İNŞAAT PROJELERİNDE ETKİN PAYDAŞ YÖNETİMİNİ ENGELLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN BELİRLENMESİ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 152 - 180, 31.12.2025

Emine Yüksel Deniz , Gülden Gümüşburun Ayalp

Öz

İnşaat sektörü, küresel ekonominin temel bileşenlerinden biri olup birçok alt sektörü kapsayan geniş bir endüstridir. Türkiye gibi gelişmekte olan ülkelerde inşaat sektörü, ekonomik büyümeye önemli katkılar sağlamaktadır. Bu sektör, yüksek istihdam kapasitesi, proje bazlı çalışma yapısı, yüksek sermaye gereksinimi ve yüksek risk içermesinin yanı sıra çok sayıda paydaşın ve sürecin bir arada yönetildiği dinamik bir yapıya sahiptir. Bu nedenle, inşaat projelerinde etkin paydaş yönetimi büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu bağlamda, etkin paydaş yönetimi, inşaat projelerinin başarısını doğrudan etkileyen kritik bir faktör olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Belirtilen nedenle, Türk inşaat sektöründe faaliyet gösteren şirketler için paydaş yönetimi stratejileri büyük önem taşımaktadır. Ancak, bu stratejilerin etkili bir şekilde belirlenebilmesi için etkin paydaş yönetimini engelleyen faktörlerin tespit edilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türk inşaat sektöründeki paydaşların, paydaş yönetimiyle ilgili yaşadıkları sorunları belirleyerek etkin paydaş yönetimini engelleyen faktörleri ortaya koymak, bu faktörlerin oluşum sıklıklarını tespit etmek ve önem derecelerini belirlemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, sistematik literatür taraması sonucunda yapı üretim sürecinde etkin paydaş yönetimini engelleyen 69 olası kriter belirlenmiş ve bu kriterlerle anket formu oluşturulmuştur. Hazırlanan anket, Türk inşaat sektöründe aktif olarak görev yapan ve önemli birer paydaş olan mimar, inşaat mühendisi, malzeme tedarikçisi ve müteahhitlerden oluşan örneklem grubuna çevrimiçi ve yüz yüze uygulanmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında, ülke genelinde 164 proje paydaşından veri toplanmış ve elde edilen verilere nicel analizler uygulanmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda inşaat projelerinde etkin paydaş yönetimini engelleyen faktörler belirlenmiştir. Bu faktörlerin sıklık ve önem derecelerinin ortaya konulması, paydaş yönetiminde yaşanan sorunların minimize edilmesine katkı sağlayacak ve inşaat projelerinde daha başarılı ve sürdürülebilir bir yönetim sürecinin oluşturulmasına olanak tanıyacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Paydaş , Paydaş yönetimi , Türk inşaat sektörü , İnşaat Projeleri

Identification of Factors Hindering Effective Stakeholder Management in Construction Projects

Öz

The construction sector is one of the fundamental components of the global economy and represents a vast industry encompassing numerous sub-sectors. The construction sector in developing countries like Turkey significantly contributes to economic growth. This sector is characterized by high employment capacity, project-based work structure, high capital requirements, and high risks, as well as the necessity to manage multiple stakeholders and processes simultaneously within a dynamic framework. Therefore, effective stakeholder management is of great importance in construction projects. In this context, effective stakeholder management emerges as a critical factor that directly influences the success of construction projects. For this reason, stakeholder management strategies are highly significant for companies operating in the Turkish construction sector. However, to establish these strategies effectively, it is essential to identify the factors that hinder effective stakeholder management.This study aims to identify the problems faced by stakeholders in the Turkish construction sector regarding stakeholder management, determine the factors that impede effective stakeholder management, assess the frequency of their occurrence, and evaluate their significance. To achieve this objective, a systematic literature review was conducted, identifying 69 potential criteria that hinder effective stakeholder management in the construction process. Based on these criteria, a survey form was developed. The survey was administered online and face-to-face to a sample group of architects, civil engineers, material suppliers, and contractors, all actively participating as key stakeholders in the Turkish construction sector. Data were collected from 164 project stakeholders across the country as part of the research, and quantitative analyses were applied to the obtained data. The studies identified the factors that hinder effective stakeholder management in construction projects. Revealing these factors' frequency and significance levels will minimize stakeholder management issues and enable a more prosperous and sustainable management process in construction projects.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Stakeholder , Stakeholder management , Turkish construction sector , Construction projects

