GÜLÜMSEME ESTETİĞİNDE PARAMETRELER: DERLEME

Öz

Günümüzde estetik beklentilerin artmasına bağlı olarak, bu amaca yönelik tedaviler hekimler tarafından çok sık uygulanmaya başlanmıştır. Gülümsemenin görünümünü iyileştirmek, hastaların dental tedaviye başvurmasının ana nedenlerinden biridir. Özellikle ön bölgede yapılan estetik düzenlemeler ile hastaya güzel bir gülüş iade edilebilir. Estetik açıdan çekici bir gülümsemenin bileşenlerini anlamak, hasta memnuniyetini ve başarılı tedavi sonuçlarını elde etmek için gereklidir. Bu sebeple gülümseme estetiği modern diş hekimliğinde önemli bir yer tutar. Estetik gülümseme tasarımı çok yönlü bir tedavi yaklaşımı gerektirir. Uyumlu bir gülümsemenin elde edilmesi için birden fazla tedavinin uygulaması gerekebilir ve bu tedaviler tek başına değil, birbirleriyle birlikte değerlendirilmelidir. Bireylerin estetik tedavisine olan ilginin artmasıyla diş estetiğini artırmaya yönelik çalışmalar hız kazanmıştır. Bu konuda prostodontistlerin, pratisyen diş hekimlerinin ve diş hekimi olmayan bireylerin estetik algısının araştırılmasına yönelik birçok çalışma yapılmıştır. Bu araştırmaların sonucunda belirli dental ve fasiyal standartların gülümseme estetiğini etkilediği görülmüştür. Sadece dişlerin değil, etrafındaki yumuşak dokuların da uyum içinde olmasının estetik bir gülümseme için gerekli olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Ayrıca dişlerin en-boy oranı, morfolojisi, angulasyonları, dişeti görünümü, gülümseme hattı ve arkı, bukkal koridor, dudak kalınlığı altın oran gibi bazı standartların gülümsemenin estetik açıdan gelişmesini sağladığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı gülümseme estetiğini etkileyen bu parametrelerin araştırılmasıdır. Böylelikle, gülüş estetiği elde edilirken daha başarılı sonuçlar alınacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dental Estetik
• Gülümseme
• restorasyon

Paramethers of Smile Esthetics: Review of Literature

Öz

Esthetic dental treatments have been widely applied by physicians currently due to increased patient demand. Improving the appearance of the smile is one of the main reasons of the patients to prefer dental treatment. Especially with the esthetic treatments made in the anterior region, a beautiful smile can be regained with these application. To achieve patient satisfaction and successful treatment results, it is necessary to understand the components of an esthetically attractive smile. For this purpose, smile esthetics is important in modern dentistry. Esthetic smile design requires a multidisciplinary approach. More than one treatment may be required to achieve a harmonious smile, and these treatments should not be evaluated alone but in combination with each other With the increasing demand for esthetic treatment of individuals, studies aimed at increasing dental esthetics have accelerated. Research has been conducted on the esthetic perception of orthodontists, prostodontists, general practitioners and laypersons. As a result of these studies, it has been shown that dental and facial standards effect smile esthetics. It was concluded that not only the teeth but also the surrounding soft tissues should be in harmony for an esthetic smile. In addition, some standards such as aspect ratio, morphology, angulation, levels of gingival exposure, smile line and arch, buccal corridor, lip thickness golden ratio of teeth have been found to effect esthetic results. The purpose of this study is to investigate these parameters affecting the smile esthetics. Thus, more successful results will be obtained while getting the esthetics of smile

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dental Esthetics
• restoration
• Smiling

Kaynakça

1. 1. Mousavi SM, Ghorani PS, Deilamani A, Rakhshan V. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial., Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019: 23: 439-451.
2. 2. Sharma PK, Sharma P. Dental Smile Esthetics: The Assessment and Creation of the Ideal Smile, Seminars in Orthodontics 2012: 18: 193-201.
3. 3. Nomura S, Freitas KMS, Silva PPC, Valarelli FP, Cancado RH, Freitas MR et al. Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics, Dental Press J Orthod 2018: 23: 47-57.
4. 4. Hussain A, Louca C, Leung A, Sharma P. The influence of varying maxillary incisor shape on perceived smile aesthetics, J Dent 2016: 50: 12-20.
5. 5. Goldstein RE. Study of need for esthetics in dentistry Atlanta, Ga: J Prosthet Dent; 1969.
6. 6. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenzac MA. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics., American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2006: 132.
7. 7. Tarantili VV, Halazonetis DJ, Spyropoulos MN. The spontaneous smile in dynamic motion, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005: 128: 8-15.
8. 8. Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, Costa ACS, Ferreira MC, Bramante FS, Fialho MPN, Gurgel JA. Comparison of gingival display in smile attractiveness among restorative dentists, orthodontists, prosthodontists, periodontists, and laypeople, J Prosthet Dent 2019.

