The Effect of Single/Double Application of Universal Adhesive on Bond Strength

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 47 Sayı: 1-3, 81 - 88, 31.12.2020

Betül Büşra Ursavaş , Esin Günal , Şule Nur Acar Ayşe Rüveyda Göçer Tuğba Bezgin

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the application of two layers of universal adhesive agent on the bond strength of compomer on primary tooth dentin. Materials and Methods: 20 caries-free primary molars were used in the study. Occlusal surfaces of the teeth were cut to expose a flat dentin surface and abraded with wet 600 grit silicon carbide paper to obtain a smear layer. The universal adhesive agent (Prime & Bond Universal, Dentsply Sirona, New York, USA) was applied to the samples by two different methods: Group 1) The adhesive agent was applied in a single coat, air-diluted and light cured; Group 2) Adhesive agent applied in two layers, diluted with air and light cured on each layer. Subsequently, compomer (Dyract XP, Dentsply Sirona, New York, USA) restorations were made to both groups. All samples were subjected to 500 thermal cycles and then sectioned for microtensile testing. Two sections from each tooth were obtained so that there were 20 samples in each group. The testing was conducted using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min (Micro Tensile Tester, T-61010Ki, Bisco, Schaumburg, USA). Failure modes were determined under a stereomicroscope. Results were analyzed using the t-test and chi-square analysis. Results: Average microtensile bonding values for Groups 1 and 2 are 12.0±5.8 and 16.7±7.4 MPa, respectively. Higher MPa values were observed as a result of applying two layers of universal adhesive, and the difference between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (p <0.05). While mixed type fractures covering both dentine and adhesive surface were observed more in Group 2 (60%), adhesive type fracture between the restorative material and tooth tissue was observed more in Group 1 (70%). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Increasing the number of layers of the universal adhesive used in compomer restorations applied to primary teeth showed an increasing effect on the bond strength.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bond strength, Compomer, Dentin, Universal adhesive

UNİVERSAL ADEZİVİN TEK/ÇİFT KAT UYGULANMASININ BAĞLANMA DAYANIMI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir universal adeziv ajanın tek/iki kat uygulanmasının kompomerin süt dişi dentinine bağlanma dayanımı üzerine olan etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 20 adet çürüksüz süt molar diş kullanılmıştır. Dişlerin okluzal yüzeyleri düz bir dentin yüzeyi elde etmek amacıyla kesilmiş ve ardından smear tabakası elde etmek amacıyla 600 gritlik silikon karbid zımpara ile aşındırılmıştır. Örneklere, universal adeziv ajan (Prime & Bond Universal, Dentsply Sirona, New York, ABD) iki farklı yöntemle uygulanmıştır: Grup 1) Adeziv ajan tek kat uygulanmış, hava ile inceltilmiş ve ışıkla polimerize edilmiştir; Grup 2) Adeziv ajan iki kat uygulanmış, her katta hava ile inceltilmiş ve ışıkla polimerize edilmiştir. Ardından, her iki gruba da kompomer (Dyract XP, Dentsply Sirona, New York, ABD) restorasyonlar yapılmıştır. Tüm örnekler 500 termal siklusa tabi tutulmuş ve sonrasında mikrogerilim testi için kesitlere ayrılmıştır. Her dişten 2 kesit elde edilmiş böylece her grupta 20 adet örnek olması sağlanmıştır. Örneklerin mikrogerilim bağlanma dayanımı (µTBS) değerleri mikrogerilim test cihazında (Micro Tensile Tester, T-61010Ki, Bisco, Schaumburg, ABD), örneklere 1 mm/dk hızla kuvvet uygulanarak ölçülmüştür. Kırık tipleri stereomikroskop altında incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar Ki-Kare analizi ve t testi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Ortalama mikrogerilim bağlanma değerleri Grup 1 ve 2 için sırasıyla 12,0±5,8 ve 16,7±7,4 MPa’dır. Universal adezivin iki kat uygulanması sonucunda daha yüksek MPa değerleri gözlenmiş ve iki grup arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Hem dentin hem adeziv yüzeyini kapsayan karışık tip kırık Grup 2’de daha çok gözlenmişken (%60), restoratif materyalle diş dokusu arasında oluşan adeziv tip kırık Grup 1’de daha çok gözlenmiştir (%70). Kırık tipleri açısından gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark tespit edilmemiştir (p>0,05). Sonuç: Süt dişine uygulanan kompomer restorasyonlarda kullanılan universal adezivin tabaka sayısının arttırılmasının bağlanma dayanımını arttırıcı etkisi olmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bağlanma dayanımı, Dentin, Kompomer, Universal adeziv

