The Eff ect of Insulin Detemir on the Metabolic Control in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 61 Sayı: 4, 202 - 206, 01.04.2008

Tolga Ünüvar Ayhan Abacı Ali Ataş Ece Böber Atilla Büyükgebiz

https://doi.org/10.1501/Tipfak_0000000684

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellituslu Çocuk ve Adolesanlarda İnsülin Detemirin Metabolik Kontrol Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Amaç: Literatürde çocuk ve adolesan yaş grubunda insülin detemirin etkinliği, gece hipoglisemi sıklığındaki azalma ve kilo değişiklikleri hakkında sınırlı sayıda çalışma olması nedeniyle bu prospektif çalışmayı planladık. Materyal Metod: Kötü metabolik kontrollü ve/veya sabah hiperglisemileri olan 15 diyabetik hasta (10 erkek) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 13.41±3.68 yıl ve ortalama diyabet süresi 5.03±1.74 yıldı. Hemoglobin A1c ve lipid düzeyleri, kan şekeri profilleri ve vücut kitle indeksleri başlangıçta ve detemir kulanımından 32±2.32 ay sonra değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Bazal insülin olarak insülin detemir uygulanmasından sonra ortalama HbA1c değerleri %9.08’den %8.31’e geriledi. Total ve LDL kolesterol düzeylerinde detemir sonrası istatiksel olarak anlamlı azalma görüldü. Detemire geçildikten sonra ortalama günlük kan şekeri profillerinde anlamlı azalma saptandı. Gece hipoglisemi sıklıklarında detemire geçiş sonrası anlamlı azalma saptandı. Hastaların günlük insülin dozları, bolus/bazal oranları ve BMI SDS değerlerinde anlamlı bir değişiklik olmadı. Sonuç: Bu çalışma, bazal - bolus rejimde günde tek doz detemir tedavisinin NPH ile karşılaştırıldığında özellikle dislipidemi riskinin azaltılmasında ve daha iyi metabolik kontrol sağlanmasında gece hipoglisemi riskini arttırmaksızın, etkin ve iyi tolere edilebilir olduğunu desteklemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Detemir, NPH, Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellitus

Kaynakça

• Home P, Kurtzhals P. Insulin detemir: From concept to clinical experience. Expert opinion pharmacother. (2006) 7 (3).
• Kurtzhals P, Havelund S, Jonassen Ib et al. Albumin binding of insulins acylated with fatty acids: characterization of the ligand protein interaction and correlation between binding affinity and timing of the insulin effect in vivo. Biochemestry J (1995) 312, 725-731.
• Whittingham JL, Havelund S, Jonassen Ib. Crystal structure of a prolonged – acting insulin with albumin – binding properties. Biochemistry (1997) 36, 2826-2831.
• Chapman TM, Perry CM. Insulin detemir, a review of its use in the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs 2004; 64 (22): 25772595.
• Heinemann L, Sinha K, Weyer C et al. Time – action profile of the soluble, fatty acid acilated, long – acting insulin analogue NN304. British diabetic association. Diabetic medicine (1999); 16: 332-338.
• Jehle PM, Micheler C, Jehle DR et al. Inadequate suspension of neutral protamine Hagendorn (NPH) insulin in pens. The Lancet. (1999); 354: 1604-1607.
• Danne T, Lüpke K, Walte K et al. Insulin detemir is characterized by a consistent pharmacokinetic profile across age – groups in children, adolescents and adults in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes care 2003; 26: 30873092.
• The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial / Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Beneficial effects of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: Outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The Journal of Pediatrics 2001; 139: 804-812.
• Hermansen K, Fontaine P, Kukolja KK et al. Insulin analogues (insulin detemir and insulin aspart) versus traditional human insulins (NPH insulin and regular human insulin) in basal – bolus therapy for patients with Type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2004; 47: 622-629.
• Vague P, Selam JL, Skeie S et al. Insulin detemir is associated with more predictable glycemic control and reduced risk of hypoglycemia than NPH insulin in patients with Type 1 diabetes on a basal – bolus regimen with premeal insulin aspart. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 590-596.
• Standl E, Lang H, Roberts A. The 12 – month efficacy and safety of insulin detemir and NPH insulin in basal – bolus therapy for the treatment of Type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2004; 6: 579588.
• Leeuw ID, Vague P, Selam JL et al. Insulin detemir used in basal – bolus therapy in people with type 1 diabetes is associated with a lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia and less weight gain over 12 months in comparison to NPH insulin. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2005; 7: 73-82.
• Brunner GA, Sendlhofer G, Wutte A et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of long – acting insulin analogue NN304 in comparison to NPH insulin in humans.
• Robertson KJ, Schönle E, Gucev Z et al. Benefits of insulin detemir over NPH insulin in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: Lower and more predictable fasting plasma glucose and lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia. Diabetologia 2004; 47: supplement 1.
• Home P, Bartley P, Russel – Jones D et al. Insulin detemir offers improved glycemic control compared with NPH insulin in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1081-1087.
• Pickup J, Mattock M, Kerry S. Glycaemic control with continuous insulin infusion compared with intensive insulin injections in patients with type 1 diabetes: Meta analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2002; 324: 1-6.
• Hermansen K, Madsbad S, Perrild H et al. Comparison of the soluble basal insulin anolog insulin detemir with NPH insulin. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 296-301.
• Russel – Jones D, Simpson R, Hylleberg B et al. Effects of QD insulin detemir or neutral protamine Hagedorn on blood glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a basal – bolus regimen. Clinical Therapeutics 2004; 26: 724-736.
• Haak T, Tiengo A, Draeger et al. Lower within – subject variability of fasting blood glucose and reduced weight gain with insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2005; 7: 56-64.
• Purnell JQ, Hokanson JE, Marcovina SM et al. Effect of excessive weight gain with intensive therapy of type 1 diabetes on lipid levels and blood pressure. JAMA 1998; 280: 140-146.