DENTİN HİPERSENSİTİVİTESİ VE ŞİDDETİYLE İLİŞKİLİ ETİYOLOJİK FAKTÖRLERİN İNCELENMESİ

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

AN ANALYSIS OF AETIOLOGICAL FACTORS RELATED TO DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY AND SEVERITY

Öz

Amaç: Dentin hipersensitivitesinin tedavi stratejisinde tek başına tedaviden ziyade predispozan ve etiyolojik faktörler göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı dentin hipersensitivitesinin prevelansı ve etiyolojik faktörlerini belirlemek, bu faktörlerle dentin hipersensitivitesinin değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışma populasyonu 173 hastadan oluştu. Tüm hastalar dentin hipersensitivitesi ile ilişkili olan ya da olmayan etiyolojik faktörler açısından değerlendirildi. Dentin hipersensitivitesinin şiddeti ise Visual Anolog Skalası kullanılarak kaydedildi. Bulgular: Populasyonda, % 13,3 dişeti çekilmesi, % 9,2 atrizyon, % 5,8 periodontal hastalık, % 5,2 abrazyon, % 4,6 erozyon ve % 2,3 abfraksiyondan kaynaklananhipersensitivitesi gözlendi. Dentin hipersensitivitesine neden olan VAS değerleri ortalaması erozyonda 4,8, abrazyonda abfraksiyonda 3,45, periodontal hastalıkta 2,94 ve son olarak atrizyonda 2,65 olarak saptandı. Sonuç: Bu çalışma, dentin hipersensitivitesinin en yaygın nedenini dişeti çekilmesinden sonra atrizyonun oluşturduğunu, buna rağmen hastaların çürük olmayan servikal göstermiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dentin Hipersensitivitesi, diş aşınmaları, dişeti çekilmesi,abfraksiyon

Kaynakça

1. Attar N, Korkmaz Y. Dentin hypersensitivity. H.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2006; 30: 83-91.
2. Dababneh RH, Khouri AT, Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: Dentine hypersensitivity - an enigma? a review of terminology, mechanisms, aetiology and management. Brit Dent J 1999 ; 187: 606 – 611.
3. Çelik Ç, Özgünaltay G, Attar N. Tooth wear. Hacettepe Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2007; 31: 22-30. 4. Jacobsen PL, Bruce G. Clinical dentin hypersensitivity: understanding the causes and prescribing a treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract 2001; 2:1-7.
4. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137: 990- 998. 6. Addy M. Dentin
5. hypersensitivity : new
6. perspectives on an old problem. Int Dent J 2002; 52: 367-375.
7. Louisville CHD. Dentin hypersensitivity-dental hygiene and periodontal considerations. Int Dent J 2002; 52 : 385-393.
8. Addy M. Tooth brushing, tooth wear and dentine hypersensitivity- are they associated ? Int Dent J 2005; 55: 261-267.