Kaynakça

• Abdul Rafeh, M., 2023. Sustainable Stakeholder Management in Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 41(7): 883-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.03.002
• AL-Fadhali, M., 2022. Improving Communication in Construction Projects for Better Performance. International Journal of Construction Management, 12(1): 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.1819520
• Ali, H., ve Haapasalo, H. (2023). Stakeholder Conflict Management in Large Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 41(3): 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.11.004
• Ali, M., Ur Rehman, S., Qadeer, A., 2025. Fulfilling Stakeholder Needs and Concerns: A Path to Satisfaction in Construction Projects. Construction Technologies and Architecture, 17: 73-80.
• Al Nahyan, M., Al-Shehhi, A., Al-Mansoori, H., 2019. Risk Analysis in Stakeholder Management for Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(6): 04019046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001732
• Aslan, E., 2018. Sistematik Literatür Taraması (SLT): Yöntem ve Uygulama. Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(2): 35-52.
• Assaf, S., Al-Hejji, S., 2006. Measuring the Performance of Construction Projects: The Relative Importance Index Method. International Journal of Project Management, 24(2): 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.10.003 Assaf, J., 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
• Bourne, L., 2005. Project Relationship Management and the Stakeholder Circle™. PhD Thesis, RMIT University.
• Bourne L., Walker D.H.T., 2005. Visualizing and Mapping Stakeholder Influence. Manag Dec. 43:649 660.
• Bourne, L., Walker, D. H. T., 2005. The Role of Top Management in Achieving Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 23(3): 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.09.004 Brammer, S., Millington, A., 2004. The Development of Corporate Charitable Contributions in the UK: A Stakeholder Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8): 1411–34.
• Brown, M. W., Jackson, D. N., Charnov, E. L., 1999. Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Skewed and Kurtotic Data. Journal of Statistical Methods, 34(2): 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(99)00007-6
• Bryson J.M., 2004. What to do when stakeholders matter. Pub Manag Rev. 6:21 53.
• Carroll, A. B., Shabana, K. M., 2010. The Business Case For Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review Of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1): 85-105.
• Chan, A., Chan, A.P.L., 2004. Key Performance Indicators For Measuring Construction Success. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(2): 203–21.
• Cronbach, L. J., 1951. Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3): 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
• Doloi, H., 2012. Understanding Stakeholder Views on Construction Projects: Impact of Communication and Relationship Management. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5): 550-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.001
• Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K., 2011. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors. Wiley.
• Ebekozien, A., 2012. The Role of Stakeholders in Construction Project Delivery. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7): 1094-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.004
• Ebekozien, A., Aigbavboa, C. O., Ramotshela, M., 2024. A Qualitative Approach to Investigate Stakeholders' Engagement in Construction Projects. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(3): 866-883.
• Ebekozien, A., Olaniran, A., Akinlolu, E., 2023. Project Performance and Stakeholder Analysis in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(6): 04023048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002570
• Ekung, G., 2014. The Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Construction Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(3): 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.04.003
• El Asmar, M., Hanna, A. S., Loh, W. Y., 2013. Integrated Project Delivery: Lessons Learned from Early Adopters. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(3): 224-233. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000702
• El-Sawalhi, N., Hammad, A., 2015. Managing Project Risks in Stakeholder-Intensive Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4): 1094-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.006
• Enshassi, A., AlSwaity, E., 2015. Key Stressors Leading to Construction Professionals’ Stress in the Gaza Strip, Palestine”, Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 20(2): 53-79
• Erdem, H., 2015. Paydaşların Süreçlere Katılımı ve Etkili Yönetim Stratejilerinin Proje Başarısına Etkisi. Proje Yönetimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 22(1): 12-30.
• Freeman, R. E., 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing.
• Gamil, Y., Abdullah, M.A., Abd Rahman, I., Asad, M.M. 2020. Internet of Things in Construction Industry Revolution 4.0: Recent Trends and Challenges in the Malaysian Context. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(5): 1091-1102, doi: 10.1108/JEDT-06-2019-0164
• Gündüz, M., Yılmaz, H., Aydın, İ., 2013. Göreceli Önem İndeksi (GÖİ) Yöntemiyle Kriter Değerlendirmesi. İnşaat Mühendisliği Dergisi, 29(4): 95-105.
• Hammad, A., 2015. Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement in Construction Projects. Construction Management and Economics, 33(5): 342-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1044525
• Hesamian, G. (2016). One-way ANOVA based on interval information. International Journal of Systems Science, 47(11), 2682-2690.
• Hong, Y., Chan, J., 2014. Impact of Policy Changes on Research Performance in China: A Systematic Review. Research Policy, 43(3): 395-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.006
• Horta, I., Silva, A., Costa, P., 2013. The Impact of Corporate Governance on Project Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(7): 828-836. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000765
