ALL CERAMIC RESTORATIONS ACCORDING TO THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

KİMYASAL YAPILARINA GÖRE TAM SERAMİK RESTORASYONLAR

Öz

Hastaların estetik restoratif materyallere olan talebinin ve estetik bilincinin artması ve metal destekli seramik sistemlerin özellikle biyouyumluluk ve optik özelliklerinin kalitesi konusundaki endişeler tam seramik kuronların geliştirilmesini sağlamıştır. Lityum disilikat, aluminyum oksit ve zirkonyum oksit gibi tam seramik alt yapı materyallerindeki gelişmeler tam seramik restorasyonların uygulama alanlarını genişletmiştir. Kimyasal yapılarına göre üç ana grupta sınıflandırılan ve üretici firmaların talimatlarına göre farklı uygulama teknikleri olan tam seramik sistemlerin kullanımlarının yaygınlaşması, sistemlerin özelliklerini, güvenirliğini ve birbirlerine olan üstünlüklerini karşılaştıran çalışmalara olan ihtiyacı da arttırmaktadır. Bu derlemede tam seramik restorasyonların kimyasal yapılarına göre sınıflandırılması, sistemlerin özellikleri ve gelişimleri detaylı olarak anlatılmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tam Seramikler, Polycristalline ceramics

Kaynakça

1. Lin MT, Munoz J, Munoz CA, Goodacre CJ, Naylor WP. The effect of tooth preparation form on the fit of Procera copings. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:580-590.
2. Bindl A, Windisch S, Mormann WH. Full-ceramic CAD/CAM anterior crowns and copings. Int J Comput Dent 1999; 2:97-111.
3. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kastner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera All Ceram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000: 84:419-24.
4. Baldwin DC. Appearance and aesthetic in oral health. Community Dent. Oral Epidemol 1980; 8:224-56
5. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramic in dentistry: Historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75:18-32.
6. Guess PC, Andreja Kulis A, Witkowski S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR. Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dent Mater doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.028
7. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96:433-42.
8. McLaren EA, White SN. Survival of In-Ceram crowns in a private practice: A prospective clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83:216-22.

9. Campbell SD, Sozio RB. Evaluation of the fit and strength of an all-ceramic fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 59:301-6.
10. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48:531-44.
11. Chang JC, Hart DA, Estey AW, Chan JT. Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD- CAM restorative materials and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:18-23.
12. Mc Lean JW. Dental ceramics in clinical dentistry, Br Dent J 1988;19:164(6),187-194.
13. Mc Lean JW, Odont D. Evolution of dental ceramics in twentieth century. J Ptosthet Dent 2001; 85:61-6.
14. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part І: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:10-15.
15. Fradeani M, Redemagni M. An 11-year clinical evaluation of leucite reinforced glass ceramic crowns: a retrospective study. Quintesssence Int
16. Quınn JB, Sundar V, Lloyd IK. Influence of microstructure and chemistry on the fracture thougness of dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2003; 19:603-11.
17. Nakamura T, Ohyama T, Imanishi A, Nakamura T, Ishigaki S. Fracture resistance of pressable glass- ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:951-5.
18. Marquardt P, Strub JR. Survival rates of IPS Empress 2 all ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures: results of a 5 year prospective clinical study. Quintesssence Int 2006; 37:253-9.
19. Conrad HJ, Wook-Jin Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98:389-404.
20. Giordano RA, Pelletier L, Campbell S, Pober R. Flexural strength of an infused ceramic, glass ceramic and feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73:411-18.
21. Bindl A, Mormann WH. An up to 5-year clinical evaluation of posterior In-Ceram CAD/CAM core crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15:451-6
22. Sundh A, Sjogren G. A comparison of fracture strength of yttrium-oxide- partially-stabilized zirconia ceramic crowns with varying core thickness, shapes and veneer ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31:682-8.
23. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Quach L, Swain MV. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of a glass infiltrated alumina zirconia reinforced dental ceramic. Dent Mater 2005; 21:454-63.
24. Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends. Dent Clin N Am 2004; 48:513-30.
25. Tinschert J, Natt G, Hassenpflug S, Spiekermann H. Status of current CAD⁄CAM techonology in dental medicine. Int J Comput Dent 2004; 7:25- 45.
26. Duret F, Blouin JL, Duret B. CAD⁄CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 117:115-20.
27. Sim C, Ibbetson RJ. Comparison of fit of porcelain veneers fabricated using different techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6:36-42.
28. Suh PS, Johnson R., White SN. Fit of veneers made by CAD/CAM and platinum foil methods. Oper Dent 1997; 22:121-27.
29. Mörmann WH, Bindl A. All ceramic, chaır- sıdecomputer aıded desıgn ⁄computer aıded machining restorations. Dent Clin N Am 2002 46:405-26.
30. Christensen GJ. Computerized restorative dentistry. JADA 2001; 132:1301
31. Van Der Zel JM, Vlaar S, De Ruiter WJ, Davidson C. The CICERO system for CAD CAM fabrication of full ceramic crowns. J Prosthet. Dent 2001; 85:261-7.
32. Russel M, Andersson M, Dahlmo K, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. A new computer assisted method for fabrication of crowns and fixed partial dentures.Quintessence Int 1995; 126:757-63
33. Ottl P, Piwowarczyk A, Laueur C. The Procera AllCeram System. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20:151-61.
34. Burke FJT, Fleming GJP, Nathanson D, Marquis PM. Are adhesive techonologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4:7-22.
35. Denissen H, Dozic A, Van Der Zel J, Van Waas M. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC and Procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:506-13.
36. Becker CM, Kaldahl WB. (2005). Current theories of crown contour, margin placement and pontic design. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93:107-115.
37. O’Brien WJ. Dental Materials And Their Selection 2nd edition. Chicago, Berlin, London Tokyo, Paris: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc., 1997
38. Lothar V. Cercon the all ceramic CAM system by Degussa Dental. Quintessence, 2001; 52;8:811-14.
39. Oilo M, Gjerdet NR, Tvinnereim HM. The firing procedure influences properties of a zirconia core ceramic. Dent mater 2008; 2 4:471–5
40. Steyern PV, Carlson P, Nilner K. All ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC- Zirkon technique. A 2 year clinical study. J Oral Reh 2005; 32; 180-7.
41. Witkowski S, Komine F, Gerds T. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques. J Prosthet Dent
42. Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Lauer HC, Kuretzky T. A clinical report and overview of scientific studies and clinical procedures conducted on the 3M ESPE Lava All-Ceramic System. J Prosthodont 2005;14:39-45.