BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 2007 Sayı: 2, 1 - 6, 01.02.2007

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ertuğrul Ercan Doç. Dr. Ali Erdemir Yrd. Doç. Dr. Yahya Orçun Zorba Dt. Mehmet Dallı

Öz

Bu çal man namac ;haz rlanan II. s n f kavitelere uygulanan posterior restoratif materyallerin k r lma dayan kl l klar n nde8erlendirilmesidir

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Kitty MY, Stephen HY. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. JADA 1997; 128: 1088-96.
  • Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage. Dent Mater 2004;20:3–11.
  • Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Quagliatto PS, Soares CJ. The influence of the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2007,Bas mda
  • Kahler B, Kotousov A, Borkowski K. On fracture resistance of restored teeth. Key Engineering Materials Vol. 2005;245-51.
  • Y lmaz EÖ, Ulusoy N. Farkl yöntemlerle haz rlanan s n f mikros z nt s n n de8erlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Di Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32;171-80. 6- Nalçac A, Ulusoy N. Farkl
  • polimerizasyon zamanlar n n
  • rezinlerin yüzey sertli8i üzerine etkileri. A.Ü. Di
  • Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32; 79-84 ,
  • Manhart W, Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitable of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132: 639-45.
  • Altun C, Kabalay U, Güven G, Ba ak F, Akbulut E, pediatrik di yöntemlerinin restoratif materyalin polimerizasyon büzülmesi üzerine etkileri. Gülhane T p Derg 2005; 47: 127-31.
  • Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 1991;41:25–32.
  • Ritter AV. Posterior resin-based composite restorations: clinical recommendations for optimal success. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:88–99.
  • Cho L, Song H, Koak J, Heo S. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:388– 95.
  • Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147–53.
  • Koran P, Kürschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998;10: 17- 22.
  • Pyk N, Méjare I, Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate, Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57: 195– 200.
  • Almqusit TC, Cowan RD, Lambert RL. Conservative amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:524-8.
  • Nordbo H, Leirskar J, van der Fehr FR. Saucer- shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: Observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1998;29:5-11.
  • Ellis SG, McCord JF, Burke FJ. Predisposing and contributing factor for complete and incomplete tooth fractures. Dent Update 1999;26: 150-2
  • Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations.J Prosthet Dent 1980;43: 419-22.
  • Houpt M, Fuks A, Eidelman E. Direct bonded Class I Quintessence Int 1994;25:155-9.
  • Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer- shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three-year results.1: J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:155-9.
  • Jinks GM. Fluoride-impregnated cements and their effect on the activity of interproximal caries. J Dent Child 1963;30: 87-92.
  • Tveit AB, Espelid I, Skodje F. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway. Int Dent J 1999;49:165–72.
  • Sundberg H, Mejare I, Espelid I, Tveit AB. Swedish dentists’ decisions on preparation techniques and restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:135–41
  • Wagnild GW, Mueller KI. Restoration of the endodontically treated teeth. Pathways of the Pulp 8th ed. Mosby Inc. St Louis, USA, 2002: 765-795.
  • Reeh ES, Douglass WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1540-4.
  • Gutmann JL The dentin-root complex: Anatomic and biologic coniderations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 458-67.
  • Potashnick SR, Weine FS, Strauss S. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Endodontic Therapy 4th ed. Mosby Inc, St Louis, USA, 1989: 653-98.
  • Hernandez R, Bader S, Boston D, Trope M. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with new generation dentine bonding systems. Int Endod J 1994; 27: 281-4.
  • Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU, Belli S. Farkl restorasyon materyalleri ile restore edilmi endodontik tedavili di lerin k r lma dirençlerinin in vitro incelenmesi. A. Ü. Di Hek Fak Derg 2004;14: 41-9.
  • Lin CL, Chang CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto- mesh finite element approach. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:576–85.
  • Svaördström G. Mini preparationer for dagens kariessituation och material utbud. Odontologi 91. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1991.p. 67-79.
  • Kinomoto Y, Inoue Y, Ebisu S. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Dent. 2004;17:253-6.
  • Horsted-Bindslev P, Heyde-Petersen B, Simonsen P, Baelum V. Tunnel or saucer-shaped restorations: a survival analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9:233-8.
  • Ercan E, Dülgergil ÇT, Y ld r m I, Dall M. Tünel restorasyonlar n daimi di lerdeki ba ar s : 3 y ll k takip çal mas . ADO Klinik Bilimleri Derg. Bas mda
  • Denehy GE, Torney DL. Internal enamel reinforcement through micromechanical bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:171–5.
  • Eakle WS, Staninec M. Effect of bonded gold inlays on fracture resistance of teeth. Quintessence Int 1992;23:421-5.
  • Jagadish S, Yogesh BG. Fracture resistance of teeth with class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations. Oper Dent 1990;15:42-7. Yaz?@ma Adresi: Ertu8rul ERCAN
  • K r kkale Üniversitesi
  • Di Hekimli8i Fakültesi
  • Di Hastal klar ve Tedavisi AD 71200, K r kkale.
  • Tel: 0 3182244927 Faks: 0 3182243618
  • e-mail: ertugrulercan@hotmail.com

FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 2007 Sayı: 2, 1 - 6, 01.02.2007

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ertuğrul Ercan Doç. Dr. Ali Erdemir Yrd. Doç. Dr. Yahya Orçun Zorba Dt. Mehmet Dallı

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fracture resistance posterior composite tunnel restoration conventional class II cavity modified class II cavity (Saucer-shaped cavity)

Kaynakça

  • Kitty MY, Stephen HY. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. JADA 1997; 128: 1088-96.
  • Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage. Dent Mater 2004;20:3–11.
  • Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Quagliatto PS, Soares CJ. The influence of the cavity preparation design on marginal accuracy of laboratory-processed resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2007,Bas mda
  • Kahler B, Kotousov A, Borkowski K. On fracture resistance of restored teeth. Key Engineering Materials Vol. 2005;245-51.
  • Y lmaz EÖ, Ulusoy N. Farkl yöntemlerle haz rlanan s n f mikros z nt s n n de8erlendirilmesi. A.Ü. Di Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32;171-80. 6- Nalçac A, Ulusoy N. Farkl
  • polimerizasyon zamanlar n n
  • rezinlerin yüzey sertli8i üzerine etkileri. A.Ü. Di
  • Hek. Fak. Derg. 2005;32; 79-84 ,
  • Manhart W, Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitable of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132: 639-45.
  • Altun C, Kabalay U, Güven G, Ba ak F, Akbulut E, pediatrik di yöntemlerinin restoratif materyalin polimerizasyon büzülmesi üzerine etkileri. Gülhane T p Derg 2005; 47: 127-31.
  • Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 1991;41:25–32.
  • Ritter AV. Posterior resin-based composite restorations: clinical recommendations for optimal success. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:88–99.
  • Cho L, Song H, Koak J, Heo S. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:388– 95.
  • Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147–53.
  • Koran P, Kürschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998;10: 17- 22.
  • Pyk N, Méjare I, Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate, Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57: 195– 200.
  • Almqusit TC, Cowan RD, Lambert RL. Conservative amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:524-8.
  • Nordbo H, Leirskar J, van der Fehr FR. Saucer- shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: Observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1998;29:5-11.
  • Ellis SG, McCord JF, Burke FJ. Predisposing and contributing factor for complete and incomplete tooth fractures. Dent Update 1999;26: 150-2
  • Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations.J Prosthet Dent 1980;43: 419-22.
  • Houpt M, Fuks A, Eidelman E. Direct bonded Class I Quintessence Int 1994;25:155-9.
  • Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer- shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three-year results.1: J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:155-9.
  • Jinks GM. Fluoride-impregnated cements and their effect on the activity of interproximal caries. J Dent Child 1963;30: 87-92.
  • Tveit AB, Espelid I, Skodje F. Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway. Int Dent J 1999;49:165–72.
  • Sundberg H, Mejare I, Espelid I, Tveit AB. Swedish dentists’ decisions on preparation techniques and restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:135–41
  • Wagnild GW, Mueller KI. Restoration of the endodontically treated teeth. Pathways of the Pulp 8th ed. Mosby Inc. St Louis, USA, 2002: 765-795.
  • Reeh ES, Douglass WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1540-4.
  • Gutmann JL The dentin-root complex: Anatomic and biologic coniderations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 458-67.
  • Potashnick SR, Weine FS, Strauss S. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Endodontic Therapy 4th ed. Mosby Inc, St Louis, USA, 1989: 653-98.
  • Hernandez R, Bader S, Boston D, Trope M. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with new generation dentine bonding systems. Int Endod J 1994; 27: 281-4.
  • Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU, Belli S. Farkl restorasyon materyalleri ile restore edilmi endodontik tedavili di lerin k r lma dirençlerinin in vitro incelenmesi. A. Ü. Di Hek Fak Derg 2004;14: 41-9.
  • Lin CL, Chang CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto- mesh finite element approach. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:576–85.
  • Svaördström G. Mini preparationer for dagens kariessituation och material utbud. Odontologi 91. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1991.p. 67-79.
  • Kinomoto Y, Inoue Y, Ebisu S. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Dent. 2004;17:253-6.
  • Horsted-Bindslev P, Heyde-Petersen B, Simonsen P, Baelum V. Tunnel or saucer-shaped restorations: a survival analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9:233-8.
  • Ercan E, Dülgergil ÇT, Y ld r m I, Dall M. Tünel restorasyonlar n daimi di lerdeki ba ar s : 3 y ll k takip çal mas . ADO Klinik Bilimleri Derg. Bas mda
  • Denehy GE, Torney DL. Internal enamel reinforcement through micromechanical bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:171–5.
  • Eakle WS, Staninec M. Effect of bonded gold inlays on fracture resistance of teeth. Quintessence Int 1992;23:421-5.
  • Jagadish S, Yogesh BG. Fracture resistance of teeth with class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations. Oper Dent 1990;15:42-7. Yaz?@ma Adresi: Ertu8rul ERCAN
  • K r kkale Üniversitesi
  • Di Hekimli8i Fakültesi
  • Di Hastal klar ve Tedavisi AD 71200, K r kkale.
  • Tel: 0 3182244927 Faks: 0 3182243618
  • e-mail: ertugrulercan@hotmail.com
Toplam 44 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ertuğrul Ercan Bu kişi benim

