TRAVMAYA UĞRAMIŞ MAKSİLLER SANTRAL KESİCİ DİŞİN YEKPARE POSTKOR-KRON RESTORASYON İLE TEDAVİSİ: OLGU SUNUMU

Öz

Aşırı madde kaybı olan dişlerde komplikasyona neden olmadan uzun süre kullanılabilecek aynı zamanda hastanın estetik ve fonksiyonel ihtiyaçlarını karşılayabilecek bir restorasyonun yapımı özellikle hasarlı diş estetik önceliği olan üst çene ön bölgede ise çok zordur. Bu vakada aşırı harabiyete uğramış üst santral kesici dişin geleneksel tedavilere alternatif bir yöntem ile tedavisi sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Post-kor, aşırı hasarlı dişler

TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT

Öz

Fabricating a restoration which can serve clinically long term without any sign of complication and fulfill the functional and esthetic requirement is very hard to achieve in excessivelly damaged tooth especially when it is in the esthetic zone. The following case report presents an alternate method for the treatment of excessively damaged tooth which can diminish the ability of complication in the traditional treatment modality and as well as can fulfill the esthetic and functional demands of the patient

Anahtar Kelimeler

• post-core, excessively damaged tooth

Kaynakça

1. 1. Robbins JW. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:367-84
2. 2. Makade CS, Meshram GK, Warhadpande M, Patil PG. A comperative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems-an invitro study J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:90-5.
3. 3. Saupe WA, Gluskin HA, Radke RA. A comparative study of fracture resistance between conventional dowel and cores and a resin reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996: 27;483-91.
4. 4. Pontius O, Hutter JW. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems and endodontically treated teeth incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement. J Endodon 2002;28:710-5.
5. 5. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:10-92.
6. 6. Pollington S. Novel Glass-ceramics for dental restorations.J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12:60-7.
7. 7. Neiva G, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Resistance of fracture of three all ceramic systems. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:60–6
8. 8. Kato H, Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Bond strength and durability of porcelain bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:163–8

9. 9. Dilmener FT, Sipahi C, Dalkiz M. Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:130-6.
10. 10. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J 2011;5:77-83.
11. 11. Rasimick BJ, Wan J, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. A review of failure modes in teeth restored with adhesively luted endodontic dowels. J Prosthodont 2010;19:639-46
12. 12. Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G, Karbhari V. Monoblocks in root canals: a finite elemental stress analysis study. Int Endod J 2011;44:817-26.
13. 13. Köroğlu A, Ekren O, Kurtoglu C. Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak 2012;:205-16