RISING REGIONALIZATION: AN ASSESSMENT OF REGIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS

Öz

In parallel with the structural change in world trade, Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) are becoming more prominent and gaining increasing importance. The proliferation of these agreements fills the gap left by multilateral trade negotiations, with their scope of influence expanding beyond trade tariff reduction. Since the mid-20th century, multilateral trade negotiations have been used to liberalize global trade, and the Bretton Woods institutions have accelerated this process. Along with multilateral initiatives, countries have also tended to liberalize trade among themselves through bilateral, regional, or interregional formations. Especially in the last three decades, Asia’s rapidly expanding role in the world economy and its growing weight in global production and supply chains, coupled with the slowing economic power of developed countries, rising protectionism, and global uncertainties, have shown signs of a significant transformation in the international trade system. The breakdown of the Doha Round process in the face of rapid and structural change in the world economy, the failure of the WTO to realize the expected reforms and improvements, and the effects of the global financial crisis have led member countries to turn to RTAs instead of multilateral negotiations. This interest has increased even more and shifted towards new RTAs, namely, mega-regional agreements. This study examines the transformation of multilateral trade negotiations within the liberal trade system and argues that the emergence of new regionalism in this process, and hence the RTA, has promoted globalization through trade liberalization. In this context, it addresses the dynamics of RTAs, which are an essential part of the global trade system and have proven to have trade-creating potential. It argues that they will continue to be preferred by countries to broaden and deepen their trade policies in the coming years.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Global Trade System
• Regional Trade Agreements
• World Trade Organization

Kaynakça

1. A. Frankel, Jeffrey, Ernesto Stein and Shang-Jin Wei. Regional Trading Blocs in The World Economic System, Peterson Institute, Washington, 1997.
2. Abbott, Frederick M. “A New Dominant Trade Species Emerges: Is Bilateralism a Threat?”, Journal of International Economic Law, 10(3), 2007, pp. 571-583.
3. Bagwell, Kyle, Chad P. Bown and Robert W. Staiger. “Is the WTO Passé?”, Journal of Economic Literature, 54(4), 2016, pp. 1125-1231.
4. Baier, Scott L. and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand. "Estimating The Effects of Free Trade Agreements on International Trade Flows Using Matching Econometrics”, Journal of international Economics, 77(1), 2009, pp. 63-76.
5. Baier, Scott L. and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand. “Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members' International Trade?”, Journal of international Economics, 71(1), 2007, pp. 72-95.
6. Baldwin, Richard and Theresa Carpenter. “Why not in the WTO? The Erosion of WTO Centricity in Trade Liberalisation”, World Trade Organization, Centre for Trade and Economic Integration, The Graduate Institute, Geneva, 2009.
7. Baldwin, Richard E. “The Causes of Regionalism”, World Economy, 20(7), 1997, pp. 865-888.
8. Bhagwati, Jagdish. “Regionalism and Multilateralism: An Overview”, İçinde, Jaime de Melo and Arvind Panagariya (eds.) New Dimensions in Regional Integration (pp. 22-50), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.

