A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF RAPID MAXILLARY EXPANSION AND FANTYPE RAPID MAXILLARY EXPANSION ON DENTO-ALVEOLAR STRUCTURES

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 2006 Sayı: 1, 1 - 7, 01.01.2006

Yrd. Doç. Dr. İbrahim Yavuz Arş. Gör. Dt. Nalan Aslan

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

KONVANSİYONEL VE FAN TİPİ HIZLI ÜST ÇENE GENİŞLETMESİNİN DENTOALVEOLER YAPILAR ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz

Bu çal man n amac fan tipi ve konvansiyonel h zlüst çene geni letme apareylerinin (RME) dentoalveoler etkilerinin incelenmesi ve kar la t r lmas d r. Çal man nmateryalini 30 bireyin tedavi öncesi ve sonras lateral, postero anterior sefalometrik radyografileri ile ortodontik modelleri olu turmaktad r. Fan tipi RME grubunu; molarlar aras geni li7i normal olan fakat anterior bölgesi daralm maksillaya sahip 15 birey, konvansiyonel RME grubunu ise tranvers yönde maksiller yetersizli7e sahip posteriorda çapraz kapan olan 15 birey olu turmu tur. Tedavi ile meydana gelen de7i imleri de7erlendirmek için tedavi öncesi ve sonras veriler aras nda E le tirilmi t testi uygulanm t r. Apareylerin dentoalveoler etkilerini kar la t rmak için ise gruplar ntedavi öncesi ve sonras farklar aras nda Student’s t testi yap lm t r. Her iki grupta da üst çenenin, istatistiksel olarak önemli düzeyde a a7 ya ve öne do7ru hareket etti7i tespit edilmi tir. Alt çenenin a a7 ya ve geriye do7ru rotasyon yapt 7 ancak bu de7i ikli7in istatistiksel olarak önemli olmad 7 bulunmu tur. Fan tipi h zl üst çene geni letme apareyi ile üst molarlar aras mesafede ortalama 1,46 mm’lik art olurken kaninler arasmesafede 4,02 mm art n oldu7u, konvansiyonel h zlüst çene geni letme apareyi ile molarlar aras mesafede 7,23 mm’lik art olurken kaninler aras mesafede 2,44 mm’lik art n oldu7u tespit edilmi tir. Bu sonuçlar üst çene ön bölgesindeki daralmay düzeltmede Fan tipi RME apareyinin konvansiyonel h zl üst çene geni letme apareyinden daha iyi oldu7unu göstermi tir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Konvansiyonel RME, Fan tipi RME, Dentoalveoler etki

Kaynakça

• Haas AJ. The treatment of maxillary deficiency by opening the mid-palatal suture. Angle Orthod. 1965; 65:200–217.
• Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod. 1970; 57:219– 255.
• Wertz RA. Skeletal and dental changes accompanying rapid midpalatal suture opening. Am J Orthod. 1970; 58:41–66.
• Harberson VA, Myers DR. Midpalatal suture opening during functional posterior cross-bite correction. Am J Orthod. 1978; 74:310–313.
• McNamara JA Jr, Brudon WL. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Ann Arbor, Mich: Needham Press, Inc; 2001:39–61.
• Lamparski DG, Rinchuse DJ, Close JM, Sciote JJ. Comparison of skeletal and dental changes between 2- point and 4-point rapid palatal expanders. Am J Orthod
• Haas AJ. Rapid expansion of the maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity by opening the midpalatal suture Angle Orthod 1961;31:73-90.
• Biederman W. An hygienic appliance for rapid expansion. J Pract Orthod 1968;2: 67-70.
• Isaacson RJ, Murphy TD. Some effects of rapid maxillary expansion on cleft lip and palate patients. Angle Orthod. 1964; 34: 143–154.
• Bishara SE, Staley RN. Maxillary expansion: clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987; 91: 3–14.
• Ninou S, Stephens C. The early treatment of posterior crossbites: a review of continuing controversies. Dent Update 1994; 21:420–426.
• Petren S, Bondemark L, Soderfeldt B. A systematic review concerning early orthodontic treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 588–596
• Lagravere MO, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Long-Term Dental Arch Changes After Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment: A Systematic Review Angle Orthod 2005;75:155-161
• Krebs A. Midpalatal suture expansion studied by the implant method over a seven-year period Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1964;40:131-142.
• Davis WM, Kronman JH. Anatomical changes induced by splitting the midpalatal suture Angle Orthod 1969;39:126-132.
• Isaacson RJ, Ingram AH. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion: II. Forces present during treatment Angle Orthod 1964;34:261-270.
• Zimring JF, Isaacson RJ. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion: 3. Forces present during retention Angle Orthod 1965;35:178-186.
• Melsen B. A histological study of the influence of sutural morphology and skeletal maturation on rapid palatal expansion in children Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1972;48:499-507.
• Wertz R, Dreskin M. Midpalatal suture opening: a normative study Am J Orthod 1977;71:367-381.
• Silva Filho OG, Villas Boas MC, Capelozza Filho L. Rapid maxillary expansion in the primary and mixed dentitions: a cephalometric evaluation Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:171-181.
• Doruk C,B cakç AA, Ba ciftci FA, Agar U, Babacan H. A Comparison of the Effects of Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Fan-Type Rapid Maxillary Expansion on Dentofacial Structures Angle Orthod 2004;74:184 -194
• Schellino E, Modica R, Benech A, Modaro E. REM: la vite ragno secondo Schellino e Modica. Boll Interm Orthod. Leone. 1996; 55:36–39.
• Levrini L, Filippi V. A fan shaped maxillary expander. J Clin Orthod. 1999;33:642–643.
• Sadeddin A. Cephalometric Evaluation of Anterior Maxillary Expansion [master's thesis]. Istanbul: Marmara University Health Sciences Institute; 2000.
• Zimring JF, Isaacson RJ. Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion. 3. forces present during retention. Angle Orthod 1965;35:178-86.
• Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biomedical Students. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd; 1940:96–109,122–132.
• Akkaya S, Lorenzon S, Uçem TT. A comparison of sagittal and vertical effects between bonded rapid and slow maxillary expansion procedures Eur J Orthod 1999;21:175-180.
• Erverdi N, Sabri A, Küçükkele N. Cephalometric evaluation of Haas and hyrax rapid maxillary appliances in the treatment of the skeletal maxillary transverse deficiency. J Marmara Univ. Dent Faculty. 1993; 1:361– 366.
• Sand kç oglu M, Hazar S. Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:321-327.
• Ba çiftçi FA, Karaman AI. Effects of a modified acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance and vertical chin cap on dentofacial structures. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72:61–71.
• Bayda B, Yavuz H, Aslan N. Fan-Tipi H zl Üst Çene Geni letmesinin Dentoalveoler Yap lar Üzerine Etkilerinin Hncelenmesi. Atatürk Üniv. Di Hek. Fak 2005;15(2):1- 10.
• Bell RA, LeCompte EJ. The effects of maxillary expansion using a quadhelix appliance during the deciduous and mixed dentitions. Am J Orthod. 1981; 79:152–161.
• Timms DJ. A study of basal movement with rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod. 1980; 77:500–507.
• Adkins MD, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Arch perimeter changes on rapid palatal expansion. Am J Orthod Yaz@2ma Adresi:
• Yrd. Doç. Dr. brahim Yavuz
• Atatürk Üniv. Di Hek. Fak.
• Ortodonti A.D. ERZURUM Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
• e-mail: [e-mail]