From crisis to normal: Science teachers’ distance education experiences during COVID-19 and the transition back to face-to-face education

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 336 - 358, 23.12.2025

Seher Toğantemur , Pelin Yıldırım , Gonca Keçeci

https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1756640

Abstract

The pandemic process has accelerated digitalization in education and transformed teaching methods. This study aims to examine science teachers' distance education experiences during the COVID-19 period and their views on the transition to face-to-face education. Conducted between 2020 and 2023, this phenomenological study involved 30 science teachers working in schools affiliated with the Ministry of National Education (MoNE) in the Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia regions of Turkey. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using content analysis. The findings indicate that the use of digital tools in distance education was limited due to infrastructure deficiencies and student access issues. Furthermore, low student participation and readiness gaps negatively affected face-to-face education. While online assessment methods faced reliability issues, face-to-face education preferred more controlled assessment processes. It was found that students' technology addiction increased, and the missing topics needed to be addressed; educational model preferences varied by students' readiness levels and geographic conditions. The study recommends integrating digital tools, strengthening infrastructure investments, and adopting flexible education models to enhance educational effectiveness.

Keywords

COVID-19 , Distance education , Face-to-face education , Science teachers

Ethical Statement

The Ethics Committee for Social and Human Sciences Research at Firat University has obtained ethical approval with decision number 9791 dated 08.08.2022. All data collection procedures were carried out in accordance with ethical principles, including obtaining informed consent from participants, ensuring confidentiality, and respecting voluntary participation.

