FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠

S. Kutalmış Büyük; Ahmet Karaman; Hüseyin Şimşek

doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.418759

FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; farklı sagittal iskeletsel ilişkiye sahip bireylerde, frontal sinüs morfolojisini postero-anterior sefalometrik radyograflar kullanarak araştırılmasıdır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: 75 bireyden oluşan çalışma çenelerin sagittal iskeletsel ilişkisine göre 3 gruba ayrılmıştır (Sınıf I bireyler; ortalama yaş: 15,14±1,40 yıl, Sınıf II bireyler; ortalama yaş: 15,21±1,77 yıl, Sınıf III bireyler; ortalama yaş: 15,16±1,57 yıl). Frontal sinüsün sağ ve sol maksimum yüksekliği ve genişliği, maksiller genişlik, nazal genişlik, kranial genişlik ve antegonial genişlik parametreleri 75 postero-anterior sefalometrik radyograf üzerinde ölçülmüştür. Veriler bağımsız t, Mann Whitney U, tek yönlü varyans analizi ve Kruskal-Wallis testleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir.

Bulgular: Sağ frontal sinüs yüksekliği, sol frontal sinüs yüksekliği ve genişliği gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık göstermiştir (P<0.05). Ayrıca, Sınıf III bireylerde sağ frontal sinüs genişliği erkeklerde kadınlardan daha geniş bulunmuştur ve bu fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır (P<0.05).

Sonuç: Frontal sinüs boyut parametreleri farklı sagittal iskeletsel çene ilişkisine sahip bireylerde farklılık gösterebildiğinden adli diş hekimliğine farklı bir bakış açısı getirebilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Frontal sinüs, iskeletsel maloklüzyon, postero-anterior sefalometrik radyograf

EVALUATION OF FRONTAL SINUS DIMENSION IN DIFFERENT SAGITTAL SKELETAL RELATIONSHIP OF PEDIATRIC ORTHODONTIC SUBJECTS

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this present study was to investigate frontal sinus morphology in different sagittal skeletal relationship subjects by using postero-anterior cephalometric radiographs.

Materials and Methods: The study sample consisted of 75 subjects divided into three according to their jaw sagittal skeletal relationship groups (Class I subjects; mean age: 15.14±1.40 years, Class II subjects; mean age: 15.21±1.77 years, Class III subjects; mean age: 15.16±1.57 years). The right and left maximum height and width of the frontal sinus, maxillary width, nasal width, cranial width, antegonial width parameters were measured in 75 postero-anterior cephalometric radiographs. The data were analyzed using independent t, Mann Whitney U, one-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results: Right frontal sinus height, left frontal sinus height and width show statistically significant differences among groups (P<0.05). Moreover, right frontal sinus width was larger in males than females in Class III subjects and this difference was statistically (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The frontal sinus dimension parameters may bring a different perspective to forensic dentistry because they may differ in individuals with different sagittal skeletal jaw relationship.

Keywords: Frontal sinus, skeletal malocclusion

Anahtar Kelimeler

Frontal sinüs,iskeletsel maloklüzyon

Kaynakça

1. Kullman L, Eklund E, Grundin R. Value of the frontal sinuses in the identification of the unknown persons. J Forensic Odonstostomatol 1990;8:3-10.
2. Morgan TA, Harris MC. The use of X-rays as an aid to medico-legal investigation. J Forensic Med 1953;1:28-38.
3. Riddick L, Brogdon BG, Lasswell-Hoff J, Delmas B. Radiographic identification of charred human remains through use of the dorsal defect of the patella. J Forensic Sci 1983;28:263-7.
4. Silva RF, Pinto RN, Ferreira GM, Daruge Júnior E. Importance of frontal sinus radiographs for human identification. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 74: 798.
5. Maresh MM. Paranasal sinuses from birth to late adolescence. I. Size of the paranasal sinuses as observed in routine postero-anterior roentgenog- rams. Am J Dis Child 1940;60:55–78.
6. Maresh MM, Washburn AH. Paranasal sinuses from birth to late adolescence. II. Clinical and roentgen- nographic evidence of infection. Am J Dis Child 1940;60:841–61.
7. Odita JC, Akamaguna AI, Ogisi FO, Amu OD, Ugbodaga CI. Pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus in normal and symptomatic children. Pediatr Radiol 1986;16:365–7.
8. Rothwell BR. Principles of dental identification. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:253-70.

