Union Loyalty” . Journal of Applied PsvchoIogy, Volume:74, ss: 213–227.
4. Demirbilek Tunç, Çakır Özlem Sendikal Bağlılık ve Sadakat. , Petrol-iş Yayını 91,2004. Eisenberger R, Cummings J, Armeli S, Lynnch P. (1997), “Perceived Organizational Support, Discretionary Treatment, and Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology Cilt:. 82, No: 5,ss:815-820.
5. Jack Fiorito,Daniel G.Gallagher, Cynthia V. Fukami (1988), “Satisfaction with Union Represation“ Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Volume: 41, No: 2, ss:294-307. Glick, W. Mirvis P , Harder D (1977) “Union Satisfaction and Participation”Industrial Relations.,Volume: 10,No:2,ss:145-151
6. Gordon, Michael E.; Philpot, John W. Burt, Robert E.; Thompson, Cynthia A.; Spiller, William E. (1980), “ Commitment to the Union:Development Of a Measure and an Examnination of its Correlates”, Journal of Applied Psycohology ,Volume:69, s:479-499.
7. Heshizer Brain, Lund John. (1997),“Union Commitment Types And Union Activist İnvolvement:Lessons For Union Organizer and Labor Education”Labor Studies Journal ,s:66-83. Hortaçsu, Nuran. (1998), Grup içi ve Gruplar arası Süreçler”,1.Baskı, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
8. J.E Martin (1986), “Predictors of Individual Propensity to Strike”. Industrial Labour Relations Review., Volume:39, ss: 214-222.

9. Kelloway, E.K., Catano, V.M., Southwell, R. (1992), "The Construct Validity of Union Commitment: Development and Dimensionality of a Shorter Scale", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,Volume 65, ss:197-211.
10. Kelloway Kevin, Barling Julian. (1993) ,“Member's Participation in Local Union Activities: Measurement Prediction and Replication”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Volume: 78, No.2, ss: 262-279 Kenan Köse, “Korelasyon ve Regresyon Analizi”, 5.paragraf, http://file.toraks.org.tr/TORAKSFD23NJKL4NJ4H3BG3JH/mse-ppt-pdf/Kenan_KOSE3.pdf, erişim tarihi:10.10.2015.
11. Mowday R T, Steers R M and Porter L W (1982), Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover, Academic Press, San Diego.
12. Lucy A.Newton,Lynn Mcfarlane Shore. (1992), “A Model Of Union Membership:İnstrumentality,Commitment And Opposition”,Academy Of Management Review, Volume :17,No: 2, ss:273-298. Moorman, Robert H.(1991), “Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior:Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Volume:76, No:6, ss.845-855.
13. Morrow Paula C..McElroy, James J.(2006),“Union Loyalty Antecedents: A Justice Perspective”,Journal of Labor Research, ss:75-87.
14. Robinson John Russell,(1998), “Union Commitment:An Adaptation Of Meyer And Allen’s Tripartite Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment”, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, The Faculty of Graduate Shidies of The University of Guelph. Redman,Tom.Snape, Ed.(2017). The consequences of Dual and Unilateral Commitment to the Organisation and Union,Human Resources management Journal,Vol:26,No.1,s.63-83. Sakallı,Nuray.(2001), “Sosyal Etkiler Kim Kimi Nasıl Etkiler”, 2. Baskı, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. Toubal Jonas and Straby Carsten Jensen (2014),”Why do people join trade unions?” European Review of Labour and Research,Vol:20,Issue:1,ss:1-22. Wombacher,Jörg Christian., Felfe Jorg.( 2017). Dual Commitment in The Organization: Effects of the Interplay of Team and Organizational Commitment on Employee Citizenship Behavior, Efficacy Beliefs, and Turnover Intentions, Journal of Vocational behavior,102,s.1-14.