The Relationship Between Destination Competitiveness and Foreign Direct Investments: Panel Data Analysis

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4, 1521 - 1536, 28.12.2021

Ersin Burnaz , Ertuğrul Karoğlu

https://doi.org/10.53487/ataunisosbil.900702

Öz

One of the important competition issues between countries is to get a share from world tourism at a higher rate and to benefit from tourism investments at the maximum level. In this study, it is aimed to determine how effective the competitive forces of countries in the field of tourism are in attracting foreign investment within the framework of Dunning's OLI paradigm. In order to determine the competitiveness of a country in the field of tourism, the 4 main criteria of the "Tourism and Travel Competitiveness Index (TTCI)" created by the World Economic Forum were considered as location-specific factors conceptualized within the OLI paradigm and independent variables were determined. Direct foreign capital investments that are the dependent variable of the present study were extracted from the UNCTAD database. Data covering 8 years and 114 countries were tested using panel regression analysis. The findings reveal that the infrastructure and natural and cultural resources variables of destination competitiveness have significant and positive effects on FDI inflows.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destination Competitiveness, Foreign Direct Investments (FDI), World Economic Forum Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index (TTCI), Panel Data Analysis.

Destinasyon Rekabetçiliği ile Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Arasındaki İlişki: Panel Veri Analizi

Öz

Ülkeler arasındaki önemli rekabet konularından birisi dünya turizminden daha yüksek oranda pay almak ve turizm yatırımlarından azami düzeyde faydalanmaktır. Bu çalışmada ülkelerin turizm alanındaki rekabetçi güçlerinin, yabancı yatırım çekme konusunda ne derece etkili olduğunun Dunning’in OLI paradigması çerçevesinde tespiti amaçlanmıştır. Bir ülkenin turizm alanındaki rekabet gücünü belirlemek için Dünya Ekonomik Forumu tarafından oluşturulan “Turizm ve Seyahat Rekabetçilik Endeksi (TSRE)”nin 4 ana kriteri (Çevresel Faktörler, Turizm Politikalarının ve Koşullarının Etkinleştirilmesi, Altyapı, Doğal ve Kültürel Kaynaklar), OLI paradigması kapsamında kavramsallaştırılan lokasyona özgü faktörler olarak ele alınarak bağımsız değişkenler belirlenmiştir. Bağımlı değişken olarak belirlenen doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar (DYY) verilerine ise UNCTAD veri tabanı kullanılarak erişilmiştir. 8 yıl ve 114 ülkeyi kapsayan zaman uzanımlı veriler panel regresyon analizi kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, destinasyon rekabetçiliğinin altyapı ile doğal ve kültürel kaynaklar değişkenlerinin DYY girişleri üzerinde anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü etkilere sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destinasyon Rekabetçiliği, Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar (DYY), Dünya Ekonomik Forumu Turizm ve Seyahat Rekabetçilik Endeksi (TSRE), Panel Veri Analizi

