MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH TEST AND EFFECTING FACTORS OF THE TEST RESULTS

Öz

One of the most important criteria for clinical success with composite restorative materials is the effectiveness and durability of the bonded interface. Development adhesive restorative materials provide an effective bond to dental tissue and, consequently, offering successful restorative treatment. The main challenge for dental adhesives is to provide an equally effective bond to two hard tissues of different nature. Bonding to enamel is now considered a durable, while bonding to dentin has been inconsistent. Originally, one of the key advantages of the microtensile bond strength test is the possibility to test different types of tooth tissue. Additionally, there are a lot of advantages of microtensile bond testing including, conservation of teeth, evaluation of regional bond strengths possible, more uniform loading, conductive to comprehensive examination of research question on same sample. However several factor effect of the finding of microtensile bond strength test like specimen fixation method to gripping device, mechanical properties of the adhesive and the adherents tested, or specimen shape. Different results could be obtained with any change in these testing variables. The aim of this rewiev was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength test method, different specimen geometries and the current studies that evaluate of the bond strength of dentin bonding agents using this method

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Microtensile bond strength test, dentin bonding agent, adhesion

MİKROGERİLİM BAĞLANMA DAYANIM TESTİ VE SONUÇLARINI ETKİLEYEN ETKENLER

Öz

Kompozit restorasyonların klinik başarısını etkileyen en önemli faktör, bağlayıcı ara yüzeyin sağlamlığı ve sürekliliğidir. Adeziv diş hekimliğindeki gelişmeler ile birlikte, diş dokularına etkin bağlanma sağlanmış ve bunun sonucunda restoratif tedavinin başarısı elde edilmiştir. Günümüz adeziv sisteleri ile yaşanan esas zorluk, mine ve dentin gibi iki farklı dokuya bağlanmanın tam olarak sağlanabilmesidir. Dentin dokusuna bağlanma, mineye kıyasla daha karmaşıktır ve birçok faktörden etkilenir. Mikrogerilim bağlanma testlerinin avantajı ise bu farklılıkların tek bir diş ile ölçülebilmesidir. Buna ilaveten mikrogerilim bağlanma testi birçok avantaja sahiptir. Tek bir diş ile verimli bir çalışma yapılabilmesi, dişlerin bölgesel farklılıklarının bağlanma dayanım değerleri üzerindeki etkisinin incelenebilmesi, çekme testi esnasında eşit kuvvet dağılımının daha fazla sağlanması ve tek bir örnek ile araştırmacılara kapsamlı bir çalışma imkânı sunması bunlardan bazılarıdır. Bununla birlikte bağlanma dayanım sonuçları birçok faktörden etkilenir. Hazırlanan örneklerin mikrogerilim test aparatına yerleştirilmesi, bağlayıcı ve dişin mekanik özellikleri, hazırlanan örneklerin şekli gibi birçok etken bağlanma dayanım değerleri üzerinde etkilidir. Bu makalede mikrogerilim bağlanma test metodu, farklı örnek hazırlama metotları, test sonuçlarını etkileyen faktörler ve bu test metodu kullanılarak bağlayıcı sistemlerin bağlanma direncini inceleyen güncel çalışmalar derlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mikrogerilim bağlanma testi, dentin bonding ajan, adezyon

Kaynakça

1. Tagami J, Nikaido T, Nakjima M, Shimada Y. Relationship between bond strength tests and other in vitro phenomena. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 94-9.
2. Perdigao J. Dentin bonding-Variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 24-7.
3. Meerbeek BV, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Ende AV, Neves A, Munck JD. Relationship between bond strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 100-21.
4. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL, Kimmes NS, Lata MA, Wilwerding TM. Effect of enamel etching time on roughness and bond strength. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 217-22.
5. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 212- 21.
6. Munck JD, Landuyt KV, Peumans M,Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Meerbeek BV. A critical review of durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-32.
7. Yazıcı AR, Çelik Ç, Özgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. Bond strength of different adhesive systems to dental hard tissues. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 166-72.
8. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a microtensile test. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 236-40.

