Araştırma Makalesi

Otomatik Ve İnteraktif Bölütleme Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1 1 Aralık 2016
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods

Öz

This paper includes comparision of automatic and interactive segmentation methods. Both methods are used for color images segmentatiton and based Gaussian Mixture Model. In automatic segmentation is segmented image pixels without any prior knowledge provided by the user. Interactive segmentation needs prior knowledge provided by the user and segmentation process are based prior knowledge. Obtained results demonstrate that interactive segmentatiton is faster and more accure than automatic segmentation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. [1] H. Renjini and P. Bhagavathi Sivakumar, “Comparison of Automatic and Interactive Image Segmentation Methods”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 3162-3170, 2013.
  2. [2] C. M. Smith, et al. Automatic thresholding of three-dimensional microvascular structures from confocal microscopy images. J. Microscopy , 225(3):244–257, 2007.
  3. [3] M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(4):321–331, 1987. 179.
  4. [4] V. Grau, A. U. J. Mewes, M. Alcaniz, R. Kikinis, and S. K. Warfield. Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information. IEEE Trans. Med.Imag., 23(4):447–458, 2004.
  5. [5] A. Pitiot, A.W. Toga, N. Ayache, and P. Thompson. Texture based MRI segmentation with a two-stage hybrid neural classifier. In Proc.World Congress Computational Intelligence/INNSIEEE Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, pages 2053–2058, 2002.
  6. [6] Alasu Serdar, and Muhammed Fatih Talu. "Interactive segmentatition implementation." 2015 23nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). IEEE, 2015.
  7. [7] Boykov Y, JollyM(2001) Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary & region segmentation of objects in nd images. In: Proceeding of 8th IEEE international conference on computer vision, ICCV 2001, IEEE, vol 1, pp 105–112
  8. [8] Mortensen E, Barrett W (1998) Interactive segmentation with intelligent scissors. Graph Models Image Process 60(5):349–384

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Serdar Alasu Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Aralık 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

19 Nisan 2017

Kabul Tarihi

24 Kasım 2016

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2016 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Alasu, S., & Talu, M. F. (2016). Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods. Computer Science, 1(1), 20-28. https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU
AMA
1.Alasu S, Talu MF. Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods. JCS. 2016;1(1):20-28. https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU
Chicago
Alasu, Serdar, ve Muhammed Fatih Talu. 2016. “Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods”. Computer Science 1 (1): 20-28. https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU.
EndNote
Alasu S, Talu MF (01 Aralık 2016) Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods. Computer Science 1 1 20–28.
IEEE
[1]S. Alasu ve M. F. Talu, “Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods”, JCS, c. 1, sy 1, ss. 20–28, Ara. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU
ISNAD
Alasu, Serdar - Talu, Muhammed Fatih. “Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods”. Computer Science 1/1 (01 Aralık 2016): 20-28. https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU.
JAMA
1.Alasu S, Talu MF. Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods. JCS. 2016;1:20–28.
MLA
Alasu, Serdar, ve Muhammed Fatih Talu. “Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods”. Computer Science, c. 1, sy 1, Aralık 2016, ss. 20-28, https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU.
Vancouver
1.Serdar Alasu, Muhammed Fatih Talu. Comparision of Automatic and Interactive Segmentatition Methods. JCS [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2016;1(1):20-8. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA49MA55HU

The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License 88x31.png  is applied to all research papers published by JCS and

a Digital Object Identifier (DOI)     Logo_TM.png  is assigned for each published paper.