Aşırı madde kaybı olan dişlerde komplikasyona
neden olmadan uzun süre kullanılabilecek aynı
zamanda hastanın estetik ve fonksiyonel ihtiyaçlarını
karşılayabilecek bir restorasyonun yapımı özellikle
hasarlı diş estetik önceliği olan üst çene ön bölgede ise
çok zordur. Bu vakada aşırı harabiyete uğramış üst
santral kesici dişin geleneksel tedavilere alternatif bir
yöntem ile tedavisi sunulmuştur.
1. Robbins JW. Restoration of the endodontically
treated tooth. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:367-84
2. Makade CS, Meshram GK, Warhadpande M, Patil
PG. A comperative evaluation of fracture resistance
of endodontically treated teeth restored with
different post core systems-an invitro study J Adv
Prosthodont 2011;3:90-5.
3. Saupe WA, Gluskin HA, Radke RA. A comparative
study of fracture resistance between conventional
dowel and cores and a resin reinforced dowel
system in the intraradicular restoration of
structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int
1996: 27;483-91.
4. Pontius O, Hutter JW. Survival rate and fracture
strength of incisors restored with different post
and core systems and endodontically treated teeth
incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement. J
Endodon 2002;28:710-5.
5. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet
Dent 2005;94:10-92.
6. Pollington S. Novel Glass-ceramics for dental
restorations.J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12:60-7.
7. Neiva G, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang
BR. Resistance of fracture of three all ceramic
systems. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:60–6
8. Kato H, Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Bond
strength and durability of porcelain bonding
systems. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:163–8
9. Dilmener FT, Sipahi C, Dalkiz M. Resistance of
three new esthetic post-and-core systems to
compressive loading. J Prosthet Dent.
2006;95:130-6.
10. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post
systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J
2011;5:77-83.
11. Rasimick BJ, Wan J, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. A
review of failure modes in teeth restored with
adhesively luted endodontic dowels. J Prosthodont
2010;19:639-46
12. Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G, Karbhari V.
Monoblocks in root canals: a finite elemental stress
analysis study. Int Endod J 2011;44:817-26.
13. Köroğlu A, Ekren O, Kurtoglu C. Geleneksel ve
adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme
çalışması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak 2012;:205-16
TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT
Fabricating a restoration which can serve clinically long term without any sign of complication and fulfill the functional and esthetic requirement is very hard to achieve in excessivelly damaged tooth especially when it is in the esthetic zone. The following case report presents an alternate method for the treatment of excessively damaged tooth which can diminish the ability of complication in the traditional treatment modality and as well as can fulfill the esthetic and functional demands of the patient
1. Robbins JW. Restoration of the endodontically
treated tooth. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:367-84
2. Makade CS, Meshram GK, Warhadpande M, Patil
PG. A comperative evaluation of fracture resistance
of endodontically treated teeth restored with
different post core systems-an invitro study J Adv
Prosthodont 2011;3:90-5.
3. Saupe WA, Gluskin HA, Radke RA. A comparative
study of fracture resistance between conventional
dowel and cores and a resin reinforced dowel
system in the intraradicular restoration of
structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int
1996: 27;483-91.
4. Pontius O, Hutter JW. Survival rate and fracture
strength of incisors restored with different post
and core systems and endodontically treated teeth
incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement. J
Endodon 2002;28:710-5.
5. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet
Dent 2005;94:10-92.
6. Pollington S. Novel Glass-ceramics for dental
restorations.J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12:60-7.
7. Neiva G, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang
BR. Resistance of fracture of three all ceramic
systems. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:60–6
8. Kato H, Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Bond
strength and durability of porcelain bonding
systems. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:163–8
9. Dilmener FT, Sipahi C, Dalkiz M. Resistance of
three new esthetic post-and-core systems to
compressive loading. J Prosthet Dent.
2006;95:130-6.
10. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post
systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J
2011;5:77-83.
11. Rasimick BJ, Wan J, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. A
review of failure modes in teeth restored with
adhesively luted endodontic dowels. J Prosthodont
2010;19:639-46
12. Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G, Karbhari V.
Monoblocks in root canals: a finite elemental stress
analysis study. Int Endod J 2011;44:817-26.
13. Köroğlu A, Ekren O, Kurtoglu C. Geleneksel ve
adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme
çalışması. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak 2012;:205-16
Ekren, O., & Gürbüz, C. (2015). TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(Supplement 8), 45-48. https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.67862
AMA
Ekren O, Gürbüz C. TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. Şubat 2015;24(Supplement 8):45-48. doi:10.17567/dfd.67862
Chicago
Ekren, Orhun, ve Cihan Gürbüz. “TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 24, sy. Supplement 8 (Şubat 2015): 45-48. https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.67862.
EndNote
Ekren O, Gürbüz C (01 Şubat 2015) TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 24 Supplement 8 45–48.
IEEE
O. Ekren ve C. Gürbüz, “TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, c. 24, sy. Supplement 8, ss. 45–48, 2015, doi: 10.17567/dfd.67862.
ISNAD
Ekren, Orhun - Gürbüz, Cihan. “TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 24/Supplement 8 (Şubat 2015), 45-48. https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.67862.
JAMA
Ekren O, Gürbüz C. TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;24:45–48.
MLA
Ekren, Orhun ve Cihan Gürbüz. “TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 24, sy. Supplement 8, 2015, ss. 45-48, doi:10.17567/dfd.67862.
Vancouver
Ekren O, Gürbüz C. TREATING A TRAUMATISED MAXILLARY CENTRAL INSIZOR WITH MONOBLOCK POST-CORE-CROWN RESTORATION: A CASE REPORT. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;24(Supplement 8):45-8.