EN
TR
Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods
Öz
This paper includes comparision of automatic and
interactive segmentation methods. Both methods
are used for color images segmentatiton and based Gaussian Mixture Model. In
automatic segmentation is segmented image pixels without any prior knowledge provided
by the user. Interactive segmentation needs prior knowledge provided by the user and segmentation
process are based prior knowledge. Obtained results demonstrate that
interactive segmentatiton is faster and more accure than automatic
segmentation.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- [1] H. Renjini and P. Bhagavathi Sivakumar, “Comparison of Automatic and Interactive Image Segmentation Methods”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 3162-3170, 2013.
- [2] C. M. Smith, et al. Automatic thresholding of three-dimensional microvascular structures from confocal microscopy images. J. Microscopy , 225(3):244–257, 2007.
- [3] M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(4):321–331, 1987. 179.
- [4] V. Grau, A. U. J. Mewes, M. Alcaniz, R. Kikinis, and S. K. Warfield. Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information. IEEE Trans. Med.Imag., 23(4):447–458, 2004.
- [5] A. Pitiot, A.W. Toga, N. Ayache, and P. Thompson. Texture based MRI segmentation with a two-stage hybrid neural classifier. In Proc.World Congress Computational Intelligence/INNSIEEE Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, pages 2053–2058, 2002.
- [6] Alasu Serdar, and Muhammed Fatih Talu. "Interactive segmentatition implementation." 2015 23nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). IEEE, 2015.
- [7] Boykov Y, JollyM(2001) Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary & region segmentation of objects in nd images. In: Proceeding of 8th IEEE international conference on computer vision, ICCV 2001, IEEE, vol 1, pp 105–112
- [8] Mortensen E, Barrett W (1998) Interactive segmentation with intelligent scissors. Graph Models Image Process 60(5):349–384
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
1 Aralık 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi
19 Nisan 2017
Kabul Tarihi
24 Kasım 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2016 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1
APA
Alasu, S., & Talu, M. F. (2016). Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods. Computer Science, 1(1), 20-28. https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU
AMA
1.Alasu S, Talu MF. Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods. JCS. 2016;1(1):20-28. https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU
Chicago
Alasu, Serdar, ve Muhammed Fatih Talu. 2016. “Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods”. Computer Science 1 (1): 20-28. https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU.
EndNote
Alasu S, Talu MF (01 Aralık 2016) Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods. Computer Science 1 1 20–28.
IEEE
[1]S. Alasu ve M. F. Talu, “Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods”, JCS, c. 1, sy 1, ss. 20–28, Ara. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU
ISNAD
Alasu, Serdar - Talu, Muhammed Fatih. “Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods”. Computer Science 1/1 (01 Aralık 2016): 20-28. https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU.
JAMA
1.Alasu S, Talu MF. Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods. JCS. 2016;1:20–28.
MLA
Alasu, Serdar, ve Muhammed Fatih Talu. “Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods”. Computer Science, c. 1, sy 1, Aralık 2016, ss. 20-28, https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU.
Vancouver
1.Serdar Alasu, Muhammed Fatih Talu. Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods. JCS [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2016;1(1):20-8. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU
is applied to all research papers published by JCS and
is assigned for each published paper.