9. 9. Rayyan MR. Effect of the interproximal contact level on the perception of smile esthetics, Dent Med Probl 2019: 56: 251-255.
10. 10. Cracel Nogueira F, Pinho T. Assessment of the perception of smile esthetics by laypersons, dental students and dental practitioners., 2013: 11.
11. 11. Morley J, Eubank J. Macroesthetic elements of smile design., 2001: 132: 39-45.
12. 12. AW. M. 10 commandments of smile esthetics, Dental Press J Orthod 2014: 19: 136-157.
13. 13. Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, Brensinger CM, Landis R. A morphometric analysis of the posed smile., Clin Orthod Res 1998: 1: 2-11.
14. 14. Lakshmi S, Abraham A, Selvakumaran G, Sekar V, Annapoorni H. Influence of aesthetic dental and facial measurements on patient satisfaction between genders in Indian patients, Tanta Dental Journal 2015: 12: 197-202.
15. 15. Kokich VO, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the Perception of Dentists and Lay People to Altered Dental Esthetics, Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 1999: 11.
16. 16. Lira Dos Santos EJ, Dantas AMX, Vilela RM, Santiago de Lima KJR, Beltrao RTS. The influence of varying maxillary central incisor vertical dimension on perceived smile aesthetics, J Orthod 2019: 46: 137-142.
17. 17. Al-Saleh SA, Al-Shammery DA, Al-Shehri NA, Al-Madi EM. Awareness of Dental Esthetic Standards Among Dental Students and Professionals, Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2019: 11: 373-382.
18. 18. AlShahrani I. Perception of Professional Female College Students Towards Smile arc Types and Outlook about their Appearance, J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2017: 7: 329-335.
19. 19. Machado AW, McComb R, Moon W, Gandini Jr LG. Influence of the vertical position of maxillary central incisors on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons., J Esthetic Rest Dent 2013: 25: 392-401.
20. 20. Al Taki A, Hamdan AM, Mustafa Z, Hassan M, Abu-Alhuda S. Smile esthetics: Impact of variations in the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the maxillary lateral incisors, Eur J Dent 2017: 11: 514-520.
21. 21. Sepolia S, Sepolia G, Kaur R, Gautam DK, Jindal V, Gupta SC. Visibility of gingiva - An important determinant for an esthetic smile, J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014: 18: 488-492.
22. 22. Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Schols J, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Smile line assessment comparing quantitative measurement and visual estimation, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011: 139: 174-180.
23. 23. Coachman C, Calamita MA, Sesma N. Dynamic Documentation of the Smile and the 2D/3D Digital Smile Design Process, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2017: 37: 183-193.
24. 24. Pausch NC, Katsoulis D. Gender-specific evaluation of variation of maxillary exposure when smiling, J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017: 45: 913-920.
25. 25. Li H, Cao T, Zhou H, Hou Y. Lip position analysis of young women with different skeletal patterns during posed smiling using 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019: 155: 64-70.
26. 26. Mahn E, Sampaio CS, Pereira da Silva B, Stanley K, Valdes AM, Gutierrez J et al. Comparing the use of static versus dynamic images to evaluate a smile, J Prosthet Dent 2019.
27. 27. Simoes D, Brito GM, Teixeira Cangussu MC, Machado AW. Does the vertical position of maxillary central incisors in men influence smile esthetics perception?, American Association of Orthodontists 2018: 156: 485-492.
28. 28. Vig RG, Brundo GC. The kinetics of anterior tooth display, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1978: 39: 502-504.
29. 29. Magne P, Salem P, Magne M. Influence of symmetry and balance on visual perception of a white female smile, J Prosthet Dent 2018: 120: 573-582.
30. 30. Mahn E, Sampaio CS, Pereira da Silva B, Stanley K, Valdes AM, Gutierrez J et al. Prevalence of tooth forms and their gender correlation, J Esthet Restor Dent 2018: 30: 45-50.
31. 31. Duarte MEA, Machado RM, Jardim da Motta AF, Mucha JN, Motta AT. Morphological Simulation of Different Incisal Embrasures: Perception of Laypersons, Orthodontic Patients, General Dentists and Orthodontists., J Esthet Restor Dent 2017: 29: 68-78.
32. 32. Pugliese F, Hess R, Palomo L. Black triangles: Preventing their occurrence, managing them when prevention is not practical, Seminars in Orthodontics 2019: 25: 175-186.
33. 33. Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 2. smile analysis and treatment strategies, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2003: 124: 116-127.
34. 34. Yang S, Guo Y, Yang X, Zhang F, Wang J, Qiu J, Li J. Effect of mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary central incisors on esthetic perceptions of the smile in the frontal view, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015: 148: 396-404.
35. 35. Silva BP, Jimenez-Castellanos E, Stanley K, Mahn E, Coachman C, Finkel S. Layperson’s perception of axial midline angulation in asymmetric faces., J Esthet Restor Dent 2017: 30: 119-125.
36. 36. Ozdemir H, Bayindir F. [The Evaluation of Golden Proportion in Persons with Natural Dentitions.], J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2016: 26: 251-255.
37. 37. Revilla-Leon M, Meyer MJ, Barrington JJ, Sones A, Umorin MP, Taleghani M et al. Perception of occlusal plane that is nonparallel to interpupillary and commissural lines but with the maxillary dental midline ideally positioned, J Prosthet Dent 2019: 122: 482-490.
38. 38. Moore T, Southard KA, Casko JS, Qian F, Southard TE. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2003: 127.
39. 39. Nimbalkar S, Oh YY, Mok RY, Tioh JY, Yew KJ, Patil PG. Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians, The Journal of Prosthodontic Dentistry 2016: 120: 252-256.
40. 40. Mollabashi V, Abolvardi M, Akhlaghian M, Ghaffari MI. Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types, Dental and Medical Problems 2018: 55: 305-312.
41. 41. Kim J, Topolski R, Dickinson D, Ramos V. The influence of lip form on incisal display with lips in repose on the esthetic preferences of dentists and lay people, J Prosthet Dent 2017: 118: 413-421.
42. 42. Schmid PM. Sculptural Aesthetic Surface Anatomy of the Face, Advances in Cosmetic Surgery 2019: 2: 11-21.
43. 43. Rifkin R.Facial Analysis. A chomprensyve approach to treatment planning in ahesthetic dentistry, Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 2000: 12(9): 865-871.