9. Proença JP, Polido M, Osorio E, Carolina M, Erhardt G, Aguilera FS, Godoy FG, Osorio R, Toledano M. Dentin regional bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1542-8.
10. Armstrong SR, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LHA, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of micro bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 50-62.
11. Ogata M, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Effect of dentin primer application on regional bond stregth to cercival wedge-shaped cavity walls. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 81-8.
12. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentin location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine. J Dent 1999; 27: 265-74.
13. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 299-309.
14. Munck JD, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer. Europ J Oral Sci 2005; 113: 77-82.
15. Guzman-Armstrong S, Armstrong SR, Qian F. Relationship microtensile bond strength at the resin-dentin interface. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 60-6. and
16. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the diffrent test methods: A critical literature review. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 78-93.
17. Salz U, Bock T. Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to dental hard tissue A Review. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 343-71.
18. Ghassemieh E. Evaluation of sources of uncertainties in microtensile bond strength of dental adhesive system for different specimen geometries. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 536-47.
19. Armstrong SR, Geradeli S, Maia R, Raposo LHA, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion in dentistry- analyzing bond strength test methods, variables and outcomes. Adhesion to tooth structure : a critical review of ‘micro’ test methods. Academy of Dent MaterAnnual Meeting- Portland, Oregon, USA; October 29-31, 2009.
20. Betamar N, Cardew G, Van Noort R. Influence of specimen designs on the microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 59-168.
21. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Couthino E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Critical analysis of the influence of different parameters on the microtensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. J Adhesiv Dent 2008; 10: 7- 16.
22. Eckert GJ, Platt JA. A statistical evaluation of microtensile bond strength methodology for dental adhesives. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 385-91.
23. Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Kuboki T. Bonding effectiveness of two contemporary self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Dent 2009; 37: 872-83.
24. Cho BH, Dickens SH. Effects of the acentone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 107-15.
25. Ceballos L, Camejo DG, Fuentesa MV, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch and self- etching adhesives to caries-affected dentine. J Dent 2003; 31: 469-77.
26. Ciucchi B. Bonding characteristics of resin composite restorations on dentin Class II cavity walls, in vitro (thesis). Geneva: University of Genava, Switzerland; 1997.
27. Gamborgi GP, Loguercio AD, Resi A. Influence of enamel border and regional variabilty on durability of resin-dentin bonds. J Dent 2007; 35: 371-6.
28. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 898-905.
29. Armstrong S, Jessop J, Vargas M, Zou Y, Qian F, Campbell J. Effects of exogenous collagenase and cholesterol esterase on the durability of the resin- dentin bond. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 151-60.
30. Loguercio AD, Uceda-Gomez N, Carrilho MR, Reis A. Inluence of specimen size and regional variation on long-term resin-dentin strength. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 224-31.
31. Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobb DS. Microtensile bond strength of self- etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhesiv Dent 2002; 4: 115-24.
32. Reis A, Moura K, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, de Andrade AM, Loguercio AD. Durability of enamel bonding using one-step self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 181-91.
33. Stamatacos-Mercer C, Hottel TL. The validity of reported tensile bond strength utilizing non- standardized specimen surface areas. An analysis of in vitro studies. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 105-8.
34. Hashimoto M, De Munck J, Ito S, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H. In vitro effect of nanoleakage expression on resin-dentin bond strengths analyzed by microtensile bond test, SEM/EDX and TEM. Biomater 2004; 25: 5565-74.
35. Spencer P, Wieliczka DM. A Reviw of the chemical and dentin/adhesive interface. Racent Res Dev Appl Spectrosc 1999; 2: 183-93. of the
36. Sadek FT, Goracci C, Cardoso PEC, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 297-302.
37. Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 59-84.
38. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995; 11; 117-25.
39. Cantoro A, Goracci C, Carvalho CA, Coniglio I, Ferrari M. Bonding potential of self-adhesive luting agents used at different temperatures to lute composite onlays. J Dent 2009; 37: 454-61.
