Yıl 2008,
Cilt: 2008 Sayı: 2, 60 - 65, 01.02.2008
Öz
-
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-16.
- Andersson B, Omdan P, Lindvall AM, Brenemark PI. Five-year prospective study of prosthodontic and surgical single-tooth implants treatment in general practices and at a specialist clinic. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:351-5.
- Sakakura CE, Morais JA, Loffredo LC, Scaf G. A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32:397–400.
- Engelman MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P. Optimum placement of ossointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:467-73.
- Stella JP, Tharanon W. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implants. Part I: technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:15-22.
- Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995;6:96-103.
- Bou Serhal C, Jacobs R, Flygare L, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Preoperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:39-43.
- Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:229-38.
- Kassebaum DK, Nummikoski PV, Triplett RG, Langlais RP. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70:674-8.
- Bolin A, Eliasson S, von Beetzen M, Jansson L. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:354-9.
- Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofac Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:630-7.
- Beason RC, Brooks SL. Preoperative implant site assessment in Southeast Michigan [abstract]. J Dent Res 2001;80:137.
- Scropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L. Impact of conventional tomography on prediction of the appropriate implant size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:458-63.
DİŞHEKİMLERİNİN DENTAL İMPLANT PLANLAMASINDA KULLANILAN RADYOGRAFİ TEKNİKLERİ KONUSUNDAKİ TERCİHLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Öz
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesinde görevli 41 diş hekiminin, dental implant uzunluklarının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan radyografik teknikler hakkındaki görüşlerininaraştırılmasıdır. Kesin cevaba yönelik olarak hazırlanan 19 adet sorudan oluşan bir anket formu iki araştırma görevlisi tarafından diş hekimlerine yöneltildi. Veriler SPSS v16 software programı ile analiz edildi ve iki radyografi tekniğindeki (panoramik radyografi ve bilgisayarlı tomografi) değerler chi testi ile karşılaştırıldı. Panoramik radyografi ile bilgisayarlı tomografiden elde edilen ölçümlerin doğruluğu incelendiğinde; iki tekniğin farkının istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğu (X2=11.294; P
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-16.
- Andersson B, Omdan P, Lindvall AM, Brenemark PI. Five-year prospective study of prosthodontic and surgical single-tooth implants treatment in general practices and at a specialist clinic. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:351-5.
- Sakakura CE, Morais JA, Loffredo LC, Scaf G. A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32:397–400.
- Engelman MJ, Sorensen JA, Moy P. Optimum placement of ossointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:467-73.
- Stella JP, Tharanon W. A precise radiographic method to determine the location of the inferior alveolar canal in the posterior edentulous mandible: implications for dental implants. Part I: technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:15-22.
- Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiographs. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995;6:96-103.
- Bou Serhal C, Jacobs R, Flygare L, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Preoperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:39-43.
- Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:229-38.
- Kassebaum DK, Nummikoski PV, Triplett RG, Langlais RP. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70:674-8.
- Bolin A, Eliasson S, von Beetzen M, Jansson L. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:354-9.
- Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofac Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:630-7.
- Beason RC, Brooks SL. Preoperative implant site assessment in Southeast Michigan [abstract]. J Dent Res 2001;80:137.
- Scropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L. Impact of conventional tomography on prediction of the appropriate implant size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:458-63.
Toplam 13 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Şubat 2008 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA66HN83KT |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2008 Cilt: 2008 Sayı: 2 |
Kaynak Göster
Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.