HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF DENTAL CERAMICS

Yıl 2015, Supplement 10, 157 - 166, 21.05.2015

Zeynep Tutal , İşıl Şener Yamaner Erman Tuncer

https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.93664

Öz

Ceramics were probably the first materials to be artifically made by humans, and porcelain was among the first materials to be the subject of laboratory research. This review presents the evaluation of dental ceramics from 23,000BC to more recent introduction into dentistry. The development of the science and the art of dental ceramics in many ways parallels to the development of the industrial revolution. The development of high-strength dental ceramics that mimic the optical properties of enamel and dentin, occured especially in the 20th century. This review is classified the ceramics about their method of manufacture and concerned with the evolution, formulation, strength and wear characterics of new dental ceramics. The history of main developments of dental ceramics is presented chronologically

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental ceramic, Classification of dental ceramics, History of dental ceramics

DENTAL SERAMİKLERİN TARİHSEL GELİŞİMİ

Öz

Seramikler belki de insanlar tarafından yapay olarak üretilen ve laboratuvar araştırmalarında kulanı- lan ilk materyaldir. Bu çalışma dental seramiklerin MÖ 23000 yılından diş hekimliği alanında en son gelişmelerin olduğu zamana kadar olan gelişmeleri sunmaktadır. Dental seramiklerin bilimsel ve sanatsal gelişimi endüstriyel gelişim ile birçok yönden paralel bir ilerleme göstermiştir. Dentin ve minenin optik özelliklerini en iyi taklit eden yüksek dayanıma sahip dental seramikler özellikle 20. yüz yılda gelişim göstermiştir. Seramikler yapım yöntemlerine göre sınıflandırılmıştır, seramiklerin evrimi, formulasyonu, kuvvet dayanımı ve aşınma karakteristiği ile ilgili bilgiler verilmiştir. Dental seramiklerin tarihindeki temel gelişmeler kronolojik sıra ile sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dental seramikler, Dental seramik sınıflaması, Dental seramik tarihi