Kaynakça

• 1. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008; 24(1): 90-101.
• 2. Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater 2012; 28(1): 72-86.
• 3. Nassar M, Hiraishi N, Shimokawa H, Tamura Y, Otsuki M, Kasugai S, Ohya K, Tagami J. The inhibition effect of non-protein thiols on dentinal matrix metalloproteinase activity and HEMA cytotoxicity. J Dent 2014; 42(3): 312-8.
• 4. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Pashley D, Mutluay MM. Long-term durability of dental adhesives. Current Oral Health Reports 2015; 174-181.
• 5. Fujiwara S, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Nakatsuka T, Miyazaki M. Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 77: 501-509.
• 6. Soares FZ, Rocha Rde O, Raggio DP, Sadek FT, Cardoso PE. Microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems to primary and permanent dentin. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27: 457-462.
• 7. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. Am J Dent.1997; 10: 219–223.
• 8. Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Endo H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2016; 46: 520–530.
• 9. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 9–21.
• 10. Cuevas-Suárez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding performance of universal adhesives: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21: 7–26.
• 11. Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J (2019) Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2019; 107: 2121–2131.
• 12. Takeda M, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Suzuki T, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Immediate enamel bond strength of universal adhesives to unground and ground surfaces in different etching modes. Eur J Oral Sci 2019; 127: 351–360.
• 13. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17–28.
• 14. Miyazaki M, Tsujimoto A, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Platt JA. Important compositional characteristics in the clinical use of adhesive systems. J Oral Sci 2014; 56: 1–9.
• 15. Salz U, Zimmermann J, Salzer T. Self-curing, self-adhesive cements systems. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 7–17.
• 16. Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT. Curing effi-ciency of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1104–1108.
• 17. Zorzin J, Petschelt A, Ebert J, Lohbauer U. pH neutralization and influence on mechanical strength in self-adhesive resin luting agents. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 672–679.
• 18. Ogura Y, Shimizu Y, Shiratsuchi K, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, Ando S, Miyazaki M. Effect of warm air-drying on dentin bond strength of single-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 507–513.
• 19. Shiratsuchi K, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, Furuichi T, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M. Influence of warm air-drying on enamel bond strength and surface free-energy of self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2013; 121: 370–376.
• 20. Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent 2014; 39: 489–499.
• 21. Taschner M, Kümmerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petshelt A, Frankenberger R. Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2014; 39: 416–426.
• 22. Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Muñoz MA, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating ont he immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 236–246.
• 23. Mohamad D, Young RJ, Mann AB, Watts DC. Post-polymerization of dental resin composite evaluated with nanoindetaion and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Arch Orofac Sci 2007; 2: 26–31.
• 24. Yamada M, Miyazaki M, Moore BK. Influence of interchanging adhesive resins and self-etching primers on the mechanical properties of adhesive resins. Oper Dent 2004; 29(5): 532-537.
• 25. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater 2006; 22(6): 533-544.
• 26. Takahashi M, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Long-term evaluation of water sorption and ultimate tensile strength of HEMA-containing/-free one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent 2011; 39(7): 506-512.
• 27. Hashimoto M, Sano H, Yoshida E, Hori M, Kaga M, Oguchi H, Pashley DH. Effects of multiple adhesive coatings on dentin bonding. Oper Dent 2004; 29(4): 416-23.
• 28. Wei S, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J. Effect of double-application of three single-step self-etch adhesives on dentin bonding and mechanical properties of resin-dentin area. Oper Dent 2009; 34(6): 716-724.
• 29. Takahashi R, Nikaido T, Ariyoshi M, Kitayama S, Sadr A, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Thin resin coating by dual-application of all-in-one adhesives improves dentin bond strength of resin cements for indirect restorations. Dent Mater J 2010; 29(5): 615-622.
• 30. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, Waller JL, Pashley DH. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7(2): 133-141.
• 31. Hirokane E, Takamizawa T, Kasahara Y, Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Effect of double-layer application on the early enamel bond strength of universal adhesives. Clin Oral Investig 2020 May 30.
• 32. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Bonding to Cut Enamel, Eliades G, Watts DC, Eliades T. Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding, Western Europe: Spinger Verlag 2005; 16-21.
• 33. Ermis RB, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin prepared with three differenet diamond burs. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 978-985.
• 34. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall Jr GW. The influence of dentin smear layer on adhesion: A self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 758-767.
• 35. Chan KM, Tay FR, King NM, Imazato S, Pashley DH. Bonding of mild self- etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. Am J Dent 2003; 16(5): 340-346.
• 36. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent 1999; 1(1): 57-67.
• 37. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995; 11(2): 117-125.
• 38. Camps J, Pashley DH. Buffering action of human dentin in vitro. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2(1): 39-50.
• 39. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness onpolymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 812-817.
• 40. Koike T, Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Yukitani W, Yamashita T, Wakumoto S, Hisamitsu H. Effect of multiple application of a dentin adhesive on contraction gap width of a resin-based composite. Am J Dent 2002; 15(3): 159-163. 41. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95(6): 430-436.
• 42. Lührs AK, Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Geurtsen W, Van Meerbeek B. Curing mode affects bond strength of adhesively luted composite CAD/CAM restorations to dentin. Dent Mater 2014; 30(3): 281-291.
• 43. Lima JFM, Wajngarten D, Islam F, Clifford J, Botta AC. Effect of adhesive mode and chlorhexidine on microtensile strength of universal bonding agent to sound and caries-affected dentins. Eur J Dent 2018; 12(4): 553-558.