RADIOLOGICAL CRITERIA AND CHOICE FOR RADIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE IN THE DETERMINATION OF IMPLANT SITES BEFORE OPERATION

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 2007 Sayı: 2, 23 - 30, 01.02.2007

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Binali Çakur Arş. Gör. Dt. M. Akif Sümbüllü Prof. Dr. Abubekir Harorlı

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

OPERASYON ÖNCESİ İMPLANT YERLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİNDE RADYOLOJİK KRİTERLER VE RADYOLOJİK TEKNİK SEÇİMİ

Öz

Dental implantlar n ba ar s , implant ve kemi.in bütünlük sa.lamas (osteointegrasyon) ile mümkündür. Osteointegrasyonun ba ar s ise; implant yerle tirilecek bölgedeki mevcut kemik yüksekli.i, geni li.i, yo.unlu.u ve kom u anatomik olu umlara olan uzakl . yla ilgilidir. Diagnostik radyoloji dental implant hastalar n n de.erlendirilmesinde önemli bir yere sahiptir. Hastalar n klinik gereksinimi ve biyolojik riski, implant planlamas nda kullan lacak görüntüleme tekniklerini belirler. Bu makalede, dental implant uygulamalar nda radyolojik kriterlerin ve radyolojik teknik seçiminin önemi vurgulanm t r

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental implantlar , dental radyografi , radyolojik kriterler , radyolojik teknik

Kaynakça

• Gültekin S, Araç M, Karaosmano.lu AD, Ik S. Mandibulann lingual vasküler kanallarnn dental BT ile de.erlendirilmesi. Tansal ve Giriimsel Radyoloji 2003; 9: 188-191.
• Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31:825-833.
• Akdeniz BG. Endosseöz implantlarda seçilen bölgenin elverilili.inin panoramik radyografi ve bilgisayarl tomografi kullanm ile kalitatif ve kantitatif olarak kyaslamal de.erlendirilmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Sa.lk Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, ;zmir, 1995.
• Berberi A, Le Breton G, Mani J, Woimant H, Nasseh I. Lingual parasthesia following surgical placement of implants: report of a case. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 580–582.
• Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, Gröndahl K, Harris D, Jacobs R, Lekholm U, Nakielny R, van Steenberghe D, van der Stelt P. E.A.O. Guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002; 13:566–570.
• Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry Clin Oral Impl Res 2003; 14:18–27.
• Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Buser D. The Radiographic Assessment of Implant Patients: Decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:80–89.
• ICRP Publication 60. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990.
• Daidone R. Use of computed tomography for selection of implant sites. Dentomaxillofac Radiol (Abstr) 1994; 23: 58.
• Gülyurt M. Ortodonti Yönünden Büyüme ve Geliim. Erzurum: Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Ofset Tesisleri, 1989: 31–34, 51–57, 47–69, 81–85, 95–98, 112- 124.
• Erbengi T. Histoloji 1. Ankara, Feryal Matbaas, 1992: 89–109.
• Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Mellström D, Sennerby L. Branemark implants and osteoporosis: A clinical exploratory study. Clinical Impl Dent and Rel Res 2001; 3: 50 – 56.
• Misch CE. Density of bone. Int j Oral Implant 1990; 6:23-31.
• Albrektsson T. Direct bone anchorage of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 255-261.
• Misch CE. Divisions of available bone in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implant 1990; 7: 9-17.
• Da.stan S, Çakur B, Harorl A. Dental implant uygulamalarnda radyografi. Atatürk Üniv Di Hek Fak Derg 2004; 14: 58-69.
• Reddy MS, Wang I-C. Radiographic determinants of implant performance. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13:136–145.
• Miles DA, Van Dis ML. Implant Radiology. Dent Clin North Am 1993; 37: 645–668.
• Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. CV Mosby, St. Louis, 1993:103-117.
• Gher ME, Richardson AC. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995; 15: 268–283.
• Çakur B. Mandibular Kemi.in Kantitatif De.erlendirilmesinde Panoramik Radyogramn Dansitometre De.erleri ile Dual Enerji X-Ray Absorpsiyometri De.erlerinin Karlatrlmas. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sa.lk Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora tezi, Erzurum, 2005.
• Preece JW. The accuracy of an X – ray film quality – assurence step-wedge test. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62: 449 – 458.
• Klein M, Cranin AN, Sirakian A, Russell D, Lee CJ. The CT scan: Its value as a diagnostic and therapeutic instrument: A complete oral primer. J Oral Implant 1991;17:3.
• Lekholm U. Clinical procedures for treatment with osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:116-120.
• Mörner AC, Gunilla S, Lars T, Andersson G, Welander U. Comparison of the diagnostic potential of direct digital and conventional intraoral radiography in the evaluation of periimplant conditions. Clin Oral Implant Res 2003; 14: 714.
• Mason R, Bourne S. Guide to dental radiography. Oxford University Pres, Oxford 1998.
• Jeffcoat M, Jeffcoat RL, Reddy MS, Berland L. Planning interactive implant treatment with 3-D computed tomography. JADA 1991;122: 40-44.
• Weingart D, Düker J. A tomographic technique fort he depiction of atrophied alveolar ridges prior to endosseous implant placement. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992; 22: 38-40.
• Scribano E, Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Blandino A, Racchiusa S, Gualniera P. Computed tomography in dental implantology: medico-legal implications. Radiol Med 2003;105: 92-99.