Kaynakça

• Afşar, M. (2004). Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar ve Bankacılık Sektörü. Ege Akademik Bakış. 4(1), 85-101.
• Asiedu, E. (2003). Foreign direct investment to Africa: The role of government policy, governance and political instability. Department of Economics, University of Kansas.
• Aykut, D. & Sayek, S. (2007). The Role of the Sectoral Composition of Foreign Direct Investment on Growth. Do Multinationals Feed Local Development and Growth? In Lucia Piscitello ve Grazia D. Santangelo (Ed.) 1. Edt. Elsevier: Oxford. 35-59.
• Bahar, O. (2010). Turizm Sektörüne Sağlanan Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının (DYSY) Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Olan Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği (1986-2006). Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21(1), 27-40.
• Baltagi, H., Badi & Ping X. Wu, (1999), Unequally Spaced Panel Data Regressions with Ar (1) Disturbances, Econometric Theory, 15(06), 814-823.
• Bevan A. & Estrin, S. (2000). The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies. William Davidson Institute Working Paper, 342.
• Breusch, T.S. & Pagan, A.R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of economic studies, 47(1), 239-253.
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1992). Quantitative data analysis for social scientists. Estudios Geográficos, 53(207), 347.
• Busse, M & Hefeker C. (2005). Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment. Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Hamburg, Germany.
• Candemir, A. (2009). Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarını Etkileyen Faktörler. Ege Akademik Bakış, 9(2), 659-675.
• Cheng, L. K., & Kwan, Y. K. (2000). What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience. Journal of international economics, 51(2), 379-400.
• Cheng, S, 2006, “The role of labor cost in the location choices of Japanese investors in China,” Papers in Regional Science, 85(1), 121-138.
• Chow, G. C. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 28, 591-605.
• Contractor, F. J. & Kundu, S. K. (1995). Explaining Variation in The Degree Of Internationalization Across Firms: The Case Of Hotel Industry. Journal of International Management, 1, 87-123.
• Dees, S. (1998). Foreign direct investment in China: determinants and effects. Economics of planning, 31(2-3), 175-194.
• Di Maggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160.
• Dobrivojevic, G. (2013). Analysis of the Competitive Environment of Tourist Destinations Aiming at Attracting FDI by Applying Porter’s Five Forces Model. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade. 3(4), 359-371.
• DPT. (2000). Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları. Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu.
• Driscoll, J. C. & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of economics and statistics, 80(4), 549-560.
• Dunning, J.H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9-31.
• Dunning, J.H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31.
• Dunning, J.H. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. New York: Addison-Wesley.
• Dunning, J.H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International business review, 9(2), 163-190.
• Dunning, J.H. (2001). The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2), 173-190.
• Dunning, J.H. & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. 2nd Edition. Edward Edgar Publishing Limited: UK
• Dunning, J.H. & Narula, R. (2004). Multinationals And Industrial Competitiveness: A New Agenda. Massachusetts, EUA.
• Endo, K. (2006). Foreign Direct Investment in Tourism- flows and volumes, Tourism Management, 27, 600-614.
• Erdal, F. & Tatoglu, E. (2002). Locational determinants of foreign direct investment in an emerging market economy: evidence from Turkey. Multinational Business Review, 10(1), 21-27.
• Fauzel, S., Seetenah, B. & Sannasse, R. V. (2017). Analyzing The Impact of Tourism Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth: Evidence from a Small Island Developing State. Tourism Economics, 23(5), 1042-1055.
• Fayos-Sola, E. & Pedro Bueno, A. (2001) Tourism globalization and the competitive advantage of nations, Tourism in the age of Globalization. London and New York, Routledge.
• Filatotchev, I., Strange, R., Piesse, J., & Lien, Y-C. (2007). FDI by firms from newly industrialized economies in emerging markets: corporate governance, entry mode and location. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 556-572.
• Hausman, J.A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 46(6), 1251-1271.
• İlhan-Nas T., Okan T., Düzgün A. & Çam H. (2020). Türkiye’den dışarıya yapılan DYY’ların giriş stratejilerinin belirleyicileri üzerine bir araştırma: uluslararasılaşma kuramları bakış açısı. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 11(3), 592-614.
• Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.
• Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm – four Swedish cases. The Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305-323.
