Araştırma Makalesi

EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 12 4 Şubat 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

Öz

Aim: In this study, the long-term postoperative results of inguinal hernia patients operated on using the Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) technique, one of the most used laparoscopic methods for inguinal hernia repair, were analyzed. The study aimed to investigate the long-term postoperative results and effectiveness of the laparoscopic TEP technique. Materials and Methods: The presented retrospective study included the surgical outcomes of 315 inguinal hernia patients operated on with the TEP technique in our hospital over a 7-year period between January 2016 and March 2023. The results were evaluated in terms of recurrence rate, suture dehiscence, swelling in the incisions, scrotal edema and swelling in the postoperative follow-up, and the return-to-work day of the patients. p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Postoperative recurrence was seen in 19 of the patients (6%). The average time for patients to return to work was 5.6 days. Bilateral direction ratio was significantly higher in the group with postoperative recurrence (p<0.05). Bilateral direction ratio and preoperative recurrence rate were significantly higher in the group with swelling in the incisions (p<0.05). The return to work day was significantly longer in patients with swelling in the incisions than in patients without incisions swelling (p<0.05). Bilateral inguinal hernia was significantly higher in patients with scrotal swelling and edema (p<0.05). Conclusion: Long-term postoperative experience of inguinal hernia repair with the laparoscopic TEP technique showed that the TEP approach is an effective and safe technique with the advantages of low postoperative recurrence and rapid return of patients to their daily activities and work.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. OECD. OECD Health Statistics 2022. https://www.data.oecd.org/health.htm
  2. Golden, J. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 2008;88(5):1073-1081.
  3. Bobo Z, Nan W, Qin Q, Tao W, Jianguo L, Xianli H. Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials comparing Lichtenstein and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of inguinal hernias. J Surg Res 2014;192: 409-420.
  4. Eker HH, Langeveld HR, Klitsi PJ, van’t Riet M, Stassen PSI, Weidena FW, et al. Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Surg 2012; 147:256-260.
  5. Tolver MA, Strandfelt P, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Pain characteristics after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2011; 25:3859-3864.
  6. Pokorny H, Klingler A, Schmid T, Fortelny R, Hollinsky C, Kawji R, Steiner E, Pernthaler H, Fugger R, Scheyer M. Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Hernia 2008; 12:385-389.
  7. Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, Bansal V, Bingener J, Bisgaard T, Buhck H, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc. 2015;29(2):289-321.
  8. Martinez-Hoed J, Cordero-Bermudez K, Garcia-Pastor P, Pous-Serrano S, Ortiz-Cubero JA. The inguinal hernia management in Costa Rica according to a survey between surgeons: result comparison with 2018 International Groin Hernia Guidelines. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):152.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Sistemleri (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

21 Ocak 2025

Yayımlanma Tarihi

4 Şubat 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Ekim 2024

Kabul Tarihi

25 Aralık 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 12

Kaynak Göster

APA
Şenol, Z. (2025). EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR. Atlas Journal of Medicine, 5(12), 58-61. https://doi.org/10.54270/atljm.2025.76
AMA
1.Şenol Z. EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR. ATLJM. 2025;5(12):58-61. doi:10.54270/atljm.2025.76
Chicago
Şenol, Zafer. 2025. “EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR”. Atlas Journal of Medicine 5 (12): 58-61. https://doi.org/10.54270/atljm.2025.76.
EndNote
Şenol Z (01 Şubat 2025) EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR. Atlas Journal of Medicine 5 12 58–61.
IEEE
[1]Z. Şenol, “EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR”, ATLJM, c. 5, sy 12, ss. 58–61, Şub. 2025, doi: 10.54270/atljm.2025.76.
ISNAD
Şenol, Zafer. “EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR”. Atlas Journal of Medicine 5/12 (01 Şubat 2025): 58-61. https://doi.org/10.54270/atljm.2025.76.
JAMA
1.Şenol Z. EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR. ATLJM. 2025;5:58–61.
MLA
Şenol, Zafer. “EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR”. Atlas Journal of Medicine, c. 5, sy 12, Şubat 2025, ss. 58-61, doi:10.54270/atljm.2025.76.
Vancouver
1.Zafer Şenol. EVALUATION OF THE SURGICAL RESULTS OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL (TEP) TECHNIQUE IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR. ATLJM. 01 Şubat 2025;5(12):58-61. doi:10.54270/atljm.2025.76