• Jing, Y., Yang, C., 2010. Analyzing Stakeholder Perspectives in Large Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(7): 813-822. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000200
• Kale, S., Arditi, D., 2001. A Study of Organizational Factors and Project Performance in Construction Projects. Construction Management and Economics, 19(1): 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190110042776
• Kamalirad, M., 2020. Analyzing Stakeholder Engagement Strategies in Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(12): 04020091. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001842
• Karlsen, J. T., 2002. Project Stakeholder Management. Construction Management and Economics, 20(5), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210138794
• Khoshnava, S., 2020. Risk Mitigation Strategies in Construction Projects: A Stakeholder Perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 38(1): 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.12.002
• Korkmaz, S., Messner, J. I., 2008. Competitive Positioning and Continuity of Construction Firms in International Markets. Journal of Management in Engineering, 24(4): 207-216.
• Li, H., Liu, Q., 2012. Stakeholder Management and Communication in Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7): 965-974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.004
• Liao, L., Teo, E.A.L., 2017. Critical Success Factors For Enhancing the Building Information Modelling Implementation in Building Projects in Singapore. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(8): 1029-1044, doi: 10.3846/13923730.2017.1374300
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaf, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., Moher, D., 2009. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Studies that Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10): e1-e34.
• Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Li, J., 2023. Managing Stakeholder Expectations in Construction Projects. Construction Management and Economics, 41(7): 601-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2051347
• Loosemore, M., 1998. Communication in Construction Projects: A Project Management Perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 16(4): 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461998372318
• Loosemore, M., 2006. Communication in Construction Projects: A Project Management Perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 24(4): 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500216341
• Love, P. E. D., Irani, Z., Edwards, D. J., 2002. A Novel Approach to Project Management Performance Evaluation. Construction Management and Economics, 20(7): 621-631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210138118
• Love, P. E. D., Irani, Z., Standing, C., 2000. Project Management Failure: The Case of the Brisbane Airport. International Journal of Project Management, 18(3): 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00053-X
• McAllister, D. J., 2013. Interpersonal Trust and Organizational Context in Construction Projects. Project Management Journal, 44(4): 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21312
• Menoka Bal, R. 2013. The Impact of Effective Communication on Project Performance. Project Management Journal, 44(2): 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21341
• Muhamad, N. H., & Zaini, M. A. A. M. (2022). Practices to Maintain Smooth Relationships Between Main Contractors and Subcontractors in the Malaysian Construction Industry. Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), 818-829.
• Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., Yang, J., 2015. The Influence of Stakeholders on Project Success in the Construction Industry. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3): 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.003
• Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., Yang, J., 2017. Stakeholder Management in Construction Projects: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Project Management, 35(2): 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.004
• Molwus, A., 2016. Construction Stakeholder Management and Its Implications. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(8): 04016045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001139
• Najib, N. H., Ismail, S., Che Amat, R., Durdyev, S., Konečná, Z., Chofreh, A. G., Klemeš, J. J., 2022. Stakeholders’ Impact Factors of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sustainable Mixed Development Projects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, 14(16): 10418.
• Nguyen, T., 2020. Impact of Stakeholder Management on Project Success. Journal of Project Management, 35(2): 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jproman.2019.06.004
• Okoye, P., Odesola, I., 2020. Developing a Conceptual Model for Antecedents of Resistance to Change Towards Sustainable Construction Practices. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Policy, 9(1): 72-90. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.26.2020.91.72.90
• Olander S., 2007. Stakeholder Impact Analysis in Construction Project Management, Construction Management and Economics, 25(3):277-287.
• Olander, S., Landin, A. 2005. Evaluation of Stakeholder Influence in the Implementation of Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(4): 321–8.
• Olander, S. Landin, A., 2008. A Comparative Study of Factors Affecting the External Stakeholder Management Process. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6): 553–61.
• Oppong, G. D., Chan, A. P., Dansoh, A., 2017. A Review of Stakeholder Management Performance Attributes in Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6): 1037-1051.
• Pajunen, K. 2006. Stakeholder Influences in Organizational Survival. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1261–88.
• PMI (2021). A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Project Management Institute.
