INTRAORAL PORCELAIN REPAIR SYSTEMS

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

AĞIZ iÇi PORSELEN TAMiR SİSTEMLERİ

Öz

Sabit protetik rehabilitasyonda metal destekli porselen restorasyonlar günümüzde yayg n bir ekilde kullan lmaktad r. Porselenin estetik ve biyouyumluluk gibi avantajlar n n yan s ra, k r lgan bir malzeme olmas en büyük dezavantaj d r. Porselen k r 8 nda tedavi seçeneklerinden biri olarak restorasyonun a8 z d tamiri dü ünülse de, bu zaman al c ve pahal bir yöntemdir. Özellikle çok üyeli köprülerde protezin yerinden ç kar lmas s ras nda destek di lerde ve protezde meydana gelebilecek komplikasyonlar, restorasyonun a8 z içi tamirini daha konservatif bir yakla mgetirmektedir. Porselen yap m a8 z içinde gerçekle tirilemedi8inden alternatif tamir materyali olarak kompozitler kullan lmaktad r. Kompozitin, k r lma sonucu aç 8a ç km yüzeye ba ar l bir ekilde ba8lanmas için öncelikle uygun bir yüzey haz rl 8 yap lmal d r. Kompozitin porselen-metal yüzeyine ba8lanmas nda, elmas frezle pürüzlendirme, air abrazyon, asitle pürüzlendirme ve silika kaplama gibi mekanik ba8lanma yöntemleriyle birlikte, silan, metal primer ve bonding gibi kimyasal ajanlar da kullan l r. Porselen tamirinin ba ar s hizmet süresinin uzunlu8una ve optimum estetik sa8lanmas na ba8l d r

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Porselen tamiri, yüzey i lemleri, kompozit

Kaynakça

1. Özcan M, Niedermier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15(3): 299-302.
2. Phoenix RD, Shen C. Characterization of treated porcelain surfaces via dynamic contact angle analysis. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 187–194.
3. Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerdind TM, Barkmeier WW Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 6–11. 1. Özcan M, Niedermier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15(3): 299-302. 2. Phoenix RD, Shen C. Characterization of treated porcelain surfaces via dynamic contact angle analysis. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 187–194.
4. Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerdind TM, Barkmeier WW Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 6–11.
5. Creugers NHC, Snoek PA, Kayser AF. An experimental porcelain repair system evaluated under controlled clinical conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 724–727.
6. O’Brien WJ. Dental Materials and Their Selection. 2 ed Quintessence, Chicago,1997: 1–13, 43, 79–90, 99, 287.
7. Mc Lean JW. The Science and Art of Dental Ceramics. Volum I. Quintessence, Chicago, 1979: 23.
8. Margeas RC. Salvaging a porcelain- fused to metal bridge with intraoral ceramic repair. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002; 23(10): 952-956.

9. Diaz-Arnold AM, Schneider RL, Aquilino SA. Bond strength of intraoral porcelain repair materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 305-309.
10. Llobell A, Nicholls JI, Kois JC, Daly CH. Fatigue life of porcelain repair systems. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5: 205–213.
11. Denehy G, Bouschlicher M, Vargos M. Intraoral repair of cosmetic restorations. Dental Clinics of North America 1998; 42(4): 719-737.
12. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 508–513.
13. Bertolotti RL. A new polymer glass utilized for modification and repair of fixed partial dentures. Quintessence International 1997; 28(7): 437-439.
14. Roulet JF, Degrange M. Adhesion the Silent Revolution in Dentistry, 2000, Germany, p 81-92.
15. Haselton DR, Diaz- Arnold AM, Dunne JT. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86(5): 526-531.
16. Bertolotti RL, Lacy AM, Watanabe LG. Adhesive monomers for porcelain repair. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2: 483–489.
17. Chung K, Hwang Y. Bonding strength of porcelain repair system with various surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 267–274.
18. Frankenberger R, Kramer N. Repair srengths of etched vs silica-coated metal –ceramic and allceramic restorations. Operative Dentistry 2000; 25: 209-215.
19. Matsumura H, Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Shear bond strengt of resin composite veneering material to gold alloy with varying metal surface preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 315-319.
20. Wolf DM, Power JM, O’Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 158–161.
21. Lacy AM, Laluz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60: 288–291.
22. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on the bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthodont 1994; 72: 355–359.
23. Robbins JW. Intraoral repair of the fractured porcelain restoration. Operative Dentistry 1998; 23: 203-207.
24. Gürel G. Porselen Laminat Venerler Bilim ve Sanat. 1. bask, Quintessence Yaynclk, Wstanbul, 2004: 115-131.
25. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dental Materials 2003; 19: 725-731.
26. Attia A, Kern M. Fracture strength of all- ceramic crown luted using two bonding methods. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 247-252.
27. Tylka DF, Stewart GP. Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for porcelain- composite repair. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 121-127.
28. Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 119-124.
29. Pameijer CH, Louw NP, Fischer D. Repairing Fractured Porcelain: How surface preparation affects shear force resistance. JADA 1996; 127(2): 203-209.
30. Oh W, Shen C. Effect of surface topography on the bond sterngth of a composite to three different types of ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 241246. Atatürk Üniv. Di Hek. Fak. Derg. Cilt: 16, Say: 1, Yl: 2006, Sayfa: 34-40
31. Shen C, Oh W, Williams JR. Effect of postsilanization drying on the bond strength of composite to ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 453-458.
32. Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluating of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite to porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 119–124.
33. Wood DP, Jordan RE, Way DC, Galil KA. Bonding porcelain and gold. Am J Orthod 1986; 89( 3 ): 194–205.
34. Özden AN, Akaltan F, Can G. Effect of surface treatment of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual cured cement. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 85–88.
35. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torress TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1991; 4: 17–23.
36. Hayakawa T, Horie K, Aida m, Kanaya H, Kobayashi T, Murata Y. The influence of surface conditions and silane agents on the bond of resin to dental porcelain. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 238–240.
37. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 250-7.
38. Jardel V, Degrande M, Picard B, Derrien G. Correlation of topography to bond strength of etched ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 59–64
39. Tarozzo LSA, Mattos MGC, Ribeiro RF, Semprini M. Comparison of retentive systems for composites used as alternatives to porcelain in fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89(6): 572-578.
40. Hooshmand T, Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dental Materials 2002; 18: 179-188.
41. Newburg R, Pameijer CH. Composite resins bonded to porcelain with silane solutions. J Am Assoc 1978; 96: 288–291.
42. Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelaincomposite interface microleakage with various porcelain surface treatments. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 118–123ÇAPA, ÖZKURT, KAZAZO,LU
43. Antoniadou M, Kern M, Sturb JR. Effect of a new metal primer on the bond strength between a resin cement and two high-noble alloys. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84 (5): 554-560.
44. Ohkubo C, Kono H, Tanaka Y, Watanabe I. Shear bond strength of resin composite to magnetic Fe-Pt alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93(5): 478-482.
45. Suliman AA, Swift EJ, Perdiago J. Effect of surface treatment and bonding agent on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1993;
46. Knight JS, Sneed WD, Wilson MC. Strength of composite bonded to base metal alloy using dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 149153.
47. Gregory WA, Hagen CA, Powers JM. Composite resin repair of porcelain using different bonding materials. Oper Dent 1988; 13: 114–118.
48. Aida M, Hayakawa T, Mzukawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 464–470.