EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IN THE CHILDREN LIVING IN RURAL DISTRICTS OF SOUTH-EASTERN ANATOLIA: 24-MONTH-RESULT OF A FIELD TRIAL

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

GÜNEYDOĞUANADOLU KIRSALINDA YAŞAYAN ÇOCUKLARDA DEĞİŞİK KORUYUCU UYGULAMALARIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: 24 AYLIK SAHA ÇALIŞMASI SONUÇLARI

Öz

Son y&llarda, de/i ik ülkelerde izlenen yayg&nçürük azal&m&na ra/men, Türkiye gibi geli mekte olan ço/u ülkelerde di çürü/ü hala önemli bir sa/l&ksorunu olarak devam etmektedir. Çok de/i kenli bir hastal&k olmas&na ra/men, çürü/ün kontrol alt&na al&nmas&ndaki temel sorunlarda birisi de koruyucutedavi edici uygulamalar&n, toplumun de/i ik seviyelerine ula t&r&lmas&ndaki güçlü/üdür. Bu çal& mada; di hekimli/i hizmetinin s&n&rl&/& oldu/u Güneydo/uAnadolu k&rsal&ndaki çocuklarda de/i ik koruyucu uygulamalar incelenmi tir. Diyarbak&r kentine 55 kilometre uzakl&ktaki E/il ilçesi yat&l& bölge okulu çal& ma alan& olarak seçildi. Ya lar& 9-17 aras&nda de/i en toplam 120 çocuk 3 gruba ayr&ld&. Bunlar; grup 1: cam-ionomer fissür örtücü gurup, grup 2: kontrol grubu ve grup 3: flor jel grup. Tüm koruyucu uygulamalar okul ortam&nda ve bir grup di hekimi ve di hekimli/i ö/rencisi taraf&ndan gerçekle tirildi. ki hekim taraf&ndan gerçekle tirilen ilk muayenenin sonras&nda çocuklar ikinci y&l&n sonunda tekrar muayene edildi. Grup 1, 2 ve 3 için iki y&ll&k ortalama çürük art& & s&ras&yla 00.07±0.6, 0.82±0.95, 0.68±0.75 olarak belirlendi. Gruplar aras&ndaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlaml& bulundu (p

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diçürü/ü, yüzey örtücü, florlu jel, alan çal& mas&

Kaynakça

1. Axelsson P: An introduction to risk prediction and preventive dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co, Carol Stream, usa, 1999.
2. Bravo M, Baca P, Llodra JC, Osorio E: A 24-month study comparing sealant and fluoride varnish in caries reduction on different permanent first molar surfaces. J Public Health Dent. 1997 ;57:184-6.
3. Bedi R, Sardo IJ: Oral health care in disadvantaged communities. The root cause. A proposal for action. FDI World Dental Press, 1999,33-4.
4. Carlsson A, Petersson M, Twetman S: 2-year clinical performance of a fluoride-containing fissure sealant in young schoolchildren at caries risk. Am J Dent 1997;10:115-9
5. Caufield PW, Cutter GR, Dasanayake AP: Initial acquisition of mutans streptococci by infants: evidence for a discrete window of infectivity. J Dent Res. 1993;72:37-45.
6. Gülhan A, Seymen F, Aykut AY, Güney C: Cam ionomer fissür örtücülerin mutans streptokoklar&na etkisinin de/erlendirilmesi. Pedodonti Klinik/Arat&rma 1994; 1: 1-5.
7. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G: Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro. Swed Dent J. 1991;15:253-8.
8. Horowitz AM: A report on the NIH consensus development conference on diagnosis and management of dental caries throught life [special issue] J Dent Res 2004;83; 7-15.

9. Johnston DW, Lewis DW: Three-year randomized trial of professionally applied topical fluoride gel comparing annual and biannual applications with/without prior prophylaxis. Caries Res. 1995;29:331-6.
10. Kallestal C, Norlund A, Nordenram G, Dahlgren H, Petersson LG, Lagerlöf F, Axelsson S, Lingström P, Mejare I, Holm AK, Twetman S: Economic evaluation of dental caries prevention: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:341-6.
11. Koch G, Hatibovic-Kofman S: Glass ionomer cements as a fluoride release system in vivo. Swed Dent J 1990; 14:267-70.
12. Lingström P, Holm AK, Mejare I, Twetman S, Söder B, Norlund A, Axelsson S, Lagerlöf F: Dietary factors in the caries prevention:a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:331-40.
13. Mass E, Eli I, Lev-Dor-Samovici B, Weiss EI: Continuous effect of pit and fissure sealing on S. mutans presence in situ. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21:164-8.
14. Marsh PD: Dental plaque: biological significance of a biofilm and community life-style. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 ;32 Suppl 6:54-6.
15. Mejare I, Lingström P, Petersson LG, Holm AK, Twetman S, Kallestal C, Nordenram G, Lagerlöf F, Söder B, Norlund A, Axelsson S, Dahlgren H: Caries preventive effect of fissure sealent: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:321-30.
16. Morphis TL, Toumba KJ, Lygidakis NA: Fluoride pit and fissure sealants: a review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2000;10:90-8.
17. Omatsu H, Shimokobe H, Kawakami S, Yoshimura M: Caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer sealent reapplication: Study presents three-year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125: 543-9.
18. Petersen PE: The world oral health report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century – the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health programme. Com Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31:3-24
19. Ripa LW. Rinses for the control of dental caries. Int Dent J. 1992 ;42(4 Suppl 1):263-9.
20. Selwitz RH, Nowjack-Raymer R, Driscoll WS, Li SH: Evaluation after 4 years of the combined use of fluoride and dental sealants. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995;23:30-5.
21. Simonsen RJ: Glass ionomer as fissure sealant--a critical review. J Public Health Dent. 1996;56(3 Spec No):146-9
22. Songpaisan Y, Bratthall D, Phantumvanit P, Somridhivej Y: Effects of glass ionomer cement, resin-based pit and fissure sealant and HF applications on occlusal caries in a developing country field trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995;23:25-9.
23. Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Clark HE: Long term F release from glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1984; 63:158-60.
24. Wei SH, Yiu CK: Mouthrinses: recent clinical findings and implications for use. Int Dent J. 1993;43(6 Suppl 1):541-7