EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT FOR FAMILY AND COPING STRATEGY ON DENTURE SATISFACTION IN PATIENTS WEARING COMPLETE DENTURE

Öz

Purpose: In the patients wearing complete ndenture, the psychological factors are very important on acceptance of complete dentures and for their own denture satisfaction. The aim of this study was to investigate effect of perceived social support for family and coping strategy of stressors on complete denture satisfaction in two groups of patient who are living different region. Material and Methods: The study was included totally 84 patients who applied Faculties of Dentistry, Çukurova and Atatürk University. In this study, the patient’s data were collected with using Perceived Social Support for Family (PSS-Fa) and Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI).
Results: The results of analysis of KruskalWallis were shown that there was a statistically significantly correlation between level of patient’s satisfaction and PSS-Fa, problem solving and social support strategy. According to this study results, there was a positive correlation between level of patient’s satisfaction and PSS-Fa, problem solving and social support strategy and was negative correlation with avoidance strategy.
Conclusion: It is suggested that the researches about this topic should be facilitated

Anahtar Kelimeler

• perceived social support for family
• coping strategy
• complete denture satisfaction

TAM PROTEZ HASTALARINDA AİLEDEN ALGILANAN SOSYAL DESTEK VE STRESLE BAŞETME STRATEJİLERİNİN PROTEZ MEMNUNİYETİNE ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMES

Öz

Amaç: Hastalar&n tam proteze daha kolay uyum sa7lamas&psikolojik faktörler son derece önemlidir. Bu ara t&rma; iki farkl& bölgede ya ayan hasta gruplar&nda tan&mlay&c&olarak; aileden alg&lanan sosyal destek ve stresle baetme stratejilerinin tam protez memnuniyeti üzerine etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamaktad&r.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çukurova ve Atatürk Üniversitesi Ditoplam 84 tam protez hastas& ara t&rman&n kapsam&n&olu turdu. Hastalara ait veriler Aileden Alg&lanan Sosyal Destek Ölçe7i, Stresle Ba a Ç&kma Stratejileri Ölçe7i (CSI) ve hasta memnuniyetini de7erlendirmek amac&yla Görsel Analog Ölçe7i (VAS) kullan&larak topland&.Bulgular: Kruskal-Wallis test sonuçlar&; genel memnuni- yet düzeylerine göre PSS-Fa, problem çözme ve sosyal destek arama ortalama da7&l&mlar&n&nistatistiksel olarak önemli bir ili ki gösterdi. Protez memnuniyeti ile aileden alg&lanan sosyal destek, problem çözme ve sosyal destek arama stratejileri aras&nda pozitif, kaç&nma stratejisi aras&nda negatif bir ili ki bulundu. Sonuç: Bu konuda daha fazla say&da hastay&içeren ara t&rmalar&n yap&lmas& uygun olacakt&r

Anahtar Kelimeler

• aileden alg&lanan sosyal destek
• ba etme stratejileri
• tam protez memnuniyeti

Kaynakça

1. Özgür G. Sosyal destek ve sa7l&k. Türk Hem ireler Dergisi 1993;43(2):25-26.
2. Sorias O. Sosyal destek ve ruh sa7l&7&. E Ü T&p Fak Derg 1988;27(1):359-63.
3. Ardahan M. Sosyal destek ve hem irelik. Atatürk Üniv Hem Yük Ok Derg 2005;9(2):68-75.
4. Kara Kasikci M, Alberto J. Family support, perceived self-efficacy and self-care behaviour of Turkish patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Nurs 2007;16(8):1468- 78.
5. Procidano ME, Heller K. Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies. Am J Community Psychol 1983;11(1):1-24.
6. Allen PF, Mac Milan AS. A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:173–79.
7. Fiske J, Davis DM, Frances C, Gelbier S. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. Br Dent J 1998;184(2):90-3; discussion 79.
8. Livneh H, Antonak RF, Gerhardt J. Psychosocial adaptation to amputation: the role of sociodemographic variables, disability-related factors and coping strategies. Int J Rehabil Res 1999;22(1):21-31.