Doç. Dr. Ali Erdemir Bu kişi benim

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Yahya Orçun Zorba Bu kişi benim

Dt. Mehmet Dallı Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Şubat 2007
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2007 Cilt: 2007 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Ercan, Y. D. D. E., Erdemir, D. D. A., Zorba, Y. D. D. Y. O., Dallı, D. M. (2007). FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2007(2), 1-6.
AMA Ercan YDDE, Erdemir DDA, Zorba YDDYO, Dallı DM. FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. Şubat 2007;2007(2):1-6.
Chicago Ercan, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ertuğrul, Doç. Dr. Ali Erdemir, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Yahya Orçun Zorba, ve Dt. Mehmet Dallı. “FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2007, sy. 2 (Şubat 2007): 1-6.
EndNote Ercan YDDE, Erdemir DDA, Zorba YDDYO, Dallı DM (01 Şubat 2007) FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2007 2 1–6.
IEEE Y. D. D. E. Ercan, D. D. A. Erdemir, Y. D. D. Y. O. Zorba, ve D. M. Dallı, “FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, c. 2007, sy. 2, ss. 1–6, 2007.
ISNAD Ercan, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ertuğrul vd. “FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2007/2 (Şubat 2007), 1-6.
JAMA Ercan YDDE, Erdemir DDA, Zorba YDDYO, Dallı DM. FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2007;2007:1–6.
MLA Ercan, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ertuğrul vd. “FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 2007, sy. 2, 2007, ss. 1-6.
Vancouver Ercan YDDE, Erdemir DDA, Zorba YDDYO, Dallı DM. FARKLI TiPTEKi II. SINIF KAViTE DiZAYNI KULLANILAN. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2007;2007(2):1-6.

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.