Wound Dressings, Clinical Applications and Current Approaches

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 61 - 67, 28.11.2025

Gamze Şeker , Derya Davarcı

https://doi.org/10.62425/atakim.1788843

Öz

Wound healing is a complex biological process consisting of hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodelling phases. In this process, infection control, maintaining moisture balance, and creating a suitable healing environment are among the fundamental requirements. Traditional dressing materials (gauze, cotton, etc.) only provide mechanical protection but have limited effectiveness because they cannot create a moist environment. This review discusses the historical development, classification, biological and antibacterial properties, clinical applications, and current developments of wound dressings. As a result of the literature review, it was found that hydrocolloid, hydrogel, foam, and alginate-based dressings are especially effective in the treatment of chronic and exuding wounds, while silver and chitosan-added dressings provide antibacterial activity. In addition, it was determined that nanotechnology-based wound dressings integrated with smart biosensors enable personalized treatment by monitoring the wound microenvironment and have the potential to guide clinical practice in the future with tissue engineering applications. Literature reviews show that wound dressings are no longer merely passive barriers; These advances have led to the development of biomedical materials that support cellular proliferation, prevent infection, and provide active treatment when necessary. These advances are providing clinicians with new treatment options, particularly in the management of chronic and poorly healing wounds.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Wound dressings , wound healing , antibacterial effects , nanotechnology , smart systems

Yara Örtüleri, Klinik Uygulamaları ve Güncel Yaklaşımlar

Öz

Yara iyileşmesi; hemostaz, inflamasyon, proliferasyon ve yeniden şekillenme evrelerinden oluşan kompleks bir biyolojik süreçtir. Bu süreçte enfeksiyon kontrolü, nem dengesinin sağlanması ve uygun iyileşme ortamının oluşturulması temel gereklilikler arasındadır. Geleneksel pansuman materyalleri (gazlı bez, pamuk vb.), yalnızca mekanik koruma sağlamakta ancak nemli ortam oluşturamadıkları için sınırlı etkiye sahiptir. Bu derlemede, yara örtülerinin tarihsel gelişimi, sınıflandırılması, biyolojik ve antibakteriyel özellikleri, klinik uygulamaları ve güncel gelişmeleri ele alındı. Literatür taraması sonucunda hidrokolloid, hidrojel, köpük ve alginat bazlı örtülerin özellikle kronik ve eksudalı yaraların tedavisinde etkili olduğu; gümüş ve kitosan katkılı örtülerin ise antibakteriyel etkinlik sağladığı görüldü. Ayrıca nanoteknoloji tabanlı ve akıllı biyosensörlerle entegre edilmiş yara örtülerinin, yara mikroçevresini izleyerek kişiselleştirilmiş tedaviye olanak sunduğu ve doku mühendisliği uygulamalarıyla birlikte gelecekte klinik pratiğe yön verecek potansiyele sahip olduğu tespit edildi. Literatür incelemeleri, günümüzde yara örtülerinin, yalnızca pasif bir bariyer olmaktan çıkmış olduğu; hücresel proliferasyonu destekleyen, enfeksiyonu önleyen ve gerektiğinde aktif tedavi sunabilen biyomedikal materyaller haline geldiğini göstermektedir. Bu gelişmeler, özellikle kronik ve zor iyileşen yaraların yönetiminde klinisyenlere yeni tedavi olanakları sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yara örtüleri , yara iyileşmesi , antibakteriyel etkiler , nanoteknoloji , akıllı sistemler

Etik Beyan

Etik kurul onayı gerekmemektedir.

