The Effects of Magnetic Circuit Geometry and Material Properties on Surface Mounted Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator Performance

Öz

Permanent magnet synchronous generator is one of the generator types used in electrical energy production. In this study, a 1.5 kW inner rotor, surface located permanent magnet synchronous generator is used as a reference. The computer model of this generator has been prepared using Maxwell Rmxprt software. Rmxprt analysis of the generator has been performed and results were obtained for no-load and nominal load operating conditions. Parameters such as cogging torque which is an important parameter especially for permanent magnet synchronous generators used in wind turbines and efficiency were examined. The effects of changing in magnetic circuit as the permanent magnet pole arc to pole pitch ratio, magnet thickness and magnet material parameters on the generator performance were analyzed comparatively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cogging torque
• Efficiency
• Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines

Kaynakça

1. M. Güleç, E. Yolacan, Y. Demir, O. Ocak, M. Aydin. “Modeling based on 3D finite element analysis and experimental study of a 24-slot 8-pole axial-flux permanent-magnet synchronous motor for no cogging torque and sinusoidal back-EMF.” Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, vol. 24. 1, 2016, pp 262-275.
2. H. Li, Z. Chen. “Design optimization and site matching of direct-drive permanent magnet wind power generator systems.” Renewable Energy, vol. 34. 4, 2009, pp 1175-1184.
3. D. Uygun, Y. Çetinceviz. “Yüzey yerleştirmeli kalıcı mıknatıslı senkron generatörlerin tutma torkunun azaltılması için stator yapılandırması.” Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji, vol. 6. 3, 2018, pp 605-620.
4. N. Bianchi, S. Bolognani. “Design techniques for reducing the cogging torque in surface-mounted PM motors.” IEEE Transactions on industry applications, vol. 38. 5, 2002, pp 1259-1265.
5. Z. Q. Zhu, S. Ruangsinchaiwanich, N. Schofield, D. Howe. “Reduction of cogging torque in interior-magnet brushless machines.” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 39. 5, 2003, pp 3238-3240.
6. G. C. Lee, S. H. Kam, T. U. Jung. “Design on Permanent Magnet Structure of Radial Flux Permanent Magnet Generator for Cogging Torque Reduction and Low Torque Ripple.” 16th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Lappeenranta, Finland, 2014.
7. Z. Li, J. H. Chen, C. Zhang, L. Liu, X. Wang. “Cogging Torque Reduction in External-Rotor Permanent Magnet Torque Motor Based on Different Shape of Magnet.” 2017 IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS), China, 2017.
8. A. Dalcalı, E. Kurt, E. Çelik, N. Öztürk. “Cogging torque minimization using skewed and separated magnet geometries.” Politeknik Dergisi, vol. 2. 3, 2020, pp 223-230.

9. A. Dalcalı, C. Ocak. “Farklı mıknatıs malzemelerinin yüzey mıknatıslı doğrudan tahrikli sabit mıknatıslı senkron motor performansına etkisi.” Journal of Awareness, vol. 3. Special, 2018, pp 217-224.
10. H. Mamur. “Performance evaluation for a PMSG with interior rotor of N35 and N42 NdFeB PMS having same geometry in micro wind turbines.” International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, vol. 3. 2, 2016, pp 50-54.
11. A. N. Patel. “Cogging Torque Minimization by Magnet Edge Inset Variation Technique in Radial Flux Surface Mounted Permanent Magnet Brushless DC (PMBLDC) Motor.” 5th Nirma University International Conference on Engineering (NUiCONE), Gujarat, India, 2015.
12. B. Vidhya, K. N. Srinivas. “Effect of stator permanent magnet thickness and rotor geometry modifications on the minimization of cogging torque of a flux reversal machine.” Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, vol. 25. 6, 2017, pp 4907-4922.
13. C. Ocak. “Doğrudan tahrikli asansör sistemlerinde kullanılan sabit mıknatıslı senkron motorlarda mıknatıs geometrisinin motor performansı ve maliyeti üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi.” Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, vol. 7. 4, 2019, pp 825-834.
14. A. Aksöz, A. Saygın. “Aynı fiziksel ve elektromanyetik parametreler altında EASMSM ve ORSMSM’un vuruntu torkuna göre karşılaştırılması.” Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji, vol. 6. 3, 2018, pp 659-667.
15. H. Yetiş, T. Göktaş. “Comparative design of permanent magnet synchronous motors for low-power industrial applications.” Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 8. 3, 2020, pp 218-224.
16. E. Çetin, F. Daldaban. “Eksenel akılı motorlarda oluk açıklıklarındaki hatanın moment üzerine etkisi.” El-Cezeri Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, vol. 4. 3, 2017, pp 374-381.
17. A. Gündoğdu, R. Çelikel, and Ş. Fidan. "Analysis and Simulation of A Three-Phase Delta Inverter for A Star-Connected RL Load." European Journal of Technique 10.2, 2020, 274-288.
18. C. Ocak. “Design and performance comparison of four-pole brushless DC motors with different pole/slot combinations.” The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences, vol. 3. 3, 2018, pp 69-78.
19. L. Dosiek, P. Pillay. “Cogging torque reduction in permanent magnet machines.” IEEE Transactions on industry applications, vol. 43. 6, 2007, pp 1565-1571. R. Jayapragash, C. Chellamuthu. “Development of analytical models for switched reluctance machine and their validation.” Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, vol. 10. 3, 2015, pp 990-1001.