A Comparison of The Accuracy of Two Different Apex Locators Using Different Root Canal Solutions

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Farklı Kanal Yıkama Solüsyonları Kullanılarak İki Farklı Apeks Bulucunun Doğruluğunun Karşılaştırılması

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the Apex Pointer EAL (Electronic Apex Locator) or the Propex EAL can give actual working length measurements in dry canals or canal irrigated with NaOCl, EDTA, or saline. Material and Methods: Thirty-one human premolar and incisor teeth with single roots were used in this study. To determine the actual working length, a number 10 K-file was progressed as far as the major foramen under a stereomicroscope. When the tip of the K-file was visible in the major apical foramen, a silicon stopper was immediately adjusted to the canal surface. The K-file was removed from the root canal and the distance between an endodontic ruler and the silicon stopper was measured. These measurements were selected as the control group. Then, measurements were performed with both the Propex EAL and Apex Pointer EAL under different conditions (dry, NaOCl, EDTA, and saline). A measurement was deemed unstable when the reading of the EAL did not remain stable for at least 5 seconds. The stable measurements were selected as the study group. Results: The rate of the accurate measurements with the Propex were 35% at ± 0.5 mm and 70% at ±1 mm in dry canals; 26% at ±0.5 mm and 58% at ±1 mm in canals with NaOCl; 58% at ± 0.5 mm and 90% at ±1 mm in canals with saline; and 26% at ±0.5 mm and 71% at ±1 mm in canals with EDTA. The rate of the with the actual measurements with the Apex Pointer were 35% at ±0.5 mm and 61% at ±1 mm in dry canals; 26% at ±0.5 mm and 45% at ±1 mm in canals with NaOCl; 45% at ±0.5 mm and 70% at ±1 mm in canals with saline; and 54% at ±0.5 mm and 80% at ±1 mm in canals with EDTA. None of the tested devices delivered an actual measurement of 100%. However, the differences between control and study groups in all samples were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Therefore, both the Propex EAL and Apex Pointer can be used safely to determine the actual working length

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çalışma boyutu, Propex EAL, Apex

Kaynakça

1. Chevalier V, Arbab-Chirani R, Nicolas M, Morin V. Occurrence of no-function of two electronic apex locators: an in vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;(108):e61-65.
2. Kim E, Marmo M, Lee CY, Oh NS, Kim IK. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root- ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;(105):e79-83.
3. Higa RA, Adorno CG, Ebrahim AK, Suda H. Distance from file tip to the major apical foramen in relation to the numeric meter reading on the display of three different electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 2009;(42):1065-1070.
4. Kuttler Y. Microscopic investigation of root apexes. J Am Dent Assoc 1955;(50):544-552.
5. Bayırlı G. Pratik Endodonti. İstanbul Üniversitesi Basımevi ve Film Merkezi, İstanbul, 1990; p:188- 252.
6. Custer LE. Exact method of locating the apical foramen. Journal of the National Dental Association 1918;(5):815–819.
7. Suzuki K. Experimental study on iontophoresis. Japanese Journal of Stomatology 1942;16:411–29.
8. Sunada I. New method for measuring the length of the root canals. J Dent Res 1962;(41):375-387.

9. Harrison JW. Irrigation of the root canal system. Dent Clin North Am 1984;(28):797-808.
10. Grosman LI. Endodontic Practice. 6th Ed. Leaand Febiger, Philadelphia, 1965, p.225.
11. Krajczár K, Marada G, Gyulai G, Tóth V. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;(106):e90-93.
12. Briseño-Marroquín B, Frajlich S, Goldberg F, Willershausen B. Influence of instrument size on the accuracy of different apex locators: an in vitro study. J Endod 2008;(34):698-702.
13. Hoer D, Attin T. The accuracy of electronic working length determination. Int Endod J 2004;(37):125- 131.
14. Baldi JV, Victorino FR, Bernardes RA, de Moraes IG, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, Bernardineli N. Influence of embedding media on the assessment of elect- ronic apex locators. J Endod 2007;(33):476-479.
15. Kobayashi C, Suda H.. New electronic canal measuring device based on the ratio method. J Endod 1994;(20):111-114.
16. Venturi M, Breschi L. A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an ex vivo investigation. Int Endod J 2007;(40):362-373.
17. Venturi M, Breschi L. A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an in vivo investigation. Int Endod J 2005;(38):36-45
18. Vajrabhaya L, Tepmongkol P. Accuracy of apex locator. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997;(13):180-182.
19. Wrbas KT, Ziegler AA, Altenburger MJ, Schirrmeister JF. In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 2007;(40):133-138.
20. D'Assunção FL, de Albuquerque DS, Salazar-Silva JR, de Queiroz Ferreira LC, Bezerra PM. The accuracy of root canal measurements using the Mini Apex Locator and Root ZX-II: an evaluation in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;(104):50-53.
21. Dunlap CA, Remeikis NA, BeGole EA, Rauschen- berger CR. An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals. J Endod 1998;(24):48-50.
22. Elayouti A, Weiger R, Lost C. The ability of root ZX apex locator to reduce the frequency of overestimated radiographic working length. J Endod 2002;(28): 116-119
23. Meares WA, Steiman HR. The influence of sodium hypochlorite irrigation on the accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod 200;(28):595- 598.
24. Welk AR, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators. J Endod 2003;(29):497-500.
25. Goldberg F, Marroquín BB, Frajlich S, Dreyer C. In vitro evaluation of the ability of three apex locators to determine the working length during retreatment. J Endod 2005;(31):676-678.
26. Tselnik M, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. An evaluation of root ZX and elements diagnostic apex locators. J Endod 2005;31:507-9.
27. Pagavino G, Pace R, Baccetti T. A SEM study of in vivo accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod 1998;(24):438-441.
28. Haffner C, Folwaczny M, Galler K, Hickel R. Accuracy of electronic apex locators in comparison to actual length--an in vivo study. J Dent 2005; (33): 619-625.
29. VDW. Raypex 5 apex locator—for successful endodontic treatments. Munich: VDW Endodontic Synergy; 2005. p. 1-4.
30. Huffaker SK, Safavi K, Spangberg LS, Kaufman B. Influence of a passive sonic irrigation system on the elimination of bacteria from root canal systems: a clinical study. J Endod 2010;(36):1315- 1318.
31. Susin L, Liu Y, Yoon JC, Parente JM, Loushine RJ, Ricucci D, Bryan T, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irrigant agitation techniques in a closed system Int Endod J 2010;(43):1077-1090.
32. Cunningham WT, Balekjian AY. Effect of tempera- ture on collagen-dissolving ability of sodium hypochlorite endodontic irrigant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980;(49):175-177.
33. Becker GL, Cohen S, Borer R. The sequelae of accidentally injecting sodium hypochlorite beyond the root apex. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;(38):633-638.