DİŞ ETİ PROTEZLERİ

Yıl 2014, 2014: Supplement 9, 20 - 28, 11.02.2015

Umut Çakan Nur Balcı Becen Demir

https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.57826

Öz

Periodontal hastalık, travma, periodontal cerrahi işlemler, diş çekimi ile sert ve yumuşak dokuların diğer hastalıklarına bağlı olarak gingival dokularda kayıp meydana gelir.  Gingival dokuların kaybı sonucu açığa çıkan kök yüzeylerinde, estetik problemlerin yanı sıra hassasiyet, çürük oluşumu, abrazyon, besin birikimi ve fonetik problemler de oluşmaktadır. Bu problemlerin çözümüne yönelik olarak yapılan ve periodontal tedaviye destek veren protez tipine diş eti protezi adı verilir. Doku kayıplarına yönelik olarak, rejeneratif prosedürleri uygulamanın mümkün olmadığı veya sonuçlarının öngörülemediği durumlarda, protetik bakış açısı ile yapılan diş eti protezleri hızlı, basit ve ucuz bir alternatiftir.

Bu vaka serisi ile, diş eti protezlerinin sınıflan- dırılması, endikasyonları ve kontrendikasyonları, protez yapım aşamaları, protez yapımında kullanılan mater- yaller, protezlerin avantaj ve dezavantajlarının ince- lenmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Anahtar kelimeler: Gingival protez, epitez, periodontal tedavi

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gingival protez, epitez, periodontal tedavi

GINGIVAL PROSTHESIS

Öz

Periodontal diseases, trauma, periodontal surgeries or tooth extraction can often lead to periodontal attachment loss which will further cause esthetic and functional clinical problems including caries and abrasion on root surfaces and phonetic problems. In the presence of these problems, gingival prosthesis is an inexpensive and practical option to provide an esthetic and functional outcome where the results of periodontal regenerative techniques could not be predicted. This article presents the indications, contraindications and classification of the gingival prosthesis as well as advantages, disadvantages, technique and materials used for fabrication of a gingival prosthesis

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gingival prosthesis, epithesis, periodontal treatment

Kaynakça

• Towfighi PP, Brunsvold MA, Storey AT, Arnold RM, Willman DE, McMahan CA. Pathologic migration of anterior teeth in patients with moderate to severe periodontitis. J Periodontol 1997;68:967-72.
• Brunsvold MA. Pathologic tooth migration. J Periodontol 2005;76: 859-66.
• Prato GP, Rotundo R, Cortellini P, Tinti C, Azzi R. Interdental papilla management: a review and classification of the therapeutic approaches. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:246-55.
• Wennström JL. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol 1996;1:671-701.
• Friedman MJ. Gingival Masks: A Simple Prosthesis to Improve the Appearance of Teeth. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000;11:1008-16.
• Takel HH. The interdental space. Dent Clin North Am 1980;24:169-76,.
• MacNeill SR. The periodontal aspect of anterior esthetics,. J Int Dent Assoc 1999;45:10-3.
• Serio FG, Strassler HE. Periodontal and other soft tissue considerations in esthetic dentistry. Esthet Dent 1989;6:177-88.
• Cronon RJ, Wardle WL. Loss of anterior interdental tissue: periodontal and prosthodontic solutions. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50: 4504-9.
• Cunliffe J, Pretty I. Patients’ ranking of interdental
• “black triangles” against other common aesthetic problems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2009;17:177-81.
• Korkmaz T, Coşkun A, Yılmaz C. Gingival epitezler. Cumhuriyet Üniv Dişhek Fak Derg 2004;7:68-71.
• Greene PR. The flexible gingival mask: an aesthetic solution in periodontal practice. Br Dent J 1998;11:536–40.
• Starr CB. Management of periodontal tissues for restorative dentistry. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 195· 208.
• Renggli HH, Curilovic Z. The gingival prosthesis. Quintessence Int 1971;2:65-8.
• Tallents RH. Artificial gingival replacements: How to construct,taking into consideration the problems of adaptation, retention, and shade. Oral Health 1983;73:37–40.
• Botha PJ, Gluckman HL. The gingival prosthesis — a literature review. SADJ 1999;54:288–90.
• Blair FM, Thomason JM, Smith DG. The flange prosthesis. Dent Update 1996;23:196–9.
• Mekayarajjananonth T, Sooksuntisakoonchai N, Salinas TJ. The functional and esthetic deficit replaced with an acrylic resin gingival veneer. Quintessence Int 2002;33:91–4.
• Priest GF, Lindke L. Gingival-colored porcelain for implant-supported prostheses in the aesthetic zone. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998; 10: 1231–40.
• Hannon SM, Colvin CJ, Zurek DJ. Selective use of ceramics: gingival-toned Quintessence Int 1994;25:233–8. case reports.
• Brygider RM. Precision attachment-retained gingival veneers for fixed implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:118–22.
• Barzilay I, Irene T. Gingival prostheses—a review. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:74-8.
• Shetty A, Jagtap R. Periodontics a part of cosmetic makeover. Scientific J 2009; Volume I.
• Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:220-5.
• Löe H, Anerud A, Boysen H. The natural history of periodontal disease in man: prevalence, severity, and extent of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1992;63:489-95.
• Tugnait A, Clerehugh V. Gingival recession—its significance and management. J Dent 2001; 29: 381-94.
• Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Cohen RE. Toothbrushing and gingival recession. Int Dent J 2003;53:67-72.
• Rajapakse PS, McCracken GI, Gwynnett E, Steen ND, Guentsch A, Heasman PA. Does tooth brushing progression recession? A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:1046-61. development and
• non-inflammatory gingival
• Azzi R, Etienne D, Carranza F. Surgical reconstruction ofthe interdental papilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:466-73.
• Carnio J. Surgical reconstruction of interdental papilla using an interposed subepithelial connective tissue graft:a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:31-7.
• Risch ]R, White JG, Swenson HM, The esthetic labial gingival prosthesis. J Indian Dent Assoc 1977;56:15-7.
• Gardner FM, Stankewitz CG. Using removable gingival facades with fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:262-4
• Mekayarajjananonth T, Sooksuntisakoonchai N, Salinas TJ. The functional and esthetic deficit replaced with an acrylic resin gingival veneer. Quintessence Int 2002:33:91-4 .
• Zhao X, Cao J, Zhang Y.Clinical application of a kind of flexible gingival epithesis material. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2003; 21:324-6.
• Kapari D, Tsalikis L, Lehmann KM, et al. Changes in the physical properties of Gingivamoll flexible gingival epithesis. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991;46:503- 5.
• Lai YL, Lui HF, Lee SY. In vitro color stability, stain
• resistance, and water sorption of four removable gingival flange materials. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:293-300.
• Müller HP, Flores-de-Jacoby L. The effect of flexible gingival prosthesis on the marginal periodontium and the composition of the subgingival microflora. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1985;40:783-7.
• Vryonis P. Esthetics and function in multiple unit bridges. Quintessence Dent Technol 1981;3:237- 41.
• Schregle M. Firing of gingiva-colored ceramic powders. Quintessence Dent Technol 1981;3:245- 52.
• Siebert JS, Cohen DW. Periodontal considerations in preparation for fixed and removable prostho- dontics. Dent Clin North Am 1987;31: 529-55.
• Yanıkoğlu N. Yumuşak astar maddeleri ve özellikleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2003- 2004;13-14: 55-64.