Sağlık Bilimleri Bilimsel Araştırmalarında chatGPT'nin Kullanılabilirliği

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 31 - 35, 27.02.2026

Ayşe Nur Koçak , Melis Buse Arslan

https://doi.org/10.54270/atljm.2026.106

https://izlik.org/JA68PM26AD

Öz

Yapay zeka sistemleri, akademik ortamlar da dahil olmak üzere hayatın birçok alanında bireylere yardımcı olabilir. Ancak bu ortamlardaki etkinliği konusunda görüşler farklılık göstermektedir. Bu araştırma, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi'nde görev yapan akademisyenlerin ChatGPT tarafından hazırlanan bilimsel araştırma sorularına yönelik tutumlarını incelemektedir. Çalışmaya altı sağlık bilimleri bölümü ve her bölümden beş öğretim üyesi olmak üzere 30 akademisyen katılmıştır. Sorular katılımcılara yapay zeka tarafından oluşturulduğu söylenmeden sunulmuştur. Sonuçlar, öğretim üyelerinin her bir bölüm için soruları “uygun” olarak değerlendirdiğini göstermiştir. Ancak iki noktada eleştiride bulundular: (a) bazı sorularda kullanılan terminoloji ve (b) bazı soruların bölünerek daha da detaylandırılma potansiyeli. Bu bağlamda, ChatGPT temel bilimsel konularla ilgilenen bireyler için uygun araştırma soruları oluşturabilirken, bu sorular bir uzman tarafından düzenlenmeli ve gözden geçirilmelidir. Araştırma, diğer akademik disiplinlerden gelen görüşlerin dahil edilmesiyle geliştirilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

chatGPT , akademi , sağlık bilimleri , araştırma

Usability of ChatGPT in health sciences scientific research: pilot study

https://izlik.org/JA68PM26AD

Öz

Artificial intelligence systems can assist individuals in many areas of life, including academic environments. However, opinions vary regarding their effectiveness in these settings. This research investigates the attitudes of academics working in the Faculty of Health Sciences towards scientific research questions prepared by ChatGPT. The study involved six health sciences departments and 30 academicians, with five faculty members from each department. The questions were presented to the participants without being told that it was created by artificial intelligence. The results showed that the faculty members rated the questions for each department as “appropriate.” However, they criticized two points: (a) the terminology used in certain questions and (b) the potential for some questions to be divided and elaborated further. In this context, while ChatGPT can generate suitable research questions for individuals interested in basic scientific topics, these questions should be edited and reviewed by an expert. The research could be enhanced by incorporating insights from other academic disciplines.

Anahtar Kelimeler

chatGPT , academia , health sciences , research

Kaynakça

• Singh SK, Kumar S, Mehra PS. Chat GPT & Google Bard AI: A review. In: 2023 International Conference on IoT, Communication and Automation Technology (ICICAT); 2023. IEEE; 2023. p. 1-6. doi:10.1109/ICICAT57735.2023.10263706.
• Biswas SS. Potential use of Chat GPT in global warming. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(6):1126-7. doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03171-8.
• Biswas SS. Role of Chat GPT in public health. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(5):868-9. doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03172-7.
• Kalla D, Smith N, Samaah F, Kuraku S. Study and analysis of Chat GPT and its impact on different fields of study. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol. 2023;8(3). Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4402499.
• Yu H. Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1181712. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712.
• Božić V, Poola I. Chat GPT and education [Preprint]. 2023. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Velibor-Bozic-2/publication/369926506_Chat_GPT_and_education/links/64350844ad9b6d17dc4d3a79/Chat-GPT-and-education.pdf.
• Sharma S, Yadav R. Chat GPT–A technological remedy or challenge for education system. Glob J Enterp Inf Syst. 2022;14(4):46-51. Available from: https://gjeis.com/index.php/GJEIS/article/download/698/640.
• Huallpa JJ. Exploring the ethical considerations of using Chat GPT in university education. Period Eng Nat Sci. 2023;11(4):105-15. doi:10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770.
• Blaizot A, Veettil SK, Saidoung P, Moreno-Garcia CF, Wiratunga N, Aceves-Martins M, et al. Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review. Res Synth Methods. 2022;13(3):353-62.
• Yang Y, Siau K, Xie W, Sun Y. Smart health: Intelligent healthcare systems in the metaverse, artificial intelligence, and data science era. J Organ End User Comput. 2022;34(1):1-14.
• Bishnoi L, Singh SN. Artificial intelligence techniques used in medical sciences: a review. In: 2018 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence); 2018 Jan. IEEE; 2018. p. 1-8.
• Doğaner A. The approaches and expectations of the health sciences students towards artificial intelligence. Karya J Health Sci. 2021;2(1):5-11.
• Park CW, Seo SW, Kang N, Ko B, Choi BW, Park CM, et al. Artificial intelligence in health care: current applications and issues. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(42).