40. Schilke R, Lisson JA, Bauss O, Geurtsen W. Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45: 355–61.
41. Reis AF, Giannini M, Kavaguchi A, Soares CJ, Line SR. Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcine teeth. J Adhes Dent 2004; 6: 117–21.
42. Zimmerli B, De Munck J, Lussi A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Long-term bonding to eroded dentin requires superficial bur preparation. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 1451-61.
43. Karan K, Yao X, Xu C, Wang Y. Chemical profile of the dentin substrate in non-carious cercival lesions. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1205-12.
44. Tay FR, Kwong SM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Yip HK, Moulding KM, Pashley DH. Bonding of a self- etching primer to non-carious cervical sclerotic dentin: interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile bond strength evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2: 9-28.
45. Xie C, Han Y, Zhao XY, Wang ZY, He HM. Microtensile bond strength of one and two step self-etching adhesives on sclerotic dentin: the effects of thermocycling. Oper Dent. 2010; 35: 547-55.
46. Tsai YL, Nakajima M, Wang CY, Foxton RM, Lin CP, Tagami J. Influence of etching ability of one-step self-etch adhesives on bonding to sound and non- carious cervical sclerotic dentin. Dent Mater J 2011; 30: 941–7.
47. Kwong SM, Cheung GSP, Kei LH, Itthagarun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 359-69.
48. Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J, Nishitani Y, Yamada T, Itou K. Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 556-60.
49. Nakajima M, Ogata M, Okuda M, Tagami J, Sano H, Pashley DH. Bonding to caries-affected dentin using self-etching primers. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 309-14.
50. Scholtanus JD, Purwanta K, Doğan N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of three simplified adhesives systems to caries-affected dentin. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12; 273-8.
51. Zanchi CH, D’Avila OP, Rodrigues-Junior SA, Burnett Jr LH, Demarco FF, Pinto MB. Effect of additional acid etching on bond strength and structural reliability adhesive systems applied to caries-affected dentin. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12; 109-15.
52. Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Torii Y, Nishitani Y, Doi J, Itou K. Resin adhesion to carious dentin. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 47-52.
53. Ünlü N, Çetin AR, Cebe MA, Gönlüm Ö. Güncel self etch ve total etch adeziv sistemlerin çürükten etkilenmiş dentine bağlanma dayanımları. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.2010;20:162-9.
54. Dishman MV, Covey DA, Baughan LW. The effect of peroxide bleaching on composite to enamel bond strength. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 33-6.
55. Sung EC, Chan SM, Mito R, Caputo AA. Effect o carbamide peroxide bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite to dental bonding agent enhanced enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 595- 9.
56. Torneck CD, Titley KC, Smith DC, Adibfar A. The influence of time of hydrogen peroxide exposure on the adhesion of composite resin to bleached bovine enamel. J Endo 1990; 16: 123-8.
57. Cadenaro M, Breschi L, Antoniolli F, Mazzoni A, Di Lenarda R. Influence of whitening on the degree of conversion of dental adhesives on dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2006; 114: 257-62.
58. Leonetti ES, Rodrigues JA, Reis AF, Navarro RS, Aranha AC, Cassoni A. Microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin treated with Er:YAG laser of bleached teeth. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 31-8.
59. Cavalli V, Liporoni PC, Rego MA, Berger SB, Giannini M. Influence of fluoride-containing adhesives and bleaching agents on enamel bond strength. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26: 536-42.
60. Torres RGC, Caneppele TM, Lazari DMR, Ribeiro CF, Borges AB. Effect of dental surface treatment with Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers on bond strength of resin composite to recently bleached enamel. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 755-60.
61. Perdigao J, Denehy GE, Swift EJ. Effects of chlorhexidine on dentin surfaces and shear bond strengths. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 81-4.
62. Campos EA, Correr GM, Leonardi DP, Barato-Filho F, Gonzaga CC, Zialak JC. Chlorhexidine diminishes the loss of bond strength over time under simulated pulpal pressure and thermo-mechanical stressing. J Dent 2009; 37: 108-14.
63. Campos EA, Correr GM, Leonardi DP, Pizzatto E, Influence Morais concentration on microtensile bond strength of contemporary adhesive systems. Braz Oral Res
64. Mitchem JC, Terkla LG, Gronas DG. Bonding of adhesives resin physiological conditions. Dent Mater 1988; 4: 351- 3. under simulated
65. Retif DH, Wendt SL, Bradley EL, Denys FR. The effect of storage media and duration of storage of extracted teeth on shear bonds strength of Scotchbond 2 / Silux to dentin. Am J Dent 1989; 2: 269-73.
66. Lee JJ, Nettey-Marbell A, Cook A Jr, Pimenta LAF, Leonard R, Ritter AV. Using extracted teeth for research: the effect of storage medium and sterilization on dentin bond strengths. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 1599-603.
