EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT ON BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN CEMENT TO ZIRCONIUM AND LEUCITE-REINFORCED GLASS CERAMIC

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2, 150 - 156, 22.04.2018

Hatice Özdemir Funda Bayındır

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418765

Öz

ABSTRACT

 Aim: The aim of this study was to determine
shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconium and leucite-reinforced glass
ceramic after different surface treatment.

Materials
and Methods:
A total of 50 discs of zirconium and
leucite-reinforced glass ceramic were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 1 mm in
thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were
embedded in self-cure acrylic resin blocks. Specimens were divided into five
groups randomly (n=5), and the following treatments were applied: 1. Air
abrasion with aluminium-oxide particles (50 μm), 2. Acid etching with 9,5%
hydrofluoric acid, 3. Co-jet, 4. Nd:YAG laser irradiation (1 mm distance, 100
mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W) and 5. Er:YAG laser irradiation (1 mm distance, 400 mJ, 20 Hz,
8 W). After the surface-treatment methods, Panavia F dual-cure resin cement
were applied on the specimens. All the specimens were subjected to a shear test
to evaluate their bond strengths. The data were analyzed with one-way variance
analysis (ANOVA).

Results: In the
leucite-reinforced glass ceramic specimens, the highest bonding values
(12.06±1.4) was obtained in HF acid group. In the zirconium specimens, the
highest bonding values (9.7±4.05) was obtained in CoJet group. However, adhesive failures were obtained in these
groups. But, cohesive failures were obtained commonly in Co-jet groups.

Conclusions: The in
vitro findings from this study indicate that surface-treatment procedures
applied to leucite-reinforced glass ceramic and zirconium are important to bond
strength of resin cement.

Keywords:
Zirconium, leucite-reinforced glass ceramic, resin cement

ZİRKONYUM VE LÖSİTLE
GÜÇLENDİRİLMİŞ CAM SERAMİKLERİN REZİN SİMANLA BAĞLANMA DAYANIMINA FARKLI YÜZEY
İŞLEMLERİNİN ETKİSİ

ÖZ

Amaç: Bu
çalışmanın amacı, farklı yüzey işlemlerinden sonra rezin simanın zirkonyum ve
lösitle güçlendirilmiş cam seramiklerle olan makaslama bağlanma dayanımını
değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem:
Zirkonyum ve lösitle güçlendirilmiş cam seramikten toplamda 50 tane disk
şeklinde (10 mm çap ve 1 mm kalınlığında) örnekler üretici talimatlarına uygun
olarak hazırlandı. Örnekler self-cure akrilik rezine gömüldü. Örnekler rastgele
5 gruba ayrıldı ve şu yüzey işlemleri uygulandı: 1. Alüminyum oksit tozu ile
kumlama (50 μm), 2. % 9.5’ lik hidroflorik asit ile pürüzlendirme, 3. Co-Jet,
4. Nd:YAG lazer uygulaması (1mm mesafeden, 100 mJ, 20Hz, 2W), 5. Er:YAG lazer
uygulaması (1mm mesafeden, 400 mJ, 20Hz, 8 W). Yüzey işlemlerinden sonra,
örneklerin üzerine Panavia F dual-cure rezin siman yerleştirildi. Tüm örneklere
bağlanma dayanımlarını değerlendirmek için makaslama testi uygulandı. Elde
edilen sonuçlar tek yönlü Varyans analizi ile değerlendirildi.

Bulgular:
Lösitle güçlendirilmiş cam seramik örneklerde en yüksek bağlanma dayanımı
değerleri (12.06±1.4)
hidroflorik aist uygulanan grupta, zirkonyum
örneklerde (9.7±4.05) ise Co-Jet uygulanan
örneklerde belirlendi. Ayrıca, bu gruplarda adeziv kopmalar gözlemlendi. Fakat
koheziv kopmalar yaygın olarak Co-Jet uygulanan gruplarda gözlemlendi.

Sonuç: Bu
in-vitro çalışmanın bulguları zirkonyum ve lösitle güçlendirilmiş cam
seramiklere uygulanan yüzey işlemlerinin rezin simanla olan bağlanma
dayanımında önemli olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:
Zirkonyum, lösitle güçlendirilmiş cam seramik, rezin siman

