MAXILLARY SINUS LIFTING PROCEDURES USING XENOGENEIC CORTICO-CANCELLOUS GRAFT MATERIAL WITH SIMULTANEOUS IMPLANT PLACEMENT: A 1- TO 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

- , 18.10.2018

Adnan Kılınç , Mert Ataol Ertunç Dayı

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.277921

Cited By: 1

Öz

Abstract:

Aim: The aim of this study was to
evaluate retrospectively the clinical outcomes of laterally approached sinus
floor lifting with xenografts and simultaneously dental implant placement
procedures.

Material and methods: All patients treated
with sinus lifting and simultaneous implant placement procedure and were followed for at least 1 year
were retrospectively selected for this study. The
lateral window technique was performed using a
xenogeneic cortico-cancellous grafting material
and submerged implants were placed immediately. Survival rates of implants and
clinical features of patients  and
implants were evaluated.

Results : A sample of 30 patients, 42  implants were
placed according to the one-stage approach. Residual
preoperatively alveolar ridge height varied between 3 and 6 mm with a mean of
4.58 mm and the bone gain at 1-year follow-up varied between 6 mm and 10 mm
with a mean of 8.6 mm. Only two implants were
lost before loading and overall survival rate was
96% for the implant-based analysis.

Conclusions:
Maxillary sinus lifting procedure with xenogeneic
cortico-cancellous graft material and simultaneously implant placement was
showed as a predictable and successful treatment modality.

Keywords: Biomaterials, Dental Implant, Sinus Floor Augmentation, Xenograft

Özet

Ksenojen Kortikokansellöz
Greft Materyali Kullanılan Maksiller Sinüs Tabanı Yükseltilmesi Prosedürü ile
Eş Zamanlı İmplant Yerliştirilmesi: 1 – 3 yıllık Takip

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın hedefi ksenojen kortikokansellöz
greft materyali kullanılan lateral yaklaşım uygulanan ve ile eş zamanlı implant
yerleştirilen maksiller sinüs tabanı yükseltilmesi işleminin klinik sonuçlarının
retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesidir.

Gereç ve Yöntem : Tüm hastalara sinus
tabanı yükseltme işlemi ile eş zamanlı implant yerleşimi uygulanmış ve en az 1
yıl süreyle takip edilmiştir. hayvan kaynaklı kortikokansellöz greft
materyali  ile lateral pencere tekniği
uygulanmış ve aynı esnada kemik seviyesinde implantlar yerleştirilmiştir.
İmplantların sağkalım oranları ve hastaların klinik özellikleri
değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular: 30 hasta üzerinde tek aşamalı
yaklaşım ile 42 implant yerleştirilmiştir. Preoperatif rezidüel alveolar kemik
yüksekliği 3mm ile 6mm arasında değişmektedir ve ortalama 4.58 mm’dir ve 1
yıllık takiplerde kemik kazanımı 6mm ile 10mm arasında değişmektedir ve
ortalama 8.6 mm’dir. Sadece 2 implant yükleme öncesinde kaybedilmiştir ve
implant sağ kalım oranı %96 olarak görülmüştür.

Sonuç: Ksenojen kortikokansellöz kemik
grefti kullanılan maksiller sinus tabanı yükseltme işlemi ile eş zamanlı
implant yerleşimi öngörülebilir ve başarılı bir tedavi yöntemi olarak
görülmektedir.   

Anahtar kelimler: Biyomateryaller,
Diş implantı, Sinüs taban yükseltmesi, Ksenograf

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biomaterials, Dental Implant, Sinus Floor Augmentation

