MANYETİK REZONANS GÖRÜNTÜLEMENİN DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE KULLANIMI VE DENTAL MATERYALLERE ETKİLERİ

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2, 271 - 276, 22.04.2018

Tahir Karaman , Bekir Eşer Sedat Güven Tuba Talo Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.419065

Cited By: 2

Öz

Radyolojik
görüntüleme yöntemlerinden biri olan Man- yetik Rezonans Görüntüleme,
hastalıkların tanısına çok önemli katkıları bulunmasından dolayı yaygın bir
şekil- de medikal alanda kullanılmaktadır. Bu görüntüleme tekniğinde kuvvetli
manyetik alan oluşması ve vücutta bulunan metalik objelerin bu manyetik alandan
etkile- şimleri hasta açısından potansiyel sağlık riskleri oluştu- rabilmektedir.
Diş hekimliği alanında yaygın bir şekilde kullanılan Dental implantlar,
Ortodontik braketler ve teller, Metal destekli sabit ve hareketli
restorasyonlar vb. gibi içeriğinde metal bulunan objelerin varlığında Manyetik
Rezonans Görüntülemesi esnasında oluşabi- lecek manyetik alan etkileşimlerinin
yeterince bilinmesi gerekir. Görüntüleme esnasında hasta açısından oluşa- bilecek
riskleri en asgari düzeye indirebilmek için vü- cutta bulunan ve manyetik
alandan etkilenen metalik objeler ile ilgili gerekli tedbirlerin alınması
gerekir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Manyetik Rezonans
Görüntüleme, dental alaşımlar, manyetik alan etkileşimi

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN DENTISTRY AND
ITS EFFECT ON DENTAL MATERIALS

ABSTRACT

Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the radiologic imaging techniques, using
widely in medical field due to significant contribution to the diagnosis of
diseases. Formation of the strong magnetic field and its interaction with
metallic objects in the body may cause potential risks for patient. In the
presence of metal containing objets in dentistry such as dental implants,
orthodontic brackets and wires, metal-supported fixed and removable
restorations, adequate information about the features of magnetic field and its
interaction with the metallic objects should be known. To take necessary
measures related with the magnetic field interactions, will reduced risk level
during imaging.

Keywords: Magnetic Rezonance  Imaging, dental alloys, magnetic field
interactions

