BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ

Dilara Yürekten; Arzu Pınar Erdem

doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.492657

BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ

Öz

Biyoaktif materyaller; materyal arayüzünde, doku ve materyal arasında bağlantı oluşturacak nitelikte özel bir biyolojik cevap ortaya çıkaran materyallerdir. Geçmişten günümüze tıp ve diş hekimliğinde geniş kullanım alanı bulan biyoaktif materyaller; diş hekimliğinde endodontik materyal, kalıcı restoratif materyal, simantasyon ajanı, hassasiyet giderici materyal, fissür örtücü ve remineralize edici materyaller olarak pek çok alanda kullanılmaktadır. Biyoaktif materyaller restoratif materyal olarak kullanıldıklarında kalsiyum ve fosfat gibi minerallerin salınımını yaparak doğal remineralizasyon sağlamakta, böylece diş yapısını güçlendirmekte ve materyal-diş arayüzünde oluşturduğu hidroksiapatit tabakası ile sızdırmazlığı sağlayarak ikincil çürük oluşumunu elimine edebilmektedirler. Bu makalenin amaçları, estetik özellikleri ve dayanıklılıklarıyla restoratif diş hekimliğinin geleceğinde önemli bir yere sahip olacağı düşünülen biyoaktif materyaller ile geçmişten günümüze yapılan çalışmaları incelemek ve güncel yaklaşımları sunmaktır.

Anahtar kelimeler: Biyouyumlu materyaller, kalsiyum fosfat, kalıcı diş restorasyonları, diş remineralizasyonu

ABSTRACT

Bioactive materials are the materials that elicit a spesific biological respond which provides a connection between the material and tissue at the interface. Bioactive materials which have a been used in medicine and dentistry from past to present, are used in many fields of dentistry as endodontic, permanent restorative, cementation, sensitizing, fissur sealents and remineralizing materials. Using bioactive materials as restorative materials provides a natural remineralisation mechanism which strengthen the tooth structure by releasing calcium and phosphate minerals and the eliminatation of secondary caries by sealing the material-tooth interface with a hydroxyapatite layer. The aims of this article are to investigate the studies from past to present about bioactive materials which are tought to have an important role in restorative dentistry in the future with their properties of endurance and esthetics, and to present the current approaches.

Keywords: Biocompatible materials, calcium phosphate, permanent dental restorations, tooth remineralization

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biyouyumlu materyaller,kalsiyum fosfat,kalıcı diş restorasyonları

Kaynakça

1. Abdelkarim G, Soumaya B, Naima E, Mohammed B, Abdellah H. What is a bioactive compound? A combined definition for a preliminary consensus. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2014;3:174-179.
2. Snehal S, Rucheet P. Bioactive materials in conservative dentistry. Int J of Contemp Dent Medl Rev vol.2015. Article ID 340115,2015. doi: 10.15713/ins.ijcdmr.47
3. Jefferies SR. Bioactive Dental Materials. Inside Dentistry 2016;12:1-3.
4. Hench LL. An Introduction to Bioceramics. 2 ed. Singapore;World Scientific: 1993. p.7-8.
5. Greenspan DC, Zhong JP, Latorre GP. Effect of surface area to volume ratio on in vitro surface reactions of bioactive glass particulates. Bioceramics 1994;7:28-35.
6. Gerhardt LC, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Materials 2010;3:3867–3910.
7. Siriphannon P, Kameshima Y, Yasumori A, Okada K, Hayashi S. Formation of hydroxyapatite on CaSiO3 powders in simulated body fluid. J Eur Ceram Soc 2002;22:511-520.
8. Jefferies SR. Bioactive and biomimetic restorative materials: a comprehensive review partI. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:14-26.

