SINIF 2 MALOKLUZYON KONİK DİŞ ANOMALİSİ VE HİPODONTİYE SAHİP BİR HASTAYA ORTODONTİK VE PROTETİK YAKLAŞIM

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

SINIF 2 MALOKLUZYON KONİK DİŞ ANOMALİSİ VE HİPODONTİYE SAHİP BİR HASTAYA ORTODONTİK VE PROTETİK YAKLAŞIM

Öz

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti kliniğine estetik nedenlerle 14 yaşında bayan bir hasta başvurdu. Klinik ve radyografik muayene sonucunda sol üst yan kesici dişinin konjenital olarak olmadığı ve sağ üst yan kesici dişinin ise konik formda olduğu görüldü. Protetik tedavi uygulanmadan yapılacak bir ortodontik tedavinin istenilen estetik sonucu veremeyeceği belirlendi ve ortodonti ve protez kliniklerinin beraber yürüteceği bir tedavi planlandı. Hastaya sabit ortodontik tedavi uygulandı ve ortodontik tedavi sonrası üst sağ lateral diş tam seramik kuron ile restore edilirken eksik olan üst sol lateral diş ise inley köprü ile restore edildi

Anahtar Kelimeler

• hipodonti, konik diş anomalisi, protez

Kaynakça

1. Glenn FB. Incidence of congenitally missing permanent teeth in a private pedodontic practice. J Dent Child 1961;28:317-320.
2. Kotsomitis N, Freer TJ. Inherited dental anomalies and abnormalities. J Dent Child 1997:405-408.
3. Küçükeşmen Ç, Küçükeşmen HC. “Konik diş anomalisi” bulunan üç farklı olgunun, kompozit veneer restorasyonlarla estetik ve fonksiyonel tedavisi (olgu bildirimi). A.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32: 215-221.
4. Rosentiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. The C. V. Mosby Company 2001:697-706, 643-672
5. Edelhoff D, JA S. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:241-249.
6. Cronin RJ, Cagna DR. An update on fixed prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:425- 436.
7. Shillinburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Publishing Co 1997.
8. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309-320.

9. Spalding PM, Cohen BD. Orthodontic adjunctive treatment in fixed prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:607-629.
10. Ramford S, Ash M. Occlusion. WB Saunders Co Philadelphia,3. edd. 1983:314-315.
11. Lutz F, Gohring TN. Fiber-reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: maximum preservation of dental hard tissue. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:164-171.
12. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:503-509.
13. Crispin BJ. Contemporary esthetic dentistry: practice fundementals. Quintessence Publishing Co 1994;6.bölüm:297-299.
14. Serdar Cotert H, Ozturk B. Posterior bridges retained by resin-bonded cast metal inlay retainers: a report of 60 cases followed for 6 years. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:697-704.
15. Isidor F, Stokholm R. Resin-bonded prostheses for posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:239-243.
16. Gohring TN, Mormann WH, Lutz F. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber- reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: preliminary results after one 1999;82:662-668.
17. Edelhoff D, Spiekermann H, Yildirim M. Metal-free inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2001;32:269-281.
18. Brunton PA, Cattell P, Burke FJ, Wilson NH. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative 1999;82:167-171. J Prosthet Dent
19. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Latzel D, Handel G. Fracture resistance of fiber-reinforced vs. non-fiber- reinforced composite molar crowns. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:135-139.
20. Bohlsen F, Kern M. Clinical outcome of glass-fiber- reinforced crowns and fixed partial dentures: a three-year retrospective study. Quintessence Int 2003;34:493-496.
21. Kern M, Strub JR, Lu XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:372-378.
22. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:viii, 531-544.