ÜNİVERSAL ADEZİVLERİN MİNEYE BAĞLANMA DAYANIMININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2, 204 - 209, 22.04.2018

Muhammed Karadaş Ömer Hatipoğlu Sabit Melih Ateş

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.418980

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı dört farklı üniversal
adezivin mineye makaslama bağlanma dayanımını iki aşamalı bir self-etch
adezivle karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: 100 adet sağlam
üçüncü molar diş bukkal ve lingual iki parçaya bölündü. Örnekler adeziv
ajanlara göre rastgele 5 gruba ayrıldı; OptiBond XTR, Clearfil Universal Bond,
All Bond Universal, Single Bond Universal, Clearfil SE Bond. Düzleştirilmiş
mine yüzeylerine herbir adeziv ajan self-etch ya da total-etch yöntemleri
kullanılarak uygulandı ve kompozit rezin yerleştirildi. Örnekler 24 saat
37°C’de distile su içerisinde bekletildikten sonra ya da 5.000 termal siklus uygulandıktan
sonra makaslama bağlanma testine maruz bırakıldı. Veriler 3 yönlü varyans
analizi ve Tukey post-hoc testi (p = 0.05) kullanılarak analiz edildi.

Bulgular: İstatistiksel sonuçlar adeziv ajanın
tipi ve uygulama yönteminin mineye bağlanma dayanıklılığını önemli derecede
etkilediğini gösterdi (p < 0.001). Termal siklus mineye makaslama bağlanma
dayanık- lılığını etkilemedi (p > 0.05). Total-etch yöntemi ile elde edilen
taranmış elektron mikroskop görüntüleri uzun rezin tagları ve iç içe geçmiş
polimerik ağları göstermektedir.

Sonuç: Self-etch tekniği ile Clearfil SE
Bond, üniversal adezivlerden daha fazla mineye makaslama bağlanma dayanıklılığı
gösterdi. Uygulama tekniğine bakılmaksızın üniversal adezivlerin mineye
bağlanma dayanıklıkları arasında önemli bir farklılık bulunamadı. Mineyi
asitleme tüm adezivlerin makaslama bağlanma dayanıklılığını önemli derecede
arttırdı.

Anahtar kelimeler: Bağlanma dayanımı,
diş minesi, dental adezivler, universal adeziv, total-etch tekniği

EVALUATION OF ENAMEL BOND STENGTH OF UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES

ASTRACT

Aim: 
The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond
strength of four unersal adhesives to enamel compared to two-step self-etch
adhesive.

Material and Methods:  One hundred human third molars were sectioned into two fragments (buccal
and lingual) and randomly assigned to five groups according to adhesive agents
(OptiBond XTR, Clearfil Universal Bond, All Bond Universal, Single
Bond Universal, and Clearfil SE Bond). Each adhesive agent was applied to a
flattened enamel surface by using the self-etch or etch-and-rinse strategy, and
the compo- site resin was constructed onto the bonded enamel surface. The
specimens were stored for 24 h in 37°C distilled water or were thermocycled for
5,000 cycles. Then shear bond strength testing was performed. Data were analyzed
using three-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post-hoc test (p = 0.05). Results: The type of adhesive agent and application strategy
had a significant effect on the enamel bond strength (p < 0.001). The thermocyling process did not significantly affect
the shear bond strength to enamel (p > 0.05). Scanning electron microscopy
images obtained with the etch-and-rinse strategy showed long resin tags and an interpenetrated polymeric network.

Conclusion: Clearfil SE Bond with self-etch strategy had significantly higher shear
bond strength to enamel than did the universal adhesives. No significant
differences were found among the enamel bond strengths of studied universal
adhesives regardless of application strategy. The pre-etching treatment of enamel
significantly improved the shear bond strength of all of the adhesives tested.

* Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Diş Hastalıkları ve Tedavisi, Rize **Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi, Rize.

Key words: Bond strength, enamel,
adhesiv

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bağlanma dayanımı, diş minesi, dental adezivler, universal adeziv

Kaynakça

• 1. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-84.
• 2. Perdigao J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:333-57.
• 3. Susin AH, Vasconcellos WA, Saad JR, Oliveira Junior OB. Tensile bond strength of self-etching versus total-etching adhesive systems under different dentinal substrate conditions. Braz Oral Res 2007;21:81-6.
• 4. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28.
• 5. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:265-73.
• 6. Perdigao J. Dentin bonding as a function of dentin structure. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:277-301.
• 7. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Kimmes NS. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to pre-etched enamel. Dent Mater 2009;25:1187-94.
• 8. Bahari M, Savadi Oskoee S, Kimyai S, Pouralibaba F, Farhadi F, Norouzi M. Effect of Casein Phosphopeptide-amorphous Calcium Phosphate Treatment on Microtensile Bond Strength to Carious Affected Dentin Using Two Adhesive Strategies. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2014;8:141-7.
• 9. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:1-16.
• 10. Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitao J, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 1997;10:141-6.
• 11. Hannig M, Bock H, Bott B, Hoth-Hannig W. Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:464-70.
• 12. Tay FR, King NM, Chan KM, Pashley DH. How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously? J Adhes Dent 2002;4:255-69.
• 13. Perdigao J, Loguercio AD. Universal or Multi-mode Adhesives: Why and How? J Adhes Dent 2014;16:193-4.
• 14. de Goes MF, Shinohara MS, Freitas MS. Performance of a new one-step multi-mode adhesive on etched vs non-etched enamel on bond strength and interfacial morphology. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:243-50.
• 15. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1459-67.
• 16. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent 2008;10:339-44.
• 17. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:32-41.
• 18. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:765-76.
• 19. Barutcigil Ç, Barutcigil K, Kürklü D, Harorlı OT. Güncel dentin bağlayıcı ajanların ve uygulama yöntemlerinin makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının karşılaştırılması. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2013;2:27-32.
• 20. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, Chen JH, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles? J Dent 2015;43:525-36.
• 21. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K. Influence of self-etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 1998;14:99-105.
• 22. Shinchi MJ, Soma K, Nakabayashi N. The effect of phosphoric acid concentration on resin tag length and bond strength of a photo-cured resin to acid-etched enamel. Dent Mater 2000;16:324-9.
• 23. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J,Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-8.
• 24. Milia E, Cumbo E, Cardoso RJ, Gallina G. Current dental adhesives systems. A narrative review. Curr Pharm Des 2012;18:5542-52.
• 25. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, Meerbeek BV. Self-assembled Nano-layering at the Adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;91:376-81.
• 26. Akın GE, Hergüner-sıso Ş, Akın H. Termal siklus ve suda bekletmenin kendinden asitli adezivlerin dentine mikrogerilim bağlanma dayanimlari üzerine etkileri. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek Fak Derg 2012;22:125-31.
• 27. Nunes TG, Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M. Spatially resolved photopolymerization kinetics and oxygen inhibition in dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2005;26:1809-17.
• 28. Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D'Arcangelo C, Monaco A. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;29:295-308.