Assesement Of Dental Implant Success And Patıent Profıle: A Retrospectıve Study

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 1 - 8, 01.01.2013

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Abubekir Eltas Dt. Serkan Dündar Yrd. Doç. Dr. İsmail Hakkı Uzun Yrd. Doç. Dr. Meral Arslan Malkoç

Öz

Objective: This study made in 2010-2011 years and Xive Straumann dental implants and implant failure was evaluated on the factors influencing the determination of the profile of patients who have sought to implant. Material and Methods: At 2010-2011 years 79 patients evaluated pose risks of dental implant treatment in the parameters (systemic disease, smoking, implant dimensions, due to loss of teeth, chin implant is placed and thearea, additional surgical procedures), 193 implants were placed. Patients’s clinical and radiographic evaluations were recorded in control sessions. The success rate of implant survival was evaluated as the mouth. Placement date of the implant and the implant’s lost date or time interval between the last control period was considered to be survival of the implant in the mouth. Results: In this study, a total of 193 implants were evaluated in 79 patients. 6 patients fully edentulous, 73 had partial edentulism. 20 patients with partial edentulous had single tooth loss and 19 patients had was more than one tooth loss . In 34 patients had edentulous dentition finite. 50 patients had lost the tooth due to tooth caries and endodontic problems, 28 patients had lost the tooth as a result of periodontal disease occurred in were identified. İn this study the implant loss rate is 2.6%. 4 implants had lost because of the periimplantitis before loading, and 1 had lost after installing. Conclusion: In this study the success rate of implants is 97.4%. Smoking and periodontal disease are important factors affecting the success of the implant.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental implant; survival rate; risk factors.

Dental İmplant Başarısının Ve Hasta Profilinin Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma 2010-2011 yıllarında yapılmış Straumann ve Xive dental implantların implant başarısızlığını etkileyen faktörlere göre değerlendirilmesini ve implant yaptıran hastaların profilinin belirlenmesini amaçladı. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2010-2011 yıllarında 79 hastaya dental implant tedavisi için risk oluşturacak parametreler değerlendirilerek (sistemik hastalık, sigara, implantın boyutları, diş kayıp nedeni, implantın yerleştirildiği çene ve bölge, ilave cerrahi işlemler) 193 implant yerleştirildi. Klinik ve radyografik değerlendirmeler hastaların kontrol seanslarında kaydedildi. İmplant başarısı ağızda kalım oranı olarak değerlendirildi. İmplantın yerleştirilmesi ve son kontrol arası süre veya implantın kaybedildiği zaman aralığı implantın ağızda kalım süresi olarak kabul edildi. Bulgular: Bu çalışmada toplam 79 hastaya yapılan 193 implant değerlendirildi. Hastaların 6’sı tam dişsiz iken, 73’ü kısmi dişsizliğe sahipti. Kısmi dişsiz hastaların 20’sinde tek diş eksikliği, 19’unda dişli sonlanan birden fazla diş eksikliği görüldü. 34 hasta ise dişsiz sonlanan vakalardı. Hasta öykülerinde 50 hastada diş kayıplarının çürük ve endodontik problem nedeniyle, 28 hastada ise periodontal hastalıklar sonucu diş kayıplarının meydana geldiği tespit edildi. Bu çalışmada implant kayıp oranı %2.6’dır. Kaybedilen implantların 4’ü periimplantitis nedeniyle yüklemeden önce kaybedilirken, 1’i yüklemeden sonra implant boyun kırığı nedeniyle kaybedildi. Sonuç: İmplantların başarı oranı %97,4’dür. Sigara ve periodontal hastalık implant başarısını etkileyen önemli faktörlerdendir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental implant, ağızda kalım oranı, risk faktörleri

