DİŞSİZ REZORBE MANDİBULAYA FARKLI İMPLANTLARLA YAPILAN OVERDENTURE PROTEZLERDE GERİLME ANALİZİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: SONLU ELEMANLAR ANALİZİ ÇALIŞMASI

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3, 457 - 463, 15.07.2020

Gökçe Soğancı Ünsal Güzin Neda Hasanoğlu Erbaşar

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.718033

Öz

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı rezorbe mandibular kretlerde greft uygulanarak ve uygulanmadan yerleştirilen farklı boyutlardaki implantlarla desteklenmiş overdenture protezlerin biyomekanik olarak değerlendirilmesidir.
GEREÇ ve YÖNTEM: Rezorbe mandibulayı taklit etmek amacıyla 2 tane 3 boyutlu mandibular model Tip II kemik özelliklerine göre oluşturuldu. 3.3×11.5 mm (dar çaplı implant) ve 2.5×13 mm (mini dental implant) olan osseointegre implantlar 3 boyutlu tarayıcı yardımıyla tarandı ve modellendi. İki adet dar çaplı implant kaninler bölgesine dik olacak şekilde yerleştirilerek Model 1 elde edildi, Dört adet mini dental implant ise ikisi lateral kesiciler bölgesine dik olarak diğer ikisi ise 1.premolar bölgesine 30° açıyla yerleştirilerek Model 2 oluşturuldu. Her bir model için overdenture tasarlandı. Vertikal olarak 150 N oklüzal kuvvet tek (soldan) ve çift taraflı olacak şekilde protezin 1.molar dişi üzerinden uygulandı ve veriler elde edildi.
BULGULAR: İmplantlarda oluşan von Mises değerleri ve kortikal kemikte implant boynu etrafında meydana gelen asal gerilme sonuçları ve gerilme haritaları değerlendirildi. En yüksek von Mises değeri tek taraflı yüklemede Model 1’de yüklenen taraftaki implant çevresinde 33,64 MPa olarak belirlendi. Kortikal kemikteki maksimum asal gerilme için en yüksek değer tek taraflı yüklemede Model 2’de sol lateral kesici bölgesindeki implant çevresinde 7,75 MPa olarak bulundu. Minimum asal gerilme değeri Model 1’de tek taraflı yüklemede soldaki implantın çevresinde 6,2 MPa belirlendi.
SONUÇ: Rezorbe dişsiz mandibular kretlerde greft uygulanarak yapılacak olan 2 dar çaplı implant destekli overdenture yerine greft uygulanmadan yapılacak 4 mini dental implant destekli overdenture seçeneği biyomekanik açıdan avantajlı olabilir. Bilateral dengeli oklüzyon oluşturulması da gelen kuvvet dağılımı açısından iyi bir seçenek olarak düşünülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: rezorbe mandibula, dental implant, greft, sonlu elemanlar analizi

STRESS EVALUATION OF OVERDENTURES SUPPORTED BY DIFFERENT IMPLANTS IN RESORBED MANDIBLE: A FEA ANALYSIS
ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical behavior of overdentures retained with different implant dimensions with or without using graft in a resorbed mandible.
MATERIALS and METHOD: To simulate the resorbed mandible two 3 dimensional models were created according to the Type II bone properties. 3.3×11.5 mm (narrow diameter implant) ve 2.5×13 mm (mini dental implant) implants were scanned using 3 dimensional scanner and modelled. Model 1 was created as the two narrow diameter implants were placed vertically in the canine area, 4 mini dental implants were placed as two of them in lateral incisor area vertically and the rest two implants were placed in 1.premolar region with 30° inclination to create Model 2. Overdentures were designed for each model. 150 N vertical occlusal force were applied from 1.molar tooth of overdenture, unilaterally and bilaterally and data were obtained.
RESULTS: Von Mises stresses on implants and principal stresses on cortical bone around implant necks and stress patterns of models were evaluated. The highest value of von Mises stress was in the implant on the loaded side under unilateral loading in Model 1 as 33.64 MPa. Maximum principal stresses was the highest in Model 2 around cortical bone in left lateral incisor area under unilateral loading and found as 7.75 MPa. The highest value of minimum principal stress was determined 6.2 MPa around cortical bone in the left implant area under unilateral loading.
CONCLUSION: In a resorbed mandible 4 mini dental implant retained overdenture choice without using graft might be preferable instead of 2 narrow implant retained overdenture using graft procedure in terms of biomechanical aspect. Bilateral balanced occlusion might be better for distribution of occlusal forces.