9. Mehta AB, Kumari V, Jose R, Izadikhah V. Remineralization potential of bioactive glass and casein phosphopeptideamorphous calcium phosphate on initial carious lesion: An in-vitro pH-cycling study. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:3-7.
10. Zhong Y, Liu J, Li X, Yin W, He T, Hu D, Liao Y, Yao X, Wang Y. Effect of a novel bioactive glass-ceramic on dentinal tubule occlusion: An in vitro study. Aust Dent J 2014;60:96-103.
11. Yang SY, Kwon JS, Kim KN, Kim KM. Enamel surface with pit and fissur sealent containing 45S5 bioactive glass. J Dent Res 2016; 95:550-557.
12. Cakan EF, Eren MM, Günal Ş. Restoratif diş hekimliğinde biyoaktif materyaller. Turkiye Klinikleri J Restor Dent-Special Topics 2018;4:46-52.
13. Caluwé TD, Vercruysse CWJ, Declercq HA, Schaubroeck D, Verbeeck RMH, Martens LC. Bioactivity and biocompatibility of two fluoride containing bioactive glasses for dental applications. Dent Mater 2016;32:1414–1428.
14. Kamitakahara MK, Tadashi K, Takashi N. Effect of polyacrilic acid on apatite formation of a bioactive ceramic in a stimulated body fluid: fundamental examination of the possibility to obtaining bioactive glass-ionomer cements for orthopaedic use. Biomaterials 2001;22:3191-6.
15. Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Donly K, Flaitz C. Fluoride-releasing restorative materials and secondary caries. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:229–45.
16. Randall RC, Wilson NH. Glass-ionomerrestoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment eﬀect. J Dent Res 1999;78:628–37.
17. Caluwé TD, Vercruysse CWJ, Ladik I, Convents R, Declercq H, Martens LC, Verbeeck RM. Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility. Dent Mater 2017;33:186–203.
18. Hench LL. The story of Bioglass. J Mater Sci Med 2006;17:967–78. 19. Maryam K, Fatema K. A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J 2013;10:411–420. 20. Yli-Urpo H, Narhi M. Compound changes and tooth mineralization effects of glass ionomer cements containing bioactive glass (S53P4), an in vivo study. Biomaterials 2005;26:5934-5941.
21. Yli-Urpo H, Lassila LV, Närhi T, Vallittu PK. Compressive strength and surface characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass. Dent Mater 2005;21:201-9.
22. Chatzistavrou X, Velamakanni S, DiRenzo K, Leflelidou A, Fenno JC, Kasuga T, Boccaccini AR, Papagerakis P. Designing dental composites with bioactive and bactericidal properties. Mater Sci Eng C 2015;52:267-272.
23. Drummond JL. Degradation, fatigue and failure of resin dental composite materials. J Dent Res 2008;87:710-719.
24. Takashaki Y, Imazato S, Russell RRB, Noiri Y, Ebisu S. Influence of resin monomers on growth of oral streptococci. J Dent Res 2004;83:302-306.
25. Spencer P, Ye Q, Misra A, Goncalves SEP, Laurence JS. Protheins, Pathogens and Faliure at the Composite-Tooth Interface. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 1243-294
26. Khvostenko D, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Mitchell JC, Kruzic JJ. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations. Dent Mater 2016;32:73–81.
27. Jain P, Kaul R, Saha S, Sakar S. Smart materials-making pediatric dentistry bio-smart. Int J Pedod Rehabil 2017;2:55-9.
28. Cooper GPR, Cassidy N, Nor JE, Sloan AJ, Smith AJ. The effection of calcium hydroxide on solubilisation of bioactive dentine matrix components. Biomaterials 2006;27:2865-2873.
29. Tomson PL, Grover IM, Lumley PJ, Sloan AJ, Smith AJ, Cooper PR. Dissolution of bioactive dentin matrix components by mineral trioxide aggregate. J Dent 2007;35:636-642.
30. Forsback AP, Areva S, Salonen JI. Mineralization of dentin induced by treatment with bioactive glass S53P4 in vitro. Acta Odontol 2004;62:14-20.
31. Duarte MA, Martins CS, de Oliveira Cardoso Demarchi AC, de Godoy LF, Kuga MC, Yamashita JC. Calcium and hydroxide release from different pulp capping materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:66–9.
32. Melo MAS, Weir MD, Rodrigues LKA, Xu HKK. Novel calcium phosphate nonocomposite with caries-inhibition in a human in situ model. Dent Mater 2013;29:231–40;
33. Davis HB, Gwinner F, Mitchell JC, Ferracane JL. Ion release from, and fluoride recharge of a composite with a fluoride-containing bioactive glass. Dent Mater 2014;30:1187–1194.
34. Skrtic D, Hailer AW, Takagi S, Antonucci JM, Eanes ED. Quantitative assessment of the efficacy of amorphous calcium phosphate/methacrylate composites in remineralizing caries-like lesions artificially produced in bovine enamel. J Dent Res 1996;75:1679-86.
35. Xu HHK, Moreau JL. Dental glass-reinforced composite for caries inhibiton:Calcium Phosphate ion release and mechanical properties. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 92:332-340.
36. Cheng L, Zhang K, Zhang N, Melo MAS, Weir MD, Zhou XD, Bai YX, Reynolds MA, Xu HHK. Developing a new generation of antimicrobial and bioactive dental resins. J Dent Res 2017;96:855-863.
37. Zhang K, Cheng L, Weir MD, Bai YX, Xu HH. Effects of quaternary ammonium chain length on the antimicrobial and remineralizing effects of a calcium phospate nonacomposite. Int J Oral Sci 2016;8:45-53.
38. Zhang N, Ma J,Melo MA, Weir MD, Bai Y, Xu HH. Protein-repellent and antibacterial dental composite to inhibit biofilms and caries. J Dent 2015;43:225-234.
39. Melo MA, Orrego S, Weir MD, Xu HH, Arola DD. Designing multiagent dental materials for enhanced resistance to biofilm damage at the bonded interface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016;8:11779-11787.
40. Zhang N, Weir MD, Chen C, Melo MA, Bai Y, Xu HH. Ortodontic cement with protein repellent antimicrobial properties and release pf calcium and phophate ions. J Dent 2016;50:51-59.
41. Wang L, Xie X, Imazato S, Weir MD, Reynols MA, Xu HH. A protein-repellent and antimicrobial nanocomposite for class V restorations to inhibit periodontitis related pathogens. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016;67:702-710.
42. Spencer P, Ye Q, Park J, Topp EM, Misra A, Marangos O, Wang Y, Bohaty BS, Singh V, Sene F, Eslick J, Camarda K, Katz JL. Adhesive/Dentin Interface: The Weak Link in the Composite Restoration. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:1989-2003.
43. Kumar JS, Jayalakshmi S. Bond failure and its prevention in composite restoration :A review. J Pharm Sci Res 2016;8:627-631.
44. Sauro S, Osorio R, Watson T, Toledano M. Therapeutic effects of novel resin bonding systems containing bioactive glasses on mineral-depletad areas within the bonded-dentine interface. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012;23:1521-1532.
45. Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. A12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in non carious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:526–35.
46. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A5-and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991;22:143–51.
47. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 2012;28:87–101.
48. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitao J, DeRouen TA. Survivaland reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:775–83.
49. Liu Y, Tjäderhane L, Bresche L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res 2011;90:953–68.
50. Ülker HE, Tunçdemir MT, Erkan Aİ, Arslan Malkoç M, Çobanoğlu N. İki self-etch bonding sistemin biyouyumlulukların ve bağlanma dayanımlarının değerlendirilmesi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2014;24:44-49.
51. Abuna G, Feitosa VP, Correr AB, Cama G, Giannini M, Sinhoreti MA, Pashley DH, Sauro S. Bonding performance of experimental bioactive/biomimetic self-etch adhesives doped with calcium-phospate fillers and biomimetic analogs of phosphoproteins. J Dent 2016;52:79-86.
52. Sauro S, Osorio R, Watson TF, Tolenado M. Inluence of phosphoproteins’ biomimetic analogs on remineralization of mineral depleted resin-dentin interfaces created with ion-releasing resin based systems. Dent Mater 2015;31:759-777.
53. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Maruo Y, Sano H, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Bacterial adhesion not inhibited by ion-releasing bioactive glass filler. Dent Mater 2017;33:723–734.
54. Chow LC. Calcium phospate cements:Chemistry, properties and applications. Mater Res Symp Proc 2000;599:27-37.
55. Korkut E, Gezgin O, Tulumbacı F, Özer H, Şener Y. Biyoaktif Rezin Modifiye Cam İyonomer Simanın Mekanik Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırmalı Değerlendirilmesi. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2017;38:170-175.
56. Chen S, Cai Y, Engqvist H, Xia W. Enhanced of glass ionomer cement by incorporating calcium silicates. Biomatter 2016;1:1123842.
57. Oral O, Lassila LV, Kumbuloglu O, Vallittu PK. Bioactive glass particulate filler composite: Effect of coupling of fillers and filler loading on some physical properties. Dent Mater 2014;30:570–577.
58. Goldberg M, Kulkarni AB, Young M, Boskey A. Dentin: structure, composition and mineralization. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2011;3:711-35.
59. Choi JY, Lee HH, Kim HW. Bioactive sol–gel glass added ionomer cement for the regeneration of tooth structure. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2008;19:3287–3294.
60. Salehi S, Gwinner F, Mitchell JC, Pfeifer C, Ferracane JL. Cytotoxicity of resin composites containing bioactive glass fillers. Dent Mater 2015;31:195–203.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Diş Hekimliği