67. Brackett WW, Tay FR, Leooney SW, Ito S, Haisch LD, Pashley DH. The effect of subjects age on the microtensile bond strength of a resin and resin- modified glass lonomer adhesive to tooth structure. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 282-6.
68. Tagami J, Nakajima M, Shono T, Takatsu T, Hoshoda H. Effect of aging on dentin bonding. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 145-7.
69. Özer F, Sengun A, Öztürk B, Say EC, Tagami J. Effect of tooth age on microtensile bond strength of two fluoride-releasing bonding agents. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 289-95.
70. Toledano M, Osorio R, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Carlos AOF, Tay FR, Carvalho RM. Microtensile bond strength of several adhesive systems to diffrent dentin depths. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 292-8.
71. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Carvalho RM, Russel CM. Bond strength versus dentine structure: A modelling approach. Archs Oral Biol 1995; 40: 1109-18.
72. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN, Mjor IA. Bonding of all-porcelain crowns: Structural characteristics of the substrate. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 156-64.
73. Proença JP, Polido M, Osorio E, Carolina M, Erhardt G, Aguilera FS, Godoy FG, Osorio R, Toledano M. Dentin regional bond strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1542-8.
74. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM. Regional strength of bonding agents to cercival sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1404-13.
75. Munck JD, Mine A, Cardoso MV, Neves ADA, Landuyt KLV, Poitevin A, Meerbeek BV. Effect of Dentin Location and long term water storage on bonding effectiveness of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater J 2011; 30: 7-13.
76. Yeşilyurt C, Bulucu B, Koyutürk AE. Adeziv sistemlerin derin ve yüzeyel dentine mikrotensile bağlanma dayanımları. İstanbul Üni Diş Hek Fak Der 2007;41:13-20.
77. Cavalcanti AN, Mitsui FH, Lima AF, Mathias P, Marchi GM. Evaluation of dentin hardness and bond strength at different walls of class II preparations. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 183-8.
78. Cavalcanti AN, Mitsui FHO, Ambrosano GMB, Mathias P, Marchi GM. Dentin bonding on different walls of a class II preparation. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 17-23.
79. Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Resin tags do not contribute to dentin adhesion in self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 97-103.
80. do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Michel MD, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Active application improves the bonding performance of self-etch adhesives to dentin. J Dent 2009; 37: 82- 90.
81. Meerbeek BV, Munck JD, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Landuyt KLV, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-35.
82. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1706-15.
83. Perdigao J. New concepts in dental adhesion. Northwest Dent 2000; 79: 29-33.
84. Lodovici E , Reis A, Geraldeli S, Ferracane JL, Ballester RY, Filho LER. Does adhesive thickness affect thermal/load cycling? Oper Dent 2009; 34: 58-64.
85. Chaves P, Giannini M, Ambrosano GM. Influence of smear layer pretreatments on bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4: 191-6.
86. Reis A, Grandi V, Carlotto L, Bortoli G,Patzlaff R,Lourdes M, Loguercio AD. Effect of smear layer thicness and acidity of self-etching solitions on erly and long term bond strength to dentin. J Dent
87. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 296-308.
88. Kenshima S, Reis A, Gomez NU, Tancredo LLF, Filho LER, Nagueira FN, Loguercio AD. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etching adhesive systems on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 117- 26.
89. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 758-67.
90. He Z, Shimada Y, Tagami J. The effects of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in Class I cavities. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 533-8.
91. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restauration. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-9.
92. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996; 75: 871-8.
93. Roulet JF. Marginal integrity: clinical significance. J Dent 1994; 22: 9-22.
94. Shirai K, Munck JD, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suziki K, Shintani H, Meerbeek BV. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 110-24.
95. Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. The influence of water storage and C-factor on the dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 268-76.
96. Marques MSM, Kenshima S, Muench A, Ballester RY, Filho LER. Effect of the c-factor and dentin preparation method in the bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 452-9.
97. Landuyt KLV, Mine A, Munck JD, Countinho E, Peumans M, Jaecques S, Lambrechts P, Meerbeek BV. Technique sensitivity of water-free one-step adhesives. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1258-67.
