DÖRT FARKLI TIP ALVEOLER DEFEKTE SAHIP MAKSILLADA DÖRTLÜ ZIGOMATIK İMPLANT UYGULAMASININ BIYOMEKANIK ETKILERININ DEĞERLENDIRILMESI
Öz
Bulgular: Beş model arasında, kemikte görülen en yüksek Von Mises Stres değeri, tek taraflı kusurlu (1/3 kusurlu) maksillada bulundu. Deformasyon değeri 2/3 kusurlu maksilla modelinde en yüksek bulundu. Asimetrik defekt modellerinde, maksilla'nın sağlam kısmında daha yüksek stres değerleri elde edildi. Simetrik kusurlu modellerde, stresin daha homojen bir şekilde dağıldığı görüldü.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Zigomatik implant, kuad zigoma, maksillar defekt, sonlu elemanlar analizi
Evaluation of Biomechanical Effects of Quad Zigomatic Implant Applications in Four Different Maxillary Defect Types
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical effects of quad zygomatic implant use in four different type alveolar defected maxilla.
Materials and Methods: Three dimensional models of human skull, zygomatic implants, bar attachment and hybrid prosthesis was modeled using SolidWorks Computer-Aided Design (CAD) program. Four different defect locations were modeled on intact model to mimic different alveolar defect scenarios. In all models, four zygomatic implants were placed on maxilla models at the location of first premolar and second premolar tooth, assembly of the modeled parts were completed. The data were processed by ANSYS Workbench software, 150N vertical occlusal and 300N masseteric load were simulated on modeled prosthesis. The Maximum Von Mises Stress in bone/implants and deformations were visualized and comparatively evaluated with color distribution scale.
Conclusion: Cortical bone thickness, defect size and localization are among the factors closely related to the stability and success of the implant.
Keywords: Zygomatic implant, quadrant zygoma, maxillary defect, finite element analysis
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Baqain ZH, Anabtawi M, Kraky M, Malkawi Z. Morbidity from anterior iliac crest bone harvesting for secondary alveolar bone grafting: an outcome assessment study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:570-5.
- 2. Pellegrino G, Tarsitano G, Basile F, Pizzigallo A, Marchetti C. Computer-Aided Rehabilitation of Maxillary Oncological Defects Using Zygomatic Implants: A Defect-Based Classification. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73: 2446 e1-2446 e11.
- 3. Vosselman N, Merema BJ, Schepman KP, Raghoabar GM. Patient-specific sub-periosteal zygoma implant for prosthetic rehabilitation of large maxillary defects after oncological resection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;48:115-117.
- 4. Chigurupati R, Aloor N, Salas R, Schmidt BL. Quality of life after maxillectomy and prosthetic obturator rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:1471-8.
- 5. Devlin H, Barker GR. Prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous patient requiring a partial maxillectomy. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:223-7.
- 6. Akay C, Yalug S. Biomechanical 3-dimensional finite element analysis of obturator protheses retained with zygomatic and dental implants in maxillary defects. Med Sci Monit 2015;21:604-11.
- 7. Block MS, Haggerty CJ, Fisher GR. Nongrafting implant options for restoration of the edentulous maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67(4): 872-81.
- 8. Ömezli MM, Ertaş Ü. Zigoma İmplantları. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Dergi 2015;10:190-195.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
Türkçe
Konular
Diş Hekimliği
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
15 Ekim 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
24 Nisan 2019
Kabul Tarihi
25 Temmuz 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 4