MICROORGANISM ADHESION ON DENTURE MATERIALS

Öz

Dental prosthetic restorations are applications used for the replacement of missing function and aesthetics in the oral cavity. Dentures, as well as natural teeth and oral tissues, provide a convenient environment for the adhesion of microorganisms. Although the biofilm on fixed and removable denture materials may seem to be harmless due to its location, the consequences might be severe. The aim of this paper is to review the microorganism adhesion and biofilm formation on different denture materials in the light of previous studies

Anahtar Kelimeler

• dental prosthesis, biofilm, bacterial adhesion

DENTAL PROTETİK MATERYALLERE MİKROORGANİZMA TUTUNUMU

Öz

Dental protetik restorasyonlar, ağız içindeki kaybolmuş fonksiyon ve estetiğin yerine konması için yapılan uygulamalardır.  Doğal dişler ve ağız içi doku- larda olduğu gibi protezler de, mikroorganizmaların tutunması için uygun bir ortam sağlamaktadır.  Sabit ve hareketli protez materyalleri üzerinde oluşan biyofilm, konumu nedeniyle zararsız gibi görünse de sonuçları şiddetli olabilmektedir.  Bu derlemenin amacı, farklı protetik materyallerde mikroorganizma tutunumu ve biyofilm oluşumunun, konuyla ilgili yapılan araştırmalar ışığında incelenmesidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• diş protezi, biyofilm, bakteriyel yapışma

Kaynakça

1. Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
2. Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, van der Mei HC. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J Dent Res 2010;89:657-65.
3. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:68-81.
4. Bremer F, Grade S, Kohorst P, Stiesch M. In vivo biofilm formation on different dental ceramics. Quintessence Int 2011;42:565-74.
5. Hannig C, Hannig M. The oral cavity--a key system to understand substratum-dependent bioadhesion on solid surfaces in man. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13:123-39.
6. Kolenbrander PE, Ganeshkumar N, Cassels FJ, Hughes CV. Coaggregation: specific adherence among human oral plaque bacteria. FASEB J 1993;7:406-13.
7. Whittaker CJ, Klier CM, Kolenbrander PE. Mechanisms of adhesion by oral bacteria. Annu Rev MicroBiol 1996;50:513-52.
8. Radford DR, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Denture plaque and adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials in vivo and in vitro. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1999;10:99-116.