98. Hiraishi N, Breschi L, Prati C, Ferrari M, Tagami J, King NM. Technique sensitivity associated with air- drying of HEMA-free, single-bottle,one-step self- etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 498-505.
99. Silva ALF, Lima DANL, Souza GMD, Santos CTD, Paulillo LAMS. Influence of additional adhesive aplication on the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 562-8.
100. Reis A, Cardoso P, Vieira L, Baratieri L, Grande R,
101. Loguercio AD. Effect of prolonged applicatin
102. times on the durability of resin-dentin bonds.
103. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 639-44.
104. Elkassas D, Taher HA, Elsahn N, Hafez R, El
105. Badrawy W. Effect of the number of applicaitons
106. of acetone-based adhesives on microtensile bond
107. strength and the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 688-96.
108. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of
109. contemporary self-etching adhesives Part II:
110. etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001 ;17: 430-44.
111. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Cardoso PEC,
112. Ferrari M. Influence of substrate, shape, and
113. thickness on microtensile specimens structural
114. integrity and their measured bond strengths.
115. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 643-54.
116. Bouillaguet S, Ciucchi B, Jacoby T, Wataha JC,
117. Pashley D. Bonding characteristics to dentin walls
118. of Class II cavities, in vitro. Dent Mater 2001; 17:316-21.
119. Ermiş RB. Kullanılan test araçlarının mikrogerilme
120. bağlanma dayanımı ölçümlerindeki etkisinin
121. değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Diş Hek Fak Derg 2008; 32:94-102.
122. Yoshida E, Uno S, Noasaka Y, Kaga M, Hirano S.
123. Relationship between water status in dentin and
124. interfacial morphology in all-in-one adhesives.
125. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 556-60.
126. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi
127. L, Carvalho RM, Ito S. Collagen degradation by
128. host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 216-21.
129. Spencer P, Wang Y. Adhesive phase separation
130. at the dentin interface under wet bonding
131. conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 62: 447- 56.
132. Yiu CKY, King NM, Pashley DH, Suc BI,. Carvalho
133. RM, Carrilho MRO, Tay FR. Effect of resin
134. hydrophilicity and water storage on resin
135. strength. Biomater 2004; 25: 5789-96.
136. Sadek FT, Castellan CS, Braga RR, Mai S, Leo T,
137. Pashley DH, Tay FR. One year stability of resin
138. dentin bonds created with a hydrophobic
139. ethanol-wet bonding technique. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 380-6.
140. Burrow MF, Harada N, Kitasako Y, Nikaido T,
141. Tagami J. Seven-year dentin bond strengths of a
142. total- and self-etch system. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113: 265-70.
143. Torkabadi S, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, Foxton RM,
144. Tagami J. Bonding durabilty of HEMA-free and
145. HEMA containing one-step adhesives to dentine
146. surrounded by bonded enamel. J Dent 2008; 36: 80-6.
147. Hashimoto M, Fujita S, Kaga M, Yawaka Y. In
148. vitro durability of one-bottle resin adhesives
149. bonded to dentin. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 677- 86.
150. Osorio R, Proenca JP, Erhardt MCG, Osorio E,
151. Aguilera F, Tay FR, Toledano M. Resistance of
152. ten contemporary adhesives to resin-dentine
153. bond degradation. J Dent 2008; 36: 163-9.
154. Kiyomura M. Bonding strength to bovine dentin
155. with 4 META/ MMA-TBB resin: Long term stability
156. and influence of water. J Jpn Dent Mater 1987; 6: 860-72.
157. Abdalla Al, El Zohairy AA, Aboushelib MM, Felizer
158. AJ. Inluence of thermal and mechanical load
159. cycling on the microtensile bond strength of self
160. etching adhesives. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 250-4.
161. Asaka Y, Yamaguchi K, Inage H, Takamizawa T,
162. Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Kuroda T, Miyazaki M.
163. Effect of thermal cycling on bond strengths of
164. single-step self-etch adhesives to bovine dentin.
165. J Oral Sci 2006; 48: 63-9.
166. Asaka Y, Amano S, Rikuta A, Kurokawa H,
167. Miyazaki M, Platt JA and Moore BK. Influence of
168. thermal cycling on dentin bond strengths of
169. single-step self-etch adhesive systems. Oper
170. Dent 2007; 32: 73-8.
171. Akın GE, Hergüner-Siso Ş, Akın H. Termal siklus
172. ve suda bekletmenin kendinden asitli adezivlerin
173. dentine mikrogerilim bağlanma dayanımları
174. üzerine etkileri. J Dent Fac Atatürk Üni 2012; 22: 125-31.
175. Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, De Munck J,
176. Nagakane K, Suziki K, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B.
177. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded
178. to dentin. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 1160-4.
179. Watanabe LG, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ.
180. Variables influence on shear bond strength
181. testing to dentin. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry
182. 3rd International Kuraray Symposium,1999; 75- 90.
183. Leloup G, D’Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M,
184. Vreven J. Meta-analytical review of factors
185. involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 1605–14.