Kaynakça

• Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J. & Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery1969; 3: 81-100.
• Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP,Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Longterm evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi center study with 2359 implants. . Clin Oral İmpl Res 1997;8: 161-72.
• Petricevic N, Celebic A, Rener-Sitar K. A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions. Gerodontology 2012; 29:e956-63.
• Leite-Cavalcanti A, Menezes SA, Granville-Garcia AF, Correia-Fontes LB. Prevalence of early loss of primary molars: Study retrospective. Acta Sci Health Sci 2008; 30: 139–43.
• Donos N, Laurell L, Mardas N Hierarchical decisions on teeth vs. implants in the periodontitissusceptible patient: the modern dilemma. Periodontology 2000 2012; 59: 89–110.
• Carcuac O, Jansson L. Peri-implantitis in a specialist clinic of periodontology. Clinical features and risk indicators. Swed Dent J 2010; 34: 53–61.
• Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol 2008; Suppl. 8: 292–304.
• Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failurerates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 569-77. Lindeboom JA, Frenken JW, Dubois L, Frank M, Abbink I, Kroon FH. Immediate loading versus immediate provisionalisation of maxillary singletooth replacements: a prospective randomized study with BioComp implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 936-42.
• Alberkston T, Zarb G, Worhington P,Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Galucci GO. Success Criteria in Implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2012;91:242-8. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, Steigmann M, Rebaudi A, Palti A, Pikos MA, Schwartz-Arad D, Choukroun J,Gutierrez-Perez JL, Marenzi G, Valavanis DK. Implant success, survival and failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 5-15.
• Smith RA, Berger R, Dodson TB. Risk factors associated with dental implants in healty and medically compromised patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992:7;367-72.
• Matukas VJ. Medical risk associated with dental impalants. Int J Oral Implantol 1988; 5: 49-50.
• Baqain ZH, Moqbel WY,Sawair FA. Early dental implant failure:risk factors.British Journal Of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery 2012;50:239-43.
• Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Komárek A, Van Steenberghe D. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 610-7.
• Mısch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. Third edition. Mosby Elsevier 2008:421-621.
• Lee JY, Park HJ, Kim JE, Choi YG, Kim YS, Huh JB, Shin SW. A 5-year retrospective clinical study of the Dentium implants. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3: 229Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:27-551.
• Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:721
• Esposito M, Thomsen P, Ericson LE, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Histopathologic observations on late oral implant failures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 18-32.
• Van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R, Desnyder M, Maffei G, Quirynen M. The relative impact of local and endogenous patient-related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 617-22.
• Mombelli A, Cionca N. Systemic diseases affecting osseointegration therapy. Clin Oral Imp Res 2006; Suppl 2: 97–103.
• Palma-Carrió C, Maestre-Ferrín L, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Peñarrocha-Diago M Risk factors associated with early failure of dental implants. A literature review Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16: e514-7.
• Shernoff AF, Colwell JA, Bingham SF. Implants for type II diabetic patients: Interim report. VA Implants in Diabetes Study Group. Implant Dent 1994; 3: 183-5.
• Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Dental implants in the diabetic patient: A retrospective study. Implant Dent 1999; 8: 355-9.
• Javed F, Romanos GE.Review Impact of Diabetes Mellitus and Glycemic Control on the Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Systematic Literature Review .J Periodontol 2009; 80:1719-30.
• Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Komárek A, Van Steenberghe D. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 610-7.
• Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failurerates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20: 569-77.
• Klokkevold PR, Han TJ. How do smoking, diabetes, and periodontitis affect outcomes of implant treatment? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22 Suppl:173–202
• Koldsland OC, Scheie AA, Aass AM. Prevalence of implant loss and the influence of associated factors. J Periodontol 2009;80: 1069–75.
• Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Michiles K, Teughels W, Komárek A, van Steenberghe D. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of failures up to abutment connection with modified surface oral implants. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35:51-7.
• Noguerol B, Muñoz R, Mesa F, de Dios Luna J, O’Valle F. Early implant failure. Prognostic capacity of Periotest: retrospective study of a large sample. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17: 459Bornstein MM, Halbritter S, Harnisch H, Weber HP, Buser D. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: indications, surgical procedures, and early failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 1109-016.
• Hurzeler MB, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Quinones CR. Reconstruction of theseverely resorbed maxilla with dental implants inthe augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation. International Journal of Oral &Maxillofacial Implants 1996;11: 466–75.
• Tong DC, Rioux K, Drangsholt M, Beirne ORA review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using metaanalysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1998;13: 175–82.
• Haas R, Mailath G, Dortbudak O, Watzek G. Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus augmentation: analysis of interfacial bond strength of dental implants using pull-out tests. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1998;9: 117–22.
• Stanford C. Dental implant outcomes may vary in patients with a history of periodontal disease. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010; 10: 46-8.
• Ong CT, Ivanovski S, Needleman IG, Retzepi M, Moles DR,Tonetti MS, Donos N. Systematic review of implant outcomes in treated periodontitis subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 438- 62.
• Kürkçüoğlu I, Köroğlu A, Özkır SE. Dental İmplantlarda Başarı Kriterleri Ve Başarı Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2010; 20: 216-24.
• Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13: 204-11.
• Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10: 303-11.
• Shin SW, Bryant SR, Zarb GA. A retrospective study on the treatment outcome of wide-bodied implants. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 52-8.
• Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89: 352-9. Yazışma Adresi: Yrd. Doc. Dr. Ebubekir ELTAS
• İnönü Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Periodontoloji ABD. Tlf.: 0.422.3411106 e-mail adresi: [e-mail]