9. Bhagwati, Jagdish. “US Trade Policy: The Infatuation with Free Trade Areas”, içinde Jagdish Bhagwati and Anne O. Krueger (eds.), The Dangerous Drift to Preferential Trade Agreements (pp.1-18), The American Enterprise Institute Press, Washington, 1995.
10. Calvo Pardo, Hector F., Caroline L. Freund and Emanuel Ornelas. “The ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Impact on Trade Flows and External Trade Barriers”, World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper (4960), 2009.
11. DeRosa, Dean A. “The Trade Effects of Preferential Arrangements: New Evidence from the Australia Productivity Commission”, Peterson Institute for International Economics (Working Paper: 07-1), 2007.
12. Donnan, Shawn. “WTO Approves Global Trade Deal”, Financial Times, 7.12.2013, https://www.ft.com/content/072486ac-5f3f-11e3-8d1d-00144feabdc0, Erişim: 14.7.2023
13. Edith Laget vd., “Deep Trade Agreements and Global Value Chains”, Review of Industrial Organization 57, 2020, pp. 379-410.
14. Edward D. Mansfield and Helen V. Milner. “The New Wave of Regionalism”, International Organization, 53.3, 1999, pp. 589-627.
15. Estevadeordal, Antoni, Caroline Freund and Emanuel Ornelas. “Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization toward Nonmembers?”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), (2008), pp. 1531-1575.
16. Estevadeordal, Antoni, Kati Suominen and Christian Volpe. “Regional Trade Agreements: Development Challenges and Policy Options”, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) & World Economic Forum, Geneva, 2013.
17. Ethier, Wilfred J. “The New Regionalism”, The Economic Journal, 108(449), 1998, pp. 1149-1161. Flach, Lisandra, Hannah-Maria Hildenbrand and Feodora Teti. “The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement and Its Expected Effects on World Trade”, Intereconomics, 56, 2021. pp. 92-98.
18. Francois, Joseph and Manfred Elsig. “Short Overview of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)”, European Parliament, (2021).
19. Groser, Tim. “The U.S. Has a Way Back on Pacific Trade”, The Wall Street Journal, 29.9.2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/america-tpp-china-japan-indo-pacific-trade-influence-11632931688, Erişim: 4.8.2023.
20. Guerrieri Paolo and Irene Caratelli. “EU's Regional Trade Strategy, the Challenges Ahead”, The International Trade Journal, 20(2), 2006, pp. 139-184.
21. Jagdish Bhagwati. “Regionalism versus Multilateralism”, World Economy, 15(5), 1992, pp. 535-556.
22. Jake Sullivan, “Remarks by National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on Renewing American Economic Leadership at the Brookings Institution”, The White House. Washington, DC. 27 April 2023.
23. Krueger, Anne O. “Free Trade Agreements versus Customs Unions”, Journal of Development Economics, 54(1), 1997, pp. 169-187.
24. Krugman, Paul. “Is Bilateralism Bad?”, İçinde Elhanan Helpman and Assaf Razin (eds), International Trade and Trade Policy (pp. 9-23), MIT Press. Cambridge, Mass. 1991.
25. Laget, Edith, Alberto Osnago, Nadia Rocha ve Michele Ruta. “Deep Trade Agreements and Global Value Chains”, Review of Industrial Organization 57, 2020, pp. 379-410.
26. Lawrence, Robert Z. Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration, The Brookings Institution Press, Washington, 2000.
27. Majluf, Luis Abugattas. “Swimming in the Spaghetti Bowl: Challenges for Developing Countries under the ‘New Regionalism’”, Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series, No.27, United Nations Publication, New York & Geneva, 2004.
28. Mattoo, Aaditya Nadia Rocha and Michele Ruta. Handbook of Deep Trade Agreements, World Bank Publications, Washington, 2020.
29. Mattoo, Aaditya, Alen Mulabdic and Michele Ruta. “Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in Deep Agreements”, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'économique, 55(3), 2022, pp. 1598-1637.
30. Mullen, Andrew. “What is RCEP, the World’s Largest Free Trade Deal that is Under Way?”, South China Morning Post, 1.1.2022, https://www.scmp.com/economy/global-economy/ article/3161707/what-rcep-worlds-largest-free-trade-deal-under-way, Erişim: 5.8.2023.
31. Philomena Apiko, Sean Woolfrey and Bruce Byiers, “The Promise of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)”, ECDPM Discussion Paper 287, 2020, pp. 1-16.
32. Schott, Jeffrey J. “Why Transatlantic Trade Winds are Blowing”, Council on Foreign Relations, 25.2.2013, https://www.cfr.org/interview/why-transatlantic-trade-winds-are-blowing, Erişim: 5.8.2023.
33. Seib, Gerald F. “Obama Presses Case for Asia Trade Deal, Warns Failure Would Benefit China”, The Wall Street Journal, 27.4.2015, https://www.wsj.com/articles/obama-presses-case-for-asia-tradedeal-warns-failure-would-benefit-china-1430160415, Erişim: 4.8.2023.
34. Statista, “E-commerce Worldwide-Statistics & Facts”, 26.9.2023, https://www.statista.com/ topics/871/online-shopping/#topicOverview, Erişim: 18.7.2023.
35. Summers, Lawrence. “Regionalism and the World Trading System”, Policy Implications of Trade and Currency Zones. Wyoming: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 1991.
36. Udi Dadush and Enzo Dominguez Prost, “Preferential Trade Agreements, Geopolitics, and the Fragmentation of World Trade”, World Trade Review. 22(2), 2023, pp. 278-294.
37. UNCTAD. Trade and Development Report 2023: Growth, Debt and Climate: Realigning the Global Financial Architecture, United Nations Publications, New York, 2024.
38. UNCTAD. Trade Structure by Partner–UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics 2023, https://hbs.unctad.org/trade-structure-by-partner/ , Erişim 10.11.2023.
39. Viner, Jacob. The Customs Union Issue, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York, 1950.
40. Walter M. Hudson, “Revisiting Albert O. Hirschman on Trade and Development”, American Affairs. 20 August, 2022.
41. Wang, Orange. “RCEP: China Says World’s Largest Trade Pact Gives it ‘Powerful Leverage’ To Cope With 2022 Challenges”, South China Morning Post, 31.12.2021, https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3161601/rcep-china-says-worlds-largest-trade-pact-gives-itpowerful, Erişim: 5.8.2023.
42. WTO, “Doha Development Agenda”, https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/ doha1_e.htm, Erişim: 6.7.2023.
43. WTO, “Ministerial Conference, 10th, Nairobi: WTO members secure “Historic” Nairobi Package for Africa and the World”, 19.12.2023, https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news15_e/mc10_19dec15_e.htm, Erişim: 16.7.2023.
44. WTO, “The Uruguay Round”, https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/fact5_e.htm, Erişim: 12.7.2023.
45. WTO, “Twelfth WTO Ministerial Conference: WTO Members Secure Unprecedented Package of Trade Outcomes at MC12”, 17.6.2022, https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news22_e/mc12_17jun22_e.htm, Erişim: 16.7.2023.
46. WTO, Regional Trade Agreements Database, https://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicMaintainRTAHome. aspx, Erişim: 6.07.2023.
47. WTO. World Trade Report 2011: The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-Existence to Coherence, World Trade Organization, Geneva, 2011.