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

References

• Ak, S., Gokdas, I., Oksuz, C., & Torun, F. (2021). Uzaktan eğitimde eğiticilerin eğitimi: Uzaktan eğitime yönelik öz yeterlik ve yarar algısına etkisi [Training of trainers in distance education: Effect on self-efficacy and benefit perception towards distance education]. Journal of Open Education Applications and Research, 7(1), 24-44. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/60075/826745
• Aldossari, S., & Altalhab, S. (2022). Distance learning during COVID-19: EFL students' engagement and motivation from teachers' perspective. English Language Teaching, 15(7), 85-109. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n7p85
• Ali, K. A. K. (2023). The role of educational games in compensating educational loss and its impact on students’motivation towards face-to-face and e-learning in crises [Doctoral dissertation, An-Najah National University]. ANNU Digital Library. https://repository.najah.edu/items/d3ca8197-927e-457a-b570-aef4141a374b/full
• Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16
• AlQashouti, N. M., Yaqot, M., & Menezes, B. C. (2024). Online learning and teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic in higher education in Qatar. Sustainability, 16(6), 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062265
• Atli, H., Medeni, T. D., Medeni, I. T., Ates, V., & Guzel, M. S. (2023). Uzaktan eğitimin teknolojik gelişimi: Öğretmen ve öğrencilerin bakış açısı ile karşılaştırmalı GZFT analizi [Technological development of distance education: A comparative SWOT analysis with the perspectives of teachers and students]. Journal of Social and Human Sciences, 15(1), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.55978/sobiadsbd.1250265
• Bayir, M. (2024). Harmanlanmış öğrenme modeli [Blended learning model]. Journal of Turkic Civilization Studies, 5(1), 171-186. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jtcs/issue/85938/1490647
• Bozdag, H. C., & Gokler, I. (2023). Ters yüz sınıf modeline yönelik dijital içerik tasarımı: Biyoloji dersi örneği [Digital content design for the flipped classroom model: Example of biology lesson]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11(21), 335-355. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1246524
• Bozkurt, A. (2017). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitimin dünü, bugünü ve yarını [The past, present and future of the distance education in Turkey]. AUAd, 3(2), 85-124. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/34117/378446
• Bozkurt, E., & Sarikoc, A. (2008). Fizik eğitiminde sanal laboratuar, geleneksel laboratuarın yerini tutabilir mi? [Can the virtual laboratory replace the traditional laboratory in physics education?]. Selcuk University Ahmet Kelesoglu Faculty of Education Journal, 25, 89-100.
• Bundervoet, T., Dávalos, M. E., & Garcia, N. (2022). The short-term impacts of Covid-19 on households in developing countries: An overview based on a harmonized dataset of high-frequency surveys. World Development, 153, 105844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105844
• Candan, A., & Usta, I. (2022). Pandemi sürecinde öğretmenlerin uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarına yönelik bakış açılarının incelenmesi [Examination of teachers' perspectives on distance education applications during the pandemic process]. Anadolu Academy Social Sciences Journal, 4(1), 1-18. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/anadoluakademi/issue/69008/1091740
• Cepni, S. (2014). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş [Introduction to research and project work] (7th ed.). Celepler Printing.
• Christopoulos, A., & Sprangers, P. (2021). Integration of educational technology during the Covid-19 pandemic: An analysis of teacher and student receptions. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1964690. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1964690
• Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2023). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni [Qualitative research methods: Qualitative research and research design according to five approaches] (7th ed.; M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans.). Siyasal Bookstore.
• Cagirkan, B., & Albas, I. (2024). COVID-19 pandemi sürecinde zorunlu uzaktan eğitim ve akademisyenlerin uyum süreci [Compulsory distance education and the adaptation process of academics during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Bingöl University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 27, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.1208732
• Cakar, A. C. (2025). Teknolojik erişimin sosyoekonomik etkenlerle kesişimi: Öğrencilerin eğitim başarısı ve motivasyonu üzerine bir inceleme [Intersection of technological access with socioeconomic factors: A study on students' educational achievement and motivation]. International Society That Learn Journal, 2(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.64782/istlj22272131
• Dayal, S. (2023). Online education and its effect on teachers during COVID-19-A case study from India. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0282287. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282287
• Demirbilek, N., & Atila, F. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinin zorunlu uzaktan eğitimin yürütülmesine ilişkin önerileri [Suggestions of university students on compulsory distance education]. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 21(3), 820-832. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2021.21.64908-816505
• Durdu, A., & Coskun, Y. (2023). COVID-19 pandemi sürecinde uzaktan eğitimde öğretmen olmak: Sınıf öğretmenlerinin algılarının incelenmesi [Being a teacher in distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic process: Examination of primary school teachers’ perceptions]. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(1), 15-36. https://doi.org/10.52826/mcbuefd.1211859
• Ersoy, A. F. (2017). Fenomenoloji [Phenomenology]. In A. Saban & A. Ersoy (Eds.), Eğitimde nitel araştırma desenleri [Qualitative research designs in education] (pp. 81-138). Ani Publishing.
• Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications.
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, N. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
• Grimalt-Álvaro, C., Ametller, J., & Pintó, R. (2019). Factors shaping the uptake of ICT in science classrooms: A study of a large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards and computers. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 27(1), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.27.01.002
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 363-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185
• Hanaysha, J. R., Shriedeh, F. B., & In'airat, M. (2023). Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100188
• Isman, A. (2015). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional technologies and material development] (5th ed.). Pegem Academy Publishing.
• Kahya, V. (2021). Koronavirüs (COVID-19) salgını süresince zorunlu uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarının birleştirilmiş teknoloji kabul modeli ile araştırılması [Investigation of compulsory distance education practices with integrated technology acceptance models during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic]. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 9(2), 737-750. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v9i2.1783
• Kalyani, L. K. (2024). The role of technology in education: Enhancing learning outcomes and 21st century skills. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, 3(4), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.59828/ijsrmst.v3i4.199
• Kayri, M., & Gunuc, S. (2016). Yüksek ve düşük sosyoekonomik koşullara sahip öğrencilerin internet bağımlılığı açısından karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi [Comparing internet addiction in students with high and low socioeconomic status levels]. The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 3(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0110
• Kaysi, F., & Aydemir, E. (2024). Uzaktan eğitim süreçlerindeki etkileşim boyutlarının değerlendirilmesi [Assessment of interaction dimensions in distance education processes]. The Journal of Social Sciences, 11(11), 778-790. https://doi.org/10.16990/SOBIDER.3442
