AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS

Adnan Kılınç; Mustafa Gündoğdu; Tuba Aydın; Mehmet Zahit Baş; Ümit Ertaş; Ertunç Dayı

doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.418998

AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS

Öz

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rates of implants placed in alveolar sockets immediately after the extraction of teeth or with a standard approach in normal alveolar bone in periodontally compromised patients.

Material and Methods: In this study, patients who had implant placement both into healed bone after previous extraction and into the alveolar sockets in the same surgical session after extraction of periodontally hopeless teeth that had inadequate attachment and bone loss who could not be treated were selected for inclusion. Implant success, complications, and failures were recorded during follow-up.

Results: Twelve patients (four female and eight male) ranging in age from 27 to 62 years (mean 48.6 years) were studied; the mean duration of follow-up was 27 months (range 18–36 months).. A total of 152 implants were placed (89 in the maxilla, 63 in the mandible). Of these, 83 (54.6%) were placed immediately into alveolar sockets following extraction and 69 (45.4%) into normal alveolar bone. The success rate for all immediately placed implants was 97.6%, and the success rate for all implants placed as non-immediate was 98.6 %.

Conclusion: The study findings show that both imme- diate implant placement and non-immediate implant pla- cement in periodontally compromised patients receiving treatment of implant-supported fixed full or partial prostheses are safe and preferable treatment modalities.

^* Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum

^** Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum

^***Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, Erzurum

Keywords: Immediate dental implant, implant survival, periodontitis, immediate implantation, non-immediate implantation, implant survival, periodontally compromised sites

PERIODONTAL OLARAK PROBLEMLİ HASTALARDA İMMEDİYAT VE STANDART YÖNTEMLERLE YERLEŞTİRİLEN DENTAL İMPLANTLARIN BAŞARISININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

ÖZ

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, periodontal problemli hastalarda diş çekiminin ardından alveoler soketlere immediyat olarak yerleştirilen ya da normal alveoler kemiğe standart yaklaşım ile yerleştirilen implantların başarı oranlarını değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya, hem daha önceden yapılmış diş çekimleri sonrası iyileşmiş kemiklere hem de uygun olmayan ataçman ve kemik kaybı sebebiyle tedavi edilemeyecek olan periodontal açıdan umutsuz dişlerin çekimi ile aynı cerrahi işlemde alveoler soketlere implant yerleştirilen hastalar dahil edilmiştir. Takip süresi boyunca implant başarısı, komplikasyonlar ve kayıplar kaydedilmiştir.

Bulgular: Yaşları 27 ile 62 arasında on iki hasta (4 bayan ve 8 erkek) çalışmaya alınmıştır; ortalama takip süresi 27 aydır (18-36 arası). Toplam 152 implant yerleştirilmiştir ( 89 adet maksillaya, 63 adet mandibulaya). Bunların 83 tanesi (%54,6) diş çekimini takiben immediate olarak ve 69 tanesi (%45,4)normal alveoler kemiğe yerleştirilmiştir. İmmediayat olarak yerleştirilen implantların başarı oranı %97,6 ve immediyat olarak yerleştirilmeyen implantların başarısı %98,6 olarak gösterilmiştir.

Sonuç: Çalışma sonuçları göstermektedir ki; periodontal problemli hastalara hem immediayat hem de immediayat olmayan prosedürlerle yerleştirilen implantlar ile uygulanan implant destekli sabit tam ve bölümlü protezler güvenli ve tercih edilebilir bir tedavi seçeneğidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Acil dental implant, İmplant sağkalımı, İmmediayat implantasyon, implant sağkalımı, periodontal problemli bölge

Anahtar Kelimeler

Immediate dental implant,implant survival,periodontitis,immediate implantation,non-immediate implantation

Kaynakça

1. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A: Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977; 16:1-132.
2. Chrcanovic BR, Martins MD, Wennerberg A: Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17 Suppl 1:e1-e16.
3. Casap N, Zeltser C, Wexler A, Tarazi E, Zeltser R: Immediate placement of dental implants into debrided infected dentoalveolar sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65:384-92.
4. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, d'Archivio D, di Placido G, Tumini V, Piattelli A: Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol 2001; 72:1560-71.
5. Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A: Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:189-99.
6. Lee CT, Chiu TS, Chuang SK, Tarnow D, Stoupel J: Alterations of the bone dimension following immediate implant placement into extraction socket: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2014; 41:914-26.
7. Lang NP, Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M: A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth--implant-supported FPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:643-53.
8. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M: A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15:667-76.