Kaynakça

• Chang SH, Lin CL, Hsue SS, Lin YS, Huang SR. Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34(2):153-160. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.005.
• 2. Marx RE. Alveolar Bone Augmentation via In Situ Tissue Engineering. Horiz Alveolar Ridge Augment Implant Dent A Surg Man. 2015:297.
• 3. Esposito M, Barausse C, Pistilli R, Sammartino G, Grandi G, Felice P. Short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants in atrophic maxillae: One-year post-loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015;8(3).
• 4. Jurisic M, Markovic A, Radulovic M, Brkovic BMB, Sandor GKB. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106(6):820-827. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.025.
• 5. Umanjec‐Korac S, Wu G, Hassan B, Liu Y, Wismeijer D. A retrospective analysis of the resorption rate of deproteinized bovine bone as maxillary sinus graft material on cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(7):781-785.
• 6. Jensen OT, Brownd C, Baer D. Maxillary molar sinus floor intrusion at the time of dental extraction. J oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(9):1415-1419.
• 7. Fugazzotto PA. Sinus floor augmentation at the time of maxillary molar extraction: technique and report of preliminary results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 1999;14(4):536-542.
• 8. Doobrow JH, Leite RS, Hirsch HZ. Concomitant oroantral communication repair and immediate implant placement: a five-year case report. Implant Dent. 2008;17(2):176-181. doi:10.1097/ID.0b013e318166dbe7.
• 9. Tatum Jr H. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986;30(2):207-229.
• 10. Galindo-Moreno P, ??vila G, Fern??ndez-Barbero JE, et al. Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using a composite bone graft mixture. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(3):376-382. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01337.x.
• Lambert F, Lecloux G, Rompen E. One-step approach for implant placement and subantral bone regeneration using bovine hydroxyapatite: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(3):598-606.
• 12. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation: Part I: Lateral approach. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(SUPPL. 8):216-240. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x.
• 13. Galindo‐Moreno P, Moreno‐Riestra I, Ávila G, et al. Histomorphometric comparison of maxillary pristine bone and composite bone graft biopsies obtained after sinus augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(1):122-128.
• 14. Murugan R, Ramakrishna S. Development of nanocomposites for bone grafting. Compos Sci Technol. 2005;65(15-16 SPEC. ISS.):2385-2406. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.022.
• 15. Karabuda C, Ozdemir O, Tosun T, Anil A, Olgaç V. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases. J Periodontol. 2001;72(10):1436-1442.
• 16. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood. A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(3):217-229. doi:clr110305 [pii].
• 17. MacHtei EE, Mahler D, Oettinger-Barak O, Zuabi O, Horwitz J. Dental implants placed in previously failed sites: Survival rate and factors affecting the outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(3):259-264. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01466.x.
• 18. Wittneben J, Buser D, Salvi GE, Bürgin W, Hicklin S, Brägger U. Complication and Failure Rates with Implant‐Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses and Single Crowns: A 10‐Year Retrospective Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(3):356-364.
• 19. van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R, Desnyder M, Maffei G, Quirynen M. The relative impact of local and endogenous patient-related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2002;13(6):617-622. doi:clr130607 [pii].
• 20. Browaeys H, Defrancq J, Dierens MCA, et al. A retrospective analysis of early and immediately loaded osseotite implants in cross-arch rehabilitations in edentulous maxillas and mandibles up to 7 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(3):380-389. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00367.x.
• 21. Fortin T, Camby E, Alik M, Isidori M, Bouchet H. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: A clinical radiological study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(2):198-204. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00342.x.
• 22. Peleg M, Garg AK, Mazor Z. Predictability of simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla: A 9-year longitudinal experience study of 2132 implants placed into 731 human sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(1):94-102.
• 23. Zinser MJ, Randelzhofer P, Kuiper L, Zoller JE, De Lange GL. The predictors of implant failure after maxillary sinus floor augmentation and reconstruction: a retrospective study of 1045 consecutive implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115(5):571-582. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2012.06.015.
• 24. Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Komárek A, Van Steenberghe D. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(7):610-617. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01077.x.
• 25. Gerressen M, Hermanns-Sachweh B, Riediger D, Hilgers R-D, Spiekermann H, Ghassemi A. Purely cancellous vs. corticocancellous bone in sinus floor augmentation with autogenous iliac crest: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(2):109-115. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01619.x.
• 26. Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Sigalov S. Factors affecting changes in sinus graft height between and above the placed implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111(1):e6-e11. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.09.064.
• 27. Özkan Y, Akoğlu B, Kulak-Özkan Y. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bovine bone grafts with simultaneous implant placement: a 5-year prospective follow-up study. Implant Dent. 2011;20(6):455-459. doi:10.1097/ID.0b013e3182386cbc.
• 28. Kim Y-K, Yun P-Y, Kim S-G, Kim B-S, Ong JL. Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(2):e21-8. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.033.
• 29. Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(2):219-234. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24977257.
• 30. Ali SA, Karthigeyan S, Deivanai M, Kumar A. Implant Rehabilitation For Atrophic Maxilla: A Review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14(3):196-207. doi:10.1007/s13191-014-0360-4.