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Dilara Yürekten Bu kişi benim

Arzu Pınar Erdem Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Nisan 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

26 Haziran 2018

Kabul Tarihi

5 Aralık 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.492657

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA44LM84AH

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Yürekten, D., & Erdem, A. P. (2020). BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 337-345. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.492657

AMA

1.Yürekten D, Erdem AP. BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2020;30(2):337-345. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.492657

Chicago

Yürekten, Dilara, ve Arzu Pınar Erdem. 2020. “BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 30 (2): 337-45. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.492657.

EndNote

Yürekten D, Erdem AP (01 Nisan 2020) BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 30 2 337–345.

IEEE

[1]D. Yürekten ve A. P. Erdem, “BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, c. 30, sy 2, ss. 337–345, Nis. 2020, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.492657.

ISNAD

Yürekten, Dilara - Erdem, Arzu Pınar. “BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 30/2 (01 Nisan 2020): 337-345. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.492657.

JAMA

1.Yürekten D, Erdem AP. BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2020;30:337–345.

MLA

Yürekten, Dilara, ve Arzu Pınar Erdem. “BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 30, sy 2, Nisan 2020, ss. 337-45, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.492657.

Vancouver

1.Dilara Yürekten, Arzu Pınar Erdem. BİYOAKTİVİTENİN RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDEKİ ÖNEMİ VE BU KONUDAKİ GÜNCEL ÇALIŞMALARIN DERLENMESİ. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 01 Nisan 2020;30(2):337-45. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.492657

Cited By

EVALUATİON OF ALKALİZİNG POTENTİAL OF ALKASİTE RESTORATİONS PREPARED İN DİFFERENT SİZES

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1061216