İMPLANT TEDAVİSİNİN PROGNOZUNU ETKİLEYEN LOKAL RİSK FAKTÖRLERİ

Yıl 2015, Supplement 10, 105 - 111, 21.05.2015

Elif Peker İnci Karaca

https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.86535

Cited By: 2

Öz

Modern Diş Hekimliğinin amacı; stomatognatik sistem atrofisi, hastalıkları ve yaralanmaları gibi durumlarda normal fonksiyon, estetik ve rahatlığı restore etmektir. Estetik bölgelerde implant tedavisi yapılacak vakalarda, risk faktörlerinin tedavi öncesinde dikkatlice değerlendirilmesi ve hastaya özel bazı kısıtlamaların tespiti son derece önemlidir. Bir ya da daha fazla lokal risk faktörünün bulunduğu bazı hastalarda mükemmel bir sonuç alınması her zaman mümkün değildir. Bu derlemede lokal risk faktörlerinin dental implant tedavisinin başarısına olan etkisi değerlendirilmiş ve göz önünde bulundurulması gereken kriterler anlatılmaya çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

diş implantasyonu, risk faktörleri, periodontit

LOCAL RISK FACTORS AFFECTING THE PROGNOSIS IN IMPLANT THERAPY

Öz

The aim of modern dentistry is to restore function, aesthetics and comfort, regardless of the stomotognatik system atrophy, diseases and injuries. Careful evaluation of the risk factors and patientspecific determination of some of the restrictions is extremely important prior to implant treatment in aesthetic areas. In some patients with one or more local risk factor is not always possible to get an excellent result. In this review local risk factors on the success of dental implant treatment were evaluated and it is tried to explain the criteria to be taken into consideration