9. Altintas NY, Taskesen F, Bagis B, Baltacioglu E, Cezairli B, Senel FC: Immediate implant placement in fresh sockets versus implant placement in healed bone for full-arch fixed prostheses with conventional loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45:226-31.
10. Schwartz-Arad D, Laviv A, Levin L: Survival of immediately provisionalized dental implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets. J Periodontol 2007; 78:219-23.
11. Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Bragger U, Hammerle CH, Lang NP: Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14:329-39.
12. Matarasso S, Rasperini G, Iorio Siciliano V, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Aglietta M: A 10-year retrospective analysis of radiographic bone-level changes of implants supporting single-unit crowns in periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:898-903.
13. Mengel R, Schroder T, Flores-de-Jacoby L: Osseointegrated implants in patients treated for generalized chronic periodontitis and generalized aggressive periodontitis: 3- and 5-year results of a prospective long-term study. J Periodontol 2001; 72:977-89.
14. Leonhardt A, Grondahl K, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U: Long-term follow-up of osseointegrated titanium implants using clinical, radiographic and microbiological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13:127-32.
15. Klokkevold PR, Han TJ: How do smoking, diabetes, and periodontitis affect outcomes of implant treatment? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22 Suppl:173-202.
16. Jiang BQ, Lan J, Huang HY, Liang J, Ma XN, Huo LD, Xu X: A clinical study on the effectiveness of implant supported dental restoration in patients with chronic periodontal diseases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42:256-9.
17. Barzilay I: Immediate implants: their current status. Int J Prosthodont 1993, 6:169-75.
18. Becker W, Becker BE: Guided tissue regeneration for implants placed into extraction sockets and for implant dehiscences: surgical techniques and case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1990; 10:376-91.
19. Werbitt MJ, Goldberg PV: The immediate implant: bone preservation and bone regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992; 12:206-17.
20. Wagenberg B, Froum SJ: A retrospective study of 1925 consecutively placed immediate implants from 1988 to 2004. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:71-80.
21. Alves CC, Correia AR, Neves M: Immediate implants and immediate loading in periodontally compromised patients-a 3-year prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010; 30:447-55.
22. Villa R, Rangert B: Early loading of interforaminal implants immediately installed after extraction of teeth presenting endodontic and periodontal lesions. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7 Suppl 1:S28-35.
23. Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, Bragger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE: 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:839-51.
24. Evian CI, Emling R, Rosenberg ES, Waasdorp JA, Halpern W, Shah S, Garcia M: Retrospective analysis of implant survival and the influence of periodontal disease and immediate placement on long-term results.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:393-8.
25. Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Peled M, Machtei EE: Immediate and delayed restoration of dental implants in periodontally susceptible patients: 1-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22:423-9.
26. Rabel A, Kohler SG: [Microbiological study on the prognosis of immediate implant and periodontal disease]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2006; 10:7-13.
27. Meltzer AM: Immediate implant placement and restoration in infected sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012; 32:e169-73.
28. Villa R, Rangert B: Immediate and early function of implants placed in extraction sockets of maxillary infected teeth: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97:96-108.
29. Bruschi GB, Crespi R, Cappare P, Bravi F, Bruschi E, Gherlone E: Localized management of sinus floor technique for implant placement in fresh molar sockets. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15:243-50.
30. Zinser MJ, Randelzhofer P, Kuiper L, Zoller JE, De Lange GL: The predictors of implant failure after maxillary sinus floor augmentation and reconstruction: a retrospective study of 1045 consecutive implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 115:571-82

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Adnan Kılınç

Mustafa Gündoğdu

Tuba Aydın Bu kişi benim

Mehmet Zahit Baş Bu kişi benim

Ümit Ertaş Bu kişi benim

Ertunç Dayı Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

22 Nisan 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Ocak 2017

Kabul Tarihi

7 Haziran 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418998

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA85WT67TX

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kılınç, A., Gündoğdu, M., Aydın, T., Baş, M. Z., Ertaş, Ü., & Dayı, E. (2018). AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 216-221. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418998

AMA

1.Kılınç A, Gündoğdu M, Aydın T, Baş MZ, Ertaş Ü, Dayı E. AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018;28(2):216-221. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.418998

Chicago

Kılınç, Adnan, Mustafa Gündoğdu, Tuba Aydın, Mehmet Zahit Baş, Ümit Ertaş, ve Ertunç Dayı. 2018. “AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 (2): 216-21. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418998.

EndNote

Kılınç A, Gündoğdu M, Aydın T, Baş MZ, Ertaş Ü, Dayı E (01 Nisan 2018) AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 2 216–221.

IEEE

[1]A. Kılınç, M. Gündoğdu, T. Aydın, M. Z. Baş, Ü. Ertaş, ve E. Dayı, “AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, c. 28, sy 2, ss. 216–221, Nis. 2018, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.418998.

ISNAD

Kılınç, Adnan - Gündoğdu, Mustafa - Aydın, Tuba - Baş, Mehmet Zahit - Ertaş, Ümit - Dayı, Ertunç. “AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28/2 (01 Nisan 2018): 216-221. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418998.

JAMA

1.Kılınç A, Gündoğdu M, Aydın T, Baş MZ, Ertaş Ü, Dayı E. AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018;28:216–221.

MLA

Kılınç, Adnan, vd. “AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 28, sy 2, Nisan 2018, ss. 216-21, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.418998.

Vancouver

1.Adnan Kılınç, Mustafa Gündoğdu, Tuba Aydın, Mehmet Zahit Baş, Ümit Ertaş, Ertunç Dayı. AN ASSESSMENT OF SUCCESS OF DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH IMMEDIATE AND STANDARD METHODS IN PERIODONTALLY COMPROMISED PATIENTS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 01 Nisan 2018;28(2):216-21. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.418998