9. Tang JP, Hu DY, Jiang FH, Yu XJ. Assessing fo- rensic applications of the frontal sinus in a Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int 2009;183:104-3.
10. Wood RE. Forensic aspects of maxillofacial radiology: Review. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159:47-55.
11. Quatrehomme G, Fronty P, Sapanet M, Grévin G, Bailet P, Ollier A. Identification by frontal sinus pattern in forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Int 1996;83:147-53.
12. Asherson N. Identification by frontal sinus prints. A forensic medical pilot survey. London: Lewis and Co.; 1965.
13. Yoshino M, Miyasaka S, Sato H, Seta S. Classification system of frontal sinus patterns by radiography. Its application to identification of unknown skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int 1987;34:289-99.
14. Kirk NJ, Wood RE, Goldstein M. Skeletal identification using the frontal sinus region: a retrospective study of 39 cases. J Forensic Sci 2002;47:318–23.
15. Reichs KJ. Quantified comparison of frontal sinus patterns by means of computer tomography. Forensic Sci Int 1993;61:141–68.
16. White PS, Robinson JM, Stewart IA, Doyle T: Computerized tomography mini-series: an alternative to standard paranasal sinus radiographs. Aust N Z J Surg 1990;60:25-9.
17. Sanchez Fernandez JM, Anta Escuredo JA, Sanchez Del Rey A, Santaolalla Montoya F: Morphometric study of the paranasal sinuses in normal and pathological conditions. Acta Otolaryngol 2000;120:273-8.
18. Emirzeoglu M, Sahin B, Bilgic S, Celebi M, Uzun A. Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study. Auris Nasus Larynx 2007;34:191-5.
19. Pirner S, Tingelhoff K, Wagner I, Westphal R, Rilk M, Wahl FM, Bootz F,Eichhorn KW. CT-based manual segmentation and evaluation of paranasal sinuses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:507-18.
20. Rubira Bullen IR, Rubira CM, Sarmento VA, Azevedo RA. Frontal sinus size on facial plain radiographs. J Morphol Sci 2010;27:77 81.
21. Harris AM, Wood RE, Nortjé CJ, Thomas CJ. The frontal sinus: Forensic fingerprint? A pilot study. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1987;5:9 15.
22. Nambiar P, Naidu MD, Subramaniam K. Anatomical variability of the frontal sinuses and their application in forensic identification. Clin Anat 1999;12:16 9.
23. Buckland Wright JC. A radiographic examination of frontal sinuses in early British populations. Man 1970;5:512 7.
24. Camargo JR, Daruge E, Prado FB, Caria PHF, Alves MC, Silva RF, Daruge Jr E. The frontal sinus morphology in radiographs of Brazilian subjects: Its forensic importance. Braz J Morphol Sci 2007;24:239 43.
25. Farias PJ, Gonzalez RE. Existing relation between the size of the frontal sinus and the growth stages of skeletal maturation. Rev Odont Mex 2007;11:12 9.
26. Soman BA, Sujatha GP, Lingappa A. Morphometric evaluation of the frontal sinus in relation to age and gender in subjects residing in Davangere, Karnataka. J Forensic Dent Sci 2016;8.
27. Uthman AT, Al Rawi NH, Al Naaimi AS, Tawfeeq AS, Suhail EH. Evaluation of frontal sinus and skull measurements using spiral CT scanning: An aid in unknown person identification. Forensic Sci Int 2010;197:124 7.
28. Perillo L, De Rosa A, Laselli F, d’Apuzzo F, Grassia V, Cappabianca S. Comparison between rapid and mixed maxillary expansion through an assessment of dento-skeletal effects on posteroanterior cephalometry. Prog Orthod 2014;15:46.
29. Said OT, Rossouw PE, Fishman LS, Feng C. Relationship between anterior occlusion and frontal sinus size. Angle Orthod 2017;87:752-758. 30. Tai B, Goonewardene MS, Murray K, Koong B, Islam SM. The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice. Aust Orthod J 2014;30:132-42.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

S. Kutalmış Büyük Bu kişi benim

Ahmet Karaman

Hüseyin Şimşek

Yayımlanma Tarihi

22 Nisan 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

28 Ekim 2016

Kabul Tarihi

12 Ocak 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418759

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA32ZM46BK

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Büyük, S. K., Karaman, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 144-149. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418759

AMA

1.Büyük SK, Karaman A, Şimşek H. FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018;28(2):144-149. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.418759

Chicago

Büyük, S. Kutalmış, Ahmet Karaman, ve Hüseyin Şimşek. 2018. “FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 (2): 144-49. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418759.

EndNote

Büyük SK, Karaman A, Şimşek H (01 Nisan 2018) FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 2 144–149.

IEEE

[1]S. K. Büyük, A. Karaman, ve H. Şimşek, “FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, c. 28, sy 2, ss. 144–149, Nis. 2018, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.418759.

ISNAD

Büyük, S. Kutalmış - Karaman, Ahmet - Şimşek, Hüseyin. “FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28/2 (01 Nisan 2018): 144-149. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418759.

JAMA

1.Büyük SK, Karaman A, Şimşek H. FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018;28:144–149.

MLA

Büyük, S. Kutalmış, vd. “FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 28, sy 2, Nisan 2018, ss. 144-9, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.418759.

Vancouver

1.S. Kutalmış Büyük, Ahmet Karaman, Hüseyin Şimşek. FARKLI SAGİTTAL İSKELETSEL İLİŞKİYE SAHİP PEDİATRİK ORTODONTİK BİREYLERDE FRONTAL SİNÜS BOYUTLARININ İNCELENMESİ≠. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 01 Nisan 2018;28(2):144-9. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.418759

Cited By

Craniofacial parameters and their interrelationships: a comprehensive CBCT analysis of cranial, nasal, mandibular, and maxillary dimensions with sinus measurements

Australasian Orthodontic Journal

https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2025-0008