• Kazak, E., & Karaahmetoglu, H. H. (2023). Uzaktan eğitim sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunlara ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Teacher’s opinions on the problems encountered in the distance education process]. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Journal of ISS, 13(1), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1213000
• Khan, S., Kambris, M. E. K., & Alfalahi, H. (2022). Perspectives of university students and faculty on remote education experiences during COVID-19-a qualitative study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 4141-4169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10784-w
• Kilinc, M. (2015). Uzaktan eğitim uygulamalarının etkililiği üzerine bir araştırma “İnönü Üniversitesi Uzaktan Eğitim Merkezi ilahiyat lisans tamamlama programı örneği” [The effectiveness of distance education a research on “İnönü University Distance Education Centre of theology degree completion program example”] (Publication No. 384746) [Doctoral dissertation, İnönü University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
• Kiral, B. (2021). Nitel araştırmada fenomenoloji deseni: Türleri ve araştırma süreci [Phenomenology design in qualitative research: Types and research process]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 10(4), 92-103. http://www.jret.org/FileUpload/ks281142/File/jret2021_10.cilt_sayi4-pages-93-104.pdf
• Kizilok, F. (2022). Uzaktan eğitimin öğrenci başarısı üzerine etkileri ve uzaktan eğitimin etkililiğine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Effects of distance education on student on success and teachers' opinions on the effectiveness of distance education]. Social Sciences Studies Journal (SSSJournal), 8(102), 3145-3159. https://doi.org/10.29228/sssj.64625
• Kurt, S., & Karaaziz, M. (2021). Covid-19 pandemisinin psikososyal alandaki etkileri [The effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on the psychosocial area]. Journal of Faculty of Architecture, 3(2), 81-91. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/neujfa/issue/65575/1016261
• Lee, S. A. (2020). Coronavirus anxiety scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Studies, 44(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1748481
• Li, J., Yang, S., Chen, C., & Li, H. (2022). The impacts of Covid-19 on distance education with the application of traditional and digital appliances: Evidence from 60 developing countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6384. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116384
• Mali, D., & Lim, H. (2021). How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
• Munoz-Najar, A., Gilberto, A., Hasan, A., Cobo, C., Azevedo, J. P., & Akmal, M. (2021). Remote learning during COVID-19: Lessons from today, principles for tomorrow. The World Bank.
• Ozdogan, A. C., & Berkant, H. G. (2020). COVID-19 pandemi dönemindeki uzaktan eğitime ilişkin paydaş görüşlerinin incelenmesi [The examination of stakeholders’ opinions on distance education during the COVID-19 epidemic]. National Education Journal, 49(1), 13-43. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.788118
• Ozer, M., Suna, H. E., Celik, Z. & Askar, P. (2020). Covid-19 salgını dolayısıyla okulların kapanmasının eğitimde eşitsizlikler üzerine etkisi [The impact of school closures due to the Covid-19 pandemic on inequalities in education]. The Journal of Humanity and Society, 10(4), 217-246. https://doi.org/10.12658/M0611
• Oztoprak, S. (2022). Covid-19 pandemisinde uzaktan eğitim: Kamu hizmeti ilkeleri çerçevesinde bazı değerlendirmeler [Distance education in Covid-19 pandemic: Some evaluations within the scope of the principles of public service]. Ankara Bar Association Journal, 80(2), 189-249. https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1141966
• Rumble, G. (2019). The planning and management of distance education. Routledge.
• Saavedra, J. (2020, March 30). Educational challenges and opportunities of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/education/educational-challenges-and-opportunities-covid-19-pandemic
• Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (Eds.). (2020). Educational practices during the COVID-19 viral outbreak: International perspectives. ISTES Organization.
• Sari, T., & Nayir, F. (2020). Pandemi dönemi eğitim: Sorunlar ve fırsatlar [Education in the pandemic period: Challenges and opportunities]. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 959-975. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44335
• Simonson, M., Zvacek, S. M., & Smaldino, S. (2019). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Information Age Publishing, Inc.
• Srinivasan, M., Jishnu, D., & Shamala, R. (2021). COVID-19 and online education: Digital inequality and other dilemmas of rural students in accessing online education during the pandemic. World of Media, 4, 34-54. http://worldofmedia.ru/volumes/2021/2021_Issue_4/
• Tas, H. (2021). Covid-19 salgını sürecinde uygulamaya konan uzaktan eğitimin paydaş görüşleri bağlamında değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of distance education implemented during the Covid-19 pandemic process in the context of stakeholder views]. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 12(23), 23-49. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eibd/issue/63474/909908
• Tekindal, M., & Arsu, S. U. (2020). Nitel araştırma yöntemi olarak fenomenolojik yaklaşımın kapsamı ve sürecine yönelik bir derleme [A review on the scope and process of phenomenological approach as a qualitative research method]. Beyond the Horizon of Scientific Journal, 20(1), 153-172. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uobild/issue/58856/813813
• Thelma, C. C. (2024). The impact of remote learning on educational outcomes: A case of selected higher learning institutions in Lusaka District, Zambia. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(7), 587-596. https://www.ijrpr.com/archive.php?volume=5&issue=7
• Tican, C., & Gokoglu, S. D. T. (2021). Ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitim matematik dersine ilişkin görüşleri [Opinions of middle school mathematics teachers about distance education mathematics lessons]. MSKU Journal of Education, 8(2), 767-786. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.996395
• Vigevano, L., & Mattei, P. (2023). The challenges of distance learning in Italy: New inequalities and implications for inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 29(8), 1308-1322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2266718
• Yalcin, H. (2019). Denetimli serbestlikten yararlanan kişilerin toplumsal uyum süreçleri [Social adaptation processes of people benefiting from probation]. Fakulte Yayinevi.
• Yalcin, H. (2022). Bir araştırma deseni olarak fenomenoloji [Phenomenology as a research pattern]. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 22(Special issue 2), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227345
• Yildirim, A., & Simsek H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seckin Publishing.
• Yildirim, K. (2020). İstisnai bir uzaktan eğitim-öğretim deneyiminin öğrettikleri [Lessons from an exceptional distance education experience]. Alanyazın, 1(1), 7-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.22596/cresjournal.0101.7.16
• Yildirim, P. (2018). Mobil artırılmış gerçeklik teknolojisi ile yapılan fen öğretiminin ortaokul öğrencilerinin fen ve teknolojiye yönelik tutumlarına ve akademik başarılarına etkisi [The impact of science teaching made with mobile augmented reality technology on science and technology attitudes and academic achievement of secondary school students] (Publication No. 511068) [Master’s thesis, Fırat University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
• Yilmaz, E. O., & Toker, T. (2022). COVID-19 salgını öğretmenlerin dijital yeterliliklerini nasıl etkiledi? [How did the COVID-19 outbreak affected the digital competencies of teachers?]. National Education Journal, 51(235), 2713-2730. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.896996
• Yunus, O., Kalayci, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2024). Pandemi öncesi uzaktan eğitim ile pandemi sonrası yüz yüze eğitim sürecinin karşılaştırılması [Comparison of distance education before the pandemic and face-to-face education after the pandemic]. World Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.58853/dumad.1436011