COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS

Öz

 Purpose: The present study evaluated fiber post bond strength in root dentin using various root canal sealers and resin cements.

Material and Methods: After root canal preparation, teeth were divided into 5 distinct groups [(Sealapex (calcium hydroxide-based); AH Plus (resin-based); Tubli-Seal (eugenol-based); BC Sealer (bioceramic-based) and No Sealer (control)] according to root canal sealer used. After root filling, post space preparations were done. Five main groups were sub-divided into 3 groups (self-etch, etch-and-rinse, and self-adhesive) corresponding to the resin systems applied. After post cementation, 3 slices were obtained from different regions (coronal, middle, apical) for push-out testing. SEM images of specimens were obtained to evaluate for debonding failures. Differences in bond strength were evaluated by ANOVA and Post-hoc Tukey HSD methods.

Results: It was observed that in Tubli-Seal, BC Sealer and Sealapex groups the bond strength was significantly decreased (p < 0.01). No significant difference (p > 0.05) in bond strength values was observed between the AH Plus and control groups. It was also observed that the bond strength values were similar (p >0.05) in different resin cement systems.

Conclusion: Root canal sealers affect bond strength between fiber posts and the root canal dentin, whereas different resin cement systems have no effect on the bond strengths.

Keywords: Bond strength; fiber post; push-out; resin cement; root canal sealer

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bond strength; fiber post; push-out; resin cement; root canal sealer

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS

Öz

Purpose: The present study evaluated fiber post bond strength in root dentin using various root canal sealers and resin cements.

Material and Methods: After root canal preparation, teeth were divided into 5 distinct groups [(Sealapex (calcium hydroxide-based); AH Plus (resin-based); Tubli-Seal (eugenol-based); BC Sealer (bioceramic-based) and No Sealer (control)] according to root canal sealer used. After root filling, post space preparations were done. Five main groups were sub-divided into 3 groups (self-etch, etch-and-rinse, and self-adhesive) corresponding to the resin systems applied. After post cementation, 3 slices were obtained from different regions (coronal, middle, apical) for push-out testing. SEM images of specimens were obtained to evaluate for debonding failures. Differences in bond strength were evaluated by ANOVA and Post-hoc Tukey HSD methods.

Results: It was observed that in Tubli-Seal, BC Sealer and Sealapex groups the bond strength was significantly decreased (p < 0.01). No significant difference (p > 0.05) in bond strength values was observed between the AH Plus and control groups. It was also observed that the bond strength values were similar (p >0.05) in different resin cement systems.

Conclusion: Root canal sealers affect bond strength between fiber posts and the root canal dentin, whereas different resin cement systems have no effect on the bond strengths.

Keywords: Bond strength; fiber post; push-out; resin cement; root canal sealer.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• bağlanma dayanımı; fiber post; kök kanal patı; push-out; rezin siman

Kaynakça

1. Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent1996; 75: 375-80.
2. Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation. J Endod 1991; 17: 338-42.
3. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-8.
4. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod2004; 30: 289-301.
5. Solomon CS, Osman YI. Aesthetic restoration of the compromised root: a case report. SADJ 2003; 58: 370, 373-6, 381.
6. Kıvanç BH. Application of posts in endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2006; 18-23.
7. Purton DG, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of carbon fibre versus stainless steel root canal posts. Int Endod J 1996; 29: 262-5.
8. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive and photoelastic properties of two prefabricated endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 488-94.

9. Qualtrough AJ, Chandler NP, Purton DG. A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts. Quintessence Int2003; 34: 199-201.
10. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 400-5.
11. Kurtz JS, Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS, Bowles WR. Bond strengths of tooth-colored posts, effect of sealer, dentin adhesive, and root region. Am J Dent 2003; 16 Spec No: 31A-36A.
12. Demiryurek EO, Kulunk S, Yuksel G, Sarac D, Bulucu B. Effects of three canal sealers on bond strength of a fiber post. J Endod 2010; 36: 497- 501.
13. Ahmetoğlu F., Şimşek N., Yıldırım G., Polat T. Post materials in restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2014; 24: 153-7.
14. Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Frankenberger R. Is adhesive cementation of endodontic posts necessary? J Endod 2008; 34: 1006-10.
15. Le Bell AM, Tanner J, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Depth of light-initiated polymerization of glass fiber-reinforced composite in a simulated root canal. Int J Prosthodont2003; 16: 403-8.
16. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005; 31: 584-9.
17. Rathke A, Haj-Omer D, Muche R, Haller B. Effectiveness of bonding fiber posts to root canals and composite core build-ups. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 604-10.
18. Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Chieffi N, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116: 557-63.
19. Dimitrouli M, Gunay H, Geurtsen W, Luhrs AK. Push-out strength of fiber posts depending on the type of root canal filling and resin cement. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 15: 273-81.
20. Cecchin D, Farina AP, Souza MA, Carlini-Junior B, Ferraz CC. Effect of root canal sealers on bond strength of fibreglass posts cemented with self- adhesive resin cements. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 314-20.
21. Cecchin D, Farina AP, Souza MA, Pereira Cda C. Effect of root-canal sealer on the bond strength of fiberglass post to root dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2011; 69: 95-100.
22. Davis ST, O'Connell BC. The effect of two root canal sealers on the retentive strength of glass fibre endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 468-73.
23. Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Effect of three root canal sealers on the retentive strength of endodontic posts luted with a resin cement. Int Endod J2002; 35: 372-8.
24. Ozcan E, Capar ID, Cetin AR, Tuncdemir AR, Aydinbelge HA. The effect of calcium silicate-based sealer on the push-out bond strength of fibre posts. Aust Dent J 2012; 57: 166-70.
25. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 752-8.
26. Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC, Tay F, Ferrari M. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 353-61.
27. Goracci C, Grandini S, Bossu M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: a review. J Dent 2007; 35: 827-35.
28. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent1999; 1: 57-67.
29. Baldissara P, Zicari F, Valandro LF, Scotti R. Effect of root canal treatments on quartz fiber posts bonding to root dentin. J Endod2006; 32: 985-8.
30. Teixeira CS, Pasternak-Junior B, Borges AH, Paulino SM, Sousa-Neto MD. Influence of endodontic sealers on the bond strength of carbon fiber posts. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 84: 430-5.
31. Caicedo R, Alongi DJ, Sarkar NK. Treatment- dependent calcium diffusion from two sealers through radicular dentine. Gen Dent 2006; 54: 178-81.
32. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 251-8.
33. Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 326-33.