Anahtar Kelimeler

Zirconium, leucite-reinforced, glass ceramic

Kaynakça

• 1. Nakamura S, Yoshida K, Kamada K, Atsuta M. Bonding between resin luting cement and glass infiltrated alumina-reinforced ceramics with silane coupling agent. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:785-93.
• 2. Kiyan VH, Saraceni CH, da Silveira BL, Aranha AC, Eduardo Cda P. The influence of internal surface treatments on tensile bond strength for two ceramic systems. Oper Dent 2007;32:457-65.
• 3. Guess PC, Andreja Kulis A, Witkowski S, Wolkewitz M, Zhang Y, Strub JR. Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dent Mater 2008;24:1556-67.
• 4. Paolo FM, Pierfrancesco RI, Luca R. An overview of zirconia ceramics; Basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819-26.
• 5. Lawn BR, Deng Y, Lloyd IK, Janal MN, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Materials Design Of Ceramic- Based Layer Structures For Crowns. J Dent Res 2002;81:433–8.
• 6. Vult P, Von Steyern, Carlson P, Nilner K. All-Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures Designed According To The DC-Zirkon Technique: A 2-Year Clinical Study. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:180–7.
• 7. Dental Materials Science. 2nd ed. Cork Universty Press. 1993. p. 112–120.
• 8. Qualtrough AJE, Piddock V. Ceramic Update. J Dent 1997;25:91–5.
• 9. Haselton DR,Diaz-Arnold A, Hillis SL. Clinical assessment of high-strenght all-ceramic crowns J. Prosthet Dent 2000;83:396-401.
• 10. Kern M. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:350.
• 11. Lawn BR, Deng Y, Thompson VP. Use of contact testing in the characterization and design of allceramic crown like layer structures: A review. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:495-510.
• 12. Tinscherta J, Zweza D, Marxa R, Anusaviceb K J. Structural Reliability Of Alumina-, Feldspar-,Leucite-, Mica- And Zirconia-Based Ceramics. J Dent 2000;28:529–35.
• 13. Aksoy İ, Varol S, Özkan Y. Zirkonyum restorasyonların simantasyonu. Ata Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2012;Suppl 6:124-31.
• 14. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74.
• 15. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28:163-77.
• 16. Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 1994;7:453-61.
• 17. Shopr AM, Sobrino LC, Consani S, Sinhoreti M, Knowles JC. Influent of surface conditions and silane agent on the bond of resin to IPS Empress 2 ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:277-82.
• 18. Nagayassu MP, Shintome LK, Uemura ES, Araujo JEJ. Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of a resin-based cement to porcelain. Braz Dent J 2006;17:290-5.
• 19. Shopr AM, Sobrino LC, Consani S, Sinhoreti M, Knowles JC. Influent of surface conditions and silane agent on the bond of resin to IPS Empress 2 ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:277-82 . 20. Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effect of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:699-705.
• 21. Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Valandro LF, et al. Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on micro tensile bond strength to a glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:412-8.
• 22. Madani M, Chu FC, McDonald AV, Smales RJ. Effect of surface treatment on shear bond strength between a resin cement and an alumina core. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:644-50.
• 23. Bona AD, Donassollo TA, Demarco FF, Barrett AA, Mecholsky Jr JJ. Characterization and surface treatment effects on topography of a glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconiareinforced ceramic. Dent Mater 2007;23:769-75.
• 24. Retief HD. Standardizing laboratory test. Am J Dent 1991;4:231-6.
• 25. Özcan M, Alkumru H, Gemalmaz D. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:335-43.
• 26. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-31.
• 27. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:508-13.
• 28. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Inter J Prosthodont 1991;4:17–23.
• 29. Bailey LF, Bennet RJ. DICOR surface treatments for enhanced bonding. J Dent Res 1988;67:925–31. 30. Wolf DM, Powers JM, O’Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater 1992;8:158–61.
• 31. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dent 1998;26:53–8.
• 32. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250–7.
• 33. Li R, Ren Y, Han J. Effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser irradiation on shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2000;18:377–9.
• 34. Shiu P, De Souza-Zaroni WC, de Eduardo CP, Youssef MN. Effect of feldspathic ceramic surface treatments on bond strength to resin cement. Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25:291– 6.
• 35. Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Micro tensile bond strength of a repair composite to leucite reinforced feldspathic ceramic. Braz Dent J 2007;18:314–9.
• 36. Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Yenisey M, Guler E, Ural C. Effect of acid etching time and a self-etching adhesive on the shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:21–5.
• 37. Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Ural C, Guler E. Evaluation of 24- hour shear bond strength of resin composite to porcelain according to surface treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:156–60.
• 38. Akova T, Yoldas O, Toroglu MS, Uysal H. Porcelain surface treatment by laser for bracket-porcelain bonding. J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:630–7.
• 39. Akyıl MS, Yılmaz A, Karaalioğlu OF, Duymuş ZY. Shear bond strength of repair composite resin to an acid-etched and a laser-irradiated feldspathic ceramic surface. Photomed Laser Surg 2010;28:539–45.
• 40. Estafan D, Dussetschleger F, Estafan A, Jia W. Effect of prebonding procedures on shear bond strength of resin composite to pressable ceramic. Gen Dent 2000;48:412–6.
• 41. Neis CA, Albuquerque NLG, de Souza Albuquerque I, Gomes EA, de Souza- Filho B, Feitosa VP, Spazzin AO, Bacchi A. Surface treatments for repair of feldspathic, leucite- and lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramics using composite resin. Braz Dent J. 2015;26:152-5.
• 42. Lacy AM, La Luz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288–91.
• 43. Kara HB, Dilber E, Koç O, Ozturk AN, Bulbul M. Effect of different surface treatments on roughness of IPS Empress 2 ceramic. Laser Med Sci 2012;27:267-72.
• 44. Keller U, Hibst R. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg Med 1989;9:345–51.
• 45. Shiu P, De Souza-Zaroni WC, de Eduardo CP, Youssef MN. Effect of feldspathic ceramic surface treatments on bond strength to resin cement. Photomed Laser Surg 2007;25:291– 6.
• 46. Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Ozcan M. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:540–6.
• 47. Stübinger S, Homann F, Etter C, Miskiewicz M, Wieland M, Sader R. Effect of Er:YAG, CO(2) and diode laser irradiation on surface properties of zirconia endosseous dental implants. Lasers Surg Med 2008;40:223–8.
• 48. Cavalcanti AN, Pilecki P, Foxton RM, Watson TF, Oliveira MT, Gianinni M, Marchi GM. Evaluation of the surface roughness and morphologic features of Y-TZP ceramics after different surface treatments. Photomed Laser Surg 2009;27:1–7.