Kaynakça

• 1. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193(4812):293–294.
• 2. Thomas S. Wound management and dressings. J Wound Care. 1990;2(1):45–50.
• 3. Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HN, Eccleston GM. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97(8):2892–2923.
• 4. Jones V, Grey JE, Harding KG. Wound dressings. BMJ. 2006;332(7544):777–780.
• 5. Thomas S. Hydrocolloid dressings in the management of acute wounds: a review of the literature. Int Wound J. 2008; 5(5):602-613.
• 6. Dumville JC, O’Meara S, Deshpande S, Speak K. Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD009101.
• 7. Stephen-Haynes J, Callaghan R, Vibaux A, Johnson P, Carty N. Clinical evaluation of a thin absorbent skin adhesive dressing for wound management. J Wound Care, 2014;23(11):532-536.
• 8. Zhang S, Ren C, Wang C, Han R, Xie S. Effects of hydrocolloids and oleogel on techno-functional properties of dairy foods. Food Chem. X. 2024;21:101215.
• 9. Ho TC, Chang CC, Chan HP, et al. Hydrogels: Properties and Applications in Biomedicine. Molecules 2022;27(9):2902.
• 10. Guo Y, Bae J, Fang Z, Li P, Zhao F, Yu G. Hydrogels and Hydrogel-Derived Materials for Energy and Water Sustainability. Chem. Rev. 2020;120(15):7642–7707.
• 11. Hollander DA, Blome-Eberwein S. Modern wound dressings: an overview. Clin Plast Surg. 2021;48(2):191–199.
• 12. Varaprasad K, Jayaramudu T, Kanikireddy V, Toro C, Sadiku ER. Alginate-based composite materials for wound dressing application: a mini review, Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;236(2020):116025.
• 13. Okan D, Woo K, Ayello EA, Sibbald G. The role of moisture balance in wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007;20(1):39–53.
• 14. Gupta B, Agarwal R, Alam MS. Textile-based smart wound dressings. Indian J Fibre Text Res. 2010;35(2):174–187.
• 15. Gefen A, Alves P, Beeckman D, et al. How should clinical wound care and management translate to effective engineering standard testing requirements from foam dressings? Mapping the existing gaps and needs. Adv Wound Care. 2024;13(1):34–52.
• 16. Rezvani Ghomi E, Khalili S, Nouri Khorasani S, Esmaeely Neisiany R, Ramakrishna S. Wound dressings: Current advances and future directions. Polymers. 2019;136(27):47738.
• 17. Atiyeh BS, Ioannovich J, Al-Amm CA, El-Musa KA. Management of acute and chronic open wounds: the importance of moist environment in optimal wound healing. Burns. 2007;3(3):179-195.
• 18. Alven S, Aderibigbe, BA. Chitosan-Based Scaffolds Incorporated with Silver Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Infected Wounds. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(3);327.
• 19. Schreml S, Szeimies RM, Prantl L, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Wound healing in the 21st century. Br J Dermatol. 2010;63(5):866-881
• 20. Atiyeh BS, Costagliola M, Hayek SN, Dibo SA. Effect of silver on burn wound infection control and healing: Review of the literature. Burns. 2007;33(2):139-148.
• 21. Jayakumar R, Menon D, Manzoor K, Nair SV, Tamura H. Biomedical application of chitin and chitosan based nanomaterials- A short review. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2010;82(2):227-232.
• 22. Molan PC. The evidence supporting the use of honey as a wound dressing. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2006;5(1):40-54.
• 23. Bigliardi PL, Alsagoff SAL., El-Kafrawi HY, Pyon JK, Wa CTC, Villa MA. Povidone Iodine in wound healing: A review of current concepts and practices. Intern J Surger. 2017;44:260-268.
• 24. Boateng JS, Matthews KH, Stevens HN, Eccleston GM Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: A review. J Pharml Sci. 2008;97(8).2892-2923.
• 25. Pereira RF, Bartolo PJ. Traditional therapies for skin wound healing. Advan Wound Care. 2016;5(5):208-229.
• 26. Dhivya S, Padma VV, Santhini E. Wound dressings – a review. Biomedicine. 2015;5(4):22.
• 27. Liu X, Li J, Xu Y, et al. Hydrocolloid and other moist dressings promote angiogenesis and re-epithelialization in wound healing: A review. RSC Advances. 2023;13:5509–5528.
• 28. Patil NA, Kandasubramanian B. Functionalized polylysine biomaterials for advanced medical applications: A review. Eur Polym J. 2021;146:110248.
• 29. Jayabal P, Kannan Sampathkumar V, Vinothkumar A, Pannerselvam S, Achiraman S, Venkatasubbu GD. Fabrication of a chitosan-based wound dressing patch for enhanced antimicrobial, hemostatic, and wound healing application. ACS Applied Bio Materials. 2023;6(2):615-627.
• 30. Armstrong DG, Tan TW, Boulton AJ, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers: a review. Jama. 2023;330(1):62-75. 31. Aziz Z, Abu SF, Chong NJ. A systematic review of silver-containing dressings and topical silver agents (used with dressings) for burn wounds. Burns. 2012;38(3):307-318.
• 32. Abboud EC, Settle JC, Legare TB, Marcet JE, Barillo DJ, Sanchez JE. Silver-based dressings for the reduction of surgical site infection: review of current experience and recommendation for future studies. Burns. 2014;40:30-39.
• 33. Öztaş P. Yara İyileşmesi, Bakımı ve Tedavisi. Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi. 2021; 54(2):341-351.
• 34. Hastuti H, Nugraha BA, Annisa HN, Aprilia I, Maesaroh I, Hasna L. The effectiveness of hydrocolloid dressing in post-operative wound healing: A narrative review. J Midwifery Nursing. 2024;6(2):572-579.
• 35. Çelik E, Akelma H. Hydrogel burn dressing effectiveness in burn pain. Burns. 2024;50(1):190-196.
• 36. Mostafalu P, Tamayol A, Rahimi R, et al. Smart bandage for monitoring and treatment of chronic wounds. Small. 2018; 14(33): e1800296.
• 37. Jin G, Prabhakaran MP, Ramakrishna S. Stem cell differentiation to epidermal lineages on electrospun nanofibrous substrates for skin tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(8):3113–3122.
• 38. Vig K, Chaudhari A, Tripathi S, et al. Advances in skin regeneration using tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(4):789.
• 39. Coutts P M, Ryan J, Sibbald RG. Case series of lower-extremity chronic wounds managed with an antibacterial foam dressing bound with gentian violet and methylene blue. Advances in skin & wound care, 2014;27(3):9-13.
• 40. Zhou Y, Wang M, Yan C, Liu H, Yu DG. Advances in the application of electrospun drug-loaded nanofibers in the treatment of oral ulcers. Biomolecules, 2022;12(9):1254.
• 41. Zhang C, Liu Y, Li W, et al. Mucoadhesive buccal film containing ornidazole and dexamethasone for oral ulcers: in vitro and in vivo studies. Pharm Dev Technol. 2019;24(1):118-126.
• 42. Kalowes P, Messina V, Li M. Five-layered soft silicone foam dressing to prevent pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit. Am J of Crit Care. 2016;25(6):108-119.
• 43. Zhao X, Wu H, Guo B, et al. Antibacterial anti-oxidant electroactive injectable hydrogel as self-healing wound dressing with hemostasis and adhesiveness for cutaneous wound healing. Biomaterials, 2017;122:34-47.
• 44. Wu J, Zheng Y, Wen X, Lin Q, Chen X, Wu Z. Silver nanoparticle/bacterial cellulose gel membranes for antibacterial wound dressing: investigation in vitro and in vivo. Biomedical Materials. 2014;9(3):1-12.