9. Endler NS, Corace KM, Summerfeldt LJ, Johnson JM, Rothbart P. Coping with chronic pain. Personality and Individual Differences 2003;34(2):323-46.
10. Karlsen B, Bru E. Coping styles among adults with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Psychology, Health & Medicine 2002;7(3):245–59.
11. Zeng J, Hong L, Li G. The study on the personality factors in patients' satisfaction with their complete dentures. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 1999;34(3):184-6.
12. Al Quran F, Cilifford T, Cooper C, Lamey PJ. Influence of psychological factors on the acceptance of complete dentures. Gerodontology 2001;18(1):35-40.
13. Eskin M. Reliability of the Turkish version of the Perceived Social Support from Friends and Family scales, Scale for Interpersonal Behavior, and Suicide Probability Scale. J Clin Psychol 1993;49(4):515-22.
14. Amirkhan JH. A factor analytically derived measure of coping - the coping strategy indicator. J Pers Soc Psychol1990;59(5):1066-74.
15. Aysan F. Ba a ç&kma stratejileri ölçe7inin üniversite ö7rencileri için geçerlili7i ve güvenilirlili7i. Çukurova E7itim Fakültesi Kongre Kitab& 28-29 Nisan;1994.
16. de Grandmont P, Feine JS, Tache R, Boudrias P, Donohue WB, Tanguay R, ve ark. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: psychometric evaluation. J Dent Res 1994;73(5):1096-104.
17. Birol L., Akdemir N, Bedük T. ç hastal&klar& ve hem irelik bak&m&. stanbul: Vehbi Koç Yay&nlar& 1998:472.
18. Türküm SA. Stresle Ba aç&kma ve yimserlik.
19. Eski ehir: TC Anadolu Üniversitesi Yay&nlar&; No:1098 1999.
20. Balc& G. Stres etkileri ve stresle ba etme. Sa7l&k ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 2002;1:43-46.
21. Balta A. Stres ve ba aç&kma yollar&. stanbul: Remzi Kitapevi 2000.
22. ahin HN. Stresle ba aç&kma. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derne7i Yay&nlar& 1998. Kaya B. Problem çözme. Ç&nar Dergisi 1996;2(3):91-94.
23. Özgür G. Sosyal destek ve sa7l&k. Türk Hem ireler Dergisi 1993;43(2):25-26.
24. Kutner NG, Curtin RB, Oberley E, Sacksteder P. Fulfilling the promise: Linking rehabilitation interventions with ESRD patient outcomes. Dialysis & Transplantation 1997;26(5):283-90.
25. ahin HN. Stresle ba aç&kma tarzlar& ölçe7i. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 1995;10(34):56-73.
26. Buzlu S. Diabetin psikososyal yönü. Erdo7an S. Ed. Diabet hem ireli7i Temel Bilgiler. stanbul:Tavasl& Matbaac&l&k 2002:195-203.
27. Brunier G, Graydon J, Rothman B, Sherman C, Liadsky R. The psychological well-being of renal peer support volunteers. J Adv Nurs 2002;38(1):40-9.
28. Karabulut E. Hemodiyaliz hastalar&nda uygulanan hastal&k ve stresle ba etme bilinçlendirilmesinin depresyon e7ilimi ve anksiyete düzeyine etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sa7l&k Bilimleri Enstütüsü, Doktora Tezi 2005.
29. Welch JL, Austin J. Stressors, coping and depression in haemodialysis patients. J Adv Nurs 2001;33(2):200-06.
30. Reeve PE, Watson CJ, Stafford GD. The role of personality in the management of complete denture patients. Br Dent J 1984;156(10):356-62.
31. Watson CJ, Reeve PE. The effects of combined psychological and controlled clinical management of preprosthetic surgery patients. Br Dent J 1985;159(9):286-91. Yaz;5ma Adresi
32. Yrd. Doç. Dr. /amil AKYIL
33. Atatürk Üniversitesi,
34. Di Hekimli7i Fakültesi
35. Protetik Di Tedavisi Anabilim Dal& 25240- ERZURUM Tlf. 0 442 2311783 Fax. [phone]
36. e-mail: [e-mail]