Araştırma Makalesi

Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility

Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2 31 Ağustos 2021
  • Vahit Ferhan Benli *
  • Feyzullah Yetgin
PDF İndir
TR EN

Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility

Öz

This paper elaborates the relevancy issue of a rating model in the context of credit rating analysis process of a natural gas distribution company. Against this background, we have analysed the Moody’s Analytics Risk Calc™ v3.1 Emerging Markets and the Regulated Electric and Gas Rating Methodology of Moody’s Investor Services dated from March the 16th, 2017. Methodologically, the article relies on case studies namely the Enron case and a case from regulated natural gas distribution company in Turkey. In terms of findings, Enron case highlights the importance of point-in-time rating models over agency based rating models in terms of default prediction. The EDF model provided a PD value of 0.65%, which corresponds to Baa3 level in Moody’s rating agency terms. On the other hand, the REGU Model indicates the Company with “Ba” rating, which is a “Speculative Grade”. This result indicates us a severe difference in default probabilities for the same entity. This is consequent and in line with the informational needs of different users and if different models are used respective to their needs. In summary, each rating model is developed by rating agencies for different purposes and we need to choose the appropriate rating model to make accurate analysis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Augar, Ph. (2005): The Greed Merchants. How the Investment Banks played the Free Market Game, Allen Lane.
  2. 2. Bayraktar, A. (Fall 2018): Energy Transition in Turkey. In: Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol. 17, No: 3, pp. 19-26.
  3. 3. BDDK (Aralık 2020): Türk Bankacılık Sektörü Temel Göstergeleri.
  4. 4. Bryce, R. (2002): Pipe Dreams. Greed, Ego and the Death of Enron, The Perseus Book Group.
  5. 5. Crouhy, M., Galai, D., Mark, R. (2000): A Comparative Analysis of Current Credit Risk Models. In: Journal of Banking & Finance 24.
  6. 6. Cruver, B. (2003): The Unshredded Truth from an Enron Insider: Enron, Anatomy of Greed, Arrow Books.
  7. 7. De Laurentis, G., Maino, R., Molteni, L. (2010): Developing, Validating and Using Internal Ratings, Methodologies and Case Studies, John Wiley.
  8. 8. Fight, A. (2001): The Ratings Game, John Wiley.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Finans

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Vahit Ferhan Benli * Bu kişi benim
0000-0002-0510-7662
Türkiye

Feyzullah Yetgin Bu kişi benim
0000-0002-3712-845X
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Ağustos 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

20 Mayıs 2021

Kabul Tarihi

29 Temmuz 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Benli, V. F., & Yetgin, F. (2021). Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, 15(2), 227-259. https://doi.org/10.46520/bddkdergisi.987435
AMA
1.Benli VF, Yetgin F. Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi. 2021;15(2):227-259. doi:10.46520/bddkdergisi.987435
Chicago
Benli, Vahit Ferhan, ve Feyzullah Yetgin. 2021. “Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility”. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi 15 (2): 227-59. https://doi.org/10.46520/bddkdergisi.987435.
EndNote
Benli VF, Yetgin F (01 Ağustos 2021) Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi 15 2 227–259.
IEEE
[1]V. F. Benli ve F. Yetgin, “Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility”, BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, c. 15, sy 2, ss. 227–259, Ağu. 2021, doi: 10.46520/bddkdergisi.987435.
ISNAD
Benli, Vahit Ferhan - Yetgin, Feyzullah. “Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility”. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi 15/2 (01 Ağustos 2021): 227-259. https://doi.org/10.46520/bddkdergisi.987435.
JAMA
1.Benli VF, Yetgin F. Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi. 2021;15:227–259.
MLA
Benli, Vahit Ferhan, ve Feyzullah Yetgin. “Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility”. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, c. 15, sy 2, Ağustos 2021, ss. 227-59, doi:10.46520/bddkdergisi.987435.
Vancouver
1.Vahit Ferhan Benli, Feyzullah Yetgin. Structuring Key Credit Risk Parameters for Regulated Electric and Gas Utilities under Alternative Moody’s Rating Methodologies: A Case Study for a Natural Gas Distribution Utility. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi. 01 Ağustos 2021;15(2):227-59. doi:10.46520/bddkdergisi.987435