MAKSİLLER RETRÜZYONUN BÜYÜME DÖNEMİNDE ALT-RAMEC VE MANDİBULAR MİNİ VİDA İŞBİRLİĞİ İLE TEDAVİSİ: Bir Olgu Sunumu

Öz

İskeletsel Sınıf III malokluzyonlar %40 oranında maksiller gerilik ile birlikte olup erken büyüme döneminde ortopedik, geç büyüme döneminde ise ortognatik cerrahi ile tedavi edilir. Bu vaka raporunda amaç maksiller retrüzyonla birlikte iskeletsel ve dişsel Sınıf III maloklüzyonu olan 13,3 yaşında bir erkek bireyde Mc Namara tipi maksiller ekspansiyon apereyi/Alt-RAMEC protokolü ile mandibular kanin bölgeye bilateral olarak yerleştirilen mini vidalardan ortopedik şiddette Sınıf III intermaksiller elastiklerin birlikte uygulanmasının kraniyo-fasiyal yapıdaki etkilerini sunmaktır. Ortopedik tedavi, sabit ortodontik tedavi ve 1 yıllık retansiyon etkileri değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuç olarak adolesan dönemde bu yöntemin etkili bir maksiller anterior hareket oluşturduğu saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Geçici ankraj sistemi
• Mini vida
• Maksiller gerilik
• Sınıf III malokluzyon

Maxillary Retrusion Therapy Combined with Alt-RAMEC and Mandibular Mini Screw in Growth Period: A Case Report

Öz

Skeletal Class III malocclusions are associated with maxillary retrusion of 40% and are treated by orthopedic treatment in early growth period and orthognathic surgery in late growth period. The aim of this case report is to present results that 13,3 –year-old boy having skeletal and dental Class III malocclusion associated with maxillary retrusion, treated with combination Mc Namara type maxillary expander/Alt-RAMEC protocol and orthopedically forced Class III intermaxillary elastics from mandibular mini screws placed canine regions on the craniofacial structures. It was evaluated respectively effects of orthopedic treatment, fixed orthodontic treatment and retention period of 1 year. Conclusively, it has been determined that this method causes effectively anterior movement of the maxilla in adolescent period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Temporary anchorage system
• Mini Screw
• Maxillary deficiency
• Class III malocclusion

Kaynakça

1. 1. Frankel R. Maksiller retrüzyon in Class III and treatment with the function corrector III. Trans. Eur. Orthod., 249-259, 1970.
2. 2. Tuncer BB. Sınıf III malokluzyonlarında uygulanan tedavi sistemleri. Cumhuriyet Dental J, 11(1):53-58, 2008:
3. 3. Kidner G, DiBiase A, DiBiase D. Class III twin blocks: a case series. J Orthod. 30(3):197–201, 2003.
4. 4. Thilander B. Chin-cap treatment for angle class 3 malocclusion. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc.41:311–327, 1965.
5. 5. Sugawara J, Asano T, Endo N, Mitani H. Long-term effects of chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 98(2):127–133, 1990.
6. 6. Nartallo-Turley PE, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 68(3):217–224, 1998.
7. 7. Ngan P, Yiu C, Hu A, Hagg U, Wei SH, Gunel E. Cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction. Eur J Orthod. 20(3):237–254, 1998.
8. 8. De Clerck H, Cevidanes L, Baccetti T. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 138(5):577–581, 2010.

9. 9. Haas A. J. Long-term posttreatment evaluation of rapid palatal ex-pansion.» Angle Orthod, 50: 189-217, 1980.
10. 10. Gökalp H, Çalpan D. "Treatment of Functional Class III Malocclusion Associated with Retrognathic Maxilla by Double Hinged Maxillary Expansion Device and Sequential Rapid Maxillary Expansion-Constriction Protocol-Case Report." A.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 43(2) 103-112, 2016.
11. 11. Wang YC, Chang PM, Liou, EJ-W. Opening of circumaxillary sutures by alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Angle Orthod, 79: 230- 234, 2009.
12. 12. Nanda R. Biomechanical and clinical considerations of a modified protraction headgear. Am J Orthod., 78: 125-139, 1980.
13. 13. Mermigos J, Full, CA, Andreasen G. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 98(1): 47-55, 1990.
14. 14. Saadia M, Torres E. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions: a longitudinal retrospective study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 117(6): 669-680, 2000.
15. 15. Mitani M, Mohri JI, Yoshida Y, Saito J, Ishii S, Tsuru K, Kojoh SI. Living polymerization of ethylene catalyzed by titanium complexes having fluorine-containing phenoxy− imine chelate ligands. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 124(13): 3327-3336, 2002.
16. 16. Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, ve McNamara JA. Tollaro Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113: 333-343, 1998.
17. 17. Gu Y, Rabie AB, Hagg U. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117: 691-699, 2000.
18. 18. Sar C, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Uçkan S, Yazıcı AC. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.139(5):636-49, 2011.
19. 19. Kaplan RF, Trevino, RP, Johnson GM, Levy L., Dornbush R, Hu LT, Klempner MS. Cognitive function in post-treatment Lyme disease Do additional antibiotics help?. Neurology, 60(12): 1916-1922,2003.
20. 20. Chun YS, Jeong SG, Row J, Yang SJ. A new appliance for orthopedic correction of Class lll malocclusion. Clin Orthod. 33: 705-711, 1999
21. 21. Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, İplikcioglu H. Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123: 571-577, 2003.
22. 22. Kırçelli BH, Pektaş ZO. Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored face mask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 133: 440-441, 2008
23. 23. Liou EJ-W. Effective maxillary orthopaedic protraction for growing Class III patients: a clinical application simulated distraction osteogenesis. Prog Orthod. 6:154–171, 2005.
24. 24. Wilmes B, Su YY, Drescher D. Insertion angle impact on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Angle Orthod. 78: 1065-1070, 2008.
25. 25. EJ E, Liou EJ-W, Tsai WC. A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: Repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 1: 121-127, 2005.
26. 26. Sung SJ, Baik HS.Assessment of skeletal and dental changes by maxillary protraction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 114: 492–502, 1998.
27. 27. Merwin D, Ngan P, Hägg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 112: 292–299, 1997.
28. 28. Cha KS. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal Class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups. Angle Orthodontist, 73: 26-35, 2003.
29. 29. Kapust AJ, Sinclair PM, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of face mask/expansion therapy in Class III children: a comparison of three age groups.» American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 113: 204–212, 1998.
30. 30. Chang HP, Tseng YC, Chang HF. Treatment of Mandibular Prognathism. J Formos Med Assoc. 105:781-90, 2006.
31. 31. Hata S, Itoh T, Nakagawa M, Kamogashira K, Ichikawa K, Matsumoto M, Chaconas SJ. Biomechanical effects of maxillary protraction on the craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 91:305–311, 1987.
32. 32. Chong YH, Ive JC, Artun J. Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 66:351–362, 1996.
33. 33. Kajiyama K, Murakami T, Suzuki A. Comparison of orthodontic and orthopedic effects of a modified maxillary protractor between deciduous and early mixed dentitions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.126:23–32, 2004.