Kaynakça

• The glossary of prosthodontic term. The academy of prosthodontıcs. The journal of prosthetıc dentıstry 2005; 94: 10-83.
• Wildgoose DG, Johnson A, Winstanley RB. Glass/ceramic/refractory development and introduction into dentistry: A historical literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 136-43. techniques, their
• Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s restorative dental materials. In: Scope and history of restorative materials 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier Inc.; 2006: 2-12
• Jones DW. Development of dental ceramics. An historical perspective. Dent Clin. North. Am. 1985; 29: 621-44.
• Anusavince K.J: Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials. 10. edition, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1996.p 10-45
• Maloney WJ, Maloney MP. Pierre Fauchard: the father of modern dentistry J Mass Dent Soc. 2009 Summer; 58: 28-9.
• Kelly JR, Nishimura I., Campbell SD. Ceramics in denstry: Historical roots and current perspective. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 18-32.
• Rosentiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. In: Denry IL All-Ceramic Restorations, 4th ed. St Louis Missouri, Mosby Elsevier, 2006.
• McLean JW, Odont D. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 61-6.
• McLean JW. The Science and Art of Dental Cramics, Vol II. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc, Chicago, Berlin, Rio de Janerio, Tokyo, 1980.
• Qualtrough AJE, and Piddock V. Ceramics update. J. Dent 1997; 25: 91-5.
• Chiche GJ, Pinault A. Esthetics of Anterior Fixed Prosthodontics. In: Mc Lean, Jeansonne EE, Chiche GJ, Pinault A. All-Ceramic Crowns and Foil Crowns. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. St Louis, 1994.
• McLean JW. Dental Ceramics. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Ceramics. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, 1983: 27.
• Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1992: 67; 859- 65.
• Coskun A,Yalug S. Metal desteksiz porselen sistemleri. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt 5, Sayı 2, 2002.
• Bayındır F, Uzun İH. Tam seramik kuron sistemleri. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2007; Suppl 2: 33-42
• Uctasli S, Wilson HJ, Unterbrink G, Zaimoglu A. The strength of a heatpressed all-ceramic restorative material. J Oral Rehabil. 1996: 23; 257- 61.
• Dickinson AJG, Moore BK, Haris RK. A comparative study of the strength of aluminous porcelain and all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 297- 304.
• Seghi RR, Daher T, Caputo A. Relative flexural strength of dental restorative ceramics. Dent Mater. 1990: 6; 181-4.
• Moffa JP, Lugassy AA, Ellison JA. Clinical evaluation of a castable ceramic material (abst.) J Dent Res 1988: 67; 118.
• Kelly JR, Campbell SD. Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1989: 62; 536-41.
• Sjögren G, Lantto R, Tillberg A. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns (Dicor) in general practice. J Prosthet Dent 1999: 81; 277-84.
• Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 1995: 8; 239-46.
• Giordano RA, Pelletier L, Campbell S, Pober R. Flexural strength of an infused ceramic, glass ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1995: 73; 411-8.
• Wall JG, Cipra DL. Alternative crown systems. Dent Clin. North Am. 1992: 36; 765-82.
• Thompson JY, Anusavice KJ, Naman A, Morris HF. Fracture surface characterization of clinically failed all-ceramic crowns. J. Dent Res. 1994: 73; 1824- 32.
• Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF. Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1995: 74; 145-50.
• Bindl A, Mormann WH. An up to 5-year clinical evaluation of posterior In-Ceram CAD/CAM core crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2002: 15; 451-6.
• Wagner WC, Chu TM. Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1996: 76; 140-4.
• Guazzato M, Albakry M, Swain MV, Ironside J. Mechanical properties of In-Ceram Alumina and In- Ceram Zirconia. Int J Prosthodont 2002: 15; 339- 46.
• Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2004: 92; 557-62.
• Chai J, Takahashi Y, Sulaiman F, Chong K. Probability of fracture of all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2000: 13; 420-4.
• Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: Core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002: 88; 4-9.
• Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: Core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002: 88; 10-5.
• Jung YG, Peterson IM, Pajares A, Lawn BR. Contact damage resistance and strength degradation of glass-infiltrated alumina and spinel ceramics. J Dent Res. 1999: 77; 804-14.
• Sundh A, Sjogren GA. Comparison of fracture strength zirconia ceramic crowns with varying core thickness, shapes and veneer ceramics. J Oral Rehabil. 2004: 31; 682-8.
• Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999: 20; 1-25.
• Itinoche KM, Özcan M, Bottino MA, Oyafuso D. Effect of mechanical cycling on the flexural strength of densely sintered ceramics. Dent Mater. 2002: 2; 1029–34.
• Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all ceramic restoration. JADA. 1997: 128; 297-307.
• Whitters CJ, Strang R, Brown D, Clarke RL, Curtis RV. Dental Materials: 1997 literature review. J Dent 1999: 27; 401-35.
• Cattell MJ, Clarke RL, Lynch EJ. The transverse strength, reliability and microstructural features of four dental ceramic, Part I. J Dent 1997: 25; 399- 407.
• Wen MY, Mueller HJ, Chai J, Wozniak WT. Comparative mechanical property characterization of 3 all-ceramic core materials. Int J Prosthodont 1999: 12; 534-41.
• Şener ID, Türker ŞB. Kimyasal yapılarına göre tam seramik restorasyonlar. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2009; 19: 61-7.
• Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli, and x-ray diffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2003: 89; 374-80.
• Chu SJ. Current clinical strategies with lithium- disilicate restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2012; 33: 64, 66-7
• Griggs JA. Recent Advances in Materials for All- Ceramic Restorations. Dent Clin N Am. 2007: 51; 713-27.
• Küçük BE, Kunt GE, Lityum disilikat seramikler. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2012; Suppl 5: 123-31.
• Yalım B, Türker ŞB. Klinikte tam seramik sistemler. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek Fak. Derg. 2012; Suppl 5: 76-90.
• Wassermann A, Kaiser M, Strub JR. Clinical long- term results of VITA In-Ceram classic crowns and fixed partial dentures: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2006: 19; 355-63.
• Giray Z. Özkurt Z, Kazazoğlu E. Zirkonya yapısı ve zirkonya alt yapıların üretim teknikleri. Dentiss 2007: Mayıs/Haziran,1-3.
• Chai J, Chu FCS, Chow TW, Liang BMH. Chemical Solubility and Flexural Strength of Zirconia-Based Ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2007: 20; 587-95.
• Van Der Zel JM, Vlaar S, De Ruiter WJ, Davidson C. The CICERO system for CAD CAM fabrication of full ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2001: 85; 261-7. Computerized manufacturing of esthetic dental restorations. Dent Clin N Am. 1992: 36; 797-807. design and
• Lothar V. Cercon the all ceramic CAM system by Degussa Dental. Quintessence, 2001: 52: 811-4.
• Bachhav VC, Aras MA. Zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a clinical review. Quintessence Int 2011; 42: 173-82.
• Conrad HJ, Wook-Jin Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007: 98; 389-404.
• Piwowarczyk A, Ottl P, Lauer HC, Kuretzky T. A clinical report and overview of scientific studies and clinical procedures conducted on the 3M ESPE Lava All-Ceramic System. J Prosthodont 2005: 14; 39-45.