Anahtar Kelimeler

Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme, dental alaşımlar

Kaynakça

• 1. Hubálková H, Serna P, Linetskiy I, Dostálová Tj. Dental alloys and magnetic resonance imaging. Int Den J 2006;56:135-41.
• 2. Mathew CA, Maller S. Interactions between magnetic resonance imaging and dental material. Jl Pharmacy Bioallied Sci 2013;5:113.
• 3. Park J, Song H, Roh H, Kim Y, Lee J. Correlation between clinical diagnosis based on RDC/TMD and MRI findings of TMJ internal derangement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:103-8.
• 4. Matsuzaki H, Katase N, Hara M, Asaumi J-I, Yanagi Y, Unetsubo T, et al. Ameloblastic carcinoma: a case report with radiological features of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:e40-7.
• 5. Espeland MA, Bryan RN, Goveas JS, Robinson JG, Siddiqui MS, Liu S, et al. Influence of type 2 diabetes on brain volumes and changes in brain volumes results from the women’s health initiative magnetic resonance imaging studies. Diabetes care 2013;36:90-7.
• 6. Hargreaves BA, Worters PW, Pauly KB, Pauly JM, Koch KM, Gold GE. Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. American Journal of Roentgenology 2011;197:547-55.
• 7. Labrousse M, Hossu G, Calmon G, Chays A, Felblinger J, Braun M. In vivo characterization of the vestibulo-cochlear nerve motion by MRI. NeuroImage 2012;59:943-9.
• 8. Drzezga A, Barthel H, Minoshima S, Sabri O. Potential clinical applications of PET/MR imaging in neurodegenerative diseases. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2014;55:47S-55S.
• 9. Geva T. Magnetic resonance imaging: historical perspective. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2006;8:573-80.
• 10. Brown MA, and Richard C. Semelka. MRI: basic principles and applications, Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons 2003 p.1-19
• 11. Shafiei F, Honda E, Takahashi H, Sasaki T. Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of dental research 2003;82:602-6.
• 12. Shah N, Bansal N, Logani A. Recent advances in imaging technologies in dentistry. World J Radiol 2014;6:794-807.
• 13. Boeddinghaus R, Whyte A. Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. European journal of radiology 2008;66:396-418.
• 14. Tymofiyeva O, Rottner K, Jakob P, Richter E-J, Proff P. Three-dimensional localization of impacted teeth using magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical Oral Investigations 2010;14:169-76.
• 15. Kress B, Buhl Y, Anders L, Stippich C, Palm F, Bähren W, et al. Quantitative analysis of MRI signal intensity as a tool for evaluating tooth pulp vitality. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2004;33:241-4
• 16. Dragăn OC, Fărcășanu AȘ, Câmpian RS, Turcu RVF. Human Tooth and Root Canal Morphology Reconstruction Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Clujul Medical 2016;89:137-42
• 17. Tymofiyeva O, Rottner K, Gareis D, Boldt J, Schmid F, Lopez M, et al. In vivo MRI‐based dental impression using an intraoral RF receiver coil. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering 2008;33:244-51.
• 18. Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2002;87:351-63.
• 19. Uzun İh, Bayindir F. Dental Uygulamalarda Titanyum ve Özellikleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2010;3:213-20.
• 20. Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, Bluemke DA, Flamm SD, Kanal E, et al. Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2007;116:2878-91.
• 21. Titanium Alloy Guide. RMI Titanium company An RTI internationals Metals, Inc Company 2000:1-45.
• 22. Ideta T, Yamazaki M, Kudou S, Higashida M, Mori S, Kaneda T, et al. Investigation of radio frequency heating of dental implants made of titanium in 1.5 tesla and 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance procedure: measurement of the temperature by using tissue-equivalent phantom. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 2013;69:521-8.
• 23. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection, 4 Ed. Quintessence: 2008. p. 202-11
• 24. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in implant dentistry. Clinical oral implants research 2003;14:18-27.
• 25. Goldman A. Handbook of modern ferromagnetic materials: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.p. 1-32
• 26. Herek D, Karabulut N. Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme. TTD Toraks Cerrahisi Bülteni 2010;1:214-22.
• 27. Kwong RY, Yucel EK. Computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2003;108:e104-6.
• 28. Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP. MR Artifacts, Safety, and Quality Control 1. Radiographics 2006;26:275-97.
• 29. Starčuková J, Starčuk Z, Hubálková H, Linetskiy I. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts. dental materials 2008;24:715-23.
• 30. Longstreth W, Phillips LE, Drangsholt M, Koepsell TD, Custer BS, Gehrels JA, et al. Dental X‐rays and the risk of intracranial meningioma. Cancer 2004;100:1026-34.
• 31. El-Bediwi AB, El-Fallal A, Saker S, Özcan M. Effect of non-ionizing radio frequency signals of magnetic resonance imaging on physical properties of dental alloys and metal-ceramic adhesion. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:407-13.
• 32. Ayyıldız S, Kamburoğlu K, Sipahi C, Murat S, Görgülü S, Pişkin B. Radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions of fixed partial dentures during 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology 2013;116:640-7.
• 33. Hasegawa M, Miyata K, Abe Y, Ishigami T. Radiofrequency heating of metallic dental devices during 3.0 T MRI. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2013;42:20120234.
• 34. Shahidi S, Bronoosh P, Alavi A, Zamiri B, Sadeghi A, Bagheri M, et al. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2009;38:470-4.
• 35. Yilmaz S, Misirlioğlu M. The effect of 3 T MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2013;42:20130072.
• 36. Mortazavi S, Neghab M, Anoosheh S, Bahaeddini N, Mortazavi G, Neghab P, et al. High-field MRI and mercury release from dental amalgam fillings. The international journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2014;5:101-5.
• 37. Devge C, Tjellström A, Nellström H. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with dental implants: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1997;12.
• 38. Görgülü S, Ayyıldız S, Kamburoğlu K, Gökçe S, Ozen T. Effect of orthodontic brackets and different wires on radiofrequency heating and magnetic field interactions during 3-T MRI. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2014;43:20130356.
• 39. Sinkiewicz D. MRI scan hazard. British dental journal 2013;214:376.
• 40. Oriso K, Kobayashi T, Sasaki M, Uwano I, Kihara H, Kondo H. Impact of the Static and Radiofrequency Magnetic Fields Produced by a 7T MR Imager on Metallic Dental Materials. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences 2016;15:26-33.