• Polat, G., Kılınç, S., Çakır, O., 2017. İnşaat Projelerinde Göreceli Önem İndeksi Yöntemi ve Uygulama Alanları. Proje Yönetimi ve İnşaat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(2): 145-158.
• Rowley, T. J., 1997. Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887-910. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107
• Sanda, M., 2022. Stakeholder Engagement in Large Construction Projects: A Case Study. International Journal of Project Management, 40(5): 640-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.04.004
• Shakantu, W., Ngowi, A. B., Chileshe, N. 2022. A Study on Stakeholder Management and Project Success in Construction. Construction Management and Economics, 40(2): 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.1841964
• Shen, G. Q., 2009. Construction Stakeholder Management and Sustainable Development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(12): 1223-1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000141
• Szentes, H. and Eriksson, P., 2013. Societal Changes and New Conditions for the Management of Large Construction Projects. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 7(1): 182-192. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836820131111006
• Şenyiğit, A., ve Bayram, H., 2021. Veri Analizinde Tanımlayıcı İstatistikler ve Normal Dağılımın Önemi. İstatistik ve Veri Analizi Dergisi, 10(2): 121-137.
• Taimu, M., Awuzie, B., Ngowi, A., 2020. Success Factors for Effective Contractor-led Stakeholder Relationship Management: Perspectives from the Botswana Construction Industry. In MATEC Web of Conferences, 312: 02014. EDP Sciences.
• Tanyer, A., Kaya, S., Demir, M., 2019. Büyük Ölçekli İnşaat Projelerinde Paydaş Beklentilerinin Yönetilmesi ve Türkiye’deki Uygulamalar. İnşaat Yönetimi Dergisi, 25(3): 45-67.
• Tao, Y., Yu, Z., 2019. Improving Project Delivery through Stakeholder Coordination. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(11): 04019067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001885 TCA (Turkish Contractor Association) (2021), “İnşaat Sektörü Analizi-2021'in Başında Endişe ve Umut Bir Arada (in Turkish)”, available at: https://www.tmb.org.tr/uploads/publications/60658acb4e2c483e72ff8fac/1619764255560-tmb-bulten-ocak-2021.pdf (accessed 8 December 2024).
• TMB 2021. 2021'in Başında Endişe ve Umut Bir Arada, www.tmb.org.tr
• Toor, S. U. R., Ogunlana, S. O., 2010. Problems Caused by Institutional and Operational Weaknesses in the Construction Industry: Insights from Developing Countries. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5): 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.10.004
• Ünal, M., Ünal, Z. 2015., Proje Yönetiminde Paydaş İlişkilerinin Rolü ve Önemi. Selçuk İletişim, 8 (4): 90-103.
• Valderrama-Zurian, J. A., García-Campos, F. J., Pérez-Sánchez, J., 2015. The Impact of International Collaboration on Research Performance in Latin America. Science and Public Policy, 42(5): 663-674. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv019
• Winch, G.M., 2010, Managing Construction Projects: An Information Processing Approach, 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex.
• Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., 2019. Analysis of Stakeholder Management Practices in Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(8): 04019058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001683
• Xue, X., Wang, W., 2020. Stakeholder Relationships in Construction Project Success. Journal of Project Management, 38(6):1195-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jproman.2020.04.005
• Vennström, A., Eriksson, P. (2010). Client Perceived Barriers to Change in the Construction Process. Construction Innovation, 10(2): 126-137. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714171011037156
• Yang, J., Shen, G. Q., ve Ho, M. (2009). Stakeholder Management in Public Sector Projects: An Analysis of the Stakeholder Perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 27(7), 654-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.005
• Yang, J., 2014. Stakeholder Identification and Classification in Construction Projects. Construction Management and Economics, 32(4):312-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.922030
• Yang, J., Zhang, W., 2020. Construction Stakeholder Management and Project Performance. Journal of Project Management, 39(3):456-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jproman.2020.01.002 Yang, J., Liu, S., 2011. Analysis of Stakeholder Influence in Construction Projects. Construction Management and Economics, 29(2):167-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.534909
• Yıldırım, M., Çalışkan, İ., 2020. Kamu ve Özel Sektör Projelerinde Paydaş Yönetimi: Planlama, Bütçeleme ve Zamanlama Üzerindeki Etkiler. İnşaat Projeleri Yönetimi ve Uygulamaları, 17(2):101-121.
• Yılmaz, M. Bakış, A., 2015. Sustainability in Construction Sector. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 195: 2253–2262.
• Yu, X., Liu, X., Wang, Y., 2020. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources in Asia. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6):063004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7d7c
• Zwikael, O., ve Smyrk, J., 2022. The Role of Project Stakeholders in Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 40(9):1042-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.06.001
• Zhou, Z., 2023. Risk Management in Construction Projects: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Project Management, 41(4):525-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.01.003
• Zhang, J., 2014. Building Trust in Construction Project Stakeholder Relationships. Construction Management and Economics, 32(8): 745-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.928924
• Zhao, X., Hwang, B.G. and Low, S.P. (2015), “Enterprise Risk Management in International Construction Firms: Drivers and Hindrances”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(3):347-366, doi: 10.1108/ECAM-09-2014-0117