Key Words: resorbed mandible, dental implant, graft, finite element analysis

Anahtar Kelimeler

rezorbe mandibula, dental implant, greft

Kaynakça

• 1. Kilic E, Doganay O. Evaluation Of Stress In Tilted Implant Concept With Variable Diameters In The Atrophic Mandible: 3D Finite Element Analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2019. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00066. [Epub ahead of print]
• 2. Chang SH, Huang SR, Huang SF, Lin CL. Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016;19:911-21.
• 3. Solberg K, Heinemann F, Pellikaan P, Keilig L, Stark H, Bourauel C, Hasan I. Finite element analysis of different loading conditions for implant-supported overdentures supported by conventional or mini implants. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017;20:770-82.
• 4. Özdemir Doğan D, Polat NT, Polat S, Şeker E, Gül EB. Evaluation of "all-on-four" concept and alternative designs with 3D finite element analysis method. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:501-10.
• 5. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:799–806.
• 6. Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, deLlanos-Lanchares H, Brizuela-Velasco A, Martin-Fernandez E, Ellacuria-Echebarria J. Influence of Implant Positions and Occlusal Forces on Peri-Implant Bone Stress in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43:419-28.
• 7. Toth A, Hasan I, Bourauel C, Mundt T, Biffar R, Heinemann F. The influence of implant body and thread design of mini dental implants on the loading of surrounding bone: a finite element analysis. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2017;62:393-405.
• 8. Inglam S, Suebnukarn S, Tharanon W, Apatananon T, Sitthiseripratip K. Influence of graft quality and marginal bone loss on implants placed in maxillary grafted sinus: a finite element study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010;48:681-89.
• 9. Soğancı G, Yazıcıoğlu H. Evaluation of Stress Distribution of Mini Dental Implant-Supported Overdentures in Complete Cleft Palate Models: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53:73-83.
• 10. Griffitts TM, Collins CP, Collins PC. Mini dental implants: an adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100: 81–4.
• 11. Mundt T, Schwahn C, Stark T, Bi ar R. Clinical response of edentulous people treated with mini dental implants in nine dental practices. Gerodontology. 2015;32:179–87.
• 12. Aksan ME, Atsü S, Bulut AC. İmplant-protez bağlantısında sonlu elemanlar yöntemi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2018;28:91-7.
• 13. Mosavar A, Ziaei A, Kadkhodaei M. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:1317-26.
• 14. Lian Z, Guan H, Ivanovski S, Loo YC, Johnson NW, Zhang H. Effect of bone to implant contact percentage on bone remodelling surrounding a dental implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:690-98.
• 15. Dos Santos MBF, Meloto GO, Bacchi A, Correr-Sobrinho L. Stress distribution in cylindrical and conical implants under rotational micromovement with different boundary conditions and bone properties: 3-D FEA. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017;20:893-900.
• 16. Lin CL, Lin YH, Chang SH. Multi-factorial analysis of variables influencing the bone loss of an implant placed in the maxilla: prediction using FEA and SED bone remodeling algorithm. J Biomech. 2010;43:644-51.
• 17. Gümrükçü Z, Kurt S. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2019;29:534-41.
• 18. Moreira de Melo EJ, Francischone CE. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.015. [Epub ahead of print]
• 19. Damarisy A, Badr AMI, Rizk FN, Mohamed JF. Effect of one piece versus two piece mini implants on bone height of implant retained mandibular overdenture. OHDM 2017;16:1-6.
• 20. Topkaya T, Solmaz MY. The effect of implant number and position on the stress behavior of mandibular implant retained overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Biomech. 2015;48:2102-09.
• 21. Hong HR, Pae A, Kim Y, Paek J, Kim HS, Kwon KR. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:69-76.
• 22. Georgiopoulos B, Kalioras K, Provatidis C, Manda M, Koidis P. The effects of implant length and diameter prior to and after osseointegration: a 2-D finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:243-56.
• 23. Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:350-56.
• 24. Kaleli N, Sarac D, Külünk S, Öztürk Ö. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:437-45.
• 25. CaglarA, BalBT, AydınC, YılmazH, OzkanS. Evaluationofstress occuring on three different zirconia dental implants: three dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:95–103.