Anahtar Kelimeler

dental implantology, risk factors, periodontitis

Kaynakça

• Martin W, Lewis E, Nicol A. Local risk factors for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:28-38.
• Esposito M, Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl K. Radiological evaluation of marginal bone loss at tooth surfaces facing single Branemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993;4:151-7.
• Krennmair G, Piehslinger E, Wagner H. Status of teeth adjacent to single-tooth implants. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:524-8.
• Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, Froum S, Magner A, Cho SC, Salama M, Salama H, Garber DA. Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. Journal of Periodontolgy 2003; 74, 1785–
• Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter- implant bone crest. Journal of Periodontology 2000;71, 546-9.
• Lekholm U, Jemt T. Principles for single tooth replacement. In: Albrektsson T, Zarb G (eds). The Branemark Osseointegrated Implant, ed 1. Chicago: Quintessence,1989:117-26.
• Tonetti SM. Determination of the success and failure of root-form osseointegrated dental implants. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13:173-80.
• Malet J, Mora F, Bouchard P. Implant Dentistry at a Glance: Wiley; 2012.
• Zetu L, Wang HL. Management of inter- dental/inter-implant papilla. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 831–9
• Atieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta- analysis. J Periodontol, 2010:81,1350–66
• Palmer RM. Risk management in clinical practice. Dental implants. British Dental Journal 2010; 209:499-506.
• Torabinejad M. Goodacre J. Endodontic or dental implant therapy: The factors affecting treatment planning. JADA 2006;137:973-7.
• Quirynen M, Gijbels F, Jacobs R. An infected jawbone osseointegration. Periodontology 2000; 33:129–44 successful
• Dahlin C, Nikfarid H, Alsen B et al. Apical Peri- implantitis:Possible predisposing factors, case reports and surgical treatment suggestions. Clin Imp Dent and Rel Res 2009; 11:3
• Quirynen M, Vogels R, Alsaadi G, Naert I, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Predisposing conditions for retrograde suggestion. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:599- 608. and treatment
• Kois JC. Predictable single tooth periimplant esthetics. Five diagnostic keys. Compendium Continuing Education Dentistry 2001;22,199–208.
• Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediat implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:73-80
• Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007.
• Bouri A Jr, Bissada N,Al-Xahrani MS,et al. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:323-6.
• Wennström JL, Bengazi F, Lekholm U. The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the peri- implant soft tissue condition. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:1-8.
• Chung DM, Oh TJ,Shotwell JL,et al. Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol 2006;77:1410-20.
• Roos-Jansaker AM, Renvert H, Lindahl C,et al. Nine-to-fourteen-year follow up of implant treatment. Part 3:Factors associated with peri- implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:296- 301.
• Sadig W., Almas K. Risk factors and management of dehiscent wounds in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 2004;13:140-147.
• Wood MR, Vermilyea SG. A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prost Dent. 2004;5:447-62.
• Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl. 1988;3:129-34.
• Baqaina ZH, Moqbelb WY, Sawaira FA. Early dental implant failure: risk factors. Bri J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;3:239-43.
• Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in the type IV bone, a 5 year analysis. J Periodontol. 1991;62:2-4.
• Friberg B, Jemt T, Leckholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants, a study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl. 1988;3:129-34.
• Kourtis S.G., Sotiriadou S, Voliotis S,et al. Private practice results of dental implants. Part 1: Survival and evaluation of risk factors. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 373-85.
• Fugazzotto PA, Wheeler SI, Lindsay JA. Success and failure rates of cylinder implants in type IV bone. J Periodontol 1993;64:1085-7.
• Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Collins TA. The reverse- torque test: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:179-85.
• Snauwaert K, Duyck D, van Steenberghe D. Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses:a 15-year follow-up. Study Clin Oral Invest. 2000;4:13-20.
• Hutton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY. Factors related to success and failure rates at 3 year follow up in an multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:33-42.
• Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M,et al. The effectiveness of immediate, early and conventional loading of dental implants:A cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:893-904.
• Orenstein IH, Tarnow DP, Morris HF,et al. Three- year post-placement survival of implants mobile at placement. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:32-41.
• Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:124-35.
• Mathieua V, Vayrona R, Richardb G, Lambertb G, Nailia S, Meningaudc JP, Haiatd G. Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: Influence of the bone–implant interface properties. Journal of Biomechanics 2014;1:3-13.
• Mesa F., Munoz R., Nogerol B,et al. Multivariate study of factors influencing primary dental implant stability. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 19,2008;196-200.
• Balshi SF, Allen FD, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. A resonance frequency analysis assessment of maxillary and mandibular immediately loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:584-94.
• Turkyılmaz I, Tumer C, Ozbek EN, et al. Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: A clinical study of 230 regular platform implants. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:716- 22.
• Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Komarek A,et al. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34: 610-7.
• Lachmann S, Laval JY, Jäger B, Axmann D, Gomez- Roman G, Groten M, Weber H. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow- up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Feb;17:80-4.
• Ong CT, Ivanovski S, Needleman IG, et al. Systematic review of implant outcomes in treated periodontitis 2008;35:438-62. J Clin Periodontol
• Klokkevold PR, Han TJ. How do smoking, diabetes, and periodontitis affect outcomes of implant treatment? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:173-202.
• Karoussis IK, Kotsovillis S, Fourmousis I. A comprehensive and critical review of dental implant prognosis in periodontally compromised partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;6:669-79.
• Ouirynen M, Abarca M, Van Assche N, et al. Impact of supportive periodontal therapy and implant surface roughness on implant outcome in patients with a history of periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:805-15.
• Schou S, Holmsrtup P, Worthington HV, et al. Outcome of implant therapy in patients with previous tooth loss due to periodontitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:104-23.
• Heitz-Mayfield L, Huynh-Ba G. History of treated periodontitis and smoking as risks for implant therapy.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:39- 68.
• Schou S. Implant treatment in periodontitis- susceptible patients: A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:9-22.
• Tolstunov L. Dental implant success-failure analysis: A concept of implant vulnerability. Implant Dent 2006;9:341-6.
• Lekholm U, Zarb GA. “Patient selection and preparation,” in Tissue Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry, P. I. Brånemark, G. A. Zarb, and T. Alberktsson, Eds., Quintessence, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1985. pp. 199–