BİRİNCİ DAİMİ MOLAR DİŞLERİN YAŞ VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE KLİNİK DURUMLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 46 Sayı: 3, 137 - 144, 31.12.2019

Burak İncebeyaz , Hatice Ahsen Deniz , Elif Polat , Mehmet Eray Kolsuz

Öz

Amaç: Eksik veya restore edilmiş daimi birinci azı dişleri oklüzal durumu ve diş sağlığını etkiler. Bu çalışmanın amacı eksik, restorasyonlu (dolgu,kanal tedavisi,protetik restorasyon) veya implant gibi durumların birinci molar dişler üzerindeki yaygınlığını belirlemektir. Yöntemler: 1117 erkek 1487 kadın hastanın panoramik radyograflarının değerlendirildiği çalışmamızda, hastalar 7-15, 16-24, 25-40, 41-55, 56-70 ve 71 yaş ve üzeri olarak yaş gruplarına ayrıldı. Maksiller ve mandibuler birinci molarların durumları var-yok, var ise sağlıklı, dolgulu, kanal tedavili, protetik restorasyonlu, kanal tedavili + protetik restorasyonlu, yok ise kök artığı, ya da ilgili bölgede implant var olarak değerlendirildi. Sonuç: Sürekli birinci molarların sürme yaşının erken olması, süt dişlenme döneminde ağız içerisinde bulunması, bu dişlerin bakımının göz ardı edilmesine ve sıklıkla kaybedilmesine yol açmaktadır. Erken yaşta olan diş kayıplarının çocuklarda çene gelişimi üzerindeki etkileri hem dental sağlık hem genel sağlık yönünden olumsuz sonuçlara yol açmaktadır. İlerleyen yaşlarda bu kayıpların restore edilmesi için harcanan maddi olanaklar devlet bütçesinde oldukça yüksek rakamlar oluşturmaktadır. Bu sebeplerden dolayı karışık dişlenme döneminde aileler diş bakımı açısından uygun şekilde bilgilendirilmelidirler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Birinci sürekli molar, Panoramik radyografi, klinik değerlendirme

Evaluation of Clinical Status of First Permanent Molar Teeth According to Age and Gender

Öz

Objective: Incomplete or restored permanent first molars affect the occlusal condition and dental health. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of missing, restorated (filling, canal treatment, prosthetic restoration) or implants on first molars. Methods: In our study, 1117 male and 1487 female patients were evaluated and panoramic patients were divided into 6 different age groups (age range between 7-15 years, 16-24 years, 25-40 years, 41-55 years, 56-70 years and 71 and older ages). Maxillary and mandibular first molars were evaluated as present or absent, healthy, filled, root canal treatment, prosthetic restoration, root canal treatment + prosthetic restoration, and if there was no root residue, or implant in the related region. Results: The early age of permanent first molars and their presence in the mouth during the deciduous dentition lead to disregard and frequent loss of care of these teeth. The effects of early tooth loss on the jaw development of children lead to negative results in terms of both dental health and general health. Financial resources spent in the restoration of these losses in later years constitute quite high figures in the state budget. For these reasons, families should be properly informed about dental care during mixed dentition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

First permanent molar, Panoromic radiography, clinical evaluation

Kaynakça

• 1. Shyam R, Manjunath BC, Kumar A, Narang R, Goyal A, Piplani A. Assessment of dental caries spectrum among 11 to 14-year-old school going children in India. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2017. vol. 11, no. 6, pp. ZC78–ZC81.Rezaie M, Ghapanchi J, Haghnegahdar A, Khojastehpour L, Khorshidi H, Heidari H. A Radiographic Evaluation of Missing of Permanent First Molars in a Group of Iranian Children and Adults: A Retrospective Study. Int J Dent 2018. Apr 1;2018:5253965.
• 2. Hamasha AA, Sasa I, Al-Qudah M. Risk indicators associated with tooth loss in Jordanian adults. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 2000. vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 67– 72.Hiremath A, Murugaboopathy V, Ankola AV, Hebbal M, Mohandoss S, Pastay P. Prevalence of dental caries among primary school children of India: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2016. vol. 10, no. 10, pp. ZC47– ZC50.
• 3. Major MA. Wheeler’s Dental Anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion, 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1993:79-117, 325- 430.
• 4. Graber TM. Vanarsdall RL. Current Orthodontic Concept and Techniques, 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000:39.
• 5. Angle EH. Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth, 7th ed. Philadelphia: S. S. White Manufacturing Co; 1907:252.
• 6. Bazrafshan E, Kamani H, Mostafapour FK, Mahvi AH. Determination of the decayed, missing, filled teeth index in Iranian students: a case study of Zahedan city. Health Scope 2012. vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 84–88.
• 7. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation 7th ed. New York, 2014.
• 8. da Fonseca MA, Avenetti D. “Social determinants of pediatric oral health,” Dental Clinics of North America 2017. vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 519–532
• 9. Mclaren L, Singhal S. “Does cessation of community water fluoridation lead to an increase in tooth decay? A systematic review of published studies,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2016. vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 934–940.
• 10. Arrow P. Dental enamel defects, caries experience and oral health-related quality of life: a cohort study. Australian Dental Journal 2017. vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 165–172.
• 11. Opydo-Szymaczek J, Gerreth K. Developmental enamel defects of the permanent first molars and incisors and their association with dental caries in the region of Wielkopolska, Western Poland. Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry 2015. vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 461–469.
• 12. Patel S, Ashley P, Noar J. Radiographic prognostic factors determining spontaneous space closure after loss of the permanent first molar. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2017. vol.151, no. 4, pp. 718–726.
• 13. Mathu-Muju KR, Kennedy DB. Loss of permanent first molars in the mixed dentition: circumstances resulting in extraction and requiring orthodontic management. Pediatric Dentistry 2016 vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 46–53.
• 14. Aksoy MC, Kocer G, Kucukesmen HC, Eroglu E, Senturk MF. Distribution and pattern of implant therapy in a part of the Turkish population. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 Oct;66(10):1277-1280.
• 15. Kont Cobankara F, Orucoglu H.Cumhuriyet Universitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2004.Cilt:7 Sayı:2.