9. Nikawa H, Hamada T, Yamamoto T. Denture plaque--past and recent concerns. J Dent 1998;26:299-304.
10. Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm. Caries Res 2004;38:204-11.
11. Coulthwaite L, Verran J Potential pathogenic aspects of denture plaque. Br J Biomed Sci
12. Verran J Malodour in denture wearers: an ill- defined problem. Oral Dis. 2005;11:24-8.
13. Nalbant AD, Kalkanci A, Filiz B, Kustimur S. Effectiveness of different cleaning agents against the colonization of Candida spp and the in vitro detection of the adherence of these yeast cells to denture acrylic surfaces. Yonsei Med J 2008;49:647-54.
14. Bal BT, Yavuzyilmaz H, Yücel M. A pilot study to evaluate the adhesion of oral microorganisms to temporary soft lining materials. J Oral Sci 2008;50:1-8.
15. Theilade E, Budtz-Jİrgensen E, Theilade J Predominant cultivable microflora of plaque on removable dentures in patients with healthy oral mucosa. Arch Oral Biol 1983;28:675-80.
16. Theilade E, Budtz-Jİrgensen E. Predominant cultivable microflora of plaque on removable dentures in patients with denture-induced stomatitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1988;3:8-13.
17. Lewis N, Ready D, Howlett J, Lee D, Cookson B, Wilson M. Culture-dependant detection of MRSA in angular cheilitis. J Dent Res 2006;85(Spec Issue C):Abstract 0401.
18. Teles FR, Teles RP, Sachdeo A, Uzel NG, Song XQ, Torresyap G, Singh M, Papas A, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Comparison of microbial changes in early redeveloping biofilms on natural teeth and dentuRes J Periodontol 2012;83:1139-48.
19. Ramage G, Tomsett K, Wickes BL, López-Ribot JL, Redding SW. Denture stomatitis: a role for Candida biofilms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:53-9.
20. Atay A. Ağız dokularına Candida yapışması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak. Derg 2007;17:46-50.
21. Babaç YG, Nalbant D. Oral kandidoz. TDB Dişhekimi Derg, 2006;Bilimsel ek, 17 Temmuz- Ağustos: 16-21.
22. Elguezabal N, Maza JL, Dorronsoro S, Pontón J Whole saliva has a dual role on the adherence of Candida albicans to poly(methylmetacrylate). Open Dent J 2008;2:1-4.
23. Bamford CV, d'Mello A, Nobbs AH, Dutton LC, Vickerman MM, Jenkinson HF. Streptococcus gordonii modulates Candida albicans biofilm formation through intergeneric communication. Infect Immun. 2009;77:3696-704.
24. Avon SL, Goulet JP, Deslauriers N. Removable acrylic resin disk as a sampling system for the study of denture biofilms in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:32-8.
25. Pereira T, Cury AA, Cenci MS, Rodrigues-Garcia RC. In vitro Candida colonization on acrylic resins and denture liners: influence of surface free energy, roughness, saliva, and adhering bacteria. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:308-10.
26. Radford DR, Sweet SP, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials with different surface finishes. J Dent
27. Chandra J, Patel JD, Li J, Zhou G, Mukherjee PK, McCormick TS, Anderson JM, Ghannoum MA. Modification of surface properties of biomaterials influences the ability of Candida albicans to form biofilms. Appl Environ MicroBiol 2005;71:8795-801.
28. Tari BF, Nalbant D, Dogruman Al F, Kustimur S. Surface roughness and adherence of Candida albicans on soft lining materials as influenced by accelerated aging. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:18-25.
29. Wady AF, Machado AL, Zucolotto V, Zamperini CA, Berni E, Vergani CE. Evaluation of Candida albicans adhesion and biofilm formation on a denture base acrylic resin containing silver nanoparticles. J Appl MicroBiol 2012;112:1163-72.
30. Acosta-Torres LS, Mendieta I, Nuñez-Anita RE, Cajero-Juárez M, Castaño VM. Cytocompatible antifungal nanoparticles for dentuRes Int J Nanomedicine 2012;7:4777-86. containing silver
31. Morgan TD, Wilson M. Anti-adhesive and antibacterial properties of a proprietary denture cleanser. J Appl MicroBiol 2000;89:617-23.
32. Bal BT, Yavuzyılmaz H. Yumuşak astar maddeleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak. Derg 2006;16:53-60.
33. Boscato N, Radavelli A, Faccio D, Loguercio AD. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans on the surface of a soft denture-lining material. Gerodontology. 2009;26:210-3.
34. Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G, Bürgers R. Surface characterization of dental ceramics and initial streptococcal adhesion in vitro. Dent Mater
35. Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:221-7.
36. Kawai K, Urano M, Ebisu S. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:664-7.
37. Wang YN, Wen GJ, Shi B, Pan XH. Adhesion of oral microorganisms on dental porcelain polished and glazed. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003;38:342-4.
38. Scotti R, Zanini Kantorski K, Scotti N, Monaco C, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Early biofilm colonization on polished- and glazed-zirconium ceramic surface. Preliminary 2006;55:493-502. Minerva Stomatol.
39. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Bürgers R, Feilzer AJ, Hahnel S. In vitro adherence of oral streptococci to zirconia core and veneering glass-ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl BioMater 2009;91:257- 63.
40. Poortinga AT, Bos R, Busscher HJ Measurement of charge transfer during bacterial adhesion to an indium tin oxide surface in a parallel plate flow chamber. J Microbiol Methods. 1999;38:183-9.
41. Mei L, van der Mei HC, Ren Y, Norde W, Busscher HJ Poisson analysis of streptococcal bond strengthening on stainless steel with and without a salivary conditioning film. Langmuir 2009; 25: 6227-31.
42. Schmalz G, Garhammer P. Biological interactions of dental cast alloys with oral tissues. Dent Mater 2002;18:396-406.
43. Akca AE, Akca G, Gökce S, Sultan N, Özdemir A. Farklı sabit protetik restorasyon maddelerinde bakteri tutunmasının incelenmesi. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi 2005;47:251-5.
44. Grivet M, Morrier JJ, Benay G, Barsotti O. Effect of hydrophobicity on in vitro streptococcal adhesion to dental alloys. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000;11:637-42.
45. Çölgeçen Ö, Kesim B, Abay S, Topal ES. Dental nikel krom alaşımına uygulanan altın kaplamanın yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve bakteri adezyonuna etkilerinin incelenmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2011;20:217-26.
46. Buergers R, Hahnel S, Reischl U, Mueller R, Rosentritt M, Handel G, Behr M. Streptococcal adhesion to various luting systems and the role of mixing errors. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:139- 45.
47. Orstavik D, Orstavik J Two-hour bacterial colonization of dental luting cements in vivo. Acta Odontol Scand 1981;39:115-23.
48. Kuula H, Könönen E, Lounatmaa K, Konttinen YT, Könönen M. Attachment of oral gram-negative anaerobic rods to a smooth titanium surface: an electron microscopy study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:803-9.
49. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292-6.
50. Salihoglu U, Boynuegri D, Engin D, Duman AN, Gokalp P, Balos K. Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconium oxide and titanium alloys: an in vivo human study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:101-7.
51. Yılmaz HG, Yılmaz SK. Farklı abutment materyallerinin implant çevresi dokuların sağlığına etkileri. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2011;32:69-75.
52. Al-Radha AS, Dymock D, Younes C, O'Sullivan D. Surface properties of titanium and zirconia dental implant materials and their effect on bacterial adhesion. J Dent 2012;40:146-53.