9. Ganss C. How valid are current diagnostic criteria for dental erosion? Clin Oral Invest 2008 ; 12: 41- 49.
10. Scaramucci T, Marques MM, Geraldo D, et al. The influence toothbrushing on root dentine: An invitro study. Int Dent J 2009; 20:185-189. during
11. Frederic CSC, Hak KY, Philip RH, et al. Restorative management of the worn dentition : aetiology and diagnosis. Dent Update 2002 ; 29: 162-168.
12. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG. Aetiology, prevalence and clinical features of cervical dentine sensitivity. J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24:15-9.
13. Ommerborn MA, Schneider C, Giraki M, et al. In vivo evaluation of noncarious cervical lesions in sleep bruxism subjects. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98: 150-158.
14. Christensen GJ. Desensitization of cervical tooth structure, JADA 1998; 129: 765-766.
15. Marini MG, Greghi SLA, Passanezi E, et al. Gingival recession: prevalence, extension and severity ın adults, J Appl Oral Sci. 2004; 12: 250- 255.
16. Bamise CT, Olusile AO, Oginni AO, et al. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity among adult patients attending a Nigerian teaching hospital, Oral Health Prev Dent. 2007; 5: 49-53.
17. Udoye CI. Pattern and distribution of cervical dentine hypersensitivity in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Odontostomatol Trop. 2006; 29: 19-22.
18. Rees JS, Jin LJ, Lam S, et al. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in a hospital clinic population in Hong Kong. J Dent. 2003; 31: 453- 461.
19. Hugoson A, Bergendal T, Ekfeldt A, et al. Prevalence and severity of incisal and occlusal tooth wear in an adult Swedish population. Acta Odontolica 1988 ; 46: 255-265.
20. Cornelius TB, Adeyemi OO, Adeleke O. An analysis of the etiological and predisposing factors related to dentin hypersensitivity. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9: 052-059.
21. Cao Y, Gao C, Zhou Y. The study on the attrition of molars with occlusal hypersensitivity molars in elderly people. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1998; 33: 225-226.
22. Smith WA, Marchan S, Rafeek RN. The prevalence and severity of non-carious cervical lesions in a group of patients attending a university hospital in Trinidad. J Oral Rehabil. 2008 ; 35:128-134.
23. Patricia AW. Dentinal Hypersesitivity: A Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6: 107-117.
24. Ricarte JM, Matoses VF, Llacer VJF, et al. Dentinal sensitivity: consept and methodology for ıts objective evaluation. Med Oral Patol 2008 ; 13: 201-206.
25. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman JS, et al. Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist Periodontology Department. J Clin Periodontol. 1996 ; 23: 989-992.
26. Ölmez A, Erdemli E, Dentin hypersensitivity and treatment plans, GÜ Dişhek. Fak. Derg. 2003 ; 20: 65-71.
27. Seligman DA, Pullİnger AG, Solberg WK. The prevalence of dental attrition and ıts association with factors of age, gender, occlusion, and TMJ Symptomatology. J Dent Res. 1988 ; 67: 1323- 1333. 28. Bartlett D, Dugmore C. Pathological or physiological erosion-is there a relationship to age? Clin Oral Invest. 2008; 12: 27-31.
28. Dugmore CR, Rock WB. The prevalence of tooth erosions in 12-year-old childeren. Br Dent J. 2004 ;196: 279- 282.
29. Rafeek RN, Marchan S, Eder A, et al. Tooth surface loss in adult subjects attending a university dental clinic in Trinidad, Int. Dent. Journal 2006 ;56: 181-186.
30. Milosevic A, Lo MSF. Tooth wear in three ethnic groups in Sabah, International Dental Journal 1996 ;46: 572-578.
31. Saerah NB, Ismail NM, Naing L, et al. Prevalence of tooth wear among 16-year-old secondary school childeren in Kota Bharu Kelantan. Arch of Orofacial Sci. 2006 ;1:21-28.
32. Jaeggi T, Lussi A. Dental erosion. Oral Sci. 2006; 20: 44-65. 34. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentin hypersensitivity: A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine, J Clin Periodontol, 1987 ;14: 280-284.
33. Kumar V, Ana JR. Prevalence and severity of tooth attrition in Nigerians in rural areas. Niger Med J. 1978 ; 8: 557-62.
34. Gabriele BB, Kutschmann M, Bardhele D. Methodological considerations concerning the development of oral dental erosion indexes: literature survey, validity and reliability. Clin Oral Invest. 2008 ;12: 52-58.
35. Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevelance of gingival recession. JADA 2003 ;134: 220-225.
36. Tammaro S, Wennström JL, Bergenholtz G. Root- dentin periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27: 690-697. non-surgical
37. Fischer C, Wennberg A, Fischer RG, Attström R. Clinical evaluation of pulp and dentine sensitivity after supragingival and subgingival scaling. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991 ;7: 259-265.
38. Taani DQ, Awartani F. Prevalence and distribution of dentin hypersensitivity and plaque in a dental hospital population. Quintessence Int. 2001 ;32: 372-376.
39. Pretha MSS, Setty S, Ravindra S. Dentinal hypersensitivity?-Can this agent be the solution? Indian Journal of Dent. Res. 2006; 17: 178-184.
40. Gorman WJ. Prevalence and aetiology of gingival recession, J Periodontol 1967; 38: 316-322.
41. Murray JJ. Gingival recession in tooth types in high fluoride and low flouride areas. J Periodontal Res. 1973; 8: 243-251.
42. Nazlıel H. Oral and dental health in elderly. Turk J Geriatr 1999;2:14-21.
43. Tugnait A, Clerehug V. Gingival recession-ıts significance and management. J Dent 2001 ; 29: 381-394.
44. Tar CAW, Lepe X, Johnson GH, et al. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions. JADA 2002; 133: 725-733.
45. Neuval L, Consalaro A. Cemento-enamel junction microscopic resorpsion. J Endod. 2000; 26: 503-508. and external cervical
46. Çanakçı CF, Çanakçı V. Pain experienced by patients therapies. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138: 1563- 1573. different periodontal
47. Isabel P, Andrade AKM, Marcos M. Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci 2009; 51: 323-332.