• Kar, M. & Tatlısöz, F. (2008). Türkiye’de Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Hareketlerini Belirleyen Faktörlerin Ekonometrik Analizi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8 (14), 436-458.
• Karagöz, K. (2007). Türkiye’de Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım Girişlerini Belirleyen Faktörler: 1970-2005. Journal of Yasar University. 2(8), 927-948.
• Karoğlu, E. (2018). The Effect of Corruption Distance on Turkey’s Inward Foreign Direct Investment. 2nd International Conference on New Approaches in Social Science and Humanities the Book of Proceedings and Abstracts, 130-131.
• Kepenek, Y. & Yentürk, N. (2000). Türkiye Ekonomisi. 11. Basım. İstanbul Remzi Kitabevi.
• Koçtürk, M. & Eker, M. (2012). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları ve Çok Uluslu Şirketlerin Gelişimi. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi. 18(1), 35-42.
• Kundu, S. K. & Contractor, F. J. (1999). Country Location Choices of Services Multinationals – An Empirical Study Of The İnternational Hotel Sector. Journal of International Management, 5 (4), 299-317.
• Leuz, C., Lins, K.V. & Warnock, F. E. (2010). Do Foreigner Invest Less in Poorly Governed Firms? Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 3245-3285.
• Mathews, J.A. (2002). Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: a resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 467-488.
• Mathews, J.A. (2006). Dragon multinationals: new players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1), 5-27.
• Metaxas, T. (2010). Place Marketing, Place Branding and Foreign Direct Investments: Defining Their Relationship in The Frame Of Local Economic Development Process. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6(3), 228-243.
• Morisset, J. (2000). ‘Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: Policies also Matter’. Transnational Corporations 9(2): 107–125.
• Özcan, B. & Arı, A. (2010). Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımların Belirleyicileri Üzerine Bir Analiz: OECD Örneği. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi. 12, 65-88.
• Peric J. & Radic, M. N. (2015) Tourism Productivity and Tourism FDI in Croatia, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 425-433.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). “Genaral Diagnostic Test for Cross Section Dependence In Panels”, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, Vol. 0435, 1-41.
• Ravinthirakumaran, K., Selvanathan, E. A., Selvanathan, S., & Singh, T. (2015). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Sri Lanka. South Asia Economic Journal, 16(2), 233-256.
• Rodrick, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131–165.
• Rodriguez, A. R. (2002). Determining Factors in Entry Choice for International Expansion: The Case Of The Spanish Hotel Industry, Tourism Management, 23 (6), 597-607.
• Salleh, N. H. M., Othman, R. & Sarmidi, T. (2011). An Analysis Of The Relationships Between Tourism Development And Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Study in Selected Majör Asian Countries. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(17), 250-257.
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage.
• Singh, H. & Jun, K. W. (1995). Some New Evidence On Determinants Of Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries. Policy Research Working Papers, World Bank.
• Subbarao, S. P (2008). A study on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Indian Tourism. Conference on Tourism in India – Challenges Ahead 15-17 Mayıs 2008.107-113.
• Surdu, I., Mellahi, K., & Glaister, K. (2018). Emerging market multinationals’ international equity-based entry mode strategies. International Marketing Review, 35(2), 342-359.
• Tang, S., Selvanathan, E.A. & Selvenathan, S. (2007). The Relationship Between Foreign Direct Investment and Tourism: Empirical Evidence From China. Tourism Economics, 13(1), 25-39.
• Tatoglu, E., & Glaister, K. W. (1998a). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Turkey. Thunderbird International Business Review, 40(3), 279–314.
• Tatoglu, E., & Glaister, K. W. (1998b). Western MNCs’ FDI in Turkey: an analysis of location specific factors. Management International Review, 38(2), 133-159.
• Tatoğlu, F.Y. (2020). “Panel Veri Ekonometrisi Stata Uygulamalı”, Beta Yayınevi, Genişletilmiş 5.Baskı İstanbul.
• Tomohara, A. (2016). Japan’s Tourism-Led Foreign Direct Investment Inflows: An Empirical Study. Economic Modelling. 52. 435-441.
• UNCTAD, World Investment Report (2006): Incentives and Foreign Direct Investment, New York and Geneva: United Nation
• UNWTO. (2017). Tourism Highlights, 2017 edition.
• Ussi, M. U., & Wei, J. G. (2011). The Location determinants for hotel foreign direct investment (FDI) in Zanzibar. Management and Service Science, 8, 105-112.
• WEF (2019), The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2019
• WTTC. (2018). Travel & Tourism Economic Impact 2017 World.