EFFECTS OF LINGUAL ARCH APPLICATION ON THE DENTO-ALVEOLAR STRUCTURES IN CHIN-CUP TREATMENT

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 2006 Sayı: 2, 1 - 9, 01.02.2006

Yrd. Doç. Dr.ibrahim Yavuz Dr. Nurhan Durna Prof. Dr. Abdulvahit Erdem

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

ÇENELİK TEDAVİSİNDE LİNGUAL ARK UYGULAMASININ DENTO-ALVEOLAR YAPILAR ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Bu çal man n amac iskeletsel S n f III anomaliye sahip bireylerin Çenelik ile tedavisinde Lingual ark uygulamas n n dento-alveolar yap lar üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesidir. Ara t rmam z n materyalini, alt çene prognatisinden kaynaklanan s n f III anomalisine sahip pubertal büyüme at l m henüz ba lamam 30 bireyin lateral sefalometrik filmleri olu turmaktad r. Hastalar n15 tanesine lingual ark ve çenelik uygulan rken, geri kalan 15 hastaya yaln zca çenelik uygulanm t r. Grup içi de;i iklikleri belirlemek için e le tirilmi t testi uygulanm t r. Gruplar aras farkl l klar belirlemek için ise farklar üzerine Student’s t testi uygulanm t r.Her iki uygulamada da büyümenin etkisiyle üst çene öne do;ru hareket ederken alt çenenin a a; ya ve arkaya do;ru rotasyon yapt ; tespit edilmi tir. >ki grubun kar la t r lmas nda ise çenelik grubunda L1-NB ve IMPA aç lar nda azalma oldu;u bu azalman nL1-NB aç s nda 0.05 düzeyinde IMPA da ise 0.001 düzeyinde istatistiksel olarak önemli oldu;u tespit edilmi tir. Sonuçlar iddetli olmayan S n f III vakalarda lingual ark nistenilen iskeletsel düzeltmenin sa;lamas nda faydalolabilece;ini göstermi tir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çenelik, Lingual ark

Kaynakça

• Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB, Turley PK. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:299-309.
• Lee KG, Ryu YK, Park YC, Rudolph DJ. A study of holographic interferometry on the initial reaction of maxillofacial complex during protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:623-32. 3.Ucem TT, Ucuncu N, Yuksel S. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;26:672-9.
• Irie M. Nakmura S. Orthopedic approach to severe skeletal Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1975;67: 377 – 392.
• Deguchi T, Kitsugi A. Stability of changes associated with chin cup treatment. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:139-45.
• Graber L W Chin cup therapy for mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1977;72: 23 – 41.
• Mitani H, Sakamoto T. Chin cap force to a growing mandible. Long-term clinical reports. Angle Orthod. 1984 ;54:93-122.
• Sakamoto T, Iwase I, Uka A, Nakamura S. A roentgenocephalometric study of skeletal changes during and after chin cup treatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:341-50.
• Sugawara J. Asano T, Endo N. Mitani H. Long – term effects of the chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:127 – 133.
• Wendell PD, Nanda R. The effects of chin cup therapy on the mandible: A longitudinal study. Am J Orthod 87: 265 – 74, 1985
• Üner O, Yüksel S. Üçüncü N. Long – term evaluation after chincup treatment. Eur J Orthod 17: 135 – 141, 1995.
• Suzuki W. A cephalometric observation on the effect of the chin cap. J Jpn Orthod Soc 1972;31: 64 – 74.
• Mitani H, Fukazawa H. Effects of chincup force an the timing and amount of mandibular growth associated with anterior reversed occlusion (Class III malocclusion) during puberty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90: 454-63,
• Rittucci R, Nanda R. The effect of chincup therapy on the growth and development of the cranial base and midface. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98: 127 – 33.
• Üçüncü N, Tortop Ücem T, Yüksel S. A comparison of chincup and maxillary portraction appliances in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:43 – 51. 16.Tahmina K, Tanaka E, Tane K. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patient of Class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes. Am J Orthodd Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117.681 – 90.
• Deguchi T, Kuroda T, Minoshima Y, Graber TM. Craniofacial features of patients with Class III abnomalities: growth related changes and effects of short – term and long – term chincup therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:
• Ferro A, Nucci LP. Ferro F. Gallo C. Long – term stability of skeletal Class III patients treated with splints, Class III elastics and chincup. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123: 423 – 34.
• Ko Y, Baek S, Mah J, Yang W. Deteminants of successfiul chincup therapy in skeletal Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;26: 33 – 34.
• Janzen E K, Bluher J A The cephalometric, anatomic and histologic changes in Macaca mulatta after application of a continuous – acting retraction force on the mandible. Am J Orthod 1965;52: 823 – 855.
• Joho J P. The effects of extraoral low – pull traction to the madibular dentition. Macaca mulatta. Am J Orthod 1973;64: 555 – 577.
• Asano T. The effects of mandibular retroactive force on the growing rat mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 90:464–474.
• Williams S, Andersen CE. The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing child. Am J Orthod. 1986;89:302-311. 24.Hwang CI, Suhr CH. A roentgenocephalometric study on the effect of the chin-cap in the skeletal Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod. 1989;19:219-243.
• Susami R. A cephalometric study of dentofacial growth in mandibular prognathism. J Jpn Orthod Soc. 1967;26:1-34.
• Sawa S. Roentgeno-cephalometric study on the dentocraniofacial growth of the individuals with reversed occlusion. Nippon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1978;37:237-268. 27.Sung JH. A clinical consideration on treatment of anterior crossbite in growing children (the effect of chin-cap). Korean J Orthod. 1982;12:117-126
• Lu YC, Tanne K, Hirano Y, Sakuda M. Craniofacial morphology of adolescent mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:277-282.
• Graber LW. The alterability of mandibular growth. In: McNamara JA, ed. Determinants of mandibular form and growth. Monograph no. 4. Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan 1975:229-241.
• Mimura H, Deguchi T. Morphologic adaptation of temporomandibular joint after chincup therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:541-546.
• Carlotti AE, George R. Differential diagnosis and treatment planning of the surgical orthodontic Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1981;79:424436.
• Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biomedical Students. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd; 1940:96–109,122–132.
• Sakamoto T. Effective timing for the application of orthopedic force in the skeletal class III malocclusion.Am J Orthod. 1981;80:411-6.
• Nukatsuka S. The longitudinal study of orthopedic effects caused by chin cup treatment. Tohoku Univ Dent J 1982;1:1-17. 35.Allen RA, Connolly IH, Richardson A. Early treatment of Class III incisor relationship using the chincap appliance.Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:3716.
• Sperry TP, Speidel TM, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW. Differential treatment planning for mandibular prognathism.Am J Orthod. 1977;71:531-41. 37.Ceylan I, Baydas B, Bolukbasi B. Longitudinal cephalometric changes in incisor position, overjet, and overbite between 10 and 14 years of age. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:246-50.
• Arman A, Toygar TU, Hjleh EA. Çenelik ve çenelik+srma pla; uygulamalarnn iskeletsel ve dentoalveoler r etkilerinin karlatrlmasTürk .Ortodonti Dergisi 2005;18:11-25.