DETERMINING ERGONOMIC FACTORS OF LOADING MACHINES USING IN FORESTRY OPERATIONS IN TURKEY

Öz

Loading machines in various types are generally used in forest depots in Turkey for loading and stacking the forest products. However, the risks accompanying this development threaten the health of the operators working in loading machines. The aim of this study is to examine the working conditions of the operators of loading machines being used in forest operations in Turkey in terms of ergonomics. This study was applied on machines and operators 45 each, working in loading and stacking operations in forest depots within the borders of Western Black Sea Region. Physiological workload and ergonomic factors influencing the workload were evaluated with principal component analysis. The average physiological workload was calculated as 49% and it was in the category of “medium heavy work”. It was also determined that the most important factors influencing the physiological workload during the operations were; body weight, machine technology and noise, anthropometric lengths, vibration, work technique, the length of the operator’s arm, climate factors, social position, the surface of the terrain, the duration of the use of machine and the seat, motivation, smoking and proceeding speed of the machine.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ergonomics, Forestry, Loading machine, Physiological workload.

DETERMINING ERGONOMIC FACTORS OF LOADING MACHINES USING IN FORESTRY OPERATIONS IN TURKEY

Öz

Loading machines in various types are generally used in forest depots in Turkey for loading and stacking the forest products. However, the risks accompanying this development threaten the health of the operators working in loading machines. The aim of this study is to examine the working conditions of the operators of loading machines being used in forest operations in Turkey in terms of ergonomics. This study was applied on machines and operators 45 each, working in loading and stacking operations in forest depots within the borders of Western Black Sea Region. Physiological workload and ergonomic factors influencing the workload were evaluated with principal component analysis. The average physiological workload was calculated as 49% and it was in the category of “medium heavy work”. It was also determined that the most important factors influencing the physiological workload during the operations were; body weight, machine technology and noise, anthropometric lengths, vibration, work technique, the length of the operator’s arm, climate factors, social position, the surface of the terrain, the duration of the use of machine and the seat, motivation, smoking and proceeding speed of the machine. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ergonomics

Kaynakça

1. o Abeli W.S., E.J. Malisa (1994) Productivity and workload when cutting with peg and raker toothed croscut saws. International Seminar on Forest Operations under Mountainous Conditions. Harbin, P.R. of China, pp. 173-180.
2. o Acar H.H., Ö. Topalak (2001) Ormancılıkta kullanılan traktörlerin denetim aygıtlarının tip ve yerleşim açısından ergonomik nitelikleri üzerine bir araştırma (An ergonomic research on control device of tractors using forestry operations in respect of type and settlement), 8. Ulusal Ergonomi Kongresi, İzmir, s. 325-331.
3. o Astrand P., K. Rodahl, H.A. Dahl, S.B. Stromme (2003) Textbook of Work Physiology, physiological Bases of Exercise (forth edition). Human Kinetics, Canada, 650 p.
4. o Bridger R S (1995) Introduction to Ergonomics, St. Louis: McGraw-Hill Inc., 529 p.
5. o Gellerstedt S., R. Alnqvist, D.M. Attebrant, B.O. Wikström, J. Winkel (1999) Ergonomic Guidelines for Forest Machines, ISBN 91 7614 093 8, SkogForsk, Uppsala, Sweden, 85 p.
6. o Hirai T., Y. Kusaka, N. Suganuma, A. Seo, Y. Tobita (2006) Physical work load affects the maximum oxygen uptake., Industrial Health, 44: 250-257.
7. o Kirk M.P., M.J. M. Sullman (2001) Heart rate strain in cable hauler choker setter in New Zealand Logging Operations, Applied Ergonomics, 32: 389-398.
8. o Kirk M.P., R.J. Parker (1994) Physical demands of steep terrain forestry work in New Zealand. International Seminar on Forest Operations under Mountainous Conditions. Harbin, P.R. of China, pp. 196-204.

9. o Kroemer K., H. Kroemer, K. Kroemer-Elbert (1999) Ergonomics, How to Design for Ease and Efficiency, Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, 766 p.
10. o Lass J., H. Hinrikus, J. Kaik, K. Meigas (1997) Measurement of correlation between heart rate and physiological parameters variations, Proceedings in 19th International Conferences IEEE/EMBS,USA.
11. o Neitzel R., M. Yost (2002) Task-based Assessment of Occupational Vibration and Noise Exposures in Forestry Workers. AIHA Journal, 63: 617-627.
12. o Roja Z (2005) Measures to Overcome Health Problems of Latvian Road Builders Created by Ergonomical Risks, Doctorate Thesis, University of Latvia, Faculty of Chemistry, Institu of Occupational and Environmental Health, Riga.
13. o Shemwetta D., R. Ole-Meiludie, A.D. Silayo (2002) The physical workload of employees in logging and forest industries, Wood for Africa Forest Engineering Conference. South Africa.
14. o Tunay M., K Melemez, E.N. Dizdar (2006) Ormancılıkta kullanılan yükleme makinaları operatör koltuklarının antropometrik tasarımı (An anthropometric design of operator seat on the loading machine using forestry operations), ZKÜ, KTEF Teknoloji Dergisi, 9 (2): 137-144.
15. o Vitalis A (1987). The use of Heart Rate as the Main Predictor of the cost of work. In: Proceedings of the Inaugural conference of the NZ ergonomics Society, Auckland, pp. 168-181.
16. o Yıldırım M (1989) Ormancılık İş Bilgisi (Science of forestry work). İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayın No: 3555, Orman Fakültesi Yayın No: 404, İstanbul, 287 s.